Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Three donor site dressings in pediatric split-thickness skin grafts: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Craig A McBride, Roy M Kimble, Kellie Stockton

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

For children requiring split-thickness skin grafting for burn injury, the optimum donor site dressing is an ongoing subject of debate. The most common dressings in use, both regionally and worldwide, are calcium alginates. We will compare an alginate with two other dressings, all of which are in current use in the Pegg Leditschke Paediatric Burns Centre (PLPBC), to determine which dressing performs the best.

Methods/Design

This is a randomised, prospective single center parallel three-arm trial comparing three donor site wound (DSW) dressings: Algisite™ M, a calcium alginate dressing; Cuticerin™, a smooth acetate gauze impregnated with water-repellent ointment (petrolatum, paraffin and Eucerite®) and Sorbact®, a gauze mesh coated with a dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC) and amorphous hydrogel.
Primary outcomes are days to complete DSW healing, and pain. Previously validated measures will be used for all outcomes. Secondary outcomes are: itch; scar appearance at three, six and 12 months; ease of dressing application and removal and dressing costs and utility. Results will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Donor site thickness will be measured with a small biopsy from the center of the graft, to document the depth of the DSW across the groups.

Discussion

This study will provide comprehensive short- and long-term data on DSW dressings in pediatric split-thickness skin grafting. The best-performing dressing will become the preferred dressing for the PLPBC. We will provide rigorous data against which other dressings can be compared in future, recognising that alginates are the most common DSW dressing currently in use. Our study design replicates a real-world scenario in order to identify clinically significant differences between the three dressings.

Trial registration

This trial was prospectively registered on 8 April 2014 with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (identifier: ACTRN12614000380​695).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lars PKLP, Giretzlehner M, Trop M, Parvizi D, Spendel S, Schintler M, et al. The properties of the “ideal” donor site dressing: results of a worldwide online survey. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2013;26:136–41.PubMedPubMedCentral Lars PKLP, Giretzlehner M, Trop M, Parvizi D, Spendel S, Schintler M, et al. The properties of the “ideal” donor site dressing: results of a worldwide online survey. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2013;26:136–41.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Lyall PW, Sinclair SW. Australasian survey of split skin graft donor site dressings. Aust N Z J Surg. 2000;70:114–6.CrossRefPubMed Lyall PW, Sinclair SW. Australasian survey of split skin graft donor site dressings. Aust N Z J Surg. 2000;70:114–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Geary PM, Tiernan E. Management of split skin graft donor sites–results of a national survey. Clin Plast Surg. 2012;39:77–84.CrossRefPubMed Geary PM, Tiernan E. Management of split skin graft donor sites–results of a national survey. Clin Plast Surg. 2012;39:77–84.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Vermeulen H, Ubbink DT, de Zwart F, Goossens A, de Vos R. Preferences of patients, doctors, and nurses regarding wound dressing characteristics: a conjoint analysis. Wound Repair Regen. 2007;15:302–7.CrossRefPubMed Vermeulen H, Ubbink DT, de Zwart F, Goossens A, de Vos R. Preferences of patients, doctors, and nurses regarding wound dressing characteristics: a conjoint analysis. Wound Repair Regen. 2007;15:302–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Birchall MA, Varma S, Milward TM. The Moriarty sign: an appraisal. Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44:149–50.CrossRefPubMed Birchall MA, Varma S, Milward TM. The Moriarty sign: an appraisal. Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44:149–50.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Miller K, Rodger S, Kipping B, Kimble RM. A novel technology approach to pain management in children with burns: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Burns. 2011;37:395–405.CrossRefPubMed Miller K, Rodger S, Kipping B, Kimble RM. A novel technology approach to pain management in children with burns: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Burns. 2011;37:395–405.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Brown NJ, Kimble RM, Rodger S, Ware RS, Cuttle L. Play and heal: randomized controlled trial of Ditto™ intervention efficacy on improving re-epithelialization in pediatric burns. Burns. 2014;40:204–13.CrossRefPubMed Brown NJ, Kimble RM, Rodger S, Ware RS, Cuttle L. Play and heal: randomized controlled trial of Ditto™ intervention efficacy on improving re-epithelialization in pediatric burns. Burns. 2014;40:204–13.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Brown NJ, Kimble RM, Gramotnev G, Rodger S, Cuttle L. Predictors of re-epithelialization in pediatric burn. Burns. 2014;40:751–8.CrossRefPubMed Brown NJ, Kimble RM, Gramotnev G, Rodger S, Cuttle L. Predictors of re-epithelialization in pediatric burn. Burns. 2014;40:751–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kishikova L, Smith MD, Cubison TCS. Evidence based management for paediatric burn: new approaches and improved scar outcomes. Burns. 2014;40:1530–7.CrossRefPubMed Kishikova L, Smith MD, Cubison TCS. Evidence based management for paediatric burn: new approaches and improved scar outcomes. Burns. 2014;40:1530–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Voineskos SH, Ayeni OA, McKnight L, Thoma A. Systematic review of skin graft donor-site dressings. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:298–306.CrossRefPubMed Voineskos SH, Ayeni OA, McKnight L, Thoma A. Systematic review of skin graft donor-site dressings. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:298–306.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rakel BA, Bermel MA, Abbott LI, Baumler SK, Burger MR, Dawson CJ, et al. Split-thickness skin graft donor site care: a quantitative synthesis of the research. Appl Nurs Res. 1998;11:174–82.CrossRefPubMed Rakel BA, Bermel MA, Abbott LI, Baumler SK, Burger MR, Dawson CJ, et al. Split-thickness skin graft donor site care: a quantitative synthesis of the research. Appl Nurs Res. 1998;11:174–82.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wiechula R. The use of moist wound-healing dressings in the management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Pract. 2003;9:S9–S17.CrossRefPubMed Wiechula R. The use of moist wound-healing dressings in the management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Pract. 2003;9:S9–S17.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Schreuder SM, Vermeulen H, Qureshi MA, Ubbink DT. Dressings and topical agents for treating donor sites of split-skin grafts: a systematic review [abstract]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:22(4). Schreuder SM, Vermeulen H, Qureshi MA, Ubbink DT. Dressings and topical agents for treating donor sites of split-skin grafts: a systematic review [abstract]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:22(4).
15.
16.
go back to reference Probst A, Norris R, Cutting KF. Cutimed Sorbact® made easy. Wounds Int. 2012;3(2). Probst A, Norris R, Cutting KF. Cutimed Sorbact® made easy. Wounds Int. 2012;3(2).
17.
go back to reference Ahmadi H, Durrant C, Williams G. Permanent scarring in a scald burn dressed with paraffin gauze. J Wound Care. 2009;18:256–8.CrossRefPubMed Ahmadi H, Durrant C, Williams G. Permanent scarring in a scald burn dressed with paraffin gauze. J Wound Care. 2009;18:256–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Raza MS, Nazim T, Khan FA. Comparison of bupivacaine moistened dressing and conventional dressing for pain relief on skin graft donor sites. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014;24:416–9.PubMed Raza MS, Nazim T, Khan FA. Comparison of bupivacaine moistened dressing and conventional dressing for pain relief on skin graft donor sites. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014;24:416–9.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13:606–8.CrossRefPubMed Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13:606–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997;23:293–7.PubMed Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997;23:293–7.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L. A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e1168–98.CrossRefPubMed Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L. A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e1168–98.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Morris V, Murphy LM, Rosenberg M, Rosenberg L, Holzer CE, Meyer WJ. Itch assessment scale for the pediatric burn survivor. J Burn Care Res. 2012;33:419–24.CrossRefPubMed Morris V, Murphy LM, Rosenberg M, Rosenberg L, Holzer CE, Meyer WJ. Itch assessment scale for the pediatric burn survivor. J Burn Care Res. 2012;33:419–24.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FRH, Botman YAM, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1960–5.CrossRefPubMed Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FRH, Botman YAM, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1960–5.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tyack Z, Simons M, Spinks A, Wasiak J. A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use. Burns. 2012;38:6–18.CrossRefPubMed Tyack Z, Simons M, Spinks A, Wasiak J. A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use. Burns. 2012;38:6–18.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference van der Wal MBA, Tuinebreijer WE, Bloemen MCT, Verhaegen PDHM, Middelkoop E, van Zuijlen PPM. Rasch analysis of the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) in burn scars. Qual Life Res. 2011;21:13–23.PubMedPubMedCentral van der Wal MBA, Tuinebreijer WE, Bloemen MCT, Verhaegen PDHM, Middelkoop E, van Zuijlen PPM. Rasch analysis of the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) in burn scars. Qual Life Res. 2011;21:13–23.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Derraik JGB, Rademaker M, Cutfield WS, Pinto TE, Tregurtha S, Faherty A, et al. Effects of age, gender, BMI, and anatomical site on skin thickness in children and adults with diabetes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e86637.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Derraik JGB, Rademaker M, Cutfield WS, Pinto TE, Tregurtha S, Faherty A, et al. Effects of age, gender, BMI, and anatomical site on skin thickness in children and adults with diabetes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e86637.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Three donor site dressings in pediatric split-thickness skin grafts: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Craig A McBride
Roy M Kimble
Kellie Stockton
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0557-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Trials 1/2015 Go to the issue