Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Study protocol

Study protocol: the empirical investigation of methods to correct for measurement error in biobanks with dietary assessment

Authors: Derrick A Bennett, Julian Little, Lindsey F Masson, Cosetta Minelli

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Public Population Project in Genomics (P3G) is an organisation that aims to promote collaboration between researchers in the field of population-based genomics. The main objectives of P3G are to encourage collaboration between researchers and biobankers, optimize study design, promote the harmonization of information use in biobanks, and facilitate transfer of knowledge between interested parties. The importance of calibration and harmonisation of methods for environmental exposure assessment to allow pooling of data across studies in the evaluation of gene-environment interactions has been recognised by P3G, which has set up a methodological group on calibration with the aim of; 1) reviewing the published methodological literature on measurement error correction methods with assumptions and methods of implementation; 2) reviewing the evidence available from published nutritional epidemiological studies that have used a calibration approach; 3) disseminating information in the form of a comparison chart on approaches to perform calibration studies and how to obtain correction factors in order to support research groups collaborating within the P3G network that are unfamiliar with the methods employed; 4) with application to the field of nutritional epidemiology, including gene-diet interactions, ultimately developing a inventory of the typical correction factors for various nutrients.

Methods/Design

Systematic review of (a) the methodological literature on methods to correct for measurement error in epidemiological studies; and (b) studies that have been designed primarily to investigate the association between diet and disease and have also corrected for measurement error in dietary intake.

Discussion

The conduct of a systematic review of the methodological literature on calibration will facilitate the evaluation of methods to correct for measurement error and the design of calibration studies for the prospective pooling of biobanks. This could increase the efficiency of the design of such studies, improve statistical power, reduce bias, and aid in the assessment of gene-environment interaction effects in complex diseases. The systematic review of calibration of dietary intake information could inform gene-diet interaction investigations involving the pooling of results from studies with nutritional data collected in different ways.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Palmer LJ: UK Biobank: bank on it. Lancet. 2007, 369 (9578): 1980-2. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60924-6.CrossRefPubMed Palmer LJ: UK Biobank: bank on it. Lancet. 2007, 369 (9578): 1980-2. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60924-6.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chen Z, Lee L, Chen J, Collins R, Wu F, Guo Y, Linksted P, Peto R: Cohort profile: the Kadoorie Study of Chronic Disease in China (KSCDC). Int J Epidemiol. 2005, 34 (6): 1243-9. 10.1093/ije/dyi174.CrossRefPubMed Chen Z, Lee L, Chen J, Collins R, Wu F, Guo Y, Linksted P, Peto R: Cohort profile: the Kadoorie Study of Chronic Disease in China (KSCDC). Int J Epidemiol. 2005, 34 (6): 1243-9. 10.1093/ije/dyi174.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: Voume II - the design and analysis of cohort studies. 1987, Lyon: International Agency on Cancer Research Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: Voume II - the design and analysis of cohort studies. 1987, Lyon: International Agency on Cancer Research
4.
go back to reference Burton PR, Hansell AL, Fortier I, Manolio TA, Khoury MJ, Little J, Elliot P: Size matters: just how big is BIG?: Quantifying realistic sample size requirements for human genome epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2009, 38 (1): 263-73.CrossRefPubMed Burton PR, Hansell AL, Fortier I, Manolio TA, Khoury MJ, Little J, Elliot P: Size matters: just how big is BIG?: Quantifying realistic sample size requirements for human genome epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2009, 38 (1): 263-73.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hein R, Beckmann L, Chang-Claude J: Sample size requirements for indirect association studies of gene-environment interactions (G × E). Genet Epidemiol. 2008, 32 (3): 235-45. 10.1002/gepi.20298.CrossRefPubMed Hein R, Beckmann L, Chang-Claude J: Sample size requirements for indirect association studies of gene-environment interactions (G × E). Genet Epidemiol. 2008, 32 (3): 235-45. 10.1002/gepi.20298.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Clayton DG, Gill C: Covariate measurement errors in nutritional epidemiology: effects and remedies. 1997, New York: Oxford University Press, 87-105. 2 Clayton DG, Gill C: Covariate measurement errors in nutritional epidemiology: effects and remedies. 1997, New York: Oxford University Press, 87-105. 2
7.
go back to reference Wong MY, Day NE, Luan JA, Wareham NJ: Estimation of magnitude in gene-environment interactions in the presence of measurement error. Stat Med. 2004, 23 (6): 987-98. 10.1002/sim.1662.CrossRefPubMed Wong MY, Day NE, Luan JA, Wareham NJ: Estimation of magnitude in gene-environment interactions in the presence of measurement error. Stat Med. 2004, 23 (6): 987-98. 10.1002/sim.1662.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bashir SA, Duffy SW: Correction of risk estimates for measurement error in epidemiology. Methods Inf Med. 1995, 34 (5): 503-10.PubMed Bashir SA, Duffy SW: Correction of risk estimates for measurement error in epidemiology. Methods Inf Med. 1995, 34 (5): 503-10.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Clayton D, McKeigue PM: Epidemiological methods for studying genes and environmental factors in complex diseases. Lancet. 2001, 358 (9290): 1356-60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06418-2.CrossRefPubMed Clayton D, McKeigue PM: Epidemiological methods for studying genes and environmental factors in complex diseases. Lancet. 2001, 358 (9290): 1356-60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06418-2.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Garcia-Closas M, Wacholder S, Caporaso N, Rothman N: Inference issues in cohort and case-control studies of genetic effects and gene-environment interactions. Human genome epidemiology: a scientific foundation for using genetic information to improve health and prevent disease. 2004, New York: Oxford University Press, 127-44. Garcia-Closas M, Wacholder S, Caporaso N, Rothman N: Inference issues in cohort and case-control studies of genetic effects and gene-environment interactions. Human genome epidemiology: a scientific foundation for using genetic information to improve health and prevent disease. 2004, New York: Oxford University Press, 127-44.
11.
go back to reference Cheng KF, Lin WJ: The effects of misclassification in studies of gene-environment interactions. Hum Hered. 2009, 67 (2): 77-87. 10.1159/000179556.CrossRefPubMed Cheng KF, Lin WJ: The effects of misclassification in studies of gene-environment interactions. Hum Hered. 2009, 67 (2): 77-87. 10.1159/000179556.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Emberson JR, Whincup PH, Morris RW, Walker M, Lowe GD, Rumley A: Extent of regression dilution for established and novel coronary risk factors: results from the British Regional Heart Study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2004, 11 (2): 125-34. 10.1097/01.hjr.0000114967.39211.e5.CrossRefPubMed Emberson JR, Whincup PH, Morris RW, Walker M, Lowe GD, Rumley A: Extent of regression dilution for established and novel coronary risk factors: results from the British Regional Heart Study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2004, 11 (2): 125-34. 10.1097/01.hjr.0000114967.39211.e5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Whitlock G, Clark T, Vander Hoorn S, Rodgers A, Jackson R, Norton R, MacMahon S: Random errors in the measurement of 10 cardiovascular risk factors. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001, 17 (10): 907-9. 10.1023/A:1016228410194.CrossRefPubMed Whitlock G, Clark T, Vander Hoorn S, Rodgers A, Jackson R, Norton R, MacMahon S: Random errors in the measurement of 10 cardiovascular risk factors. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001, 17 (10): 907-9. 10.1023/A:1016228410194.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bashir SA, Duffy SW, Qizilbash N: Repeat measurement of case-control data: corrections for measurement error in a study of ischaemic stroke and haemostatic factors. Int J Epidemiol. 1997, 26 (1): 64-70. 10.1093/ije/26.1.64.CrossRefPubMed Bashir SA, Duffy SW, Qizilbash N: Repeat measurement of case-control data: corrections for measurement error in a study of ischaemic stroke and haemostatic factors. Int J Epidemiol. 1997, 26 (1): 64-70. 10.1093/ije/26.1.64.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kohlmeier L, Bellach B: Exposure assessment error and its handling in nutritional epidemiology. Annu Rev Public Health. 1995, 16: 43-59. 10.1146/annurev.pu.16.050195.000355.CrossRefPubMed Kohlmeier L, Bellach B: Exposure assessment error and its handling in nutritional epidemiology. Annu Rev Public Health. 1995, 16: 43-59. 10.1146/annurev.pu.16.050195.000355.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Margetts BM, Thompson RL, Key T, Duffy S, Nelson M, Bingham S, Wiseman M: Development of a scoring system to judge the scientific quality of information from case-control and cohort studies of nutrition and disease. Nutr Cancer. 1995, 24 (3): 231-9. 10.1080/01635589509514412.CrossRefPubMed Margetts BM, Thompson RL, Key T, Duffy S, Nelson M, Bingham S, Wiseman M: Development of a scoring system to judge the scientific quality of information from case-control and cohort studies of nutrition and disease. Nutr Cancer. 1995, 24 (3): 231-9. 10.1080/01635589509514412.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Friedenreich CM, Brant RF, Riboli E: Influence of methodologic factors in a pooled analysis of 13 case-control studies of colorectal cancer and dietary fiber. Epidemiology. 1994, 5 (1): 66-79. 10.1097/00001648-199401000-00011.CrossRefPubMed Friedenreich CM, Brant RF, Riboli E: Influence of methodologic factors in a pooled analysis of 13 case-control studies of colorectal cancer and dietary fiber. Epidemiology. 1994, 5 (1): 66-79. 10.1097/00001648-199401000-00011.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nelson M, Margetts BM, Black AE: Checklist for the methods section of dietary investigations. Metabolism. 1993, 42 (2): 258-9. 10.1016/0026-0495(93)90044-O.CrossRefPubMed Nelson M, Margetts BM, Black AE: Checklist for the methods section of dietary investigations. Metabolism. 1993, 42 (2): 258-9. 10.1016/0026-0495(93)90044-O.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference IARC Working Group: Fruit and Vegetables. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. 2003, Lyon, France: World Health Organisation (International Agency on Research in Cancer), 8: IARC Working Group: Fruit and Vegetables. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. 2003, Lyon, France: World Health Organisation (International Agency on Research in Cancer), 8:
Metadata
Title
Study protocol: the empirical investigation of methods to correct for measurement error in biobanks with dietary assessment
Authors
Derrick A Bennett
Julian Little
Lindsey F Masson
Cosetta Minelli
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-135

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2011 Go to the issue