Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Naloxone | Case Study

Case report: Successful induction of buprenorphine/naloxone using a microdosing schedule and assertive outreach

Authors: Jennifer Rozylo, Keren Mitchell, Mohammadali Nikoo, S. Elise Durante, Skye P. Barbic, Daniel Lin, Steve Mathias, Pouya Azar

Published in: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The requirement for moderate withdrawal prior to initiation can be a barrier to buprenorphine/naloxone induction.

Case presentation

We aimed to use a microdosing regimen to initiate regular dosing of buprenorphine/naloxone in a high-risk patient with a history of failed initiations due, in part, to withdrawal symptoms. Using an assertive outreach model and a buprenorphine/naloxone microdosing schedule, we initiated treatment of an individual’s opioid use disorder. There was a successful buprenorphine/naloxone microdosing induction as the team reached a therapeutic dose of buprenorphine/naloxone. Including the induction period, the medication was used consistently for 4 weeks.

Conclusions

A microdosing schedule can be used to induce a patient onto buprenorphine/naloxone with no apparent withdrawal; gradually reducing illicit substance use. This case report builds on previous literature, highlighting ways to minimize barriers to induction of buprenorphine/naloxone, using a microdosing schedule and assertive outreach. Given the safety profile of buprenorphine and its potential to be a lifesaving intervention, a larger study of microdosing is indicated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference British Columbia Coroners Service. Illicit drug overdose deaths in BC January 1, 2008–January 31, 2018; 2018. British Columbia Coroners Service. Illicit drug overdose deaths in BC January 1, 2008–January 31, 2018; 2018.
2.
go back to reference Global Commission on Drug Policy. The opioid crisis in North America; 2017. Global Commission on Drug Policy. The opioid crisis in North America; 2017.
4.
go back to reference Special Advisory Committee on the Epidemic of Opioid Overdoses. National report: apparent opioid-related deaths in (released September 2018)—Canada.ca. Ottawa; 2018. Special Advisory Committee on the Epidemic of Opioid Overdoses. National report: apparent opioid-related deaths in (released September 2018)—Canada.ca. Ottawa; 2018.
7.
go back to reference Gowing L, Farrell MF, Bornemann R, Sullivan LE, Ali R. Oral substitution treatment of injecting opioid users for prevention of HIV infection. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2011;8:CD004145. Gowing L, Farrell MF, Bornemann R, Sullivan LE, Ali R. Oral substitution treatment of injecting opioid users for prevention of HIV infection. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2011;8:CD004145.
8.
go back to reference Nolan S, Hayashi K, Milloy MJ, Kerr T, Dong H, Lima VD, et al. The impact of low-threshold methadone maintenance treatment on mortality in a Canadian setting. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;156:57–61.CrossRef Nolan S, Hayashi K, Milloy MJ, Kerr T, Dong H, Lima VD, et al. The impact of low-threshold methadone maintenance treatment on mortality in a Canadian setting. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;156:57–61.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hser Y-I, Evans E, Huang D, Weiss R, Saxon A, Carroll KM, et al. Long-term outcomes after randomization to buprenorphine/naloxone versus methadone in a multi-site trial. Addiction. 2016;111(4):695–705.CrossRef Hser Y-I, Evans E, Huang D, Weiss R, Saxon A, Carroll KM, et al. Long-term outcomes after randomization to buprenorphine/naloxone versus methadone in a multi-site trial. Addiction. 2016;111(4):695–705.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Clausen T, Anchersen K, Waal H. Mortality prior to, during and after opioid maintenance treatment (OMT): a national prospective cross-registry study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;94(1–3):151–7.CrossRef Clausen T, Anchersen K, Waal H. Mortality prior to, during and after opioid maintenance treatment (OMT): a national prospective cross-registry study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;94(1–3):151–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference British Columbia Center on Substance Use. A guideline for the clinical management of opioid use disorder; 2017. British Columbia Center on Substance Use. A guideline for the clinical management of opioid use disorder; 2017.
12.
go back to reference Bruneau J, Ahamad K, Goyer MÈ, Poulin G, Selby P, Fischer B, et al. Management of opioid use disorders: a national clinical practice guideline. CMAJ. 2018;190:E247–57.CrossRef Bruneau J, Ahamad K, Goyer MÈ, Poulin G, Selby P, Fischer B, et al. Management of opioid use disorders: a national clinical practice guideline. CMAJ. 2018;190:E247–57.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Daniulaityte R, Carlson R, Brigham G, Cameron D, Sheth A. Sub is a weird drug: a web-based study of lay attitudes about use of buprenorphine to self-treat opioid withdrawal symptoms. Am J Addict. 2015;24:403–9.CrossRef Daniulaityte R, Carlson R, Brigham G, Cameron D, Sheth A. Sub is a weird drug: a web-based study of lay attitudes about use of buprenorphine to self-treat opioid withdrawal symptoms. Am J Addict. 2015;24:403–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Teruya C, Schwartz RP, Mitchell SG, Hasson AL, Thomas C, Buoncristiani SH, et al. Patient perspectives on buprenorphine/naloxone: A qualitative study of retention during the starting treatment with agonist replacement therapies (START) study. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014;46:412–26.CrossRef Teruya C, Schwartz RP, Mitchell SG, Hasson AL, Thomas C, Buoncristiani SH, et al. Patient perspectives on buprenorphine/naloxone: A qualitative study of retention during the starting treatment with agonist replacement therapies (START) study. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014;46:412–26.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Srivastava A, Kahan M, Leece P, McAndrew A. Buprenorphine unobserved “home” induction: a survey of Ontario’s addiction physicians. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2019;14:18.CrossRef Srivastava A, Kahan M, Leece P, McAndrew A. Buprenorphine unobserved “home” induction: a survey of Ontario’s addiction physicians. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2019;14:18.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hämmig R. Einleitung einer Substitutionsbehandlung mit Buprenorphin unter vorübergehender Überlappung mit Heroinkonsum: ein neuer Ansatz (“Berner Methode”) [Induction of a buprenorphine substitution treatment with temporary overlap of heroin use: a new approach (“Bernese Method”)]. Suchttherapie. 2010;11:129–32 (in German).CrossRef Hämmig R. Einleitung einer Substitutionsbehandlung mit Buprenorphin unter vorübergehender Überlappung mit Heroinkonsum: ein neuer Ansatz (“Berner Methode”) [Induction of a buprenorphine substitution treatment with temporary overlap of heroin use: a new approach (“Bernese Method”)]. Suchttherapie. 2010;11:129–32 (in German).CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hammig R, Kemter A, Strasser J, von Bardeleben U, Gugger B, Walter M, et al. Use of microdoses for induction of buprenorphine treatment with overlapping full opioid agonist use: the Bernese method. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2016;7:99–105.CrossRef Hammig R, Kemter A, Strasser J, von Bardeleben U, Gugger B, Walter M, et al. Use of microdoses for induction of buprenorphine treatment with overlapping full opioid agonist use: the Bernese method. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2016;7:99–105.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bond GR, Drake RE. The critical ingredients of assertive community treatment. World Psychiatry. 2015;14:240–2.CrossRef Bond GR, Drake RE. The critical ingredients of assertive community treatment. World Psychiatry. 2015;14:240–2.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jones AA, Jang K, Panenka WJ, Barr AM, MacEwan GW, Thornton AE, et al. Rapid change in fentanyl prevalence in a community-based high-risk sample. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(3):298–300.CrossRef Jones AA, Jang K, Panenka WJ, Barr AM, MacEwan GW, Thornton AE, et al. Rapid change in fentanyl prevalence in a community-based high-risk sample. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(3):298–300.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bell J, Trinh L, Butler B, Randall D, Rubin G. Comparing retention in treatment and mortality in people after initial entry to methadone and buprenorphine treatment. Addiction. 2009;104:1193–200.CrossRef Bell J, Trinh L, Butler B, Randall D, Rubin G. Comparing retention in treatment and mortality in people after initial entry to methadone and buprenorphine treatment. Addiction. 2009;104:1193–200.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Stein MD, Cloe P, Friedmann PD. Brief report: buprenorphine retention in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1038–41.CrossRef Stein MD, Cloe P, Friedmann PD. Brief report: buprenorphine retention in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1038–41.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Mattick RP, Ali R, White JM, O’Brien S, Wolk S, Danz C. Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance therapy: a randomized double-blind trial with 405 opioid-dependent patients. Addiction. 2003;98:441–52.CrossRef Mattick RP, Ali R, White JM, O’Brien S, Wolk S, Danz C. Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance therapy: a randomized double-blind trial with 405 opioid-dependent patients. Addiction. 2003;98:441–52.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Case report: Successful induction of buprenorphine/naloxone using a microdosing schedule and assertive outreach
Authors
Jennifer Rozylo
Keren Mitchell
Mohammadali Nikoo
S. Elise Durante
Skye P. Barbic
Daniel Lin
Steve Mathias
Pouya Azar
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1940-0640
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-020-0177-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 1/2020 Go to the issue