Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Sclerotherapy | Study protocol

Treatment of haemorrhoids: rubber band ligation or sclerotherapy (THROS)? Study protocol for a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial

Authors: J. Y. van Oostendorp, T. C. Sluckin, I. J. M. Han-Geurts, S. van Dieren, R. Schouten, on behalf of the THROS trial research group

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2023

Abstract

Introduction

Haemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a common condition with significant epidemiologic and economic implications. While it is possible to treat symptomatic grade 1–2 haemorrhoids with rubber band ligation (RBL) or sclerotherapy (SCL), the effectiveness of these treatments compatible with current standards has not yet been investigated with a randomised controlled trial. The hypothesis is that SCL is not inferior to RBL in terms of symptom reduction (patient-related outcome measures (PROMs)), patient experience, complications or recurrence rate.

Methods and analysis

This protocol describes the methodology of a non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing rubber band ligation and sclerotherapy for symptomatic grade 1–2 haemorrhoids in adults (> 18 years). Patients are preferably randomised between the two treatment arms. However, patients with a strong preference for one of the treatments and refuse randomisation are eligible for the registration arm. Patients either receive 4 cc Aethoxysklerol 3% SCL or 3 × RBL. The primary outcome measures are symptom reduction by means of PROMs, recurrence and complication rates. Secondary outcome measures are patient experience, number of treatments and days of sick leave from work. Data are collected at 4 different time points.

Discussion

The THROS trial is the first large multicentre randomised trial to study the difference in effectivity between RBL and SCL for the treatment of grade 1–2 HD. It will provide information as to which treatment method (RBL or SCL) is the most effective, gives fewer complications and is experienced by the patient as the best option.

Ethics and dissemination

The study protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC (nr. 2020_053). The gathered data and results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and spread to coloproctological associations and guidelines.

Trial registration

Dutch Trial Register NL8377. Registered on 12–02-2020.

Available only for authorised users

Margetis N. Pathophysiology of internal hemorrhoids. Ann Gastroenterol. 2019;32(3):264–72. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2019.0355.

Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation. An epidemiologic study. Gastroenterol. 1990;98(2):380–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(90)90828-o.

Goligher JC. Current trends in the use of sphincter-saving excision in the treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. Cancer. 1982;50(11 Suppl):2627–30.PubMed

van Tol RR, Kleijnen J, Watson AJM, Jongen J, Altomare DF, Qvist N, et al. European Society of ColoProctology: guideline for haemorrhoidal disease. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22(6):650–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14975.

Madoff RD, Fleshman JW. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the diagnosis and treatment of hemorrhoids. Gastroenterol. 2004;126(5):1463–73. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.03.008.

Cocorullo G, Tutino R, Falco N, Licari L, Orlando G, Fontana T, et al. The non-surgical management for hemorrhoidal disease. A systematic review. G Chir. 2017;38(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.11138/gchir/2017.38.1.005.

Sun Z, Migaly J. Review of Hemorrhoid Disease: Presentation and Management. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;29(1):22–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1568144.

Song SG, Kim SH. Optimal treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(6):277–81. https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.6.277.

Akerud L. Sclerotherapy of haemorrhoids. A prospective randomised trial of polidocanol and phenol in oil. Coloproctology. 1995;17:73–86.

10.

van Tol RR, van Zwietering E, Kleijnen J, Melenhorst J, Stassen LPS, Dirksen CD, et al. Towards a core outcome set for hemorrhoidal disease-a systematic review of outcomes reported in literature. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(7):849–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3046-2.

11.

van Tol RR, Kimman ML, Melenhorst J, Stassen LPS, Dirksen CD, Breukink SO. European Society of Coloproctology Core Outcome Set for haemorrhoidal disease: an international Delphi study among healthcare professionals. Colorectal Dis. 2019;21(5):570–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14553.

12.

Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. Spirit 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200–7. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.

13.

Kuiper SZ, Kimman ML, Van Tol RR, Waardenburg SF, Van Kuijk SMJ, Dirksen CD, Breukink SO. Patient reported outcome measure-haemorrhoidal impact and satisfaction score (PROM-HISS): Development, reliability and construct validity. Colorectal Dis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16079. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35119715.

14.

Dekker L, Han-Geurts IJM, van Dieren S, et al. HollAND trial: comparison of rubber band ligation and haemorrhoidectomy in patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids grade III: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial and cost–utility analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e046836. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046836.CrossRefPubMedCentral

15.

Kuiper SZ, Dirksen CD, Kimman ML, Van Kuijk SMJ, Van Tol RR, Muris JWM, Watson AJM, Maessen JMC, Melenhorst J, Breukink SO, Napoleon Trial Study Group. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of rubber band ligation versus sutured mucopexy versus haemorrhoidectomy in patients with recurrent haemorrhoidal disease (Napoleon trial): Study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020;99:106177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2020.106177. Epub 2020 Oct 17. PMID: 33080380.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Dekker L, Han-Geurts IJM, Rørvik HD, van Dieren S, Bemelman WA. Rubber band ligation versus haemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of grade II-III haemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Tech Coloproctol. 2021;25(6):663–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02430-x. Epub 2021 Mar 8. PMID: 33683503; PMCID: PMC8124052.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Brown S, Tiernan J, Biggs K, Hind D, Shephard N, Bradburn M, Wailoo A, Alshreef A, Swaby L, Watson A, Radley S, Jones O, Skaife P, Agarwal A, Giordano P, Lamah M, Cartmell M, Davies J, Faiz O, Nugent K, Clarke A, MacDonald A, Conaghan P, Ziprin P, Makhija R. The HubBLe Trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for symptomatic second- and third-degree haemorrhoids: a multicentre randomised controlled trial and health-economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(88):1–150. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20880. PMID:27921992;PMCID:PMC5165280.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Tan VZZ, Peck EW, Sivarajah SS, Tan WJ, Ho LML, Ng JL, Chong C, Aw D, Mainza F, Foo FJ, Koh FH. Systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative pain and symptoms control following laser haemorrhoidoplasty versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic haemorrhoids: a new standard. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04225-4. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35906356.

19.

Lakmal K, Basnayake O, Jayarajah U, Samarasekera DN. Clinical outcomes and effectiveness of laser treatment for hemorrhoids: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2021;45(4):1222–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05923-2. Epub 2021 Jan 19 PMID: 33469736.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Treatment of haemorrhoids: rubber band ligation or sclerotherapy (THROS)? Study protocol for a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial
Authors: J. Y. van Oostendorp
T. C. Sluckin
I. J. M. Han-Geurts
S. van Dieren
R. Schouten
on behalf of the THROS trial research group
Publication date: 01-12-2023
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keywords: Sclerotherapy
Hemorrhoids
Published in: Trials / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07400-2

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Treatment of haemorrhoids: rubber band ligation or sclerotherapy (THROS)? Study protocol for a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Introduction

Methods and analysis

Discussion

Ethics and dissemination

Trial registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Methods and analysis

Discussion

Ethics and dissemination

Trial registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Safety of AFM11 in the treatment of patients with B-cell malignancies: findings from two phase 1 studies

A cluster randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of household alcohol-based hand rub for the prevention of sepsis, diarrhoea, and pneumonia in Ugandan infants (the BabyGel trial): a study protocol

A flexible dose-response modeling framework based on continuous toxicity outcomes in phase I cancer clinical trials

Comparing acute normovolumic hemodilution with autologous platelet-rich plasma for blood preservation during aortic surgery : study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial

Preconditioning of the motor network with repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rnTMS) to improve oncological and functional outcome in brain tumor surgery: a study protocol for a randomized, sham-controlled, triple-blind clinical trial

BEAT CF pulmonary exacerbations core protocol for evaluating the management of pulmonary exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis