Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Invited speaker presentation

Hemicrania continua and unilateral headaches: are they still together in the IHS classification?

Authors: Fabio Antonaci, Ottar Sjaastad, Torbjorn A Fredriksen

Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain | Special Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Excerpt

Sjaastad & Spierings described “Hemicrania continua” (HC) in 1984[1]. In 2001, succinct criteria were presented[2]: permanent hemicrania, pain intensity: mild-moderate, (but occasionally - severe) and indomethacin dosage < 150 mg daily. In addition, relative shortage of “local” autonomic phenomena, relative lack of “migraine symptoms” and of “cervicogenic” features. Such patients generally had tried legion drugs, with little effect. Such trials equal the usage of placebo. These guidelines seemed to function close to optimally. Then, criteria of the International Headache Society (IHS) (ICHD-III beta classification) came along. Surprisingly, they were transferred from a recent review article by Goadsby[3], almost word by word, despite the existence of a committee of intelligent and knowledgeable colleagues. There is an abundance of failures in the actual scheme. It is unacceptable to include as mandatory criteria, facial/forehead autonomic features. In this way, e.g. sweating becomes prominent - 33%, against a subjective feeling of sweating in only 6% of our series (ratio: 5.5). Objectively, by quantitative evaporimetry, there was no facial asymmetry in all our 8 cases. There were 12 autonomic phenomena in this category[3], with a mean ratio between Goadsby's/our figures of 4.4. When made mandatory, autonomic features will create bogus cases. Bogus cases necessitate ultra-high indomethacin dosages; such dosages have an unspecific, analgesic effect, on various headaches. Our mean indomethacin continuation dosage was: 83 mg (range: 50-150), while in Goadsby's series it was 176 mg (25-500). HC is the unilateral headache with the least “local” autonomic features, “migrainous” and “vascular” components. It is a rather “pure” headache. The present classification brings HC nearer to other unilateral headaches with local autonomic symptoms, a misunderstood policy. CPH is exceptional with clinical similarities; the absolute indomethacin effect suggests a shared, core pathogenesis. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sjaastad O, Spierings EL: Hemicrania continua. Another headache absolutely responsive to indomethacin. Cephalalgia. 1984, 4: 65-70. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1984.0401065.x.CrossRefPubMed Sjaastad O, Spierings EL: Hemicrania continua. Another headache absolutely responsive to indomethacin. Cephalalgia. 1984, 4: 65-70. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1984.0401065.x.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Pareja JA, Vincent M, Antonaci F, Sjaastad O: Hemicrania continua: diagnostic criteria and nosologic status. Cephalalgia. 2001, 21: 874-877. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2001.00276.x.CrossRefPubMed Pareja JA, Vincent M, Antonaci F, Sjaastad O: Hemicrania continua: diagnostic criteria and nosologic status. Cephalalgia. 2001, 21: 874-877. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2001.00276.x.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cittadini E, Goadsby P: Hemicrania continua: A clinical study of 39 patients with diagnostic implications. Brain. 2010, 133: 1073-1986.CrossRef Cittadini E, Goadsby P: Hemicrania continua: A clinical study of 39 patients with diagnostic implications. Brain. 2010, 133: 1073-1986.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hemicrania continua and unilateral headaches: are they still together in the IHS classification?
Authors
Fabio Antonaci
Ottar Sjaastad
Torbjorn A Fredriksen
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain / Issue Special Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1129-2369
Electronic ISSN: 1129-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-16-S1-A35

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2015

The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2015 Go to the issue