Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Maternity care providers’ perceptions of women’s autonomy and the law

Authors: Sue Kruske, Kate Young, Bec Jenkinson, Ann Catchlove

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Like all health care consumers, pregnant women have the right to make autonomous decisions about their medical care. However, this right has created confusion for a number of maternity care stakeholders, particularly in situations when a woman’s decision may lead to increased risk of harm to the fetus. Little is known about care providers’ perceptions of this situation, or of their legal accountability for outcomes experienced in pregnancy and birth. This paper examined maternity care providers’ attitudes and beliefs towards women’s right to make autonomous decisions during pregnancy and birth, and the legal responsibility of professionals for maternal and fetal outcomes.

Methods

Attitudes and beliefs around women’s autonomy and health professionals’ legal accountability were measured in a sample of 336 midwives and doctors from both public and private health sectors in Queensland, Australia, using a questionnaire available online and in paper format. Student’s t-test was used to compare midwives’ and doctors’ responses.

Results

Both maternity care professionals demonstrated a poor understanding of their own legal accountability, and the rights of the woman and her fetus. Midwives and doctors believed the final decision should rest with the woman; however, each also believed that the needs of the woman may be overridden for the safety of the fetus. Doctors believed themselves to be ultimately legally accountable for outcomes experienced in pregnancy and birth, despite the legal position that all health care professionals are responsible only for adverse outcomes caused by their own negligent actions. Interprofessional differences were evident, with midwives and doctors significantly differing in their responses on five of the six items.

Conclusions

Maternity care professionals inconsistently supported women’s right to autonomous decision making during pregnancy and birth. This finding is further complicated by care providers’ poor understanding of legal accountability for outcomes experienced in pregnancy and birth. The findings of this study support the need for guidelines on decision making in pregnancy and birth for maternity care professionals, and for recognition of interprofessional differences in beliefs around the rights of the woman, her fetus and health professionals in order to facilitate collaborative practice.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference ACSQHC: Australian charter of healthcare rights. 2009, Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care ACSQHC: Australian charter of healthcare rights. 2009, Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care
2.
go back to reference Burrows J: The parturient woman: can there be room for more than ‘one person with full and equal rights inside a single human skin’*?. J Adv Nurs. 2001, 33 (5): 689-695. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01700.x.CrossRefPubMed Burrows J: The parturient woman: can there be room for more than ‘one person with full and equal rights inside a single human skin’*?. J Adv Nurs. 2001, 33 (5): 689-695. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01700.x.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fentiman LC: The new “fetal protection”: The wrong answer to the crisis of inadequate health care for women and children. Denver Univ Law Rev. 2006, 84 (2): 537-599. Fentiman LC: The new “fetal protection”: The wrong answer to the crisis of inadequate health care for women and children. Denver Univ Law Rev. 2006, 84 (2): 537-599.
4.
go back to reference King PA: Helping women helping children: drug policy and future generations. The Milbank Quarter. 1991, 69 (4): 595-621.CrossRef King PA: Helping women helping children: drug policy and future generations. The Milbank Quarter. 1991, 69 (4): 595-621.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Klein MC: Many women and providers are unprepared for an evidence-based, educated conversation about birth. J Perinat Educ. 2011, 20 (4): 185-10.1891/1058-1243.20.4.185.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klein MC: Many women and providers are unprepared for an evidence-based, educated conversation about birth. J Perinat Educ. 2011, 20 (4): 185-10.1891/1058-1243.20.4.185.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Pilley Edwards N: Why can’t women just say no? and does it really matter? Informed choice in maternity care (pp. 1–30). 2004, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan Pilley Edwards N: Why can’t women just say no? and does it really matter? Informed choice in maternity care (pp. 1–30). 2004, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan
7.
go back to reference Eri TS, Blystad A, Gjengedal E, Blaaka G: ‘Stay home for as long as possible’: Midwives’ priorities and strategies in communicating with first-time mothers in early labour. Midwifery. 2011, 27 (6): e286-e292. 10.1016/j.midw.2011.01.006.CrossRefPubMed Eri TS, Blystad A, Gjengedal E, Blaaka G: ‘Stay home for as long as possible’: Midwives’ priorities and strategies in communicating with first-time mothers in early labour. Midwifery. 2011, 27 (6): e286-e292. 10.1016/j.midw.2011.01.006.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Stapleton H, Kirkham M, Thomas G: Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2002, 324 (7338): 639-643. 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.639.CrossRef Stapleton H, Kirkham M, Thomas G: Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2002, 324 (7338): 639-643. 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.639.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Symon A, Winter C, Donnan PT, Kirkham M: Examining autonomy’s boundaries: a follow-up review of perinatal mortality cases in UK independent midwifery. Birth (Berkeley, Calif). 2010, 37 (4): 280-10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00422.x.CrossRef Symon A, Winter C, Donnan PT, Kirkham M: Examining autonomy’s boundaries: a follow-up review of perinatal mortality cases in UK independent midwifery. Birth (Berkeley, Calif). 2010, 37 (4): 280-10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00422.x.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Behruzi R, Hatem M, Fraser W, Goulet L, Ii M, Misago C: Facilitators and barriers in the humanization of childbirth practice in Japan. BMC pregnancy childbirth. 2010, 10 (1): 25-25. 10.1186/1471-2393-10-25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Behruzi R, Hatem M, Fraser W, Goulet L, Ii M, Misago C: Facilitators and barriers in the humanization of childbirth practice in Japan. BMC pregnancy childbirth. 2010, 10 (1): 25-25. 10.1186/1471-2393-10-25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Behruzi R, Hatem M, Goulet L, Fraser W: The facilitating factors and barriers encountered in the adoption of a humanized birth care approach in a highly specialized university affiliated hospital. BMC women’s health. 2011, 11 (1): 53-53. 10.1186/1472-6874-11-53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Behruzi R, Hatem M, Goulet L, Fraser W: The facilitating factors and barriers encountered in the adoption of a humanized birth care approach in a highly specialized university affiliated hospital. BMC women’s health. 2011, 11 (1): 53-53. 10.1186/1472-6874-11-53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Behruzi R, Hatem M, Goulet L, Fraser W, Leduc N, Misago C: Humanized birth in high risk pregnancy: barriers and facilitating factors. Med Health Care Phil. 2010, 13 (1): 49-58. 10.1007/s11019-009-9220-0.CrossRef Behruzi R, Hatem M, Goulet L, Fraser W, Leduc N, Misago C: Humanized birth in high risk pregnancy: barriers and facilitating factors. Med Health Care Phil. 2010, 13 (1): 49-58. 10.1007/s11019-009-9220-0.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Watson B, Heatley M, Gallois C, Kruske S: An empirical investigation into beliefs about collaborative practice between maternity care providers. Aust Heal Rev. 2012, 10.1071/AH11104. Watson B, Heatley M, Gallois C, Kruske S: An empirical investigation into beliefs about collaborative practice between maternity care providers. Aust Heal Rev. 2012, 10.1071/AH11104.
14.
go back to reference Field A: Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2009, London: SAGE Publications Pty Ltd, 3 Field A: Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2009, London: SAGE Publications Pty Ltd, 3
15.
go back to reference AHPRA: Annual report of the australian health practitioner agency (AHPRA) and the national boards, 2010–11. 2011, Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA): Melbourne AHPRA: Annual report of the australian health practitioner agency (AHPRA) and the national boards, 2010–11. 2011, Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA): Melbourne
18.
go back to reference Staff L, Small K: Collaboration in the labour room - teamwork can make a difference. Paper presented at the Future birth - making a difference workshop. 2009, Birth International Staff L, Small K: Collaboration in the labour room - teamwork can make a difference. Paper presented at the Future birth - making a difference workshop. 2009, Birth International
19.
go back to reference NICE: Quick reference guide. Pregnancy and complex social factors. A model for service provision for pregnant women with complex social factors. 2010, London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence NICE: Quick reference guide. Pregnancy and complex social factors. A model for service provision for pregnant women with complex social factors. 2010, London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
20.
go back to reference NHMRC: National guidance on collaborative maternity care. 2010, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC): Canberra NHMRC: National guidance on collaborative maternity care. 2010, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC): Canberra
21.
22.
go back to reference NSW Health: Policy directive: conset to medical treatment - patient information. Doc no. PD2005_406. 2005, Sydney: Legal and Legislative Services, NSW Health NSW Health: Policy directive: conset to medical treatment - patient information. Doc no. PD2005_406. 2005, Sydney: Legal and Legislative Services, NSW Health
23.
go back to reference Cuttini M, Habiba M, Nilstun T, Donfrancesco S, Garel M, Arnaud C, European Obstetricians Study, G: Patient refusal of emergency cesarean delivery: A study of obstetricians' attitudes in Europe. Obstetrics gynecol. 2006, 108 (5): 1121-1129. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000239123.10646.4c.CrossRef Cuttini M, Habiba M, Nilstun T, Donfrancesco S, Garel M, Arnaud C, European Obstetricians Study, G: Patient refusal of emergency cesarean delivery: A study of obstetricians' attitudes in Europe. Obstetrics gynecol. 2006, 108 (5): 1121-1129. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000239123.10646.4c.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Newnham H: Mother v fetus: who wins?. Australian Midwifery. 2003, 16 (1): 23-26. 10.1016/S1031-170X(03)80012-0.CrossRef Newnham H: Mother v fetus: who wins?. Australian Midwifery. 2003, 16 (1): 23-26. 10.1016/S1031-170X(03)80012-0.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Maternity care providers’ perceptions of women’s autonomy and the law
Authors
Sue Kruske
Kate Young
Bec Jenkinson
Ann Catchlove
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-84

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2013 Go to the issue