Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Research article

Self-testing for cancer: a community survey

Authors: Sue Wilson, Angela V Ryan, Sheila M Greenfield, Sue C Clifford, Roger L Holder, Helen M Pattison, David A Fitzmaurice, Richard J McManus

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cancer-related self-tests are currently available to buy in pharmacies or over the internet, including tests for faecal occult blood, PSA and haematuria. Self-tests have potential benefits (e.g. convenience) but there are also potential harms (e.g. delays in seeking treatment). The extent of cancer-related self-test use in the UK is not known. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of cancer-related self-test use.

Methods

Adults (n = 5,545) in the West Midlands were sent a questionnaire that collected socio-demographic information and data regarding previous and potential future use of 18 different self-tests. Prevalence rates were directly standardised to the England population. The postcode based Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004 was used as a proxy measure of deprivation.

Results

2,925 (54%) usable questionnaires were returned. 1.2% (95% CI 0.83% to 1.66%) of responders reported having used a cancer related self test kit and a further 36% reported that they would consider using one in the future. Logistic regression analyses suggest that increasing age, deprivation category and employment status were associated with cancer-related self-test kit use.

Conclusion

We conclude that one in 100 of the adult population have used a cancer-related self-test kit and over a third would consider using one in the future. Self-test kit use could alter perceptions of risk, cause psychological morbidity and impact on the demand for healthcare.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ryan A, Wilson S, Greenfield S, Clifford S, McManus RJ, Pattison HM: Range of self-tests available to buy in the United Kingdom: an Internet survey. Journal of Public Health. 2006, 28 (4): 370-374. 10.1093/pubmed/fdl051.CrossRefPubMed Ryan A, Wilson S, Greenfield S, Clifford S, McManus RJ, Pattison HM: Range of self-tests available to buy in the United Kingdom: an Internet survey. Journal of Public Health. 2006, 28 (4): 370-374. 10.1093/pubmed/fdl051.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Borriello SP: Near patient microbiological tests. BMJ. 1990, 319 (7205): 298-301.CrossRef Borriello SP: Near patient microbiological tests. BMJ. 1990, 319 (7205): 298-301.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mintel Self-Diagnostics – UK: Market Intelligence Essentials. 2003 Mintel Self-Diagnostics – UK: Market Intelligence Essentials. 2003
10.
go back to reference Human Genetics Commission: Genes Direct. Ensuring the effective oversight of genetic tests supplied directly to the public. 2003, A report by the Human Genetics Commission. London Human Genetics Commission: Genes Direct. Ensuring the effective oversight of genetic tests supplied directly to the public. 2003, A report by the Human Genetics Commission. London
11.
14.
go back to reference Lupton D: Consumerism, reflexivity and medicine. Social Science & Medicine. 1997, 45 (3): 373-81. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00353-X.CrossRef Lupton D: Consumerism, reflexivity and medicine. Social Science & Medicine. 1997, 45 (3): 373-81. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00353-X.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hardey M: Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise. Sociology of Health & Illness. 1999, 21: 820-835. 10.1111/1467-9566.00185.CrossRef Hardey M: Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise. Sociology of Health & Illness. 1999, 21: 820-835. 10.1111/1467-9566.00185.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing: Code of Practice and Guidance on Human Genetic Testing Services Supplied Direct to the Public. 1997, Health Departments of the United Kingdom Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing: Code of Practice and Guidance on Human Genetic Testing Services Supplied Direct to the Public. 1997, Health Departments of the United Kingdom
22.
go back to reference Roses AD: Pharmacogenetics and future drug development and delivery. Lancet. 2000, 355: 1358-61. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02126-7.CrossRefPubMed Roses AD: Pharmacogenetics and future drug development and delivery. Lancet. 2000, 355: 1358-61. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02126-7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Messing EM, Young TB, Hunt VB, Wehbie JM, Rust P: Urinary tract cancers found by home screening with hematuria dipsticks in healthy men over 50. Cancer. 1989, 64: 2361-2367. 10.1002/1097-0142(19891201)64:11<2361::AID-CNCR2820641128>3.0.CO;2-4.CrossRefPubMed Messing EM, Young TB, Hunt VB, Wehbie JM, Rust P: Urinary tract cancers found by home screening with hematuria dipsticks in healthy men over 50. Cancer. 1989, 64: 2361-2367. 10.1002/1097-0142(19891201)64:11<2361::AID-CNCR2820641128>3.0.CO;2-4.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hobbs FDR, Delaney BC, Fitzmaurice DA, Wilson S, Hyde CJ, et al: A review of near patient testing in primary care. Health Technology Assessment. 1997, 1 (5): i-iv. 1–229. criteriaPubMed Hobbs FDR, Delaney BC, Fitzmaurice DA, Wilson S, Hyde CJ, et al: A review of near patient testing in primary care. Health Technology Assessment. 1997, 1 (5): i-iv. 1–229. criteriaPubMed
25.
go back to reference Phillips KA, Coates TJ, Eversley RB, Catania JA: Who plans to be tested for HIV or would get tested if no one could find out the results. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1995, 11: 156-162.PubMed Phillips KA, Coates TJ, Eversley RB, Catania JA: Who plans to be tested for HIV or would get tested if no one could find out the results. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 1995, 11: 156-162.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Kassler WJ: Advances in HIV testing technology and their potential impact on prevention. AIDS Education and Prevention. 1997, 9 (3 Suppl): 27-40.PubMed Kassler WJ: Advances in HIV testing technology and their potential impact on prevention. AIDS Education and Prevention. 1997, 9 (3 Suppl): 27-40.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Wilson S, Greenfield S, Pattison HM, Ryan A, McManus RJ, Fitzmaurice D, Marriott J, Chapman C, Clifford S: Prevalence of the use of cancer related self-tests by members of the public a community survey. BioMed Central Cancer. 2006, 6: 215-PubMedPubMedCentral Wilson S, Greenfield S, Pattison HM, Ryan A, McManus RJ, Fitzmaurice D, Marriott J, Chapman C, Clifford S: Prevalence of the use of cancer related self-tests by members of the public a community survey. BioMed Central Cancer. 2006, 6: 215-PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Kent Pharmaceuticals: Health Check: The early warning system for life. Product Information Brochure. Kent Pharmaceuticals. 1999 Kent Pharmaceuticals: Health Check: The early warning system for life. Product Information Brochure. Kent Pharmaceuticals. 1999
30.
go back to reference Office of Population Censuses and Surveys: Social Survey Division, OPCS Omnibus Survey, September 1993 [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], September 1997. SN: 3670. 1993, September [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], September 1997. SN: 3670 Office of Population Censuses and Surveys: Social Survey Division, OPCS Omnibus Survey, September 1993 [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], September 1997. SN: 3670. 1993, September [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], September 1997. SN: 3670
31.
go back to reference YouGov Limited: Public attitudes to genetic testing. A quantitative study for the Human Genetics Commission. London. 2003 YouGov Limited: Public attitudes to genetic testing. A quantitative study for the Human Genetics Commission. London. 2003
32.
go back to reference Ryan A, Greenfield S, McManus R, Wilson S: Self-care – Has DIY gone too far (editorial). British Journal General Practice. 2006, 56 (533): 907-908. Ryan A, Greenfield S, McManus R, Wilson S: Self-care – Has DIY gone too far (editorial). British Journal General Practice. 2006, 56 (533): 907-908.
33.
go back to reference Ryan A, Greenfield S, Wilson S: Prevalence and determinants of the use of self-tests by members of the public: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 193-10.1186/1471-2458-6-193.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ryan A, Greenfield S, Wilson S: Prevalence and determinants of the use of self-tests by members of the public: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 193-10.1186/1471-2458-6-193.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Self-testing for cancer: a community survey
Authors
Sue Wilson
Angela V Ryan
Sheila M Greenfield
Sue C Clifford
Roger L Holder
Helen M Pattison
David A Fitzmaurice
Richard J McManus
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-102

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

BMC Cancer 1/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine