Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Debate

Using reflexivity to enhance in-depth interviewing skills for the clinician researcher

Authors: Ruth McNair, Angela Taft, Kelsey Hegarty

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Primary health care clinicians are being encouraged to undertake qualitative research, however the in-depth interviewing skills required are not as straightforward as might be first supposed. While there are benefits and certain skills that clinicians can bring to interview-based research, there are important new skills to develop. To date there has been neither discussion about these new skills, nor any preparatory guidelines for clinicians entering into interview-based research in the qualitative research literature. In the absence of formal guidelines, we suggest the use of reflexivity throughout the interview process as a means to become more accomplished in this area. We present our own experiences as a novice general practitioner (GP) researcher undertaking a PhD study and her experienced supervisors. The PhD study used critical phenomenology through in-depth interviews to understand the experience of the patient-doctor relationship between same-sex attracted women and their usual GP in Australia.

Results

We used reflexivity to improve the rigour of the data collection. This enabled improved probing, fewer assumptions, avoidance of premature interpretation, and an accentuated sense of curiosity during interviews. We also enlisted reciprocity between interviewer and interviewee as a tool to improve engagement and trust, share interview control, and ultimately improve the depth of the interview content.

Conclusion

Preparatory recommendations for novice clinician research interviewers include the importance of recognising the multiple identities that they bring to the interview. In this setting in particular this involves acknowledging the clinician interviewer as a potential insider in relation to interviewees and negotiating shared understanding to avoid insider assumptions. Other essential requirements are having an experienced research supervisor, arranging pilot interviews that include active feedback on interviewing style from interviewees, and being reflexive during interviews. More formal guidelines for in-depth interviewing skills development are needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Britten N, Jones R, Murphy E, Stacy R: Qualitative Research Methods in General-Practice and Primary-Care. Family Practice. 1995, 12 (1): 104-14. 10.1093/fampra/12.1.104.CrossRefPubMed Britten N, Jones R, Murphy E, Stacy R: Qualitative Research Methods in General-Practice and Primary-Care. Family Practice. 1995, 12 (1): 104-14. 10.1093/fampra/12.1.104.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Malterud K: The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet. 2001, 358: 397-400. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05548-9.CrossRefPubMed Malterud K: The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet. 2001, 358: 397-400. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05548-9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Reed J, Procter S: Practitioner research in context. Practitioner research in health care. Edited by: Reed J, Procter S. 1995, London: Chapman and Hall, 3-31.CrossRef Reed J, Procter S: Practitioner research in context. Practitioner research in health care. Edited by: Reed J, Procter S. 1995, London: Chapman and Hall, 3-31.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference McEvoy P: Interviewing colleagues: Addressing the issues of perspective, inquiry and representation. Nurse Researcher. 2001, 9 (2): 49-59.CrossRefPubMed McEvoy P: Interviewing colleagues: Addressing the issues of perspective, inquiry and representation. Nurse Researcher. 2001, 9 (2): 49-59.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Taylor R: How to read a paper – Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). British Medical Journal. 1997, 315 (7110): 740-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greenhalgh T, Taylor R: How to read a paper – Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). British Medical Journal. 1997, 315 (7110): 740-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Richards H, Emslie C: The 'doctor' or the 'girl from the University'? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing. Family Practice. 2000, 17 (1): 71-5. 10.1093/fampra/17.1.71.CrossRefPubMed Richards H, Emslie C: The 'doctor' or the 'girl from the University'? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing. Family Practice. 2000, 17 (1): 71-5. 10.1093/fampra/17.1.71.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Minichiello V, Aroni R, Timewell E, Alexander L: In-depth interviewing: principles, techniques, analysis. 1995, Melbourne: Longman, 2 Minichiello V, Aroni R, Timewell E, Alexander L: In-depth interviewing: principles, techniques, analysis. 1995, Melbourne: Longman, 2
8.
go back to reference Miller WL, Crabtree BF: Clinical research. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Edited by: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. 2003, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 397-434. Miller WL, Crabtree BF: Clinical research. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Edited by: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. 2003, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 397-434.
9.
go back to reference Dickson-Swift V, James EL, Kippen S, Liamputtong P: Blurring Boundaries in Qualitative Health Research on Sensitive Topics. Qualitative Health Research. 2006, 16: 853-71. 10.1177/1049732306287526.CrossRefPubMed Dickson-Swift V, James EL, Kippen S, Liamputtong P: Blurring Boundaries in Qualitative Health Research on Sensitive Topics. Qualitative Health Research. 2006, 16: 853-71. 10.1177/1049732306287526.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chew-Graham CA, May CR, Perry MS: Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals. Family Practice. 2002, 19 (3): 285-9. 10.1093/fampra/19.3.285.CrossRefPubMed Chew-Graham CA, May CR, Perry MS: Qualitative research and the problem of judgement: lessons from interviewing fellow professionals. Family Practice. 2002, 19 (3): 285-9. 10.1093/fampra/19.3.285.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Stewart M: Patient-centered medicine: transforming the clinical method. 1995, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Stewart M: Patient-centered medicine: transforming the clinical method. 1995, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
12.
go back to reference Alvesson M: Postmodernism and social research. 2002, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Alvesson M: Postmodernism and social research. 2002, Philadelphia, PA: Open University
13.
go back to reference Alvesson M, Sköldberg K: Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research. 2000, London: Sage Alvesson M, Sköldberg K: Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research. 2000, London: Sage
14.
go back to reference Reinharz S, Davidman L: Feminist methods in social research. 1992, New York: Oxford University Press Reinharz S, Davidman L: Feminist methods in social research. 1992, New York: Oxford University Press
15.
go back to reference Hoddinott P, Pill R: Qualitative research interviewing by general practitioners. A personal view of the opportunities and pitfalls. Family Practice. 1997, 14 (4): 307-12. 10.1093/fampra/14.4.307.CrossRefPubMed Hoddinott P, Pill R: Qualitative research interviewing by general practitioners. A personal view of the opportunities and pitfalls. Family Practice. 1997, 14 (4): 307-12. 10.1093/fampra/14.4.307.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Fontana A, Frey J: The interview. From structured questions to negotiated text. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Edited by: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. 2003, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 61-106. Fontana A, Frey J: The interview. From structured questions to negotiated text. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Edited by: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. 2003, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 61-106.
17.
go back to reference Arber A: Reflexivity: A challenge for the researcher as practitioner?. Journal of Research in Nursing. 2006, 11 (2): 147-57. 10.1177/1744987106056956.CrossRef Arber A: Reflexivity: A challenge for the researcher as practitioner?. Journal of Research in Nursing. 2006, 11 (2): 147-57. 10.1177/1744987106056956.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Using reflexivity to enhance in-depth interviewing skills for the clinician researcher
Authors
Ruth McNair
Angela Taft
Kelsey Hegarty
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-73

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2008 Go to the issue