Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Letter

Physical activity screening to recruit inactive randomized controlled trial participants: how much is too much?

Authors: Corneel Vandelanotte, Robert Stanton, Amanda L. Rebar, Anetta K. Van Itallie, Cristina M. Caperchione, Mitch J. Duncan, Trevor N. Savage, Richard R. Rosenkranz, Gregory S. Kolt

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Screening physical activity levels is common in trials to increase physical activity in inactive populations. Commonly applied single-item screening tools might not always be effective in identifying those who are inactive. We applied the more extensive Active Australia Survey to identify inactive people among those who had initially been misclassified as too active using a single-item measure. Those enrolled after the Active Australia Survey screening had significantly higher physical activity levels at subsequent baseline assessment. Thus, more extensive screening measures might result in the inclusion of participants who would otherwise be excluded, possibly introducing unwanted bias.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12611000157​976.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Warburton DER, Nical CW, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;174:801–9.CrossRef Warburton DER, Nical CW, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;174:801–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sisson SB, Katzmarzyk PT. International prevalence of physical activity in youth and adults. Obesity Rev. 2008;9:606–14.CrossRef Sisson SB, Katzmarzyk PT. International prevalence of physical activity in youth and adults. Obesity Rev. 2008;9:606–14.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Waters LA, Winkler EA, Reeves MM, Fjeldsoe BS, Eakin EG. The impact of behavioural screening on intervention outcomes in a randomised controlled multiple behaviour intervention trial. IJBNPA. 2011;8:24.PubMedPubMedCentral Waters LA, Winkler EA, Reeves MM, Fjeldsoe BS, Eakin EG. The impact of behavioural screening on intervention outcomes in a randomised controlled multiple behaviour intervention trial. IJBNPA. 2011;8:24.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Prochaska JJ, Sallis JF, Long B. A physical activity screening measure for use with adolescents in primary care. Arch Ped Adolesc Med. 2001;155:554–9.CrossRef Prochaska JJ, Sallis JF, Long B. A physical activity screening measure for use with adolescents in primary care. Arch Ped Adolesc Med. 2001;155:554–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Snyder CD, Sloane R, Haines PS, Mille P, Clipp EC, Morey MC, et al. The Diet Quality Index-revised: a tool to promote and evaluate dietary change among older cancer survivors enrolled in a home-based intervention trial. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:1519–29.CrossRef Snyder CD, Sloane R, Haines PS, Mille P, Clipp EC, Morey MC, et al. The Diet Quality Index-revised: a tool to promote and evaluate dietary change among older cancer survivors enrolled in a home-based intervention trial. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:1519–29.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference van Stralen MM, Lecher L, Mudde AN, de Vries H, Bolman C. Determinants of awareness, initiation and maintenance of physical activity among the over fifties: a Delphi study. Health Edu Res. 2010;25:233–47.CrossRef van Stralen MM, Lecher L, Mudde AN, de Vries H, Bolman C. Determinants of awareness, initiation and maintenance of physical activity among the over fifties: a Delphi study. Health Edu Res. 2010;25:233–47.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Milton K, Bull FC, Bauman A. Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure. Brit J Sport Med. 2011;45:203–8.CrossRef Milton K, Bull FC, Bauman A. Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure. Brit J Sport Med. 2011;45:203–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jennings CA, Vandelanotte C, Caperchione CM, Mummer WK. Effectiveness of a web-based physical activity intervention for adults with Type 2 diabetes—a randomised controlled trial. Prev Med. 2014;60:33–40.CrossRefPubMed Jennings CA, Vandelanotte C, Caperchione CM, Mummer WK. Effectiveness of a web-based physical activity intervention for adults with Type 2 diabetes—a randomised controlled trial. Prev Med. 2014;60:33–40.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kolt GS, Rosenkranz RR, Savages TN, Maeder AJ, Vandelanotte C, Duncan MJ, et al. Walk 2.0—using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Pub Health. 2013;13:436.CrossRef Kolt GS, Rosenkranz RR, Savages TN, Maeder AJ, Vandelanotte C, Duncan MJ, et al. Walk 2.0—using Web 2.0 applications to promote health-related physical activity: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Pub Health. 2013;13:436.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Elley C, Kerse N, Arroll B, Robinson E. Effectiveness of counselling patients on physical activity in general practice: cluster randomised controlled trial. Brit Med J. 2003;362:793–8.CrossRef Elley C, Kerse N, Arroll B, Robinson E. Effectiveness of counselling patients on physical activity in general practice: cluster randomised controlled trial. Brit Med J. 2003;362:793–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rose SB, Elley CR, Lawton BA, Dowell AC. A single question reliably identifies physical inactive women in primary care. NZ Med J. 2008;121:40–6. Rose SB, Elley CR, Lawton BA, Dowell AC. A single question reliably identifies physical inactive women in primary care. NZ Med J. 2008;121:40–6.
12.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The Active Australia Survey; a guide and manual for implementation analysis and reporting. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2003. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The Active Australia Survey; a guide and manual for implementation analysis and reporting. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2003.
13.
go back to reference Brown W, Bauman A, Chey T, Trost S, Mummery K. Comparison of surveys used to measure physical activity. Aust NZ J Public Health. 2004;28:128–34.CrossRef Brown W, Bauman A, Chey T, Trost S, Mummery K. Comparison of surveys used to measure physical activity. Aust NZ J Public Health. 2004;28:128–34.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brenner PS, DeLamater JD. Social desirability bias in self-reports of physical activity: is an exercise identity the culprit? Soc Indic Res. 2014;117(2):489–504.CrossRef Brenner PS, DeLamater JD. Social desirability bias in self-reports of physical activity: is an exercise identity the culprit? Soc Indic Res. 2014;117(2):489–504.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Physical activity screening to recruit inactive randomized controlled trial participants: how much is too much?
Authors
Corneel Vandelanotte
Robert Stanton
Amanda L. Rebar
Anetta K. Van Itallie
Cristina M. Caperchione
Mitch J. Duncan
Trevor N. Savage
Richard R. Rosenkranz
Gregory S. Kolt
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0976-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Trials 1/2015 Go to the issue