Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2010

Open Access 01-12-2010 | Research article

"...they should be offering it": a qualitative study to investigate young peoples' attitudes towards chlamydia screening in GP surgeries

Authors: Angela H Hogan, Rebecca S Howell-Jones, Elizabeth Pottinger, Louise M Wallace, Cliodna AM McNulty

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the known health and healthcare costs of untreated chlamydia infection and the efforts of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) to control chlamydia through early detection and treatment of asymptomatic infection, the rates of screening are well below the 2010-2011 target rate of 35%. General Practitioner (GP) surgeries are a key venue within the NCSP however; previous studies indicate that GP surgery staff are concerned that they may offend their patients by offering a screen. This study aimed to identify the attitudes to, and preferences for, chlamydia screening in 15-24 year old men and women attending GP surgeries (the target group).

Methods

We undertook 36 interviews in six surgeries of differing screening rates. Our participants were 15-24 year olds attending a consultation with a staff member. Data were analysed thematically.

Results

GP surgeries are acceptable to young people as a venue for opportunistic chlamydia screening and furthermore they think it is the duty of GP surgery staff to offer it. They felt strongly that it is important for surgery staff to have a non-judgemental attitude and they did not want to be singled out as 'needing' a chlamydia screen. Furthermore, our sample reported a strong preference for being offered a screen by staff and providing the sample immediately at the surgery rather than taking home a testing kit. The positive attitude and subjective norms demonstrated by interviewees suggest that young peoples' behaviour would be to accept a screen if it was offered to them.

Conclusion

Young people attending GP surgeries have a positive attitude towards chlamydia screening and given the right environment are likely to take up the offer in this setting. The right environment involves normalising screening by offering a chlamydia screen to all 15-24 year olds at every interaction with staff, offering screening with a non-judgemental attitude and minimising barriers to screening such as embarrassment. The GP surgery is the ideal place to screen young people for chlamydia as it is not a threatening place for them and our study has shown that they think it is the normal place to go to discuss health matters.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Chief Medical Officer's Medical Advisory Group: Main report of the CMO's Expert Advisory Group on Chlamydia trachomatis. 1998, London: Department of Health Chief Medical Officer's Medical Advisory Group: Main report of the CMO's Expert Advisory Group on Chlamydia trachomatis. 1998, London: Department of Health
5.
go back to reference Pimenta JM, Catchpole M, Rogers PA, et al: Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. II: Prevalence among healthcare attenders, outcome, and evaluation of positive cases. Sex Transm Infect. 2003, 79: 22-27. 10.1136/sti.79.1.22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pimenta JM, Catchpole M, Rogers PA, et al: Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. II: Prevalence among healthcare attenders, outcome, and evaluation of positive cases. Sex Transm Infect. 2003, 79: 22-27. 10.1136/sti.79.1.22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Salisbury , et al: Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice. British Journal of General Practice. 2006, 56: 99-103.PubMedPubMedCentral Salisbury , et al: Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice. British Journal of General Practice. 2006, 56: 99-103.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference McNulty CAM, Freeman E, Oliver I, Ford-Young W, Randall S: Strategies used to increase chlamydia screening in general practice: a qualitative study. Public Health. 2008, 122: 845-56. 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.10.009.CrossRefPubMed McNulty CAM, Freeman E, Oliver I, Ford-Young W, Randall S: Strategies used to increase chlamydia screening in general practice: a qualitative study. Public Health. 2008, 122: 845-56. 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.10.009.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hocking JS, Parker RM, Pavlin N, et al: What needs to change to increase chlamydia screening in general practice in Australia? The views of general practitioners. BMC Public Health. 2009, 8: 425-10.1186/1471-2458-8-425.CrossRef Hocking JS, Parker RM, Pavlin N, et al: What needs to change to increase chlamydia screening in general practice in Australia? The views of general practitioners. BMC Public Health. 2009, 8: 425-10.1186/1471-2458-8-425.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference McNulty CAM, Thomas M, Bowen J, et al: Interactive workshops increase chlamydia testing in primary care - a controlled study. Fam Pract. 2008, 25: 279-86. 10.1093/fampra/cmn032.CrossRefPubMed McNulty CAM, Thomas M, Bowen J, et al: Interactive workshops increase chlamydia testing in primary care - a controlled study. Fam Pract. 2008, 25: 279-86. 10.1093/fampra/cmn032.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference McNulty CAM, Freeman E, Howell-Jones R, Hogan A, et al: Overcoming the barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice--a qualitative study. Family Practice. 2010, 0: 1-12. McNulty CAM, Freeman E, Howell-Jones R, Hogan A, et al: Overcoming the barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice--a qualitative study. Family Practice. 2010, 0: 1-12.
11.
go back to reference Ajzen I: The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991, 50: 271-87. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRef Ajzen I: The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991, 50: 271-87. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ritchie J, Spencer L: Quality data analysis for applied policy research. Analysing Qualitative Data. 1994, London: Routledge Ritchie J, Spencer L: Quality data analysis for applied policy research. Analysing Qualitative Data. 1994, London: Routledge
14.
go back to reference Boyatzis RE: Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. 1998, Thousand Oaks, Sage Boyatzis RE: Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. 1998, Thousand Oaks, Sage
15.
go back to reference Campbell R, Mills N, Sanford E, Graham A, Low N, Peters TJ, for the Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) group: Does population screening for chlamydia trachomatis raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening study. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 106-10.1186/1471-2458-6-106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Campbell R, Mills N, Sanford E, Graham A, Low N, Peters TJ, for the Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) group: Does population screening for chlamydia trachomatis raise anxiety among those tested? Findings from a population based chlamydia screening study. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 106-10.1186/1471-2458-6-106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Schoular A, Duncan B, Hart G: "That sort of place...where filthy men go...": a qualitative study of womens perceptions of genitourinary medicine services. Sex Transm Infect. 2001, 77: 340-343. 10.1136/sti.77.5.340.CrossRef Schoular A, Duncan B, Hart G: "That sort of place...where filthy men go...": a qualitative study of womens perceptions of genitourinary medicine services. Sex Transm Infect. 2001, 77: 340-343. 10.1136/sti.77.5.340.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pimenta , et al: Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. I: acceptability of urine testing in primary and secondary healthcare settings. Sex Trans Infect. 2003, 79: 16-21. 10.1136/sti.79.1.16.CrossRef Pimenta , et al: Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. I: acceptability of urine testing in primary and secondary healthcare settings. Sex Trans Infect. 2003, 79: 16-21. 10.1136/sti.79.1.16.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Balfe M, Brugha R, O'Connell E, McGee H, O'Donovan D: Where do young Irish women want Chlamydia-screening services to be set up? A qualitative study employing Goffman's impression management framework. Health & Place. 2010, 16 (1): 16-24.CrossRef Balfe M, Brugha R, O'Connell E, McGee H, O'Donovan D: Where do young Irish women want Chlamydia-screening services to be set up? A qualitative study employing Goffman's impression management framework. Health & Place. 2010, 16 (1): 16-24.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lorimer K, Reid ME, Hart GJ: "It has to speak to peoples everyday life...": qualitative study of men and womens willingness to participate in a non-medical approach to chlamydia trachomatis screening. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2009, 85: 201-205. 10.1136/sti.2008.031138.CrossRefPubMed Lorimer K, Reid ME, Hart GJ: "It has to speak to peoples everyday life...": qualitative study of men and womens willingness to participate in a non-medical approach to chlamydia trachomatis screening. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2009, 85: 201-205. 10.1136/sti.2008.031138.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rose SB, Smith CM, Lawton B: "If everyone does it, it's not a big deal." Young people talk about chlamydia testing. New Zealand Medical Journal. 2008, 121: 1-7. Rose SB, Smith CM, Lawton B: "If everyone does it, it's not a big deal." Young people talk about chlamydia testing. New Zealand Medical Journal. 2008, 121: 1-7.
21.
go back to reference Balfe M, Brugha R, O'Donovan D, Connell E, Vaughn D: Young women's decisions to accept chlamydia screening: influences of stigma and doctor-patient interactions. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 425-10.1186/1471-2458-10-425.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Balfe M, Brugha R, O'Donovan D, Connell E, Vaughn D: Young women's decisions to accept chlamydia screening: influences of stigma and doctor-patient interactions. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 425-10.1186/1471-2458-10-425.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Pavlin NL, Parker R, Fairley C, Gunn J, Hocking J: Take the sex out of STI screening! Views of young women on implementing chlamydia screening in General Practice. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2008, 8: 62-10.1186/1471-2334-8-62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pavlin NL, Parker R, Fairley C, Gunn J, Hocking J: Take the sex out of STI screening! Views of young women on implementing chlamydia screening in General Practice. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2008, 8: 62-10.1186/1471-2334-8-62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Macleod J, Salisbury C, ClaSS Study Group, et al: Prevalence of genital chlamydia trachomatis infection in an UK general population sample. Sex Transm Infect. 2003, 79: A6- Macleod J, Salisbury C, ClaSS Study Group, et al: Prevalence of genital chlamydia trachomatis infection in an UK general population sample. Sex Transm Infect. 2003, 79: A6-
27.
go back to reference Duncan B, Hart G, Scoular A, Bigrigg A: Qualitative analysis of psychosocial impact of diagnosis chlamydia trachomatis: implications for screening. BMJ. 2001, 322: 195-199. 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.195.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Duncan B, Hart G, Scoular A, Bigrigg A: Qualitative analysis of psychosocial impact of diagnosis chlamydia trachomatis: implications for screening. BMJ. 2001, 322: 195-199. 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.195.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Lader D, Hopkins G: Contraception and Sexual Health 2007/8. 2008, London:Office for National Statistics Lader D, Hopkins G: Contraception and Sexual Health 2007/8. 2008, London:Office for National Statistics
Metadata
Title
"...they should be offering it": a qualitative study to investigate young peoples' attitudes towards chlamydia screening in GP surgeries
Authors
Angela H Hogan
Rebecca S Howell-Jones
Elizabeth Pottinger
Louise M Wallace
Cliodna AM McNulty
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2010
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-616

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

BMC Public Health 1/2010 Go to the issue