Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Sample size re-assessment leading to a raised sample size does not inflate type I error rate under mild conditions

Author: Per Broberg

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

One major concern with adaptive designs, such as the sample size adjustable designs, has been the fear of inflating the type I error rate. In (Stat Med 23:1023-1038, 2004) it is however proven that when observations follow a normal distribution and the interim result show promise, meaning that the conditional power exceeds 50%, type I error rate is protected. This bound and the distributional assumptions may seem to impose undesirable restrictions on the use of these designs. In (Stat Med 30:3267-3284, 2011) the possibility of going below 50% is explored and a region that permits an increased sample size without inflation is defined in terms of the conditional power at the interim.

Methods

A criterion which is implicit in (Stat Med 30:3267-3284, 2011) is derived by elementary methods and expressed in terms of the test statistic at the interim to simplify practical use. Mathematical and computational details concerning this criterion are exhibited.

Results

Under very general conditions the type I error rate is preserved under sample size adjustable schemes that permit a raise. The main result states that for normally distributed observations raising the sample size when the result looks promising, where the definition of promising depends on the amount of knowledge gathered so far, guarantees the protection of the type I error rate. Also, in the many situations where the test statistic approximately follows a normal law, the deviation from the main result remains negligible. This article provides details regarding the Weibull and binomial distributions and indicates how one may approach these distributions within the current setting.

Conclusions

There is thus reason to consider such designs more often, since they offer a means of adjusting an important design feature at little or no cost in terms of error rate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chang M: Adaptive Design Theory and Implementation Using SAS and R. 2007, Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman and Hall/CRC Chang M: Adaptive Design Theory and Implementation Using SAS and R. 2007, Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman and Hall/CRC
2.
go back to reference Bretz F, Schmidli H, Konig F, Racine A, Maurer W: Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: general concepts. Biom J. 2006, 48 (4): 623-634. 10.1002/bimj.200510232.CrossRefPubMed Bretz F, Schmidli H, Konig F, Racine A, Maurer W: Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim: general concepts. Biom J. 2006, 48 (4): 623-634. 10.1002/bimj.200510232.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference PhRMA: Working group on adaptive designs. Full white paper. Drug Inf J. 2006, 40: 421-484. PhRMA: Working group on adaptive designs. Full white paper. Drug Inf J. 2006, 40: 421-484.
10.
go back to reference Whitehead J: The Design and Analysis of Sequential Clinical Trials. 1992, Chichester, West Sussex: Ellis Horwood, second edition Whitehead J: The Design and Analysis of Sequential Clinical Trials. 1992, Chichester, West Sussex: Ellis Horwood, second edition
11.
go back to reference R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2010,, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, [http://www.R-project.org] [ISBN 3-900051-07-0], R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2010,, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, [http://​www.​R-project.​org] [ISBN 3-900051-07-0],
Metadata
Title
Sample size re-assessment leading to a raised sample size does not inflate type I error rate under mild conditions
Author
Per Broberg
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-94

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2013 Go to the issue