Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Study protocol

Induction of labour versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age: a multi-centre prospective, randomised controlled trial

Authors: Kate F Walker, George Bugg, Marion Macpherson, Carol McCormick, Chris Wildsmith, Gordon Smith, Jim Thornton

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

British women are increasingly delaying childbirth. The proportion giving birth over the age of 35 rose from 12% in 1996 to 20% in 2006. Women over this age are at a higher risk of perinatal death, and antepartum stillbirth accounts for 61% of all such deaths. Women over 40 years old have a similar stillbirth risk at 39 weeks as women who are between 25 and 29 years old have at 41 weeks.
Many obstetricians respond to this by suggesting labour induction at term to forestall some of the risk. In a national survey of obstetricians 37% already induce women aged 40–44 years. A substantial minority of parents support such a policy, but others do not on the grounds that it might increase the risk of Caesarean section. However trials of induction in other high-risk scenarios have not shown any increase in Caesarean sections, rather the reverse. If induction for women over 35 did not increase Caesareans, or even reduced them, it would plausibly improve perinatal outcome and be an acceptable intervention. We therefore plan to perform a trial to test the effect of such an induction policy on Caesarean section rates.
This trial is funded by the NHS Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme.

Design

The 35/39 trial is a multi-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial. It is being run in twenty UK centres and we aim to recruit 630 nulliparous women (315 per group) aged over 35 years of age, over two years. Women will be randomly allocated to one of two groups:
Induction of labour between 390/7 and 396/7weeks gestation.
Expectant management i.e. awaiting spontaneous onset of labour unless a situation develops necessitating either induction of labour or Caesarean Section.
The primary purpose of this trial is to establish what effect a policy of induction of labour at 39 weeks for nulliparous women of advanced maternal age has on the rate of Caesarean section deliveries. The secondary aim is to act as a pilot study for a trial to answer the question, does induction of labour in this group of women improve perinatal outcomes? Randomisation will occur at 360/7 – 396/7 weeks gestation via a computerised randomisation programme at the Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham. There will be no blinding to treatment allocation.

Discussion

The 35/39 trial is powered to detect an effect of induction of labour on the risk of caesarean section, it is underpowered to determine whether it improves perinatal outcome. The current study will also act as a pilot for a larger study to address this question.

Trial registration

ISRCTN11517275
Literature
1.
go back to reference The confidential enquiry into maternal and child health (CEMACH). saving Mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer – 2003–2005. The seventh report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the united kingdom. Edited by: Lewis G. 2007, London: CEMACH The confidential enquiry into maternal and child health (CEMACH). saving Mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer – 2003–2005. The seventh report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the united kingdom. Edited by: Lewis G. 2007, London: CEMACH
2.
go back to reference Smith GCS, Cordeaux Y, White IR, Pasupathy D, Missfelder-Lobos H, Pell JP, Charnock-Jones DS, Fleming M: The effect of delaying childbirth on primary cesarean section rates. PloS Med. 2008, 5 (7): e144-10.1371/journal. Pmed.0050144.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith GCS, Cordeaux Y, White IR, Pasupathy D, Missfelder-Lobos H, Pell JP, Charnock-Jones DS, Fleming M: The effect of delaying childbirth on primary cesarean section rates. PloS Med. 2008, 5 (7): e144-10.1371/journal. Pmed.0050144.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Confidential enquiry into maternal and child health (CEMACH) perinatal mortality 2006: England, Wales and northern Ireland. 2008, London: CEMACH Confidential enquiry into maternal and child health (CEMACH) perinatal mortality 2006: England, Wales and northern Ireland. 2008, London: CEMACH
4.
go back to reference Joseph KS, Allen AC, Dodds L, Turner LA, Scott H, Liston R: The perinatal effects of delayed childbearing. Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 105: 6-CrossRef Joseph KS, Allen AC, Dodds L, Turner LA, Scott H, Liston R: The perinatal effects of delayed childbearing. Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 105: 6-CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jacobsson B, Ladfors L, Milsom I: Advance maternal Age and adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2004, 104: 4-10.1097/00006250-200410001-00001.CrossRef Jacobsson B, Ladfors L, Milsom I: Advance maternal Age and adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2004, 104: 4-10.1097/00006250-200410001-00001.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Smith GCS: Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post term in singleton pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 184: 489-496. 10.1067/mob.2001.109735.CrossRefPubMed Smith GCS: Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post term in singleton pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 184: 489-496. 10.1067/mob.2001.109735.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Reddy UM, Ko CW, Willinger M: Maternal age and the risk of stillbirth throughout pregnancy in the united states. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006, 195: 764-770. 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.019.CrossRefPubMed Reddy UM, Ko CW, Willinger M: Maternal age and the risk of stillbirth throughout pregnancy in the united states. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006, 195: 764-770. 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.019.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Audit Commission: First class delivery: Improving maternity services in England and Wales. 1997, London: Audit Commission Audit Commission: First class delivery: Improving maternity services in England and Wales. 1997, London: Audit Commission
9.
go back to reference Nicholson JM, Parry S, Caughey AB, Rosen S, Keen A, Macones GA: The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008, 198: 511-e1-511.e15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nicholson JM, Parry S, Caughey AB, Rosen S, Keen A, Macones GA: The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008, 198: 511-e1-511.e15CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Walker KF, Bugg GJ, Macpherson M, Thornton J: Induction of labour at term for women over 35 years old: a survey of the view of women and obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.016. Walker KF, Bugg GJ, Macpherson M, Thornton J: Induction of labour at term for women over 35 years old: a survey of the view of women and obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.016.
11.
go back to reference Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, Hewson SA, Hodnett RN, Myher TL, Wang EEL, Weston JA, Willan AR: Induction of labour compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. N Eng J Med. 1996, 334: 1005-1010. 10.1056/NEJM199604183341601.CrossRef Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, Hewson SA, Hodnett RN, Myher TL, Wang EEL, Weston JA, Willan AR: Induction of labour compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. N Eng J Med. 1996, 334: 1005-1010. 10.1056/NEJM199604183341601.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P: Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term (review). The Cochrane Library. 2007, Art. No.: CD004945-10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub2. 4 Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P: Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term (review). The Cochrane Library. 2007, Art. No.: CD004945-10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub2. 4
13.
go back to reference Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H, et al: The HYPITAT study group. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks’ gestation (HYPITAT): a multi-centre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009, 374: 979-988. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60736-4.CrossRefPubMed Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H, et al: The HYPITAT study group. Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks’ gestation (HYPITAT): a multi-centre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009, 374: 979-988. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60736-4.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Boers KE, Vijgen SM, Bijlenga D, et al: DIGITAT study group. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ. 2010, 341: c7087-10.1136/bmj.c7087.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boers KE, Vijgen SM, Bijlenga D, et al: DIGITAT study group. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ. 2010, 341: c7087-10.1136/bmj.c7087.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Dencker A, et al: Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010, 10: 81-10.1186/1471-2393-10-81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dencker A, et al: Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010, 10: 81-10.1186/1471-2393-10-81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Induction of labour versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age: a multi-centre prospective, randomised controlled trial
Authors
Kate F Walker
George Bugg
Marion Macpherson
Carol McCormick
Chris Wildsmith
Gordon Smith
Jim Thornton
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-145

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2012 Go to the issue