Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Systematic Reviews
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Protocol

Psychological interventions for the treatment of depression, anxiety, alcohol misuse or anger in armed forces veterans and their families: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Authors: Luke O’Shea, Ed Watkins, Paul Farrand

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Evidence highlights a high prevalence of common mental health disorders in armed forces veterans and their families, with depression, anxiety, alcohol misuse and anger being more common than PTSD. This paper presents a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify existing randomised controlled trial (RCT) research testing the effectiveness of psychological interventions for these difficulties in armed forces veterans and their family members.

Methods

Electronic databases (CENTRAL, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials, EMBASE and ASSIA) will be searched to identify suitable studies for inclusion in the review supplemented by forward and backward reference checking, grey literature searches and contact with subject authors. Research including armed forces veterans and their family members will be included in the review with research including serving personnel or individuals under the age of 18 being excluded. Few RCTs examining the treatment of depression, anxiety, alcohol misuse or anger exist in armed forces veterans to date. The primary outcome will be symptomatic change following intervention for these difficulties. The secondary outcomes will include methodological aspects of interest such as discharge type and recruitment setting if data permits. In the event that the number of studies identified is too low to undertake a meta-analysis, a narrative review will be conducted. Quality assessment will be undertaken using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool and Cochran’s Q statistic calculated to test for heterogeneity as suggested by the Cochrane handbook.

Discussion

The review will examine the findings of existing intervention research for depression, anxiety, alcohol misuse or anger in armed forces veterans and their families, along with any effect sizes that may exist.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42016036676
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
NICE. Common mental health problems: identification and pathways to care. NICE Guidelines. 2011. p. CG123.
2.
Hoge CW, Castro CA, Messer SC, McGurk D, Cotting DI, Koffman RL. Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:13–22.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Iversen A, Greenberg N. Mental health of regular and reserve military veterans. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2009;15(2):100–6.CrossRef
4.
Iversen AC, van Staden L, Hacker Hughes J, Greenberg N, Hotopf M, Rona RJ, et al. The stigma of mental health problems and other barriers to care in the UK armed forces. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Anger MS, Veterans M. Journal of student social work. Columbia Univ Acad Commons. 2006;4:7–16.
6.
Vogt D. Mental health-related beliefs as a barrier to service use for military personnel an veterans: a review. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(2):135–42.CrossRefPubMed
7.
King’s College for Military Health Research. A fifteen year report: what has been achieved by fifteen years of research into the health of UK Armed Forces? London: Kings College London, University of London; 2010.
8.
Buckman JEJ, Forbes HJ, Clayton T, Jones M, Jones N, Greenberg N, et al. Early service leavers: a study of the factors associated with premature separation from the UK Armed Forces and the mental health of those that leave early. Eur J Public Health. 2012. doi:10.​1093/​eurpub/​cks042.PubMed
9.
Dimiceli EE, Steinhardt MA, Smith SE. Stressful experiences, coping strategies, and predictors of health-related outcomes among wives of deployed military servicemen. Armed Forces Soc. 2010;36(2):351–73.CrossRef
10.
11.
Drummet AR, Coleman M, Cable S. Military families under stress: implications for family life education. Fam Relat. 2003;52(3):279–87.CrossRef
12.
Kitchiner NJ, Roberts NP, Wilcox D, Bisson JI. Systematic review and meta-analyses of psychosocial interventions for veterans in the military. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2012;3(1):19267.CrossRef
13.
Hundt NE, Barrera TL, Robinson A, Cully JA. A systematic review of cognitive behavioural therapy for depression in veterans. Mil Med. 2014;179(9):942–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.CrossRef
15.
16.
17.
Szymendera SD. Who is a “Veteran”?—basic eligibility for veterans’ benefits. (CRS Report R42324). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service; 2015.
18.
19.
British Psychological Society. A guide to psychosocial interventions in early stages of dementia. Division of Clinical Psychology. 2014.
20.
21.
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B, 7. A brief measure for assessing generalised anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. The alcohol use disorders identification test, guidelines for use in primary care, Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence, World Health Organization. 2nd ed. 2001.
23.
Novaco RW. The novaco anger scale and provocation inventory (NAS-PI) manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 2003.
24.
25.
26.
Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
27.
Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting psychologists press; 1983.
28.
Beck AT, Steer RA. Beck anxiety inventory manual. San Antonio: Psychological corporation; 1993.
29.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Novaco RW. Dimensions of anger reactions. Irvine: University of California; 1975.
31.
Spielberger CD. Manual for the state-trait anger inventory (STAXI). Odessa: Psychological assessment resources; 1988.
32.
Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline Follow-back: a technique for assessing self-reported ethanol consumption. In: Allen J, Litten RZ, editors. Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biological Methods. Totowa: Humana Press; 1992. p. 41–72.CrossRef
33.
Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef
34.
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s Tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​d5928.
35.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare. York: University of York; 2009.
36.
Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. 2014.
37.
38.
Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Rodgers M, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme. Lancaster University. 2006.
39.
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis.1st ed. West Sussex: Wiley; 2009.
40.
Metadata
Title
Psychological interventions for the treatment of depression, anxiety, alcohol misuse or anger in armed forces veterans and their families: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Authors
Luke O’Shea
Ed Watkins
Paul Farrand
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0513-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Systematic Reviews 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research

A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review

Protocol

Prevalence, predictors and adverse outcomes of adolescent pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol of a systematic review

Commentary

O’Connor et al. systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health: critical flaws may compromise conclusions

Research

Telephone consultations for general practice: a systematic review

Protocol

Psychosocial and career outcomes of peer mentorship in medical resident education: a systematic review protocol

Protocol

External validation of type 2 diabetes computer simulation models: definitions, approaches, implications and room for improvement—a protocol for a systematic review