Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology Experimental 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Editorial

Trends in radiology and experimental research

Author: Francesco Sardanelli

Published in: European Radiology Experimental | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

European Radiology Experimental, the new journal launched by the European Society of Radiology, is placed in the context of three general and seven radiology-specific trends. After describing the impact of population aging, personalized/precision medicine, and information technology development, the article considers the following trends: the tension between subspecialties and the unity of the discipline; attention to patient safety; the challenge of reproducibility for quantitative imaging; standardized and structured reporting; search for higher levels of evidence in radiology (from diagnostic performance to patient outcome); the increasing relevance of interventional radiology; and continuous technological evolution. The new journal will publish not only studies on phantoms, cells, or animal models but also those describing development steps of imaging biomarkers or those exploring secondary end-points of large clinical trials. Moreover, consideration will be given to studies regarding: computer modelling and computer aided detection and diagnosis; contrast materials, tracers, and theranostics; advanced image analysis; optical, molecular, hybrid and fusion imaging; radiomics and radiogenomics; three-dimensional printing, information technology, image reconstruction and post-processing, big data analysis, teleradiology, clinical decision support systems; radiobiology; radioprotection; and physics in radiology. The journal aims to establish a forum for basic science, computer and information technology, radiology, and other medical subspecialties.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dunnick NR (2003) Report of the 2002 Intersociety Commission meeting: Radiology 2002—today’s research is tomorrow’s practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:925–928CrossRefPubMed Dunnick NR (2003) Report of the 2002 Intersociety Commission meeting: Radiology 2002—today’s research is tomorrow’s practice. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:925–928CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference United States National Research Council (2011) National Research Council of the National Academies white paper: toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. The National Academies Press, Washington United States National Research Council (2011) National Research Council of the National Academies white paper: toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. The National Academies Press, Washington
6.
go back to reference Thrall JH (2016) Trends and developments shaping the future of diagnostic medical imaging: 2015 Annual oration in diagnostic radiology. Radiology 279:660–666CrossRefPubMed Thrall JH (2016) Trends and developments shaping the future of diagnostic medical imaging: 2015 Annual oration in diagnostic radiology. Radiology 279:660–666CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (2015) Medical imaging in personalised medicine: a white paper of the research committee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging 6:141–155CrossRef European Society of Radiology (2015) Medical imaging in personalised medicine: a white paper of the research committee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging 6:141–155CrossRef
8.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (2013) ESR statement on the stepwise development of imaging biomarkers. Insights Imaging 4:147–152CrossRef European Society of Radiology (2013) ESR statement on the stepwise development of imaging biomarkers. Insights Imaging 4:147–152CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rutman AM, Kuo MD (2009) Radiogenomics: creating a link between molecular diagnostics and diagnostic imaging. Eur J Radiol 70:232–241CrossRefPubMed Rutman AM, Kuo MD (2009) Radiogenomics: creating a link between molecular diagnostics and diagnostic imaging. Eur J Radiol 70:232–241CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (2015) ESR Position Paper on Imaging Biobanks. Insights Imaging 6:403–410 European Society of Radiology (2015) ESR Position Paper on Imaging Biobanks. Insights Imaging 6:403–410
13.
go back to reference Sala E, Mema E, Himoto Y et al (2017) Unravelling tumour heterogeneity using next-generation imaging: radiomics, radiogenomics, and habitat imaging. Clin Radiol 72:3–10CrossRefPubMed Sala E, Mema E, Himoto Y et al (2017) Unravelling tumour heterogeneity using next-generation imaging: radiomics, radiogenomics, and habitat imaging. Clin Radiol 72:3–10CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Morgan TA, Avrin DE, Carr CD et al (2013) Meaningful use for radiology: current status and future directions. Radiology 269:318–321, Erratum in Radiology 2014;270:314CrossRefPubMed Morgan TA, Avrin DE, Carr CD et al (2013) Meaningful use for radiology: current status and future directions. Radiology 269:318–321, Erratum in Radiology 2014;270:314CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S et al (2013) Body size indices to determine iodine mass with contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography of the upper abdomen: does body surface area outperform total body weight or lean body weight? Eur Radiol 23:1855–1861CrossRefPubMed Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S et al (2013) Body size indices to determine iodine mass with contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography of the upper abdomen: does body surface area outperform total body weight or lean body weight? Eur Radiol 23:1855–1861CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Awai K, Kanematsu M, Kim T, Ichikawa T et al (2016) The optimal body size index with which to determine iodine dose for hepatic dynamic CT: A prospective multicenter study. Radiology 278:773–781CrossRefPubMed Awai K, Kanematsu M, Kim T, Ichikawa T et al (2016) The optimal body size index with which to determine iodine dose for hepatic dynamic CT: A prospective multicenter study. Radiology 278:773–781CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Zanardo M, Doniselli FM, Esseridou A, Tritella S, Di Leo G, Sardanelli F. (2017) Contrast dose variability depending on morphometric values: a retrospective analysis on patients undergoing multi-phase abdominal CT. Insight Imaging (Oral presentation at ECR 2017 -Number: 5015) Zanardo M, Doniselli FM, Esseridou A, Tritella S, Di Leo G, Sardanelli F. (2017) Contrast dose variability depending on morphometric values: a retrospective analysis on patients undergoing multi-phase abdominal CT. Insight Imaging (Oral presentation at ECR 2017 -Number: 5015)
18.
go back to reference Terreno E, Uggeri F, Aime S (2012) Image guided therapy: the advent of theranostic agents. J Control Release 161:328–337. Terreno E, Uggeri F, Aime S (2012) Image guided therapy: the advent of theranostic agents. J Control Release 161:328–337.
19.
go back to reference Bello J (2012) Turf issues in radiology and its subspecialties. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 22:411–419CrossRefPubMed Bello J (2012) Turf issues in radiology and its subspecialties. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 22:411–419CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kwan SW, Talenfeld AD, Brunner MC (2016) The top three health care developments impacting the practice of interventional radiology in the next decade. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:731–736.CrossRef Kwan SW, Talenfeld AD, Brunner MC (2016) The top three health care developments impacting the practice of interventional radiology in the next decade. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:731–736.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Makris GC, Uberoi R (2016) Interventional radiology- The future: Evolution or extinction? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 39:1789–1790 Makris GC, Uberoi R (2016) Interventional radiology- The future: Evolution or extinction? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 39:1789–1790
23.
go back to reference Flor N, Di Leo G, Squarza SA et al (2013) Malignant incidental extracardiac findings on cardiac CT: systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:555–564CrossRefPubMed Flor N, Di Leo G, Squarza SA et al (2013) Malignant incidental extracardiac findings on cardiac CT: systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:555–564CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Holscher HC (2016) Hybrid imaging: the Dutch approach. Presentation at the ESR Leadership Meeting. Barcelona, 17 Nov 2016 Holscher HC (2016) Hybrid imaging: the Dutch approach. Presentation at the ESR Leadership Meeting. Barcelona, 17 Nov 2016
26.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D et al (2010) Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 31:340–346CrossRefPubMed Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D et al (2010) Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 31:340–346CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Schuhbaeck A, Achenbach S, Layritz C et al (2013) Image quality of ultra-low radiation exposure coronary CT angiography with an effective dose <0.1 mSv using high-pitch spiral acquisition and raw data-based iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol 23:597–606CrossRefPubMed Schuhbaeck A, Achenbach S, Layritz C et al (2013) Image quality of ultra-low radiation exposure coronary CT angiography with an effective dose <0.1 mSv using high-pitch spiral acquisition and raw data-based iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol 23:597–606CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference den Harder AM, Willemink MJ, de Ruiter QM et al (2015) Achievable dose reduction using iterative reconstruction for chest computed tomography: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol 84:2307–2313CrossRef den Harder AM, Willemink MJ, de Ruiter QM et al (2015) Achievable dose reduction using iterative reconstruction for chest computed tomography: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol 84:2307–2313CrossRef
29.
go back to reference European Society of Radiology (2014) Renewal of radiological equipment. Insights Imaging 5:543–546CrossRef European Society of Radiology (2014) Renewal of radiological equipment. Insights Imaging 5:543–546CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Malayeri AA, Brooks KM, Bryant LH et al (2016) National Institutes of Health perspective on reports of Gadolinium deposition in the brain. J Am Coll Radiol 13:237–241CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Malayeri AA, Brooks KM, Bryant LH et al (2016) National Institutes of Health perspective on reports of Gadolinium deposition in the brain. J Am Coll Radiol 13:237–241CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: Images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577CrossRefPubMed Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H (2016) Radiomics: Images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology 278:563–577CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Delnevo A, Bandirali M, Di Leo G et al (2013) Differences among array, fast array, and high-definition scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry on a phantom. Clin Radiol 68:616–619CrossRefPubMed Delnevo A, Bandirali M, Di Leo G et al (2013) Differences among array, fast array, and high-definition scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry on a phantom. Clin Radiol 68:616–619CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Bandirali M, Sconfienza LM, Aliprandi A et al (2014) In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Radiol Med 119:257–260CrossRefPubMed Bandirali M, Sconfienza LM, Aliprandi A et al (2014) In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Radiol Med 119:257–260CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Bandirali M, Poloni A, Sconfienza LM et al (2015) Short-term precision assessment of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with different scan modes: an in vivo study. Eur Radiol 25:2194–2198CrossRefPubMed Bandirali M, Poloni A, Sconfienza LM et al (2015) Short-term precision assessment of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with different scan modes: an in vivo study. Eur Radiol 25:2194–2198CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Bandirali M, Di Leo G, Messina C et al (2015) Reproducibility of trabecular bone score with different scan modes using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a phantom study. Skeletal Radiol 44:573–576CrossRefPubMed Bandirali M, Di Leo G, Messina C et al (2015) Reproducibility of trabecular bone score with different scan modes using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a phantom study. Skeletal Radiol 44:573–576CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Messina C, Bandirali M, Sconfienza LM et al (2015) Prevalence and type of errors in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Eur Radiol 25:1504–1511CrossRefPubMed Messina C, Bandirali M, Sconfienza LM et al (2015) Prevalence and type of errors in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Eur Radiol 25:1504–1511CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207–214CrossRefPubMed Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207–214CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216 Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216
40.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Esseridou A, Del Sole A, Sconfienza LM (2012) Response to treatment: the role of imaging. In: Aglietta M, Regge D (eds) Imaging tumor response to therapy. Springer, Milan, pp 15–36CrossRef Sardanelli F, Esseridou A, Del Sole A, Sconfienza LM (2012) Response to treatment: the role of imaging. In: Aglietta M, Regge D (eds) Imaging tumor response to therapy. Springer, Milan, pp 15–36CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Martí Bonmatí L, Alberich-Bayarri A, García-Martí G et al (2012) Imaging biomarkers, quantitative imaging, and bioengineering. Radiologia 54:269–278CrossRefPubMed Martí Bonmatí L, Alberich-Bayarri A, García-Martí G et al (2012) Imaging biomarkers, quantitative imaging, and bioengineering. Radiologia 54:269–278CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference American College of Radiology (1993) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 1st edn. American College of Radiology, Reston American College of Radiology (1993) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 1st edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
46.
go back to reference Cheng SP, Lee JJ, Lin JL et al (2013) Characterization of thyroid nodules using the proposed thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS). Head Neck 35:541–547CrossRefPubMed Cheng SP, Lee JJ, Lin JL et al (2013) Characterization of thyroid nodules using the proposed thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS). Head Neck 35:541–547CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Manos D, Seely JM, Taylor J et al (2014) The Lung Reporting and Data System (LU-RADS): a proposal for computed tomography screening. Can Assoc Radiol J 65:121–134 Manos D, Seely JM, Taylor J et al (2014) The Lung Reporting and Data System (LU-RADS): a proposal for computed tomography screening. Can Assoc Radiol J 65:121–134
48.
go back to reference Pooler BD, Kim DH, Lam VP et al (2014) CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS): benchmark values from a clinical screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:1232–1237 Pooler BD, Kim DH, Lam VP et al (2014) CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS): benchmark values from a clinical screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:1232–1237
49.
go back to reference Mitchell DG, Bruix J, Sherman M et al (2015) LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System): Summary, discussion, consensus of the LI-RADS Management Working Group and future directions. Hepatology 61:1056–1065CrossRefPubMed Mitchell DG, Bruix J, Sherman M et al (2015) LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System): Summary, discussion, consensus of the LI-RADS Management Working Group and future directions. Hepatology 61:1056–1065CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Hunink MG, Gilbert FJ, Di Leo G, Krestin GP (2010) Evidence-based radiology: why and how? Eur Radiol 20:1–15CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Hunink MG, Gilbert FJ, Di Leo G, Krestin GP (2010) Evidence-based radiology: why and how? Eur Radiol 20:1–15CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Sarwar A, Boland G, Monks A, Kruskal JB (2015) Metrics for radiologists in the era of value-based health care delivery. Radiographics 35:866–876CrossRefPubMed Sarwar A, Boland G, Monks A, Kruskal JB (2015) Metrics for radiologists in the era of value-based health care delivery. Radiographics 35:866–876CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Bravin A, Coan P, Suortti P (2013) X-ray phase-contrast imaging: from pre-clinical applications towards clinics. Phys Med Biol 58:R1–35CrossRefPubMed Bravin A, Coan P, Suortti P (2013) X-ray phase-contrast imaging: from pre-clinical applications towards clinics. Phys Med Biol 58:R1–35CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Auweter SD, Herzen J, Willner M et al (2014) X-ray phase-contrast imaging of the breast—advances towards clinical implementation. Br J Radiol 87:20130606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Auweter SD, Herzen J, Willner M et al (2014) X-ray phase-contrast imaging of the breast—advances towards clinical implementation. Br J Radiol 87:20130606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
go back to reference Hetterich H, Willner M, Habbel C et al (2015) X-ray phase-contrast computed tomography of human coronary arteries. Invest Radiol 50:686–694CrossRefPubMed Hetterich H, Willner M, Habbel C et al (2015) X-ray phase-contrast computed tomography of human coronary arteries. Invest Radiol 50:686–694CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Dong B, Sun C, Zhang HF (2017) Optical Detection of Ultrasound in Photoacoustic Imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 64:4–15CrossRefPubMed Dong B, Sun C, Zhang HF (2017) Optical Detection of Ultrasound in Photoacoustic Imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 64:4–15CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Grosenick D, Rinneberg H, Cubeddu R, Taroni P (2016) Review of optical breast imaging and spectroscopy. J Biomed Opt 21:091311CrossRefPubMed Grosenick D, Rinneberg H, Cubeddu R, Taroni P (2016) Review of optical breast imaging and spectroscopy. J Biomed Opt 21:091311CrossRefPubMed
59.
go back to reference Nance JW Jr, Meenan C, Nagy PG (2013) The future of the radiology information system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:1064–1670CrossRefPubMed Nance JW Jr, Meenan C, Nagy PG (2013) The future of the radiology information system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:1064–1670CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Morgan TA, Avrin DE, Carr CD et al (2013) Meaningful use for radiology: current status and future directions. Radiology 269:318–321CrossRefPubMed Morgan TA, Avrin DE, Carr CD et al (2013) Meaningful use for radiology: current status and future directions. Radiology 269:318–321CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Kansagra AP, Yu JP, Chatterjee AR et al (2016) Big data and the future of radiology informatics. Acad Radiol 23:30–42CrossRefPubMed Kansagra AP, Yu JP, Chatterjee AR et al (2016) Big data and the future of radiology informatics. Acad Radiol 23:30–42CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Di Leo G (2009) Biostatistics for Radiologists. Springer, Milan, pp 144–148CrossRef Sardanelli F, Di Leo G (2009) Biostatistics for Radiologists. Springer, Milan, pp 144–148CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Bauchner H, Golub RM, Fontanarosa PB (2016) Data sharing: an ethical and scientific imperative. JAMA 315:1237–1239PubMed Bauchner H, Golub RM, Fontanarosa PB (2016) Data sharing: an ethical and scientific imperative. JAMA 315:1237–1239PubMed
Metadata
Title
Trends in radiology and experimental research
Author
Francesco Sardanelli
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
European Radiology Experimental / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2509-9280
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-017-0006-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

European Radiology Experimental 1/2017 Go to the issue