Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research article

Limiting the caesarean section rate in low risk pregnancies is key to lowering the trend of increased abdominal deliveries: an observational study

Authors: Ilse Delbaere, Hendrik Cammu, Evelyne Martens, Inge Tency, Guy Martens, Marleen Temmerman

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

As the rate of Caesarean sections (CS) continues to rise in Western countries, it is important to analyze the reasons for this trend and to unravel the underlying motives to perform CS. This research aims to assess the incidence and trend of CS in a population-based birth register in order to identify patient groups with an increasing risk for CS.

Methods

Data from the Flemish birth register 'Study Centre for Perinatal Epidemiology' (SPE) were used for this historic control comparison. Caesarean sections (CS) from the year 2000 (N = 10540) were compared with those from the year 2008 (N = 14016). By means of the Robson classification, births by Caesarean section were ordered in 10 groups according to mother - and delivery characteristics.

Results

Over a period of eight years, the CS rise is most prominent in women with previous sections and in nulliparous women with a term cephalic in spontaneous labor. The proportion of inductions of labor decreases in favor of elective CS, while the ongoing inductions of labor more often end in non-elective CS.

Conclusions

In order to turn back the current CS trend, we should focus on low-risk primiparae. Avoiding unnecessary abdominal deliveries in this group will also have a long-term effect, in that the number of repeat CS will be reduced in the future. For the purpose of self-evaluation, peer discussion on the necessity of CS, as well as accurate registration of the main indication for CS are recommended.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Getahun D, Strickland D, Lawrence J, Fassett M, Koebnick C, Jacobsen S: Racial and ethnic disparities in the trends in primary cesarean delivery based on indications. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009, 201: 422-PubMed Getahun D, Strickland D, Lawrence J, Fassett M, Koebnick C, Jacobsen S: Racial and ethnic disparities in the trends in primary cesarean delivery based on indications. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009, 201: 422-PubMed
2.
go back to reference Zhang J: Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010, 203: Zhang J: Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010, 203:
3.
go back to reference Plante LA: Public health implications of cesarean on demand. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2006, 61: 807-815.CrossRef Plante LA: Public health implications of cesarean on demand. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2006, 61: 807-815.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Minkoff H: Elective primary cesarean delivery. New England Journal of Medicine, The. 2003, 348: 946-950.CrossRef Minkoff H: Elective primary cesarean delivery. New England Journal of Medicine, The. 2003, 348: 946-950.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Enkin M, Keirse M, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E, et al: A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. 2000, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3CrossRef Enkin M, Keirse M, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E, et al: A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. 2000, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cammu H, Martens G, Martens E, De Coen K, Defoort P: Perinatal activities in Flanders. SPE. 2009, 22: Cammu H, Martens G, Martens E, De Coen K, Defoort P: Perinatal activities in Flanders. SPE. 2009, 22:
7.
go back to reference Robson MS: Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2001, 15: 179-194.CrossRef Robson MS: Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2001, 15: 179-194.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gerris J, De Sutter P, De Neubourg D, Van Royen E, Van der Elst J, Mangelschots K, et al: A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2004, 19: 923-CrossRef Gerris J, De Sutter P, De Neubourg D, Van Royen E, Van der Elst J, Mangelschots K, et al: A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2004, 19: 923-CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brennan D, Robson MS, Murphy M, O'Herlihy C: Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2009, 201: e1-e8. Brennan D, Robson MS, Murphy M, O'Herlihy C: Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2009, 201: e1-e8.
10.
go back to reference Scott JR: Putting elective cesarean into perspective. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002, 99: 967-968.CrossRefPubMed Scott JR: Putting elective cesarean into perspective. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002, 99: 967-968.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Todman D: A history of caesarean section: from ancient world to the modern era. The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology. 2007, 47: 357-361.CrossRef Todman D: A history of caesarean section: from ancient world to the modern era. The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology. 2007, 47: 357-361.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference van Dillen F, Lim F, van Ripsel E: Introducing caesarean section audit in a regional teaching hospital in The Netherlands. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2008, 139: 151-156.CrossRef van Dillen F, Lim F, van Ripsel E: Introducing caesarean section audit in a regional teaching hospital in The Netherlands. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2008, 139: 151-156.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Limiting the caesarean section rate in low risk pregnancies is key to lowering the trend of increased abdominal deliveries: an observational study
Authors
Ilse Delbaere
Hendrik Cammu
Evelyne Martens
Inge Tency
Guy Martens
Marleen Temmerman
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2012 Go to the issue