Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2007

Open Access 01-12-2007 | Research article

Costs and consequences of treatment for mild gestational diabetes mellitus – evaluation from the ACHOIS randomised trial

Authors: John R Moss, Caroline A Crowther, Janet E Hiller, Kristyn J Willson, Jeffrey S Robinson, The Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recommended best practice is that economic evaluation of health care interventions should be integral with randomised clinical trials. We performed a cost-consequence analysis of treating women with mild gestational diabetes mellitus by dietary advice, blood glucose monitoring and insulin therapy as needed compared with routine pregnancy care, using patient-level data from a multi-centre randomised clinical trial.

Methods

Women with a singleton pregnancy who had mild gestational diabetes diagnosed by an oral glucose-tolerance test between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation and their infants were included. Clinical outcomes and outpatient costs derived from all women and infants in the trial. Inpatient costs derived from women and infants attending the hospital contributing the largest number of enrolments (26.1%), and charges to women and their families derived from a subsample of participants from that hospital (in 2002 Australian dollars). Occasions of service and health outcomes were adjusted for maternal age, ethnicity and parity. Analysis of variance was used with bootstrapping to confirm results. Primary clinical outcomes were serious perinatal complications; admission to neonatal nursery; jaundice requiring phototherapy; induction of labour and caesarean delivery. Economic outcome measures were outpatient and inpatient costs, and charges to women and their families.

Results

For every 100 women with a singleton pregnancy and positive oral glucose tolerance test who were offered treatment for mild gestational diabetes mellitus in addition to routine obstetric care, $53,985 additional direct costs were incurred at the obstetric hospital, $6,521 additional charges were incurred by women and their families, 9.7 additional women experienced induction of labour, and 8.6 more babies were admitted to a neonatal nursery. However, 2.2 fewer babies experienced serious perinatal complication and 1.0 fewer babies experienced perinatal death. The incremental cost per additional serious perinatal complication prevented was $27,503, per perinatal death prevented was $60,506 and per discounted life-year gained was $2,988.

Conclusion

It is likely that the general public in high-income countries such as Australia would find reductions in perinatal mortality and in serious perinatal complications sufficient to justify additional health service and personal monetary charges. Over the whole lifespan, the incremental cost per extra life-year gained is highly favourable.

Trial Registration

Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12606000294550
Literature
1.
go back to reference Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care. 2005, Oxford University Press, 3 Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care. 2005, Oxford University Press, 3
2.
go back to reference Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS: Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. NEJM. 2005, 2: 2477-86. 10.1056/NEJMoa042973.CrossRef Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS: Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. NEJM. 2005, 2: 2477-86. 10.1056/NEJMoa042973.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Diabetes mellitus: report of a WHO study group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1985, 727: 1-113. Diabetes mellitus: report of a WHO study group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1985, 727: 1-113.
5.
6.
go back to reference Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing: Manual of resource items and their associated costs for use in major submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee involving economic analyses. 2002, Canberra: AusInfo Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing: Manual of resource items and their associated costs for use in major submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee involving economic analyses. 2002, Canberra: AusInfo
7.
go back to reference Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing: Medicare Benefits Schedule Book. Canberra: Information Services, 1 November 2001 (including 1 May 2002 update) Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing: Medicare Benefits Schedule Book. Canberra: Information Services, 1 November 2001 (including 1 May 2002 update)
8.
go back to reference Department of Health and Ageing: Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits for approved Pharmacists and Medical Practitioners. 2001, Canberra: Commonwealth Copyright Administration Department of Health and Ageing: Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits for approved Pharmacists and Medical Practitioners. 2001, Canberra: Commonwealth Copyright Administration
10.
go back to reference Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing: National Hospital Cost Data Collection. Cost report round 7 (2002–2003). 2004, Canberra Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing: National Hospital Cost Data Collection. Cost report round 7 (2002–2003). 2004, Canberra
11.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics: Consumer Price Index. (Cat no. 6401.0). 2003, Canberra: ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics: Consumer Price Index. (Cat no. 6401.0). 2003, Canberra: ABS
13.
go back to reference Barber JA, Thompson SG: Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: review of published studies. BMJ. 1998, 317 (7167): 1195-1200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barber JA, Thompson SG: Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: review of published studies. BMJ. 1998, 317 (7167): 1195-1200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics: Deaths, Australia 1999. (Cat. No. 3302.0). 2000, Canberra: ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics: Deaths, Australia 1999. (Cat. No. 3302.0). 2000, Canberra: ABS
15.
go back to reference Donaldson C, Hundley V, McIntosh E: Using economics alongside clinical trials: Why we cannot choose the evaluation technique in advance. Health Economics. 1996, 5: 267-269. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199605)5:3<267::AID-HEC209>3.0.CO;2-X.CrossRefPubMed Donaldson C, Hundley V, McIntosh E: Using economics alongside clinical trials: Why we cannot choose the evaluation technique in advance. Health Economics. 1996, 5: 267-269. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199605)5:3<267::AID-HEC209>3.0.CO;2-X.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference George B, Harris A, Mitchell A: Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: Evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia 1991–96. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001, 19: 1103-9. 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00004.CrossRefPubMed George B, Harris A, Mitchell A: Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: Evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in Australia 1991–96. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001, 19: 1103-9. 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00004.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Costs and consequences of treatment for mild gestational diabetes mellitus – evaluation from the ACHOIS randomised trial
Authors
John R Moss
Caroline A Crowther
Janet E Hiller
Kristyn J Willson
Jeffrey S Robinson
The Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2007
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-27

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2007 Go to the issue