Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Core outcome sets for use in effectiveness trials involving people with bipolar and schizophrenia in a community-based setting (PARTNERS2): study protocol for the development of two core outcome sets

Authors: Thomas Keeley, Humera Khan, Vanessa Pinfold, Paula Williamson, Jonathan Mathers, Linda Davies, Ruth Sayers, Elizabeth England, Siobhan Reilly, Richard Byng, Linda Gask, Mike Clark, Peter Huxley, Peter Lewis, Maximillian Birchwood, Melanie Calvert

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the general population the prevalence of bipolar and schizophrenia is 0.24% and 1.4% respectively. People with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder have a significantly reduced life expectancy, increased rates of unemployment and a fear of stigma leading to reduced self-confidence. A core outcome set is a standardised collection of items that should be reported in all controlled trials within a research area. There are currently no core outcome sets available for use in effectiveness trials involving bipolar or schizophrenia service users managed in a community setting.

Methods

A three-step approach is to be used to concurrently develop two core outcome sets, one for bipolar and one for schizophrenia. First, a comprehensive list of outcomes will be compiled through qualitative research and systematic searching of trial databases. Focus groups and one-to-one interviews will be completed with service users, carers and healthcare professionals. Second, a Delphi study will be used to reduce the lists to a core set. The three-round Delphi study will ask service users to score the outcome list for relevance. In round two stakeholders will only see the results of their group, while in round three stakeholders will see the results of all stakeholder group by stakeholder group. Third, a consensus meeting with stakeholders will be used to confirm outcomes to be included in the core set. Following the development of the core set a systematic literature review of existing measures will allow recommendations for how the core outcomes should be measured and a stated preference survey will explore the strength of people’s preferences and estimate weights for the outcomes that comprise the core set.

Discussion

A core outcome set represents the minimum measurement requirement for a research area. We aim to develop core outcome sets for use in research involving service users with schizophrenia or bipolar managed in a community setting. This will inform the wider PARTNERS2 study aims and objectives of developing an innovative primary care-based model of collaborative care for people with a diagnosis of bipolar or schizophrenia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference WHO. Global Burden of disease report. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2008. WHO. Global Burden of disease report. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2008.
2.
go back to reference Reilly S, Planner C, Hann M, Reeves D, Nazareth I, Lester H. The role of primary care in service provision for people with severe mental illness in the United Kingdom. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36468.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reilly S, Planner C, Hann M, Reeves D, Nazareth I, Lester H. The role of primary care in service provision for people with severe mental illness in the United Kingdom. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36468.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Perala J, Suvisaari J, Saarni SI, Kuoppasalmi K, Isometsa E, Pirkola S, et al. Lifetime prevalence of psychotic and bipolar I disorders in a general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(1):19–28.CrossRefPubMed Perala J, Suvisaari J, Saarni SI, Kuoppasalmi K, Isometsa E, Pirkola S, et al. Lifetime prevalence of psychotic and bipolar I disorders in a general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(1):19–28.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wahlbeck K, Westman J, Nordentoft M, Gissler M, Laursen TM. Outcomes of Nordic mental health systems: life expectancy of patients with mental disorders. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199(6):453–8.CrossRefPubMed Wahlbeck K, Westman J, Nordentoft M, Gissler M, Laursen TM. Outcomes of Nordic mental health systems: life expectancy of patients with mental disorders. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199(6):453–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chang CK, Hayes RD, Perera G, Broadbent MTM, Fernandes AC, Lee WE, et al. Life expectancy at birth for people with serious mental illness and other major disorders from a secondary mental health care case register in London. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19590.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chang CK, Hayes RD, Perera G, Broadbent MTM, Fernandes AC, Lee WE, et al. Life expectancy at birth for people with serious mental illness and other major disorders from a secondary mental health care case register in London. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19590.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference McCrone P, Dhanasiri S, Patel A, Knapp M, Lawton-Smith S. Paying the Price. London: Kings Fund; 2008. McCrone P, Dhanasiri S, Patel A, Knapp M, Lawton-Smith S. Paying the Price. London: Kings Fund; 2008.
7.
go back to reference Mangalore R, Knapp M. Cost of schizophrenia in England. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007;10(1):23–41.PubMed Mangalore R, Knapp M. Cost of schizophrenia in England. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007;10(1):23–41.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Miyar J, Adams CE. Content and quality of 10 000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 60 years. Schizophr Bull. 2013;39(1):226–9.CrossRefPubMed Miyar J, Adams CE. Content and quality of 10 000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 60 years. Schizophr Bull. 2013;39(1):226–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Harmonised Tripartite Guideline ICH. Statistical principles for clinical trials. International Conference on Harmonisation E9 Expert Working Group. Stat Med. 1999;18(15):1905–42. Harmonised Tripartite Guideline ICH. Statistical principles for clinical trials. International Conference on Harmonisation E9 Expert Working Group. Stat Med. 1999;18(15):1905–42.
13.
go back to reference Phillips A, Haudiquet V. ICH E9 guideline ‘Statistical principles for clinical trials’: a case study. Stat Med. 2003;22(1):1–11. discussion 13–7.CrossRefPubMed Phillips A, Haudiquet V. ICH E9 guideline ‘Statistical principles for clinical trials’: a case study. Stat Med. 2003;22(1):1–11. discussion 13–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, Bloom J, Chan AW, Cronin E, et al. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One. 2008;3(8):e3081.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, Bloom J, Chan AW, Cronin E, et al. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One. 2008;3(8):e3081.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
16.
go back to reference Kirkham JJ, Dwan KM, Altman DG, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R, et al. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ. 2010;340:c365.CrossRefPubMed Kirkham JJ, Dwan KM, Altman DG, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R, et al. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ. 2010;340:c365.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Muralidhar V. The impact of selective outcome reporting in trials of mental health interventions: statistical evidence of bias. Oxford: The University of Oxford; 2011. Muralidhar V. The impact of selective outcome reporting in trials of mental health interventions: statistical evidence of bias. Oxford: The University of Oxford; 2011.
18.
go back to reference Sinha IP, Altman DG, Beresford MW, Boers M, Clarke M, Craig J, et al. StaR Child Health Group. Standard 5: Selection, measurement, and reporting of outcomes in clinical trials in children. Pediatrics. 2012;129:S146–52.CrossRefPubMed Sinha IP, Altman DG, Beresford MW, Boers M, Clarke M, Craig J, et al. StaR Child Health Group. Standard 5: Selection, measurement, and reporting of outcomes in clinical trials in children. Pediatrics. 2012;129:S146–52.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Williamson P, Clarke M. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) initiative: its role in improving Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5, ED000041.PubMed Williamson P, Clarke M. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) initiative: its role in improving Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5, ED000041.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Brod M, Tesler LE, Christensen TL. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(9):1263–78.CrossRefPubMed Brod M, Tesler LE, Christensen TL. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(9):1263–78.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Spencer L, Ritchie J, O’Connor W. Analysis: Practices, Principles and Processes. In: Lewis J, Ritchie J, editors. Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage; 2009. Spencer L, Ritchie J, O’Connor W. Analysis: Practices, Principles and Processes. In: Lewis J, Ritchie J, editors. Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage; 2009.
22.
go back to reference Reilly S, Planner C, Gask L, Hann M, Knowles S, Druss B, et al. Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:1–60. Reilly S, Planner C, Gask L, Hann M, Knowles S, Druss B, et al. Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:1–60.
23.
go back to reference NIMHE. Mental Health Outcomes Compendium. London: NIMHE; 2008. NIMHE. Mental Health Outcomes Compendium. London: NIMHE; 2008.
24.
go back to reference NIHR. Outcome measurement in mental health: the views of service users. London: Mental Health Research Network; 2010. NIHR. Outcome measurement in mental health: the views of service users. London: Mental Health Research Network; 2010.
25.
go back to reference Sinha IP, Gallagher R, Williamson PR, Smyth RL. Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in childhood asthma: a survey of clinicians, parents, and young people. Trials. 2012;13:103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sinha IP, Gallagher R, Williamson PR, Smyth RL. Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in childhood asthma: a survey of clinicians, parents, and young people. Trials. 2012;13:103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health-services research. Br Med J. 1995;311(7001):376–80.CrossRef Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health-services research. Br Med J. 1995;311(7001):376–80.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sinha IP, Smyth RL, Williamson PR. Using the Delphi Technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLoS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000393.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sinha IP, Smyth RL, Williamson PR. Using the Delphi Technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLoS Med. 2011;8(1):e1000393.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Khangura S, Polisena J, Clifford TJ, Farrah K, Kamel C. Rapid review: an emerging approach to evidence synthesis in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30(1):20–7.CrossRefPubMed Khangura S, Polisena J, Clifford TJ, Farrah K, Kamel C. Rapid review: an emerging approach to evidence synthesis in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30(1):20–7.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Macefield RC, Jacobs M, Korfage IJ, Nicklin J, Whistance RN, Brookes ST, et al. Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Trials. 2014;15:49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Macefield RC, Jacobs M, Korfage IJ, Nicklin J, Whistance RN, Brookes ST, et al. Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Trials. 2014;15:49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonson J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–45.CrossRefPubMed Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonson J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–45.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Brazier J, Deverill M. A checklist for judging preference-based measures of health related quality of life: learning from psychometrics. Health Econ. 1999;8(1):41–51.CrossRefPubMed Brazier J, Deverill M. A checklist for judging preference-based measures of health related quality of life: learning from psychometrics. Health Econ. 1999;8(1):41–51.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.CrossRef Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: a practical guide to their development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(2):171–8.CrossRefPubMed Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(2):171–8.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Mosier CI. A critical examination of the concepts of face validity. Educ Psychol Meas. 1947;7(2):191–205.CrossRefPubMed Mosier CI. A critical examination of the concepts of face validity. Educ Psychol Meas. 1947;7(2):191–205.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Core outcome sets for use in effectiveness trials involving people with bipolar and schizophrenia in a community-based setting (PARTNERS2): study protocol for the development of two core outcome sets
Authors
Thomas Keeley
Humera Khan
Vanessa Pinfold
Paula Williamson
Jonathan Mathers
Linda Davies
Ruth Sayers
Elizabeth England
Siobhan Reilly
Richard Byng
Linda Gask
Mike Clark
Peter Huxley
Peter Lewis
Maximillian Birchwood
Melanie Calvert
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0553-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Trials 1/2015 Go to the issue