Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2004

Open Access 01-12-2004 | Research article

Survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer: twenty-year data from two SEER registries

Authors: Patricia Tai, Edward Yu, Vincent Vinh-Hung, Gábor Cserni, Georges Vlastos

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many researchers are interested to know if there are any improvements in recent treatment results for metastatic breast cancer in the community, especially for 10- or 15-year survival.

Methods

Between 1981 and 1985, 782 and 580 female patients with metastatic breast cancer were extracted respectively from the Connecticut and San Francisco-Oakland registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The lognormal statistical method to estimate survival was retrospectively validated since the 15-year cause-specific survival rates could be calculated using the standard life-table actuarial method. Estimated rates were compared to the actuarial data available in 2000. Between 1991 and 1995, further 752 and 632 female patients with metastatic breast cancer were extracted respectively from the Connecticut and San Francisco-Oakland registries. The data were analyzed to estimate the 15-year cause-specific survival rates before the year 2005.

Results

The 5-year period (1981–1985) was chosen, and patients were followed as a cohort for an additional 3 years. The estimated 15-year cause-specific survival rates were 7.1% (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.8–12.4) and 9.1% (95% CI, 3.8–14.4) by the lognormal model for the two registries of Connecticut and San Francisco-Oakland respectively. Since the SEER database provides follow-up information to the end of the year 2000, actuarial calculation can be performed to confirm (validate) the estimation. The Kaplan-Meier calculation for the 15-year cause-specific survival rates were 8.3% (95% CI, 5.8–10.8) and 7.0% (95% CI, 4.3–9.7) respectively. Using the 1991–1995 5-year period cohort and followed for an additional 3 years, the 15-year cause-specific survival rates were estimated to be 9.1% (95% CI, 3.8–14.4) and 14.7% (95% CI, 9.8–19.6) for the two registries of Connecticut and San Francisco-Oakland respectively.

Conclusions

For the period 1981–1985, the 15-year cause-specific survival for the Connecticut and the San Francisco-Oakland registries were comparable. For the period 1991–1995, there was not much change in survival for the Connecticut registry patients, but there was an improvement in survival for the San Francisco-Oakland registry patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boag JW: The presentation and analysis of the results of radiotherapy. Part I. Introduction. Br J Radiol. 1948, 21: 128-138.CrossRefPubMed Boag JW: The presentation and analysis of the results of radiotherapy. Part I. Introduction. Br J Radiol. 1948, 21: 128-138.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Boag JW: The presentation and analysis of the results of radiotherapy. Part II. Mathematical theory. Br J Radiol. 1948, 21: 189-203.CrossRefPubMed Boag JW: The presentation and analysis of the results of radiotherapy. Part II. Mathematical theory. Br J Radiol. 1948, 21: 189-203.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Boag JW: Maximum likelihood estimates of the proportion of patients cured by cancer therapy. J R Stat Soc (Ser B). 1949, 11: 15-53. Boag JW: Maximum likelihood estimates of the proportion of patients cured by cancer therapy. J R Stat Soc (Ser B). 1949, 11: 15-53.
4.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958, 53: 457-481.CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958, 53: 457-481.CrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Mould RF, Boag JW: A test of several parametric statistical models for estimating success rate in the treatment of carcinoma cervix uteri. Br J Cancer. 1975, 32: 529-550.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mould RF, Boag JW: A test of several parametric statistical models for estimating success rate in the treatment of carcinoma cervix uteri. Br J Cancer. 1975, 32: 529-550.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Mould RF, Hearnden T, Palmer M, White GC: Distribution of survival times of 12,000 head and neck cancer patients who died with their disease. Br J Cancer. 1976, 34: 180-190.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mould RF, Hearnden T, Palmer M, White GC: Distribution of survival times of 12,000 head and neck cancer patients who died with their disease. Br J Cancer. 1976, 34: 180-190.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Gamel JW, Greenberg RA, McLean IW: A stable linear algorithm for fitting the lognormal model to survival data. Comput Biomed Res . 1988, 21: 38-47. 10.1016/0010-4809(88)90040-7.CrossRefPubMed Gamel JW, Greenberg RA, McLean IW: A stable linear algorithm for fitting the lognormal model to survival data. Comput Biomed Res . 1988, 21: 38-47. 10.1016/0010-4809(88)90040-7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gamel JW, George SL, Edwards MJ, Seigler HF: The long-term clinical course of patients with cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2002, 95: 1286-1293. 10.1002/cncr.10813.CrossRefPubMed Gamel JW, George SL, Edwards MJ, Seigler HF: The long-term clinical course of patients with cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2002, 95: 1286-1293. 10.1002/cncr.10813.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tai P, Tonita JYuE, Skarsgard D: A 20-year follow-up study of the long-term survival of limited stage small cell lung cancer and an overview of prognostic and treatment factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003, 56: 626-633. 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00070-1.CrossRefPubMed Tai P, Tonita JYuE, Skarsgard D: A 20-year follow-up study of the long-term survival of limited stage small cell lung cancer and an overview of prognostic and treatment factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003, 56: 626-633. 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00070-1.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Public Use Data (1973–2000). National Cancer Institute, released April 2003. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Public Use Data (1973–2000). National Cancer Institute, released April 2003. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute
12.
go back to reference Tai P, Yu E, Skarsgard D, Tonita J: Validation of the lognormal model for prediction of long-term survival rates from short-term follow-up data in stages III and IV breast cancer: a 22-year follow-up study. Curr Oncol. 2003, 10: 191-194. Tai P, Yu E, Skarsgard D, Tonita J: Validation of the lognormal model for prediction of long-term survival rates from short-term follow-up data in stages III and IV breast cancer: a 22-year follow-up study. Curr Oncol. 2003, 10: 191-194.
13.
go back to reference Arndt V, Talback M, Gefeller O, Hakulinen T, Brenner H: Modification of SAS macros for a more efficient analysis of relative survival rates. Eur J Cancer. 2004, 40: 778-779. 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.12.013.CrossRefPubMed Arndt V, Talback M, Gefeller O, Hakulinen T, Brenner H: Modification of SAS macros for a more efficient analysis of relative survival rates. Eur J Cancer. 2004, 40: 778-779. 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.12.013.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hakulinen T: Cancer survival corrected for heterogeneity in patient withdrawal. Biometrics. 1982, 38: 933-942.CrossRefPubMed Hakulinen T: Cancer survival corrected for heterogeneity in patient withdrawal. Biometrics. 1982, 38: 933-942.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rutqvist LE, Wallgren A, Nilsson BO: Is breast cancer a curable disease? A study of 14,731 women with breast cancer from the cancer registry of Norway. Cancer. 1984, 53: 1793-1800.CrossRefPubMed Rutqvist LE, Wallgren A, Nilsson BO: Is breast cancer a curable disease? A study of 14,731 women with breast cancer from the cancer registry of Norway. Cancer. 1984, 53: 1793-1800.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rudan I, Skoric T, Rudan N: Breast cancer prognosis. III. Prognostic factors in patients with distant metastases (M1) at the time of diagnosis. Acta Med Croatica. 1994, 48: 171-174.PubMed Rudan I, Skoric T, Rudan N: Breast cancer prognosis. III. Prognostic factors in patients with distant metastases (M1) at the time of diagnosis. Acta Med Croatica. 1994, 48: 171-174.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Chapman JW, Fish EB, Link MA: Competing risks analyses for recurrence from primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999, 79: 1508-1513. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690240.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chapman JW, Fish EB, Link MA: Competing risks analyses for recurrence from primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999, 79: 1508-1513. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690240.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Engel J, Eckel R, Kerr J, Schmidt M, Furstenberger G, Richter R, Sauer H, Senn HJ, Holzel D: The process of metastasisation for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003, 39: 1794-1806. 10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00422-2.CrossRefPubMed Engel J, Eckel R, Kerr J, Schmidt M, Furstenberger G, Richter R, Sauer H, Senn HJ, Holzel D: The process of metastasisation for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2003, 39: 1794-1806. 10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00422-2.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Michaelson JS, Silverstein M, Wyatt J, Weber G, Moore R, Halpern E, Kopans DB, Hughes K: Predicting the survival of patients with breast carcinoma using tumor size. Cancer. 2002, 95: 713-723. 10.1002/cncr.10742.CrossRefPubMed Michaelson JS, Silverstein M, Wyatt J, Weber G, Moore R, Halpern E, Kopans DB, Hughes K: Predicting the survival of patients with breast carcinoma using tumor size. Cancer. 2002, 95: 713-723. 10.1002/cncr.10742.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tubiana M, Koscielny S: Natural history of human breast cancer: recent data and clinical implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1991, 18: 125-140.CrossRefPubMed Tubiana M, Koscielny S: Natural history of human breast cancer: recent data and clinical implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1991, 18: 125-140.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Douglas JRS: Significance of the size distribution of blood-borne metastases. Cancer. 1971, 27: 379-390.CrossRefPubMed Douglas JRS: Significance of the size distribution of blood-borne metastases. Cancer. 1971, 27: 379-390.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Schulz W, Hort W: The distribution of metastases in the liver. A quantitative postmortem study. Virchows Arch A: Pathol Anat Histol . 1981, 394: 89-96.CrossRef Schulz W, Hort W: The distribution of metastases in the liver. A quantitative postmortem study. Virchows Arch A: Pathol Anat Histol . 1981, 394: 89-96.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Yamanami H, Chiba R, Kobari M, Takahashi T: Total number and size distribution of hepatic metastases of carcinoma. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1999, 21: 216-226.PubMed Yamanami H, Chiba R, Kobari M, Takahashi T: Total number and size distribution of hepatic metastases of carcinoma. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1999, 21: 216-226.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Kendal WS: The size distribution of human hematogenous metastases. J Theor Biol. 2001, 211: 29-38. 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2326.CrossRefPubMed Kendal WS: The size distribution of human hematogenous metastases. J Theor Biol. 2001, 211: 29-38. 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2326.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Tai P, Shiels R: Analytic epidemiology: risk and survival prediction for thyroid cancer. Curr Oncol. 2003, 10: 195-201. Tai P, Shiels R: Analytic epidemiology: risk and survival prediction for thyroid cancer. Curr Oncol. 2003, 10: 195-201.
27.
go back to reference Mould RF, Lederman M, Tai P, Wong JKM: Methodology to predict long-term cancer survival from short-term data using Tobacco Cancer Risk and Absolute Cancer Cure Models. Phys Med Biol. 2002, 47: 3893-3924. 10.1088/0031-9155/47/22/301.CrossRefPubMed Mould RF, Lederman M, Tai P, Wong JKM: Methodology to predict long-term cancer survival from short-term data using Tobacco Cancer Risk and Absolute Cancer Cure Models. Phys Med Biol. 2002, 47: 3893-3924. 10.1088/0031-9155/47/22/301.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Gamel JW, Vogel RL, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G: Parametric survival analysis of adjuvant therapy for stage II breast cancer. Cancer. 1994, 74: 2483-2490.CrossRefPubMed Gamel JW, Vogel RL, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G: Parametric survival analysis of adjuvant therapy for stage II breast cancer. Cancer. 1994, 74: 2483-2490.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Gamel JW, Meyer JS, Feuer E, Miller BA: The impact of stage and histology on the long-term clinical course of 163,808 patients with breast cancer. Cancer. 1996, 77: 1459-1464. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960415)77:8<1459::AID-CNCR6>3.3.CO;2-7.CrossRefPubMed Gamel JW, Meyer JS, Feuer E, Miller BA: The impact of stage and histology on the long-term clinical course of 163,808 patients with breast cancer. Cancer. 1996, 77: 1459-1464. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960415)77:8<1459::AID-CNCR6>3.3.CO;2-7.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Haybittle JL: The estimation of the proportion of patients cured after treatment for cancer of the breast. Br J Radiol. 1959, 32: 725-733.CrossRefPubMed Haybittle JL: The estimation of the proportion of patients cured after treatment for cancer of the breast. Br J Radiol. 1959, 32: 725-733.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Royston P: The lognormal distribution as a model for survival time in cancer, with an emphasis on prognostic factors. Stat Neerlandica. 2001, 55: 89-104. 10.1111/1467-9574.00158.CrossRef Royston P: The lognormal distribution as a model for survival time in cancer, with an emphasis on prognostic factors. Stat Neerlandica. 2001, 55: 89-104. 10.1111/1467-9574.00158.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Tai P, Shiels R, Brydon B, Liem SK: A 32-year follow-up verification of the application of the Lognormal Model to predict long-term survival rates by using short-term follow-up data in ovarian cancer. Proceedings of Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists meeting, 2003. Radioth Oncol. 2003, 69 (S1): S31 (abstr 125)- Tai P, Shiels R, Brydon B, Liem SK: A 32-year follow-up verification of the application of the Lognormal Model to predict long-term survival rates by using short-term follow-up data in ovarian cancer. Proceedings of Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists meeting, 2003. Radioth Oncol. 2003, 69 (S1): S31 (abstr 125)-
33.
go back to reference Mould RF, Tai THP, Wong JKM: Validation of Lognormal Prediction Models for estimating long-term survival rates from short-term follow-up data for cancer of the prostate patients registered by the USA SEER Program. In: Prostate cancer review. Edited by: Bruggmoser G, Mould RF, Tai THP, Mate TP. 2003, Munich: W Zuckschwerdt, Chapter 19: 135-152. Mould RF, Tai THP, Wong JKM: Validation of Lognormal Prediction Models for estimating long-term survival rates from short-term follow-up data for cancer of the prostate patients registered by the USA SEER Program. In: Prostate cancer review. Edited by: Bruggmoser G, Mould RF, Tai THP, Mate TP. 2003, Munich: W Zuckschwerdt, Chapter 19: 135-152.
34.
go back to reference Maetani S, Tobe T, Hirakawa A, Kashiwara S, Kuramoto S: Parametric survival analysis of gastric cancer patients. Cancer. 1980, 46: 2709-2716.CrossRefPubMed Maetani S, Tobe T, Hirakawa A, Kashiwara S, Kuramoto S: Parametric survival analysis of gastric cancer patients. Cancer. 1980, 46: 2709-2716.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Tivey H: The prognosis for survival in chronic granulocytic and lymphocytic leukemia. Am J Roentgenol. 1954, 72: 68-93. Tivey H: The prognosis for survival in chronic granulocytic and lymphocytic leukemia. Am J Roentgenol. 1954, 72: 68-93.
36.
go back to reference Tai P, Tonita J, Yu E, Skarsgard D: Verification of lognormality of survival time for 42 cancer sites in the SEER database and early estimation of their statistical cure rates. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Scientific Meeting of Clinical Oncological Society of Australia (COSA) & 2nd Sino-Australian-New Zealand Conference on Surgical Oncology, Sydney, Australia. 2002, abstr- Tai P, Tonita J, Yu E, Skarsgard D: Verification of lognormality of survival time for 42 cancer sites in the SEER database and early estimation of their statistical cure rates. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Scientific Meeting of Clinical Oncological Society of Australia (COSA) & 2nd Sino-Australian-New Zealand Conference on Surgical Oncology, Sydney, Australia. 2002, abstr-
37.
go back to reference Pearlman AW: Breast cancer: Influence of growth rate on prognosis and treatment evaluation. A study based on mastectomy scar recurrences. Cancer. 1976, 38: 1826-1833.CrossRefPubMed Pearlman AW: Breast cancer: Influence of growth rate on prognosis and treatment evaluation. A study based on mastectomy scar recurrences. Cancer. 1976, 38: 1826-1833.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference von Fournier D, Weber E, Hoeffken W, Bauer M, Kubli F, Barth V: Growth rate of 147 mammary carcinomas. Cancer. 1980, 45: 2198-2207.CrossRefPubMed von Fournier D, Weber E, Hoeffken W, Bauer M, Kubli F, Barth V: Growth rate of 147 mammary carcinomas. Cancer. 1980, 45: 2198-2207.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Debonis D, Terz JJ, Eldar S, Hill LR: Survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer diagnosed between 1955 and 1980. J Surg Oncol. 1991, 48: 158-163.CrossRefPubMed Debonis D, Terz JJ, Eldar S, Hill LR: Survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer diagnosed between 1955 and 1980. J Surg Oncol. 1991, 48: 158-163.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Dickman PW, Hakulinen T, Luostarinen T, Pukkala E, Sankila R, Söderman B, Teppo L: Survival of cancer patients in Finland 1955–1994. Acta Oncol. 1999, 38 (Suppl 12): 1-103.CrossRefPubMed Dickman PW, Hakulinen T, Luostarinen T, Pukkala E, Sankila R, Söderman B, Teppo L: Survival of cancer patients in Finland 1955–1994. Acta Oncol. 1999, 38 (Suppl 12): 1-103.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Todd M, Shoag M, Cadman E: Survival of women with metastatic breast cancer at Yale from 1920 to 1980. J Clin Oncol. 1983, 1: 406-408.PubMed Todd M, Shoag M, Cadman E: Survival of women with metastatic breast cancer at Yale from 1920 to 1980. J Clin Oncol. 1983, 1: 406-408.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Farrow DC, Samet JM, Hunt WC: Regional variation in survival following the diagnosis of cancer. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996, 49: 843-847. 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00176-X.CrossRefPubMed Farrow DC, Samet JM, Hunt WC: Regional variation in survival following the diagnosis of cancer. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996, 49: 843-847. 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00176-X.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Maggard MA, Thompson JE, Ko CY: Why do breast cancer mortality rates vary across states?. Am Surg. 2003, 69: 59-62.PubMed Maggard MA, Thompson JE, Ko CY: Why do breast cancer mortality rates vary across states?. Am Surg. 2003, 69: 59-62.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Goodwin JS, Freeman JL, Mahnken JD, Freeman DH, Nattinger AB: Geographic variations in breast cancer survival among older women: implications for quality of breast cancer care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002, 57: M401-406.CrossRefPubMed Goodwin JS, Freeman JL, Mahnken JD, Freeman DH, Nattinger AB: Geographic variations in breast cancer survival among older women: implications for quality of breast cancer care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002, 57: M401-406.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Goodwin JS, Freeman JL, Freeman D, Nattinger AB: Geographic variations in breast cancer mortality: do higher rates imply elevated incidence or poorer survival?. Am J Public Health. 1998, 88: 458-460.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goodwin JS, Freeman JL, Freeman D, Nattinger AB: Geographic variations in breast cancer mortality: do higher rates imply elevated incidence or poorer survival?. Am J Public Health. 1998, 88: 458-460.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer: twenty-year data from two SEER registries
Authors
Patricia Tai
Edward Yu
Vincent Vinh-Hung
Gábor Cserni
Georges Vlastos
Publication date
01-12-2004
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2004
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-4-60

Other articles of this Issue 1/2004

BMC Cancer 1/2004 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine