Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pediatrics
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Study protocol

A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Childhood Apraxia of Speech is an impairment of speech motor planning that manifests as difficulty producing the sounds (articulation) and melody (prosody) of speech. These difficulties may persist through life and are detrimental to academic, social, and vocational development. A number of published single subject and case series studies of speech treatments are available. There are currently no randomised control trials or other well designed group trials available to guide clinical practice.

Methods/Design

A parallel group, fixed size randomised control trial will be conducted in Sydney, Australia to determine the efficacy of two treatments for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: 1) Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment and the 2) Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme – Third edition. Eligible children will be English speaking, aged 4–12 years with a diagnosis of suspected CAS, normal or adjusted hearing and vision, and no comprehension difficulties or other developmental diagnoses. At least 20 children will be randomised to receive one of the two treatments in parallel. Treatments will be delivered by trained and supervised speech pathology clinicians using operationalised manuals. Treatment will be administered in 1-hour sessions, 4 times per week for 3 weeks. The primary outcomes are speech sound and prosodic accuracy on a customised 292 item probe and the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology inconsistency subtest administered prior to treatment and 1 week, 1 month and 4 months post-treatment. All post assessments will be completed by blinded assessors. Our hypotheses are: 1) treatment effects at 1 week post will be similar for both treatments, 2) maintenance of treatment effects at 1 and 4 months post will be greater for Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment than Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme treatment, and 3) generalisation of treatment effects to untrained related speech behaviours will be greater for Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment than Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme treatment. This protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee, University of Sydney (#12924).

Discussion

This will be the first randomised control trial to test treatment for CAS. It will be valuable for clinical decision-making and providing evidence-based services for children with CAS.

Trial Registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12612000744853
Literature
1.
2.
Nijland L, Maasen B, van der Meulen S, Gabreels F, Kraaimaat FW, Schreuder R: Coarticulation patterns in children with developmental apraxia of speech. Clin Linguist Phon. 2002, 16 (6): 461-483. 10.1080/02699200210159103.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Terband H, Maassen B, van Lieshout P, Nijland L: Stability and composition of functional synergies for speech movements in children with developmental speech disorders. J Commun Disord. 2011, 44 (1): 59-74. 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.07.003.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Grigos MI, Kolenda N: The relationship between articulatory control and improved phonemic accuracy in childhood apraxia of speech: a longitudinal case study. Clin Linguist Phon. 2010, 24 (1): 17-40. 10.3109/02699200903329793.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Velleman SL, Shriberg LD: Metrical analysis of the speech of children with suspected developmental apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999, 42: 1444-1460.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Lewis BA, Freebairn LA, Hansen AJ, Iyengar SK, Taylor HG: School-age follow-up of children with childhood apraxia of speech. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2004, 35 (2): 122-140. 10.1044/0161-1461(2004/014).CrossRefPubMed
7.
Gillon GT, Moriarty BC: Childhood apraxia of speech: children at risk for persistent reading and spelling disorder. Semin Speech Lang. 2007, 28 (1): 48-57. 10.1055/s-2007-967929.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Lewis BA, Freebairn LA, Hansen A, Taylor HG, Iyengar S, Shriberg LD: Family pedigrees of children with suspected childhood apraxia of speech. J Commun Disord. 2004, 37 (2): 157-175. 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2003.08.003.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Felsenfeld S, Broen PA, McGue M: A 28-year follow up of adults with a history of moderate phonological disorder: educational and occupational results. J Speech Hear Res. 1994, 37: 1341-1353.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Forrest K: Diagnostic criteria of developmental apraxia of speech used by clinical speech-language pathologists. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003, 12 (3): 376-380. 10.1044/1058-0360(2003/083).CrossRefPubMed
11.
Strand EA, Stoeckel R, Baas B: Treatment of severe childhood apraxia of speech: a treatment efficacy study. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2006, 14 (4): 297-307.
12.
Ballard KJ, Robin DA, McCabe P, McDonald J: A treatment for dysprosody in childhood apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010, 53 (5): 1227-1245. 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0130).CrossRefPubMed
13.
Maas E, Butalla CE, Farinella KA: Feedback frequency in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2012, 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0119).
14.
Morgan AT, Vogel AP: Intervention for childhood apraxia of speech. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, 1: 1-
15.
McNeill BC, Gillon GT, Dodd B: Effectiveness of an integrated phonological awareness approach for children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Child Lang Teach Therapy. 2009, 25 (3): 341-366. 10.1177/0265659009339823.CrossRef
16.
McCabe P, Macdonald-DaSilva A, Van Rees L, Arciuli J, Ballard K: Using orthographic cues to improve speech production in children with & without childhood apraxia of speech. Oral presentation at Motor speech conference. 2010, , Savannah, Georgia, USA
17.
Strand EA, Debertine P: The efficacy of integral stimulation intervention with developmental apraxia of speech. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2000, 8 (4): 295-300.
18.
Strand EA, Stoeckel R, Baas B: Treatment of severe childhood apraxia of speech: a treatment efficacy study. J Med Speech. 2006, 14 (4): 297-307.
19.
Belton E: Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme as a treatment approach for children with severe speech disorders. 2006, University College, London
20.
Lundeborg I, McAllister A: Treatment with a combination of intra-oral sensory stimulation and electropalatography in a child with severe developmental dyspraxia. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology. 2007, 32 (2): 71-79. 10.1080/14015430600852035.CrossRef
21.
Teal J: An investigation into classification approaches and therapy outcomes for a child with a severe persisteing speech difficulty. 2005, University of Sheffield, Sheffield
22.
McNeill BC, Gillon GT, Dodd B: A longitudinal case study of the effects of an integrated phonological awareness program for identical twin boys with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Int J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2009, 11 (6): 482-495.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Moriarty BC, Gillon GT: Phonological awareness intervention for children with childhood apraxia of speech. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006, 41 (6): 713-734. 10.1080/13682820600623960.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Binger C, Light J: The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. AAC: Augmentative Alternat Commun. 2007, 23 (1): 30-43. 10.1080/07434610600807470.
25.
Cumley GD, Swanson S: Augmentative and alternative communication options for children with developmental apraxia of speech: three case studies. AAC: Augmentative Altern Commun. 1999, 15 (2): 110-125. 10.1080/07434619912331278615.
26.
Harris L, Doyle ES, Haaf R: Language treatment approach for users of AAC: experimental single-subject investigation. AAC: Augmentative Altern Commun. 1996, 12 (4): 230-243. 10.1080/07434619612331277698.
27.
Bornman J, Alant E, Meiring E: The use of a digital voice output device to facilitate language development in a child with developmental apraxia of speech: a case study. Disabil Rehabil. 2001, 23 (14): 623-634. 10.1080/09638280110036517.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Binger C, Kent-Walsh J, Berens J, Del Campo S, Rivera D: Teaching Latino parents to support the multi-symbol message productions of their children who require AAC. AAC: Augmentative Altern Commun. 2008, 42 (4): 323-338.
29.
Helfrich-Miller KR: A clinical perspective: melodic intonation therapy for developmental apraxia. Clin Commun Disor. 1994, 4 (3): 175-182.
30.
Rosenthal JB: Rate control therapy for developmental apraxia of speech. Clin Commun Disord. 1994, 4 (3): 190-200.PubMed
31.
Iuzzini J, Forrest K: Evaluation of a combined treatment approach for childhood apraxia of speech. Clin Linguist Phon. 2010, 24 (4-5): 335-345. 10.3109/02699200903581083.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Martikainen A-L, Korpilahti P: Intervention for childhood apraxia of speech: a single-case study. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2011, 27 (1): 9-20. 10.1177/0265659010369985.CrossRef
33.
Hayden D, Dale P: The efficacy of PROMPT for treating Childhood Apraxia of Speech. Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie. 2011, 17 (supplement): 51-
34.
Carter P, Edwards S: EPG therapy for children with long-standing speech disorders: predictions and outcomes. Clin Linguist Phon. 2004, 18 (6–8): 359-372.CrossRefPubMed
35.
36.
Kaufman N: Kaufman speech praxis treatment kit for children, advanced level. 1998, Northern Speech Services, Gaylord, Michigan, www.​nss-nrs.​com.
37.
38.
Strode Downing R, Chamberlain C: Easy does it® for apraxia school-age. 1993, Linguisystems, East Moline, IL
39.
Strode Downing R, Chamberlain C: Easy does it® for apraxia preschool. 1994, Linguisystems, East Moline, IL
40.
Connery VM: The nuffield dyspraxia programme. 1992, The Miracle Factory, London, Second
41.
Williams P, Stephens H: Nuffield dyspraxia programme. 2004, The Miracle Factory, Windsor, England, Third
42.
Schmidt RA, Lee TD: Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. 2011, , Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics, Fifth
43.
Maas, Robin DA, Wright DL, Ballard KJ: Motor programming in apraxia of speech. Brain Lang. 2008, 106 (2): 107-118. 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.03.004.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Gierut JA, Morrisette ML, Ziemer SM: Nonwords and generalization in children with phonological disorders. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2010, 19 (2): 167-177. 10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0020).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Semel E, Wiig E, Secord W: Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals - fourth edition, Australian standardised edition (CELF-4 Australian). 2006, Pearson Inc, Sydney, Australia
46.
Wiig E, Secord W, Semel E: Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals preschool - second edition, Australian and New Zealand standardised edition (CELF P-2 Australian and New Zealand). 2006, Pearson Inc, Sydney, Australia
47.
Shriberg LD, Lohmeier HL, Strand EA, Jakielski KJ: Encoding, memory, and transcoding deficits in Childhood Apraxia of Speech. Clin Ling Phon. 2012, 26 (5): 445-482. 10.3109/02699206.2012.655841.CrossRef
48.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. ASHA. 1978, 20: 297-301.
49.
Dodd B, Hua Z, Crosbie S, Holm A, Ozanne A: Diagnostic evaluation of articulation and phonology (DEAP). 2002, The Psychological Corporation, London, England
50.
Gozzard H, Baker E, McCabe P: Single word test of polysyllables. 2004, Unpublished work
51.
Gozzard H, Baker E, McCabe P: Requests for clarification and children’s speech responses: changing “pasghetti” to “spaghetti”. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2008, 24 (3): 249-263. 10.1177/0265659008096292.CrossRef
52.
McLeod S: Sampling consonant clusters: four procedures designed for Australian children. Aust Commun Q. 1997, 9-12. Autumn
53.
Robbins J, Klee T: Clinical assessment of oropharyngeal motor development in young children. J Speech Hear Disord. 1987, 52: 271-277.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Gathercole S, Baddeley A: Children’s test of non word repetition (CNRep). 1996, The Psychological Corporation, Oxford, England
55.
Wagner R, Torgesen J, Rashlotte C: Comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP). 1999, PRO-ED Inc., Austin TX
56.
Martin NA, Brownell R: Test of auditory processing skills. 2005, Academic Therapy Publications, Novato, CA, third
57.
Peppe S, McCann J, Gibbon F: Profiling elements of prosodic systems - children (Australian English) (PEPS-C). 2008, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, Version 19_3
58.
Goldman R, Fristoe M: Goldman-Fristoe test of articulation 2 (GFTA-2). 2000, Pearson Inc
59.
Dunn LM, Dunn DM: Peabody picture vocabulary test, fourth edition (PPVT™-4). 2007, NCS Pearson Inc., Minneapolis, MN
60.
Dunn LM, Dunn DM: Peabody picture vocabulary test-third edition (PPVT). 1997, NCS Pearson Inc., Minneapolis, MN
61.
Edeal DM, Gildersleeve-Neumann CE: The importance of production frequency in therapy for childhood apraxia of speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011, 20 (2): 95-110. 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/09-0005).CrossRefPubMed
62.
Scheffé H: The analysis of variance. 1959, Wiley, New York
63.
Arciuli J, Cupples L: Would you rather ‘embert a cudsert’ or ‘cudsert an embert’? How spelling patterns at the beginning of English disyllables can cue grammatical category. Mental states: language and cognitive structure. Edited by: Schalley A, Khlentzos D. 2007, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, 213-237.CrossRef
64.
Seva N, Monaghan P, Arciuli J: Stressing what is important: orthographic cues and lexical stress assignment. J Neurolinguistics. 2009, 22 (3): 237-249. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.09.002.CrossRef
65.
Maas E, Farinella KA: Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012, 55 (2): 561-578. 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0120).CrossRefPubMed
66.
Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, Group C: The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Clin Oral Investig. 2003, 7 (1): 2-7.PubMed
67.
Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M: Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003, 83 (8): 713-721.PubMed
Metadata
Title
A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial
Publication date
01-12-2012
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-112

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Pediatrics 1/2012 Go to the issue

Research article

Parent-son decision-making about human papillomavirus vaccination: a qualitative analysis

Research article

Causes and risk factors for infant mortality in Nunavut, Canada 1999–2011

Research article

Developmental outcome of very low birth weight infants in a developing country

Study protocol

Evaluation of the effects of botulinum toxin A injections when used to improve ease of care and comfort in children with cerebral palsy whom are non-ambulant: a double blind randomized controlled trial

Research article

Prevalence of overweight in children with bone fractures: a case control study

Case report

The T1048I mutation in ATP7A gene causes an unusual Menkes disease presentation