Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2004

Open Access 01-12-2004 | Case report

Local anesthetic resistance in a pregnant patient with lumbosacral plexopathy

Authors: Renae Kavlock, Paul H Ting

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We report a case of a patient with apparent resistance to local anesthetics. While similar cases of failure of regional anesthetics are often attributed to technical failure, the overall clinical presentation and history of this patient suggests a true resistance to local anesthetics.

Case Presentation

This patient presented for elective cesarean section and the decision for regional anesthesia was made. While attempting to place an epidural, the patient failed to achieve adequate skin analgesia despite multiple attempts at local infiltration. When a spinal was ultimately placed, sensory or motor blockade was not obtained despite no evidence of technical problems with technique. Further questioning revealed multiple prior episodes of local anesthetic failure in this patient.

Conclusions

While the failure rate of spinal anesthesia has been shown range from 4–13% and is often attributed to technical failure, elements of this particular case suggest a true resistance to local anesthetics.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Munhall RS, Sukhani R, Winnie AP: Incidence and etiology of failed spinal anesthetics in a university hospital. Anesth Analg. 1988, 67: 843-8.CrossRefPubMed Munhall RS, Sukhani R, Winnie AP: Incidence and etiology of failed spinal anesthetics in a university hospital. Anesth Analg. 1988, 67: 843-8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Levy JH, Ioles JA, Ghia JN, Turnbull C: A retrospective study of the incidence and causes of failed spinal anesthetics in a university hospital. Anesth Analg. 1985, 64: 705-710.PubMed Levy JH, Ioles JA, Ghia JN, Turnbull C: A retrospective study of the incidence and causes of failed spinal anesthetics in a university hospital. Anesth Analg. 1985, 64: 705-710.PubMed
3.
go back to reference von Basedow KA: Uber neuralgia pueperarum cruralis. Wochenschrift fur die gesammte heiljunde. 1938, 6: 636-639. von Basedow KA: Uber neuralgia pueperarum cruralis. Wochenschrift fur die gesammte heiljunde. 1938, 6: 636-639.
4.
go back to reference Beatty TE: Paralysis after delivery. Irish J Med Science. 1938, 12: 304-306. Beatty TE: Paralysis after delivery. Irish J Med Science. 1938, 12: 304-306.
5.
go back to reference Weiskopf RB: Unexplained failure of a continuous spinal anesthetic. Anesthesiology. 1970, 33: 114-116.CrossRefPubMed Weiskopf RB: Unexplained failure of a continuous spinal anesthetic. Anesthesiology. 1970, 33: 114-116.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bevacqua BK, Cleary WF: Relative resistance to intrathecal local anesthetics. Anesth Analg. 1994, 78: 1024-1026.CrossRefPubMed Bevacqua BK, Cleary WF: Relative resistance to intrathecal local anesthetics. Anesth Analg. 1994, 78: 1024-1026.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Drasner K, Rigler ML: Repeat injection after "failed spinal": at times a potentially unsafe practice [letter]. Anesthesiology. 1991, 75: 713-714.CrossRefPubMed Drasner K, Rigler ML: Repeat injection after "failed spinal": at times a potentially unsafe practice [letter]. Anesthesiology. 1991, 75: 713-714.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ragsdale DS, McPhee JC, Scheuer T, Catterall WA: Molecular determinants of state-dependent block of Na+ channels by local anesthetics. Science. 1994, 265 (5179): 1724-1728.CrossRefPubMed Ragsdale DS, McPhee JC, Scheuer T, Catterall WA: Molecular determinants of state-dependent block of Na+ channels by local anesthetics. Science. 1994, 265 (5179): 1724-1728.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Local anesthetic resistance in a pregnant patient with lumbosacral plexopathy
Authors
Renae Kavlock
Paul H Ting
Publication date
01-12-2004
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2004
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-4-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2004

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2004 Go to the issue