Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research article

Using e-mail recruitment and an online questionnaire to establish effect size: A worked example

Authors: Helen M Kirkby, Sue Wilson, Melanie Calvert, Heather Draper

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Sample size calculations require effect size estimations. Sometimes, effect size estimations and standard deviation may not be readily available, particularly if efficacy is unknown because the intervention is new or developing, or the trial targets a new population. In such cases, one way to estimate the effect size is to gather expert opinion. This paper reports the use of a simple strategy to gather expert opinion to estimate a suitable effect size to use in a sample size calculation.

Methods

Researchers involved in the design and analysis of clinical trials were identified at the University of Birmingham and via the MRC Hubs for Trials Methodology Research. An email invited them to participate.
An online questionnaire was developed using the free online tool 'Survey Monkey©'. The questionnaire described an intervention, an electronic participant information sheet (e-PIS), which may increase recruitment rates to a trial. Respondents were asked how much they would need to see recruitment rates increased by, based on 90%. 70%, 50% and 30% baseline rates, (in a hypothetical study) before they would consider using an e-PIS in their research.
Analyses comprised simple descriptive statistics.

Results

The invitation to participate was sent to 122 people; 7 responded to say they were not involved in trial design and could not complete the questionnaire, 64 attempted it, 26 failed to complete it. Thirty-eight people completed the questionnaire and were included in the analysis (response rate 33%; 38/115). Of those who completed the questionnaire 44.7% (17/38) were at the academic grade of research fellow 26.3% (10/38) senior research fellow, and 28.9% (11/38) professor. Dependent upon the baseline recruitment rates presented in the questionnaire, participants wanted recruitment rate to increase from 6.9% to 28.9% before they would consider using the intervention.

Conclusions

This paper has shown that in situations where effect size estimations cannot be collected from previous research, opinions from researchers and trialists can be quickly and easily collected by conducting a simple study using email recruitment and an online questionnaire. The results collected from the survey were successfully used in sample size calculations for a PhD research study protocol.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Eng J: Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied?. Radiology. 2003, 227: 309-313. 10.1148/radiol.2272012051.CrossRefPubMed Eng J: Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied?. Radiology. 2003, 227: 309-313. 10.1148/radiol.2272012051.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Torgerson DJ, Miles JN: Simple sample size calculation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2007, 13: 952-953. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00776.x.CrossRefPubMed Torgerson DJ, Miles JN: Simple sample size calculation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2007, 13: 952-953. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00776.x.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Scales DC, Rubenfeld GD: Estimating sample size in critical care clinical trials. [Review] [38 refs]. Journal of Critical Care. 2005, 20: 6-11. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.02.002.CrossRefPubMed Scales DC, Rubenfeld GD: Estimating sample size in critical care clinical trials. [Review] [38 refs]. Journal of Critical Care. 2005, 20: 6-11. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.02.002.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kiesler S, Sproull L: Response Effects in the Electronic Survey. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 1986, 50: 402-413. 10.1086/268992.CrossRef Kiesler S, Sproull L: Response Effects in the Electronic Survey. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 1986, 50: 402-413. 10.1086/268992.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sproull L: Using Electronic Mail for Data Collection in Organizational Research. The Academy of Management Journal. 1986, 29: 159-169.CrossRef Sproull L: Using Electronic Mail for Data Collection in Organizational Research. The Academy of Management Journal. 1986, 29: 159-169.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Watt J: Internet Systems for Evaluation Research. New Directions for Evaluation. 1999, 84: 23-34.CrossRef Watt J: Internet Systems for Evaluation Research. New Directions for Evaluation. 1999, 84: 23-34.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kongsved S, Basnov M, Holm-Christensen K, Hjollund N: Response Rate and Completeness of Questionnaires: A Randomized Study of Internet Versus Paper-and-Pencil Versions. J Med Internet Res. 2007, 9: e25-10.2196/jmir.9.3.e25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kongsved S, Basnov M, Holm-Christensen K, Hjollund N: Response Rate and Completeness of Questionnaires: A Randomized Study of Internet Versus Paper-and-Pencil Versions. J Med Internet Res. 2007, 9: e25-10.2196/jmir.9.3.e25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Cook C, Heath F, Thompson R: A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web or Internet-Based Surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2000, 60: 821-10.1177/00131640021970934.CrossRef Cook C, Heath F, Thompson R: A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web or Internet-Based Surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2000, 60: 821-10.1177/00131640021970934.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yun G, Trumbo C: Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-Mail, and Web Form. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2000, 6: 0-CrossRef Yun G, Trumbo C: Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-Mail, and Web Form. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2000, 6: 0-CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Using e-mail recruitment and an online questionnaire to establish effect size: A worked example
Authors
Helen M Kirkby
Sue Wilson
Melanie Calvert
Heather Draper
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-89

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2011 Go to the issue