Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research article

Design effect in multicenter studies: gain or loss of power?

Authors: Emilie Vierron, Bruno Giraudeau

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In a multicenter trial, responses for subjects belonging to a common center are correlated. Such a clustering is usually assessed through the design effect, defined as a ratio of two variances. The aim of this work was to describe and understand situations where the design effect involves a gain or a loss of power.

Methods

We developed a design effect formula for a multicenter study aimed at testing the effect of a binary factor (which thus defines two groups) on a continuous outcome, and explored this design effect for several designs (from individually stratified randomized trials to cluster randomized trials, and for other designs such as matched pair designs or observational multicenter studies).

Results

The design effect depends on the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (which assesses the correlation between data for two subjects from the same center) but also on a statistic S, which quantifies the heterogeneity of the group distributions among centers (thus the level of association between the binary factor and the center) and on the degree of global imbalance (the number of subjects are then different) between the two groups. This design effect may induce either a loss or a gain in power, depending on whether the S statistic is respectively higher or lower than 1.

Conclusion

We provided a global design effect formula applying for any multicenter study and allowing identifying factors – the ICC and the distribution of the group proportions among centers – that are associated with a gain or a loss of power in such studies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Localio AR, Berlin JA, Ten Have TR, Kimmel SE: Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview. Ann Intern Med. 2001, 135: 112-123.CrossRefPubMed Localio AR, Berlin JA, Ten Have TR, Kimmel SE: Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview. Ann Intern Med. 2001, 135: 112-123.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kish L: Survey sampling. 1965, New York: John Wiley Kish L: Survey sampling. 1965, New York: John Wiley
4.
go back to reference Donner A, Klar N: Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. 2000, London: Arnold Donner A, Klar N: Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. 2000, London: Arnold
5.
go back to reference Vierron E, Giraudeau B: Sample size calculation for multicenter randomized trial: taking the center effect into account. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007, 28: 451-458. 10.1016/j.cct.2006.11.003.CrossRefPubMed Vierron E, Giraudeau B: Sample size calculation for multicenter randomized trial: taking the center effect into account. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007, 28: 451-458. 10.1016/j.cct.2006.11.003.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fleiss JL: The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. 1986, New York: Wiley Fleiss JL: The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. 1986, New York: Wiley
7.
go back to reference Machin D, Campbell M, Fayers P, Pinol A: Sample size tables for clinical studies. 1997, London: Blackwell Science, 2 Machin D, Campbell M, Fayers P, Pinol A: Sample size tables for clinical studies. 1997, London: Blackwell Science, 2
9.
go back to reference Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, Montori VM, Cook DJ, Yusuf S, Sackett DL, Cina CS, Walter SD, Haynes B, Schunemann HJ, Norman GR, Guyatt GH: Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005, 330: 88-10.1136/bmj.330.7482.88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, Montori VM, Cook DJ, Yusuf S, Sackett DL, Cina CS, Walter SD, Haynes B, Schunemann HJ, Norman GR, Guyatt GH: Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005, 330: 88-10.1136/bmj.330.7482.88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Julious SA: Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Stat Med. 2004, 23: 1921-1986. 10.1002/sim.1783.CrossRefPubMed Julious SA: Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Stat Med. 2004, 23: 1921-1986. 10.1002/sim.1783.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lin Z: An issue of statistical analysis in controlled multi-centre studies: how shall we weight the centres?. Stat Med. 1999, 18: 365-373. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990228)18:4<365::AID-SIM46>3.0.CO;2-2.CrossRefPubMed Lin Z: An issue of statistical analysis in controlled multi-centre studies: how shall we weight the centres?. Stat Med. 1999, 18: 365-373. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990228)18:4<365::AID-SIM46>3.0.CO;2-2.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Senn S: Some controversies in planning and analysing multi-centre trials. Stat Med. 1998, 17: 1753-1765. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1753::AID-SIM977>3.0.CO;2-X.CrossRefPubMed Senn S: Some controversies in planning and analysing multi-centre trials. Stat Med. 1998, 17: 1753-1765. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980815/30)17:15/16<1753::AID-SIM977>3.0.CO;2-X.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference ICH Topic E 9. Note for guidance on statistical principles for clinical trials. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products: 1998. 1998 ICH Topic E 9. Note for guidance on statistical principles for clinical trials. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products: 1998. 1998
14.
go back to reference Kerry SM, Bland JM: Unequal cluster sizes for trials in English and Welsh general practice: implications for sample size calculations. Stat Med. 2001, 20: 377-390. 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<377::AID-SIM799>3.0.CO;2-N.CrossRefPubMed Kerry SM, Bland JM: Unequal cluster sizes for trials in English and Welsh general practice: implications for sample size calculations. Stat Med. 2001, 20: 377-390. 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<377::AID-SIM799>3.0.CO;2-N.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Murray DM, Varnell SP, Blitstein JL: Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments. Am J Public Health. 2004, 94: 423-432. 10.2105/AJPH.94.3.423.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Murray DM, Varnell SP, Blitstein JL: Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments. Am J Public Health. 2004, 94: 423-432. 10.2105/AJPH.94.3.423.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Zhou X, Perkins A, Hui S: Comparison of software packages for generalized linear multilevel models. American Statistician. 1999, 53: 282-290. 10.2307/2686112. Zhou X, Perkins A, Hui S: Comparison of software packages for generalized linear multilevel models. American Statistician. 1999, 53: 282-290. 10.2307/2686112.
17.
go back to reference Peugh J, Enders C: Using the SPSS mixed procedure to fit cross-sectional and longitudinal multilevel models. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2005, 65: 717-741. 10.1177/0013164405278558.CrossRef Peugh J, Enders C: Using the SPSS mixed procedure to fit cross-sectional and longitudinal multilevel models. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2005, 65: 717-741. 10.1177/0013164405278558.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Singer J: Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 1998, 24: 323-355.CrossRef Singer J: Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 1998, 24: 323-355.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pinheiro J, Bates D: Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. 2000, New-York: SpringerCrossRef Pinheiro J, Bates D: Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. 2000, New-York: SpringerCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Eldridge SM, Ashby D, Kerry S: Sample size for cluster randomized trials: effect of coefficient of variation of cluster size and analysis method. Int J Epidemiol. 2006, 35: 1292-1300. 10.1093/ije/dyl129.CrossRefPubMed Eldridge SM, Ashby D, Kerry S: Sample size for cluster randomized trials: effect of coefficient of variation of cluster size and analysis method. Int J Epidemiol. 2006, 35: 1292-1300. 10.1093/ije/dyl129.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Guittet L, Ravaud P, Giraudeau B: Planning a cluster randomized trial with unequal cluster sizes: practical issues involving continuous outcomes. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006, 6: 17-10.1186/1471-2288-6-17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guittet L, Ravaud P, Giraudeau B: Planning a cluster randomized trial with unequal cluster sizes: practical issues involving continuous outcomes. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006, 6: 17-10.1186/1471-2288-6-17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference DeLong ER, Coombs LP, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED: The evaluation of treatment when center-specific selection criteria vary with respect to patient risk. Biometrics. 2005, 61: 942-949. 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00358.x.CrossRefPubMed DeLong ER, Coombs LP, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED: The evaluation of treatment when center-specific selection criteria vary with respect to patient risk. Biometrics. 2005, 61: 942-949. 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00358.x.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Kahn R, Ninomiya J, Griffith JL: Profiling care provided by different groups of physicians: effects of patient case-mix (bias) and physician-level clustering on quality assessment results. Ann Intern Med. 2002, 136: 111-121.CrossRefPubMed Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Kahn R, Ninomiya J, Griffith JL: Profiling care provided by different groups of physicians: effects of patient case-mix (bias) and physician-level clustering on quality assessment results. Ann Intern Med. 2002, 136: 111-121.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Diehr P, Martin DC, Koepsell T, Cheadle A: Breaking the matches in a paired t-test for community interventions when the number of pairs is small. Stat Med. 1995, 14: 1491-1504. 10.1002/sim.4780141309.CrossRefPubMed Diehr P, Martin DC, Koepsell T, Cheadle A: Breaking the matches in a paired t-test for community interventions when the number of pairs is small. Stat Med. 1995, 14: 1491-1504. 10.1002/sim.4780141309.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Giraudeau B, Ravaud P, Donner A: Sample size calculation for cluster randomized cross-over trials. Stat Med. 2008, 27: 5578-5585. 10.1002/sim.3383.CrossRefPubMed Giraudeau B, Ravaud P, Donner A: Sample size calculation for cluster randomized cross-over trials. Stat Med. 2008, 27: 5578-5585. 10.1002/sim.3383.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chuang JH, Hripcsak G, Heitjan DF: Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments: implications for medical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002, 9: 230-238. 10.1197/jamia.M0997.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chuang JH, Hripcsak G, Heitjan DF: Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments: implications for medical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002, 9: 230-238. 10.1197/jamia.M0997.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Lee KJ, Thompson SG: The use of random effects models to allow for clustering in individually randomized trials. Clin Trials. 2005, 2: 163-173. 10.1191/1740774505cn082oa.CrossRefPubMed Lee KJ, Thompson SG: The use of random effects models to allow for clustering in individually randomized trials. Clin Trials. 2005, 2: 163-173. 10.1191/1740774505cn082oa.CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
go back to reference Campbell MK, Grimshaw JM, Elbourne DR: Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004, 4: 9-10.1186/1471-2288-4-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Campbell MK, Grimshaw JM, Elbourne DR: Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004, 4: 9-10.1186/1471-2288-4-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Design effect in multicenter studies: gain or loss of power?
Authors
Emilie Vierron
Bruno Giraudeau
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-39

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2009 Go to the issue