Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Projection of participant recruitment to primary care research: a qualitative study

Authors: David White, Daniel Hind

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recruitment to clinical trials remains a challenge, particularly in primary care settings. Initial projections of participant recruitment need to be as accurate as possible in order to avoid the financial, clinical and ethical costs of trial extensions or failures. However, estimation of recruitment rates is challenging and often poorly executed, if attempted at all. We used qualitative methods to explore the experiences and views of researchers on the planning of recruitment in this setting.

Methods

Participants had registered accrual to a UK-based primary care research study between April 2009 and March 2012. We conducted nine interviews with chief investigators or study managers, using a semi-structured topic guide. Analysis was conducted using the framework approach.

Results

Three themes are presented: 1) the factors affecting recruitment rates, 2) the use of planning techniques, and 3) influences on poor estimation. 1) A large number of factors affecting recruitment rates were discussed, including those relating to the study protocol, the clinical setting and the research setting. Use of targeted mail-outs to invite apparently eligible individuals to participate was preferred in order to eliminate some of the uncertainty in the recruitment rate associated with opportunistic clinician referrals. 2) The importance of pilot work was stressed. We identified significant uncertainty as to how best to schedule trial timelines to maximise efficiency. 3) Several potential sources of bias involved in the estimation of recruitment rates were explored and framed as technological, psychological or political factors.

Conclusions

We found a large number of factors that interviewees felt impact recruitment rates to primary care research and highlighted the complexity of realistic estimation. Suitable early planning of the recruitment process is essential, and there may be potential to improve the projection of trial timelines by reducing biases involved in the process. Further research is needed to develop formal approaches that would be suitable for use in this setting.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Sully BGO, Julious SA, Nicholl J. A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2013;14:166.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
3.
Kahneman D, Tversky A. Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Stud Manag Sci. 1977;12:313–27.
4.
Gorringe JAL. Initial preparations for clinical trials. In: Harris EL, Fitzgerald JD, editors. In The Principals and Practice of Clinical Trials. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1970. p. 41–6.
5.
Lasagna L. The pharmaceutical revolution forty years later. Rev Farmacol Clin Exp. 1984;1:157–61.
6.
Bearman JE, Loewenson RB, Gullen WH. Muench’s Postulates, Laws, and Corollaries (Biometrics Note No. 4). Bethesda: Office of Biometry and Epidemiology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health; 1974.
7.
Colwell B, Mathers N, Ng CJJ, Bradley A. Improving recruitment to primary care trials: some lessons from the use of modern marketing techniques. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62:496–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Vanderwouden J, Blankenstein A, Huibers M, Vanderwindt D, Stalman W, Verhagen A. Survey among 78 studies showed that Lasagna’s law holds in Dutch primary care research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:819–24.CrossRef
9.
Bower P, Wilson S, Mathers N. Short report: How often do UK primary care trials face recruitment delays? Fam Pract. 2007;24:601–3.CrossRefPubMed
10.
De Maeseneer JM, Van Driel ML, Green LA, Van Weel C. The need for research in primary care. Lancet. 2003;362:1314–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Bower P, Wallace P, Ward E, Graffy J, Miller J, Delaney B, et al. Improving recruitment to health research in primary care. Fam Pract. 2009;26:391–7.
12.
Van der Windt DA, Koes BW, van Aarst M, Heemskerk MA, Bouter LM. Practical aspects of conducting a pragmatic randomised trial in primary care: patient recruitment and outcome assessment. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:371–4.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Prout H, Butler C, Kinnersley P, Robling M, Hood K, Tudor-Jones R. A qualitative evaluation of implementing a randomized controlled trial in general practice. Fam Pract. 2003;20:675–81.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Hunt CJ, Shepherd LM, Andrews G. Do doctors know best? Comments on a failed trial. Med J Aust. 2001;174:144–6.PubMed
15.
Fairhurst K, Dowrick C. Problems with recruitment in a randomized controlled trial of counselling in general practice: causes and implications. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996;1:77–80.PubMed
16.
Foy R, Parry J, Duggan A, Delaney B, Wilson S, Lewin-Van Den Broek NT. How evidence based are recruitment strategies to randomized controlled trials in primary care? Experience from seven studies. Fam Pract. 2003;20:83–92.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Snowdon C, Elbourne DR, Garcia J, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Francis D, et al. Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: evidence from a qualitative study. Trials. 2006;7:34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
19.
Flyvbjerg B. Curbing Optimism Bias and Strategic Misrepresentation in Planning: Reference Class Forecasting in Practice. Eur Plan Stud. 2008;16:3–21.
20.
Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47:263.CrossRef
21.
Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Anal Qual data. London: Routledge. 1994:173–94.
22.
Creswell JW, Hanson WE, Clark Plano VL, Morales A. Qualitative research designs: selection and implementation. Couns Psychol. 2007;35:236–64.CrossRef
23.
Van Manen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Ontario: University of Western Ontario; 1990.
24.
Cherryholmes CH. Notes on pragmatism and scientific realism. Educ Res. 1992;21:13–7.CrossRef
25.
Peirce CS. Review of Nichols’ A treatise on cosmology. In: Meaning and action. A critical history of pragmatism. Indianapolis: Hackett; 1984. p. 493–5.
26.
Dewey J. The development of American pragmatism. In: Thayer H, editor. Pragmatism class writings. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett; 1989. p. 23–40.
27.
Lovato LC, Hill K, Hertert S, Hunninghake DB, Probstfield JL. Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. Control Clin Trials. 1997;18:328–52.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Collins JF, Williford WO, Weiss DG, Bingham SF, Klett CJ. Planning patient recruitment: fantasy and reality. Stat Med. 1984;3:435–43.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Hunninghake DB, Darby CA, Probstfield JL. Recruitment experience in clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. Control Clin Trials. 1987;8(4 Suppl):6S–30S.CrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
Agras WS, Marshall GD, Kraemer HC. Planning recruitment. Circulation. 1982;66(6 Pt 2):IV54–V58.PubMed
32.
Agras WS, Bradford RH. Recruitment: an introduction. Circulation. 1982;66(6 Pt 2):IV2–5.PubMed
33.
Ederer F. Practical problems in collaborative clinical trials. Am J Epidemiol. 1975;102:111–8.PubMed
34.
Weintraub M. Selecting patients for a clinical trial part A: the outpatient. In: Buncher C, Tsay J, editors. Statistics in the pharmaceutical industry. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1993. p. 118–30.
35.
McDermind F, Peters K, Jackson D, Daly J. Conducting qualitative research in the context of pre-existing peer and collegial relationships. Nurse Res. 2013;21:28–33.CrossRef
36.
Galae A. Breaking the barriers of insider research in occupational health and safety. J Heal Saf Res Pract. 2009;1:3–12.
37.
O’Donnell D, Porter G, McGuire D, Garavan T, Heffernan M, Cleary P. Creating intellectual capital: a Habermasian community of practice (CoP) introduction. J Eur Ind Train. 2003;27:80–7.CrossRef
38.
Guest G. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18:59–82.CrossRef
39.
O’Reilly M, Parker N. ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2012;13:190–7.CrossRef
40.
Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles MP, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010;25:1229–45.CrossRefPubMed
41.
McConnell-Henry T, James A, Chapman Y, Francis K. Researching with people you know: issues in interviewing. Contemp Nurse. 2009;34:2–9.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Corden A, Sainsbury R. Verbatim quotations in applied social research: theory, practice and impact. Methods Briefing, 18, Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research, Manchester. 2006.
43.
Spencer L, Ritchie J, O’Connor W. Analysis: Practice, Principles and Processes. In Qual Res Pract A Guid Soc Sci Students Res. 2003. p. 199–218.
44.
Graffy J, Grant J, Boase S, Ward E, Wallace P, Miller J, et al. UK research staff perspectives on improving recruitment and retention to primary care research; nominal group exercise. Fam Pract. 2009;26:48–55.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Stuardi T, Cox H, Torgerson DJ. Database recruitment: a solution to poor recruitment in randomized trials? Fam Pract. 2011;28:329–33.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Fletcher K, Mant J, Holder R, Fitzmaurice D, Lip GYH, Hobbs FDR. An analysis of factors that predict patient consent to take part in a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract. 2007;24:388–94.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Hoddinott P, Britten J, Harrild K, Godden DJ. Recruitment issues when primary care population clusters are used in randomised controlled clinical trials: Climbing mountains or pushing boulders uphill? Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28:232–41.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Bell-Syer SE, Moffett JA. Recruiting patients to randomized trials in primary care: principles and case study. Fam Pract. 2000;17:187–91.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Pearl A, Wright S, Gamble G, Doughty R, Sharpe N. Randomised trials in general practice--a New Zealand experience in recruitment. N Z Med J. 2003;116:1186.
50.
Williamson MK, Pirkis J, Pfaff JJ, Tyson O, Sim M, Kerse N, et al. Recruiting and retaining GPs and patients in intervention studies: the DEPS-GP project as a case study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
De Wit NJ, Quartero AO, Zuithoff AP, Numans ME. Participation and successful patient recruitment in primary care. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:976.PubMed
52.
Ngune I, Jiwa M, Dadich A, Lotriet J, Sriram D. Effective recruitment strategies in primary care research: a systematic review. Qual Prim Care. 2012;115–123.
53.
Lasagna L. Problems in publication of clinical trial methodology. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979;25(5 Pt 2):751–3.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Simmons T. Attributing the Costs of Health and Social Care Research & Development (AcoRD). London: Department of Health; 2012.
55.
Lenney W, Perry S, Price D. Clinical trials and tribulations: the MASCOT study. Thorax. 2011;66:457–8.CrossRefPubMed
56.
57.
Kearney A, McKay A, Hickey H, Balabanova S, Marson AG, Gamble C, et al. Opening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delays. BMJ Open. 2014;4, e005874.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Snooks H, Hutchings H, Seagrove A, Stewart-Brown S, Williams J, Russell I. Bureaucracy stifles medical research in Britain: a tale of three trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
59.
Al-Shahi Salman R, Beller E, Kagan J, Hemminki E, Phillips RS, Savulescu J, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management. Lancet. 2014;383:176–85.CrossRefPubMed
60.
O’Dowd A. Target to start clinical trials within 70 days of approval will take time to achieve, admits minister. BMJ. 2013;346:f3649.CrossRefPubMed
61.
The Lancet. Untangling health research governance in the UK. Lancet. 2011;377:179.
62.
Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185:1124–31.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Kruger J. Lake Wobegon be gone! The ‘below-average effect’ and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77:221–32.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Spilker B, Cramer JA. A frame of reference for patient recruitment issues. In: Patient recruitment in clinical trials. New York: Raven; 1992. p. 3–23.
65.
Chalmers I. Health Research Authority’s great leap forward on UK trial registration. BMJ. 2013;347:f5776.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Wager E, Williams P. ‘Hardly worth the effort’? Medical journals’ policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study. BMJ. 2013;347:f5248.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
67.
Scherer RW, Sieving PC, Ervin A-M, Dickersin K. Can we depend on investigators to identify and register randomized controlled trials? PLoS One. 2012;7:e44183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
68.
69.
Cooper CL, Hind D, Duncan R, Walters S, Lartey A, Lee E, et al. A rapid review indicated higher recruitment rates in treatment trials than in prevention trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(3):347-54.
70.
Cooper C, Ketley D, Livingston G. Systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate potential recruitment to dementia intervention studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;29:515–25.
71.
Trivedi RB, Szarka JG, Beaver K, Brousseau K, Nevins E, Yancy WS, et al. Recruitment and retention rates in behavioral trials involving patients and a support person: a systematic review. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;36:307–318.
72.
Fabricatore AN, Wadden TA, Moore RH, Butryn ML, Gravallese EA, Erondu NE, et al. Attrition from randomized controlled trials of pharmacological weight loss agents: a systematic review and analysis. Obes Rev. 2009;10:333–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
73.
Villeneuve K, Potvin S, Lesage A, Nicole L. Meta-analysis of rates of drop-out from psychosocial treatment among persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Schizophr Res. 2010;121:266–70.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Projection of participant recruitment to primary care research: a qualitative study
Authors
David White
Daniel Hind
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1002-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Trials 1/2015 Go to the issue

Study protocol

Rumination-focused cognitive behaviour therapy vs. cognitive behaviour therapy for depression: study protocol for a randomised controlled superiority trial

Study protocol

The effectiveness of the biannual application of silver nitrate solution followed by sodium fluoride varnish in arresting early childhood caries in preschool children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Commentary

Core outcome sets and trial registries

Study protocol

A practice-based randomized controlled trial to improve medication adherence among Latinos with hypertension: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Review

Effect of non-surgical periodontal treatment on glycemic control of patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Research

A cluster randomised feasibility trial evaluating nutritional interventions in the treatment of malnutrition in care home adult residents