Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Protocol

Essential items for reporting of scaling studies of health interventions (SUCCEED): protocol for a systematic review and Delphi process

Authors: Amédé Gogovor, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Ali Ben Charif, Robert K. D. McLean, David Moher, Andrew Milat, Luke Wolfenden, Karina Prévost, Emmanuelle Aubin, Paula Rochon, Giraud Ekanmian, Jasmine Sawadogo, Nathalie Rheault, France Légaré

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The lack of a reporting guideline for scaling of evidence-based practices (EBPs) studies has prompted the registration of the Standards for reporting studies assessing the impact of scaling strategies of EBPs (SUCCEED) with EQUATOR Network. The development of SUCCEED will be guided by the following main steps recommended for developing health research reporting guidelines.

Methods

Executive Committee. We established a committee composed of members of the core research team and of an advisory group.
Systematic review. The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework on 29 November 2019 (https://​osf.​io/​vcwfx/​). We will include reporting guidelines or other reports that may include items relevant to studies assessing the impact of scaling strategies. We will search the following electronic databases: EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, from inception. In addition, we will systematically search websites of EQUATOR and other relevant organizations. Experts in the field of reporting guidelines will also be contacted. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. A narrative analysis will be conducted to compile a list of items for the Delphi exercise. Consensus process. We will invite panelists with expertise in: development of relevant reporting guidelines, methodologists, content experts, patient/member of the public, implementers, journal editors, and funders. We anticipated that three rounds of web-based Delphi consensus will be needed for an acceptable degree of agreement. We will use a 9-point scale (1 = extremely irrelevant to 9 = extremely relevant). Participants’ response will be categorized as irrelevant (1–3), equivocal (4–6) and relevant (7–9). For each item, the consensus is reached if at least 80% of the participants’ votes fall within the same category. The list of items from the final round will be discussed at face-to-face consensus meeting. Guideline validation. Participants will be authors of scaling studies. We will collect quantitative (questionnaire) and qualitative (semi-structured interview) data. Descriptive analyses will be conducted on quantitative data and constant comparative techniques on qualitative data.

Discussion

Essential items for reporting scaling studies will contribute to better reporting of scaling studies and facilitate the transparency and scaling of evidence-based health interventions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rabin BA, Brownson RC. Terminology for dissemination and implementation research. 2018. In: Dissemination and implementation research in health : translating science to practice [Internet]. Oxford ;: Oxford University Press. Second edition 2018. Rabin BA, Brownson RC. Terminology for dissemination and implementation research. 2018. In: Dissemination and implementation research in health : translating science to practice [Internet]. Oxford ;: Oxford University Press. Second edition 2018.
2.
go back to reference Ilott I, Gerrish K, Pownall S, Eltringham S, Booth A. Exploring scale-up, spread, and sustainability: an instrumental case study tracing an innovation to enhance dysphagia care. Implement Sci. 2013;8:128.CrossRef Ilott I, Gerrish K, Pownall S, Eltringham S, Booth A. Exploring scale-up, spread, and sustainability: an instrumental case study tracing an innovation to enhance dysphagia care. Implement Sci. 2013;8:128.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fajans P, Simmons R, Ghiron L. Helping public sector health systems innovate: the strategic approach to strengthening reproductive health policies and programs. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(3):435–40.CrossRef Fajans P, Simmons R, Ghiron L. Helping public sector health systems innovate: the strategic approach to strengthening reproductive health policies and programs. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(3):435–40.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference World Health Organization-ExpandNet. Nine steps for developing a scaling-up strategy. Geneva: WHO; 2010. World Health Organization-ExpandNet. Nine steps for developing a scaling-up strategy. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
6.
go back to reference Bégin M, Eggertson L, Macdonald N. A country of perpetual pilot projects. CMAJ. 2009;180(12):1185 E88-9.CrossRef Bégin M, Eggertson L, Macdonald N. A country of perpetual pilot projects. CMAJ. 2009;180(12):1185 E88-9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Martin D. Better now: six big ideas to improve health care for all Canadians. [Toronto, Ontario], Canada: Allen Lane; 2017. Martin D. Better now: six big ideas to improve health care for all Canadians. [Toronto, Ontario], Canada: Allen Lane; 2017.
8.
go back to reference Albury D, Beresford T, Dew S, Langford K, Horton T, Illingworth J. Against the odds : successfully scaling innovation in the NHS. UK: Innovation Unit/The Health Foundation; 2018. Albury D, Beresford T, Dew S, Langford K, Horton T, Illingworth J. Against the odds : successfully scaling innovation in the NHS. UK: Innovation Unit/The Health Foundation; 2018.
9.
go back to reference Zomahoun HTV, Ben Charif A, Freitas A, Garvelink MM, Menear M, Dugas M, et al. The pitfalls of scaling up evidence-based interventions in health. Global Health Action. Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1670449.CrossRef Zomahoun HTV, Ben Charif A, Freitas A, Garvelink MM, Menear M, Dugas M, et al. The pitfalls of scaling up evidence-based interventions in health. Global Health Action. Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1670449.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ben Charif A, Zomahoun HTV, LeBlanc A, Langlois L, Wolfenden L, Yoong SL, et al. Effective strategies for scaling up evidence-based practices in primary care: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):139.CrossRef Ben Charif A, Zomahoun HTV, LeBlanc A, Langlois L, Wolfenden L, Yoong SL, et al. Effective strategies for scaling up evidence-based practices in primary care: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):139.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. Bmj. 2014;348:g1687.CrossRef Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. Bmj. 2014;348:g1687.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference McLean R, Gargani J. Scaling impact: innovation for the public good: Routledge; 2019.CrossRef McLean R, Gargani J. Scaling impact: innovation for the public good: Routledge; 2019.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med. 2010;7(2):e1000217.CrossRef Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med. 2010;7(2):e1000217.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, Sampson M, Altman DG. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2007;4(3):e78.CrossRef Moher D, Tetzlaff J, Tricco AC, Sampson M, Altman DG. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2007;4(3):e78.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hoffmann TC, Oxman AD, Ioannidis JP, Moher D, Lasserson TJ, Tovey DI, et al. Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions. Bmj. 2017;358:j2998.CrossRef Hoffmann TC, Oxman AD, Ioannidis JP, Moher D, Lasserson TJ, Tovey DI, et al. Enhancing the usability of systematic reviews by improving the consideration and description of interventions. Bmj. 2017;358:j2998.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Moher D. Reporting research results: a moral obligation for all researchers. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:331–5.CrossRef Moher D. Reporting research results: a moral obligation for all researchers. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:331–5.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Altman DG, Simera I, Hoey J, Moher D, Schulz K. EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Open Medicine. 2008;2(2):e49–50.PubMedPubMedCentral Altman DG, Simera I, Hoey J, Moher D, Schulz K. EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Open Medicine. 2008;2(2):e49–50.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, Eldridge S, Grandes G, Griffiths CJ, et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ. 2017;356:i6795.CrossRef Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, Eldridge S, Grandes G, Griffiths CJ, et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ. 2017;356:i6795.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hales S, Lesher-Trevino A, Ford N, Maher D, Ramsay A, Tran N. Reporting guidelines for implementation and operational research. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(1):58–64.CrossRef Hales S, Lesher-Trevino A, Ford N, Maher D, Ramsay A, Tran N. Reporting guidelines for implementation and operational research. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(1):58–64.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Papoutsi C. Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement. Bmj. 2019;365:l2068.CrossRef Greenhalgh T, Papoutsi C. Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement. Bmj. 2019;365:l2068.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Milat AJ, Newson R, King L, Rissel C, Wolfenden L, Bauman A, et al. A guide to scaling up population health interventions. Public Health Res Pract. 2016;26(1):e2611604.CrossRef Milat AJ, Newson R, King L, Rissel C, Wolfenden L, Bauman A, et al. A guide to scaling up population health interventions. Public Health Res Pract. 2016;26(1):e2611604.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining knowledge translation. Cmaj. 2009;181(3-4):165–8.CrossRef Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining knowledge translation. Cmaj. 2009;181(3-4):165–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Sex-specific reporting of scientific research: a workshop summary. Washington (DC): National Academy of Sciences. National Academies Press (US); 2012. Institute of Medicine. Sex-specific reporting of scientific research: a workshop summary. Washington (DC): National Academy of Sciences. National Academies Press (US); 2012.
25.
go back to reference Tannenbaum C, Clow B, Haworth-Brockman M, Voss P. Sex and gender considerations in Canadian clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. CMAJ Open. 2017;5(1):E66–73.CrossRef Tannenbaum C, Clow B, Haworth-Brockman M, Voss P. Sex and gender considerations in Canadian clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. CMAJ Open. 2017;5(1):E66–73.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Greaves L. Why put gender and sex into health research? In: Designing and conducting gender, sex, and health research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 2012.CrossRef Greaves L. Why put gender and sex into health research? In: Designing and conducting gender, sex, and health research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 2012.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40–6.CrossRef McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40–6.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Cochrane Handbook “Checklist of items to consider in data collection” Higgins JPT, Green S: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.1.0.: The Cochrane collaboration; 2011. https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/. Accessed 17 Oct 2018. Cochrane Handbook “Checklist of items to consider in data collection” Higgins JPT, Green S: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.1.0.: The Cochrane collaboration; 2011. https://​handbook-5-1.​cochrane.​org/​. Accessed 17 Oct 2018.
31.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference de Meyrick J. The Delphi method and health research. Health Educ. 2003;103(1):7–16.CrossRef de Meyrick J. The Delphi method and health research. Health Educ. 2003;103(1):7–16.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MS, Burnand B. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 2001. Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MS, Burnand B. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 2001.
35.
go back to reference Junger S, Payne SA, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearley SG. Guidance on conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med. 2017;31(8):684–706.CrossRef Junger S, Payne SA, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearley SG. Guidance on conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med. 2017;31(8):684–706.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.CrossRef Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi rechnique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 2007. Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi rechnique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 2007.
38.
go back to reference Moher D. Protocol: reporting guidelines systematic review; 2009. Moher D. Protocol: reporting guidelines systematic review; 2009.
Metadata
Title
Essential items for reporting of scaling studies of health interventions (SUCCEED): protocol for a systematic review and Delphi process
Authors
Amédé Gogovor
Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun
Ali Ben Charif
Robert K. D. McLean
David Moher
Andrew Milat
Luke Wolfenden
Karina Prévost
Emmanuelle Aubin
Paula Rochon
Giraud Ekanmian
Jasmine Sawadogo
Nathalie Rheault
France Légaré
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1258-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Systematic Reviews 1/2020 Go to the issue