Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Study protocol

Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial

Authors: Maud A Hegeman, Dick J Bekedam, Kitty WM Bloemenkamp, Anneke Kwee, Dimitri NM Papatsonis, Joris AM van der Post, Arianne C Lim, Hubertina CJ Scheepers, Christine Willekes, Johannes J Duvekot, Marc Spaanderman, Martina Porath, Jim van Eyck, Monique C Haak, Marielle G van Pampus, Hein W Bruinse, Ben Willem J Mol

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Multiple pregnancies are at high risk for preterm birth, and therefore an important cause of infant mortality and morbidity. A pessary is a simple and potentially effective measure for the prevention of preterm birth. Small studies have indicated its effectiveness, but large studies with sufficient power on the subject are lacking. Despite this lack of evidence, the treatment is at present applied by some gynaecologists in The Netherlands.

Methods/Design

We aim to investigate the hypothesis that prophylactic use of a cervical pessary will be effective in the prevention of preterm delivery and the neonatal mortality and morbidity resulting from preterm delivery in multiple pregnancy. We will evaluate the costs and effects of this intervention. At study entry, cervical length will be measured. Eligible women will be randomly allocated to receive either a cervical pessary or no intervention. The cervical pessary will be placed in situ at 16 to 20 weeks, and will stay in situ up to 36 weeks gestation or until delivery, whatever comes first.
The primary outcome is composite bad neonatal condition (perinatal death or severe morbidity). Secondary outcome measures are time to delivery, preterm birth rate before 32 and 37 weeks, days of admission in neonatal intensive care unit, maternal morbidity, maternal admission days for preterm labour and costs. We need to include 660 women to indicate a reduction in bad neonatal outcome from 7.2% without to 3.9% with a cervical pessary, using a two-sided test with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.80.

Discussion

This trial will provide evidence on whether a cervical pessary will decrease the incidence of early preterm birth and its concomitant bad neonatal outcome in multiple pregnancies.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials: NTR 1858
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bruinse HWVG: Meerlingen (Multiple Pregnancy). Uitgeverij Elsevier/de Tijdstroom. 1997 Bruinse HWVG: Meerlingen (Multiple Pregnancy). Uitgeverij Elsevier/de Tijdstroom. 1997
2.
go back to reference Landelijke Verloskundige Registratie 2002: Dutch obstetrical Database 2002. Prismant 2002. 2009, 10.1001/jama.286.13.1581. Landelijke Verloskundige Registratie 2002: Dutch obstetrical Database 2002. Prismant 2002. 2009, 10.1001/jama.286.13.1581.
3.
go back to reference Landelijke Neonatale Registratie 2003: Dutch Neonatal Database 2002. Prismant 2002. 2009, 10.1097/00006254-200007000-00023. Landelijke Neonatale Registratie 2003: Dutch Neonatal Database 2002. Prismant 2002. 2009, 10.1097/00006254-200007000-00023.
4.
go back to reference Guinn DA, Atkinson MW, Sullivan L, Lee M, MacGregor S, Parilla BV, et al: Single vs weekly courses of antenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm delivery: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001, 286 (13): 1581-7. 10.1001/jama.286.13.1581.CrossRefPubMed Guinn DA, Atkinson MW, Sullivan L, Lee M, MacGregor S, Parilla BV, et al: Single vs weekly courses of antenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm delivery: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001, 286 (13): 1581-7. 10.1001/jama.286.13.1581.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Newcomer J: Pessaries for the treatment of incompetent cervix and premature delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000, 55 (7): 443-8. 10.1515/JPM.2003.017.CrossRefPubMed Newcomer J: Pessaries for the treatment of incompetent cervix and premature delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000, 55 (7): 443-8. 10.1515/JPM.2003.017.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Forster F, During R, Schwarzlos G: [Therapy of cervix insufficiency--cerclage or support pessary?]. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1986, 108 (4): 230-7. 10.1007/s00404-005-0082-2.PubMed Forster F, During R, Schwarzlos G: [Therapy of cervix insufficiency--cerclage or support pessary?]. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1986, 108 (4): 230-7. 10.1007/s00404-005-0082-2.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Arabin B, Halbesma JR, Vork F, Hubener M, van EJ: Is treatment with vaginal pessaries an option in patients with a sonographically detected short cervix?. J Perinat Med. 2003, 31 (2): 122-33. 10.1186/1471-2393-7-7.CrossRefPubMed Arabin B, Halbesma JR, Vork F, Hubener M, van EJ: Is treatment with vaginal pessaries an option in patients with a sonographically detected short cervix?. J Perinat Med. 2003, 31 (2): 122-33. 10.1186/1471-2393-7-7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Acharya G, Eschler B, Gronberg M, Hentemann M, Ottersen T, Maltau JM: Noninvasive cerclage for the management of cervical incompetence: a prospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006, 273 (5): 283-7. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00059.x.CrossRefPubMed Acharya G, Eschler B, Gronberg M, Hentemann M, Ottersen T, Maltau JM: Noninvasive cerclage for the management of cervical incompetence: a prospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006, 273 (5): 283-7. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00059.x.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lim AC, Bloemenkamp KW, Boer K, Duvekot JJ, Erwich JJ, Hasaart TH, et al: Progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with multiple pregnancies: the AMPHIA trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007, 7: 7-10.1186/1471-2393-7-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lim AC, Bloemenkamp KW, Boer K, Duvekot JJ, Erwich JJ, Hasaart TH, et al: Progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with multiple pregnancies: the AMPHIA trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007, 7: 7-10.1186/1471-2393-7-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Gates S, Brocklehurst P: How should randomised trials including multiple pregnancies be analysed?. BJOG. 2004, 111 (3): 213-9. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00059.x.CrossRefPubMed Gates S, Brocklehurst P: How should randomised trials including multiple pregnancies be analysed?. BJOG. 2004, 111 (3): 213-9. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00059.x.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial
Authors
Maud A Hegeman
Dick J Bekedam
Kitty WM Bloemenkamp
Anneke Kwee
Dimitri NM Papatsonis
Joris AM van der Post
Arianne C Lim
Hubertina CJ Scheepers
Christine Willekes
Johannes J Duvekot
Marc Spaanderman
Martina Porath
Jim van Eyck
Monique C Haak
Marielle G van Pampus
Hein W Bruinse
Ben Willem J Mol
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-44

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2009 Go to the issue