Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research article

The Box-Cox power transformation on nursing sensitive indicators: Does it matter if structural effects are omitted during the estimation of the transformation parameter?

Authors: Qingjiang Hou, Jonathan D Mahnken, Byron J Gajewski, Nancy Dunton

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Many nursing and health related research studies have continuous outcome measures that are inherently non-normal in distribution. The Box-Cox transformation provides a powerful tool for developing a parsimonious model for data representation and interpretation when the distribution of the dependent variable, or outcome measure, of interest deviates from the normal distribution. The objectives of this study was to contrast the effect of obtaining the Box-Cox power transformation parameter and subsequent analysis of variance with or without a priori knowledge of predictor variables under the classic linear or linear mixed model settings.

Methods

Simulation data from a 3 × 4 factorial treatments design, along with the Patient Falls and Patient Injury Falls from the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI®) for the 3rd quarter of 2007 from a convenience sample of over one thousand US hospitals were analyzed. The effect of the nonlinear monotonic transformation was contrasted in two ways: a) estimating the transformation parameter along with factors with potential structural effects, and b) estimating the transformation parameter first and then conducting analysis of variance for the structural effect.

Results

Linear model ANOVA with Monte Carlo simulation and mixed models with correlated error terms with NDNQI examples showed no substantial differences on statistical tests for structural effects if the factors with structural effects were omitted during the estimation of the transformation parameter.

Conclusions

The Box-Cox power transformation can still be an effective tool for validating statistical inferences with large observational, cross-sectional, and hierarchical or repeated measure studies under the linear or the mixed model settings without prior knowledge of all the factors with potential structural effects.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bonneterre V, Liaudy S, Chatellier G, Lang T, de Gaudemaris R: Reliability, validity, and health issues arising from questionnaires used to measure psychosocial and organizational work factors (POWFs) among hospital nurses: A critical review. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 2008, 16 (3): 207-230. 10.1891/1061-3749.16.3.207.CrossRefPubMed Bonneterre V, Liaudy S, Chatellier G, Lang T, de Gaudemaris R: Reliability, validity, and health issues arising from questionnaires used to measure psychosocial and organizational work factors (POWFs) among hospital nurses: A critical review. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 2008, 16 (3): 207-230. 10.1891/1061-3749.16.3.207.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Strickland OL: Impact of Unreliability of Measurements on Statistical Conclusion Validity. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 2005, 13 (2): 83-85. 10.1891/jnum.2005.13.2.83.CrossRefPubMed Strickland OL: Impact of Unreliability of Measurements on Statistical Conclusion Validity. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 2005, 13 (2): 83-85. 10.1891/jnum.2005.13.2.83.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Box GEP, Cox DR: An analysis of transformations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society. 1964, B 26: 211-252. Box GEP, Cox DR: An analysis of transformations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society. 1964, B 26: 211-252.
4.
go back to reference Ferketich S, Verran J: An overview of data transformation. Research in Nursing & Health. 1994, 17 (5): 393-396. 10.1002/nur.4770170510.CrossRef Ferketich S, Verran J: An overview of data transformation. Research in Nursing & Health. 1994, 17 (5): 393-396. 10.1002/nur.4770170510.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Leydesdorff L, Bensman S: Classification and powerlaws: the logarithmic transformation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. 2006, 57 (11): 1470-1486. 10.1002/asi.20467.CrossRef Leydesdorff L, Bensman S: Classification and powerlaws: the logarithmic transformation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. 2006, 57 (11): 1470-1486. 10.1002/asi.20467.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jaeger T: Categorical data analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory & Language [serial online]. 2008, 59 (4): 434-446.CrossRef Jaeger T: Categorical data analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory & Language [serial online]. 2008, 59 (4): 434-446.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gurka MJ, Edward LJ, Muller KE, Kupper LL: Extending the Box-Cox transformation to the linear mixed model. J R Statist Soc A. 2006, 169 (Part 2): 273-288.CrossRef Gurka MJ, Edward LJ, Muller KE, Kupper LL: Extending the Box-Cox transformation to the linear mixed model. J R Statist Soc A. 2006, 169 (Part 2): 273-288.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lee JC, Lin TI, Lee KJ, Hus YL: Bayesian analysis of Box-Cox transformed linear mixed models with ARMA(p,q) dependence. J Statist Plan Infer. 2005, 133: 435-451. 10.1016/j.jspi.2004.03.015.CrossRef Lee JC, Lin TI, Lee KJ, Hus YL: Bayesian analysis of Box-Cox transformed linear mixed models with ARMA(p,q) dependence. J Statist Plan Infer. 2005, 133: 435-451. 10.1016/j.jspi.2004.03.015.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Spitzer JJ: A Monte Carlo investigation of the Box-Cox transformation in small samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1978, 73: 488-495. 10.2307/2286587. Spitzer JJ: A Monte Carlo investigation of the Box-Cox transformation in small samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1978, 73: 488-495. 10.2307/2286587.
10.
go back to reference Searle SR: Linear Models. 1971, John Wiley & Sons, Inc Searle SR: Linear Models. 1971, John Wiley & Sons, Inc
11.
go back to reference Draper NR, Smith H: Applied Regression Analysis. 1998, Wiley Series in Probability and StatisticsCrossRef Draper NR, Smith H: Applied Regression Analysis. 1998, Wiley Series in Probability and StatisticsCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Johnson RA, Wichern DW: Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 1998, Printice-Hall, Inc Johnson RA, Wichern DW: Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 1998, Printice-Hall, Inc
13.
go back to reference Turkey JW: The comparative anatomy of transformations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1957, 28: 602-632. 10.1214/aoms/1177706875.CrossRef Turkey JW: The comparative anatomy of transformations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1957, 28: 602-632. 10.1214/aoms/1177706875.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lindsey JK: The roles of transformation to normality. Biometrics. 1975, 31: 247-249. 10.2307/2529728.CrossRef Lindsey JK: The roles of transformation to normality. Biometrics. 1975, 31: 247-249. 10.2307/2529728.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sakia RM: The Box-Cox transformation technique: a review. The Statistician. 1992, 41: 167-178.CrossRef Sakia RM: The Box-Cox transformation technique: a review. The Statistician. 1992, 41: 167-178.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Carroll RJ, Ruppert D: On prediction and the power transformation family. Biometrika. 1981, 68 (3): 609-615. 10.1093/biomet/68.3.609.CrossRef Carroll RJ, Ruppert D: On prediction and the power transformation family. Biometrika. 1981, 68 (3): 609-615. 10.1093/biomet/68.3.609.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bickel PJ, Doksum KA: An analysis of transformation revisited. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1981, 76: 296-311. 10.2307/2287831.CrossRef Bickel PJ, Doksum KA: An analysis of transformation revisited. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1981, 76: 296-311. 10.2307/2287831.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Oberg A, Davidian M: Estimating data transformations in nonlinear mixed effects models. Biometrics. 2000, 56: 65-72. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00065.x.CrossRefPubMed Oberg A, Davidian M: Estimating data transformations in nonlinear mixed effects models. Biometrics. 2000, 56: 65-72. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00065.x.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Etzel CJ, Shete S, Beasley TM, Fernandez JR, Alliosn DB, Amos CI: Effect of Box-Cox transformation on power of Haseman-Elson and maximum-likelihood variance components tests to detect quantitative trait loci. Human Heredity. 2003, 55 (2-3): 108-116. 10.1159/000072315.CrossRefPubMed Etzel CJ, Shete S, Beasley TM, Fernandez JR, Alliosn DB, Amos CI: Effect of Box-Cox transformation on power of Haseman-Elson and maximum-likelihood variance components tests to detect quantitative trait loci. Human Heredity. 2003, 55 (2-3): 108-116. 10.1159/000072315.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Helene HT, Zwinderman AH: Comparing transformation methods for DNA microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004, 5: 77-10.1186/1471-2105-5-77.CrossRef Helene HT, Zwinderman AH: Comparing transformation methods for DNA microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2004, 5: 77-10.1186/1471-2105-5-77.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference O'Malley AJ, Zou KH: Bayesian multivariate hierarchical transformation models for ROC analysis. Statistics in Medicine. 2005, 25 (3): 459-479.CrossRef O'Malley AJ, Zou KH: Bayesian multivariate hierarchical transformation models for ROC analysis. Statistics in Medicine. 2005, 25 (3): 459-479.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fitzmaurice GM, Lipsitz SR, Parzen M: Approximate median regression via the Box-Cox transformation. The American Statistician. 2007, 61 (3): 223-238.CrossRef Fitzmaurice GM, Lipsitz SR, Parzen M: Approximate median regression via the Box-Cox transformation. The American Statistician. 2007, 61 (3): 223-238.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Carroll RJ, Ruppert D: The analysis of transformed data: comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1984, 79: 312-313. 10.2307/2288266. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D: The analysis of transformed data: comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1984, 79: 312-313. 10.2307/2288266.
24.
go back to reference Dunton N, Gajewski BJ, Kluas S, Pierson B: The relationship of nursing workforce characteristics to patient outcomes. Online Journal of Nursing Issues. 2007 Dunton N, Gajewski BJ, Kluas S, Pierson B: The relationship of nursing workforce characteristics to patient outcomes. Online Journal of Nursing Issues. 2007
25.
go back to reference Lake TL, Shang J, Klaus S, Dunton N: Patient falls: association with hospital Magnet status and nursing unit staffing. Research in Nursing & Health. 2010, 33: 413-425. 10.1002/nur.20399.CrossRef Lake TL, Shang J, Klaus S, Dunton N: Patient falls: association with hospital Magnet status and nursing unit staffing. Research in Nursing & Health. 2010, 33: 413-425. 10.1002/nur.20399.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Draper NR, Cox DR: On distributions and their transformation to normality. Journal of Royal Statistical Society. 1969, B 31: 472-476. Draper NR, Cox DR: On distributions and their transformation to normality. Journal of Royal Statistical Society. 1969, B 31: 472-476.
28.
go back to reference Ramon CL, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD: SAS® System for Mixed Models. 1996, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc Ramon CL, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD: SAS® System for Mixed Models. 1996, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc
29.
go back to reference Gajewski BJ, Mahnken JD, Dunton N: Improving quality indicator report cards through Bayesian modeling. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2008, 8: 77-10.1186/1471-2288-8-77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gajewski BJ, Mahnken JD, Dunton N: Improving quality indicator report cards through Bayesian modeling. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2008, 8: 77-10.1186/1471-2288-8-77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Di CZ, Bandeen-Roche K: Multilevel latent class models with Dirichlet mixing distribution. Biometrics. 2010, 67 (1): 86-96.CrossRef Di CZ, Bandeen-Roche K: Multilevel latent class models with Dirichlet mixing distribution. Biometrics. 2010, 67 (1): 86-96.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Box-Cox power transformation on nursing sensitive indicators: Does it matter if structural effects are omitted during the estimation of the transformation parameter?
Authors
Qingjiang Hou
Jonathan D Mahnken
Byron J Gajewski
Nancy Dunton
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-118

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2011 Go to the issue