Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Primary Care
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research article

Patient acceptance and perceived utility of pre-consultation prevention summaries and reminders in general practice: pilot study

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients attending general practices receive only about sixty per cent of the preventive services that are indicated for them. This pilot study explores patient acceptability and perceived utility of automatically generated prevention summary and reminder sheets provided to patients immediately before consultations with their general practitioners.

Methods

Adult patients attending a general practitioner in a practice in Adelaide and a general practitioner in a practice in Melbourne, Australia for consultations in January and February 2009 received automatically-generated prevention summary and reminder sheets that highlighted indicated preventive activities that were due to be performed, and that encouraged the patient to discuss these with the general practitioner in the consultation. Patients completed a post-consultation questionnaire and were interviewed about their experience of receiving the sheets.

Results

Sixty patients, median age 53 years (interquartile range 40-74) years, and 58% female, were recruited. Seventy eight per cent of patients found the sheets clear and easy to understand, 75% found them very or quite useful, 72% reported they had addressed with their general practitioner all of the preventive activities that were listed on the sheets as being due to be performed. A further 13% indicated that they had addressed most or some of the activities. 78% of patients said that they would like to keep receiving the sheets. Themes emerging from interviews with patients included: patient knowledge was enhanced; patient conceptions of health and the GP consultation were broadened; the consultation was enhanced; patient pro-activity was encouraged; patients were encouraged to plan their health care; the intervention was suitable for a variety of patients.

Conclusions

Most patients reported that they found the prevention summary and reminder sheets acceptable and useful. The actual increase in performance of preventive activities that may result from this new intervention needs to be tested in randomised controlled trials.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Begg S, et al: The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003. 2007, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics: Australian Demographic Statistics. 2003
3.
Commonwealth of Australia: General Practice in Australia: 2004. 2005, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
4.
Stott NC, Davis RH: The exceptional potential in each primary care consultation. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1979, 29 (201): 201-5.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
6.
7.
WONCA Europe (European Society of General Practice/Family Medicine): The European Definition of General Practice/Family Medicine. 2002, WONCA Europe (European Society of General Practice/Family Medicine)
8.
Flocke SA, Stange KC, Goodwin MA: Patient and visit characteristics associated with opportunistic preventive services delivery. J Fam Pract. 1998, 47 (3): 202-8.PubMed
9.
Grol R, et al: Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. Fam. Pract. 1999, 16 (1): 4-11. 10.1093/fampra/16.1.4.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Stange KC, Flocke SA, Goodwin MA: Opportunistic preventive services delivery. Are time limitations and patient satisfaction barriers?. J Fam Pract. 1998, 46 (5): 419-24.PubMed
11.
Henderson J, Britt HC, GC M: Extent and utilisation of computerisation in Australian general practice. Med J Aust. 2006, 185 (2): 8-87.
12.
McInnes D, Saltman D, MR K: General practitioners' use of computers for prescribing and electronic health records: results from a national survey. Med J Aust. 2006, 185 (2): 88-91.PubMed
13.
Didham R, et al: Information Technology systems in general practice medicine in New Zealand. N Z Med J. 2004, 117: 1198-U977.
14.
Morris L, et al: A survey of computer use in Scottish primary care: general practitioners are no longer technophobic but other primary care staff need better computer access. Informatics in Primary Care. 2003, 11: 5-11.PubMed
15.
Hsiao CJ, et al: Electronic Medical Record/Electronic Health Record Systems of Office-based Physicians: United States, 2009 and Preliminary 2010 State Estimates. 2010, National Centre for Health Statistics
16.
Bero LA, et al: Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ. 1998, 317 (7156): 465-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Crabtree BF, et al: Primary care practice organization and preventive services delivery: a qualitative analysis. J Fam Pract. 1998, 46 (5): 403-9.PubMed
18.
Davis JE, McBride PE, Bobula JA: Improving prevention in primary care: physicians, patients, and process. J Fam Pract. 1992, 35 (4): 385-7.PubMed
19.
Dexheimer JW, et al: Prompting Clinicians about Preventive Care Measures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008, 15 (3): 311-320. 10.1197/jamia.M2555.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Frank O, Litt J, Beilby J: Opportunistic electronic reminders. Improving performance of preventive care in general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2004, 33 (1-2): 87-90.PubMed
21.
Frank O, Litt J, Beilby J: Preventive activities during consultations in general practice: influences on performance. Aust Fam Physician. 2005, 34 (6): 508-12.PubMed
22.
Garg AX, et al: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005, 293 (10): 1223-38. 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Grimshaw J, Eccles MP: Changing physician behaviour: evidence based and pragmatic approaches. 2003, National Institute of Clinical Studies
24.
Kawamoto K, et al: Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005, 330 (7494): 765-10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Wensing M, Grol R: Single and combined strategies for implementing changes in primary care: a literature review. Int J Qual Health Care. 1994, 6 (2): 115-32.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Cervical screening in Australia. 2003, 2000-2001 and 1999-2000
27.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: National Cancer Statistics Clearing House. 2004, Australian Government
28.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: 2004 Adult Vaccination Survey: summary results. 2005, Canberra: AIHW & DoHA
29.
Kottke TE, et al: Delivery rates for preventive services in 44 midwestern clinics. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997, 72 (6): 515-23. 10.4065/72.6.515.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Sayer GP, et al: Measures of health and health care delivery in general practice in Australia. 2000, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
31.
Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH: How Good Is the Quality of Health Care in the United States?. Milbank Qy. 2005, 83 (4): 843-895. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00403.x.CrossRef
32.
Solberg L, Kottke T, Brekke M: Variation in clinical preventive services. Eff Clin Pract. 2001, 4 (3): 121-6.PubMed
33.
Schuster M, McGlynn E, Brook R: How good is the quality of health care in the United States?. Milbank Q. 1998, 76 (4): 517-63. 10.1111/1468-0009.00105. 509CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Pham HH, et al: Delivery of preventive services to older adults by primary care physicians. JAMA. 2005, 294 (4): 473-81. 10.1001/jama.294.4.473.CrossRefPubMed
35.
McGlynn EA, et al: The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348 (26): 2635-45. 10.1056/NEJMsa022615.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Rosenstock I: The health belief model and preventive health behavior. 1974, Health Education Monographs, 2: 354-386.
37.
Prentice-Dunn S, Rogers RW: Protection Motivation Theory and preventive health: beyond the Health Belief Model. Health Educ. Res. 1986, 1 (3): 153-161. 10.1093/her/1.3.153.CrossRef
38.
Hogg WE, et al: Randomized controlled study of customized preventive medicine reminder letters in a community practice. Can Fam Physician. 1998, 44: 81-8.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Ornstein S, et al: Barriers to adherence to preventive services reminder letters: the patient's perspective. J Fam Practice. 1993, 36 (2): 195-200.
40.
Royal Australian College of General Practitioners: Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice (The Red Book). 2009, 2009, 7
41.
Metadata
Title
Patient acceptance and perceived utility of pre-consultation prevention summaries and reminders in general practice: pilot study
Publication date
01-12-2011
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-40

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

BMC Primary Care 1/2011 Go to the issue

Research article

Framework and indicator testing protocol for developing and piloting quality indicators for the UK quality and outcomes framework

Research article

Prediction of persistent shoulder pain in general practice: Comparing clinical consensus from a Delphi procedure with a statistical scoring system

Research article

Confidence and quality in managing CKD compared with other cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus: a linked study of questionnaire and routine primary care data

Research article

Managing depression in primary care: A meta-synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research from the UK to identify barriers and facilitators

Research article

Understanding the prescription of antidepressants: a Qualitative study among French GPs

Research article

Perspectives on key principles of generalist medical practice in public service in sub-saharan africa: a qualitative study