Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (Big CACTUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Rebecca Palmer, Cindy Cooper, Pam Enderby, Marian Brady, Steven Julious, Audrey Bowen, Nicholas Latimer

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Aphasia affects the ability to speak, comprehend spoken language, read and write. One third of stroke survivors experience aphasia. Evidence suggests that aphasia can continue to improve after the first few months with intensive speech and language therapy, which is frequently beyond what resources allow. The development of computer software for language practice provides an opportunity for self-managed therapy. This pragmatic randomised controlled trial will investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness of a computerised approach to long-term aphasia therapy post stroke.

Methods/Design

A total of 285 adults with aphasia at least four months post stroke will be randomly allocated to either usual care, computerised intervention in addition to usual care or attention and activity control in addition to usual care. Those in the intervention group will receive six months of self-managed word finding practice on their home computer with monthly face-to-face support from a volunteer/assistant. Those in the attention control group will receive puzzle activities, supplemented by monthly telephone calls.
Study delivery will be coordinated by 20 speech and language therapy departments across the United Kingdom. Outcome measures will be made at baseline, six, nine and 12 months after randomisation by blinded speech and language therapist assessors. Primary outcomes are the change in number of words (of personal relevance) named correctly at six months and improvement in functional conversation. Primary outcomes will be analysed using a Hochberg testing procedure. Significance will be declared if differences in both word retrieval and functional conversation at six months are significant at the 5% level, or if either comparison is significant at 2.5%. A cost utility analysis will be undertaken from the NHS and personal social service perspective. Differences between costs and quality-adjusted life years in the three groups will be described and the incremental cost effectiveness ratio will be calculated. Treatment fidelity will be monitored.

Discussion

This is the first fully powered trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of computerised aphasia therapy. Specific challenges in designing the protocol are considered.

Trial registration

Registered with Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN68798818 on 18 February 2014.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Department of Health. National Stroke Strategy. London: Department of Health; 2007. Department of Health. National Stroke Strategy. London: Department of Health; 2007.
2.
go back to reference Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD000425. Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD000425.
3.
go back to reference Laska A, Kahan T, Helblom A, Murray V, Von Arbin MA. Randomized controlled trial on very early speech and language therapy in acute stroke patients with aphasia. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2011;1:66–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Laska A, Kahan T, Helblom A, Murray V, Von Arbin MA. Randomized controlled trial on very early speech and language therapy in acute stroke patients with aphasia. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2011;1:66–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Bowen A, Hesketh A, Patchick E, Young A, Davies L, Vail A, et al. Clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and service users’ perceptions of early, well-resourced communication therapy following a stroke, a randomised controlled trial (The ACT NoW Study). Health Technol Assess. 2012;16:26.CrossRef Bowen A, Hesketh A, Patchick E, Young A, Davies L, Vail A, et al. Clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and service users’ perceptions of early, well-resourced communication therapy following a stroke, a randomised controlled trial (The ACT NoW Study). Health Technol Assess. 2012;16:26.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Meinzer M, Djundja D, Barthel G, Elbert T, Rockstroh B. Long term stability of improved language functions in chronic aphasia after constraint-induced aphasia therapy. Stroke. 2005;36:1462–6.CrossRefPubMed Meinzer M, Djundja D, Barthel G, Elbert T, Rockstroh B. Long term stability of improved language functions in chronic aphasia after constraint-induced aphasia therapy. Stroke. 2005;36:1462–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Raymer A, Beeson P, Holland A, Kendall D, Maher L, Martin N, et al. Translational research in aphasia: from neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:259–75.CrossRef Raymer A, Beeson P, Holland A, Kendall D, Maher L, Martin N, et al. Translational research in aphasia: from neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:259–75.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kurland J, Baldwin K, Tauer C. Treatment-induced neuroplasticity following intensive naming therapy in a case of chronic Wernicke’s aphasia. Aphasiology. 2010;24:737–51.CrossRef Kurland J, Baldwin K, Tauer C. Treatment-induced neuroplasticity following intensive naming therapy in a case of chronic Wernicke’s aphasia. Aphasiology. 2010;24:737–51.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pulvermuller F, Neininger B, Elbert T, Mohr B, Rockstroh B, Koebbel P, et al. Constraint induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1621.CrossRefPubMed Pulvermuller F, Neininger B, Elbert T, Mohr B, Rockstroh B, Koebbel P, et al. Constraint induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1621.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cherney L, Patterson J, Raymer A, Frymark T. Evidence-based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:1282–99.CrossRefPubMed Cherney L, Patterson J, Raymer A, Frymark T. Evidence-based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:1282–99.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Barthel G, Meinzer M, Djundja D, Rockstroh B. Intensive language therapy in chronic aphasia: which aspects contribute most? Aphasiology. 2008;22:408–21.CrossRef Barthel G, Meinzer M, Djundja D, Rockstroh B. Intensive language therapy in chronic aphasia: which aspects contribute most? Aphasiology. 2008;22:408–21.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference David R, Enderby P, Bainton D. Treatment of acquired aphasia: speech therapists and volunteers compared. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1982;45:957–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral David R, Enderby P, Bainton D. Treatment of acquired aphasia: speech therapists and volunteers compared. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1982;45:957–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Palmer R, Enderby P, Cooper C, Latimer N, Julious S, Paterson G, et al. Computer therapy compared with usual care for people with long standing aphasia post stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2012;43:1904–11.CrossRefPubMed Palmer R, Enderby P, Cooper C, Latimer N, Julious S, Paterson G, et al. Computer therapy compared with usual care for people with long standing aphasia post stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2012;43:1904–11.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cherney LR. Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia (ORLA): evaluating the efficacy of computer-delivered therapy in chronic nonfluent aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17:423–31.CrossRefPubMed Cherney LR. Oral Reading for Language in Aphasia (ORLA): evaluating the efficacy of computer-delivered therapy in chronic nonfluent aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17:423–31.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference van de Sandt-Koenderman M. Aphasia rehabilitation and the role of computer technology: can we keep up with modern times? Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13:21–7.CrossRefPubMed van de Sandt-Koenderman M. Aphasia rehabilitation and the role of computer technology: can we keep up with modern times? Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13:21–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Fink R, Breecher A, Schwarz M, Robey R. A computer-implemented protocol for treatment of naming disorders: evaluation of clinician-guided and partially self-guided instruction. Aphasiology. 2002;16:1061–86.CrossRef Fink R, Breecher A, Schwarz M, Robey R. A computer-implemented protocol for treatment of naming disorders: evaluation of clinician-guided and partially self-guided instruction. Aphasiology. 2002;16:1061–86.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mortley J, Wade J, Enderby P. Superhighway to promoting a client-therapist partnership: using the internet to deliver word-retrieval computer therapy monitored remotely with minimal speech and language therapy input. Aphasiology. 2004;18:193–211.CrossRef Mortley J, Wade J, Enderby P. Superhighway to promoting a client-therapist partnership: using the internet to deliver word-retrieval computer therapy monitored remotely with minimal speech and language therapy input. Aphasiology. 2004;18:193–211.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Department of Health. Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: a New Direction for Community Services. London: Her Majesty’s Government; 2006. Department of Health. Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: a New Direction for Community Services. London: Her Majesty’s Government; 2006.
19.
go back to reference Katz R, Wertz R. The efficacy of computer-provided reading treatment for chronic aphasic adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:493–507.CrossRefPubMed Katz R, Wertz R. The efficacy of computer-provided reading treatment for chronic aphasic adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:493–507.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Palmer R, Mortley J. How I offer impairment therapy (2): from idealism to realism, step by step. Speech & Language Therapy in Practice. 2011; Winter:29–32. Palmer R, Mortley J. How I offer impairment therapy (2): from idealism to realism, step by step. Speech & Language Therapy in Practice. 2011; Winter:29–32.
21.
go back to reference Palmer R, Enderby P, Paterson G. Using computers to enable self-management of aphasia therapy exercises for word finding: the patient and carer perspective. Int J of Language and Communication Dis. 2013;48:508–21.CrossRef Palmer R, Enderby P, Paterson G. Using computers to enable self-management of aphasia therapy exercises for word finding: the patient and carer perspective. Int J of Language and Communication Dis. 2013;48:508–21.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Latimer NR, Dixon S, Palmer R. Cost-utility of self-managed computer therapy for people with aphasia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:402–9.CrossRefPubMed Latimer NR, Dixon S, Palmer R. Cost-utility of self-managed computer therapy for people with aphasia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:402–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Boutron I, Moher D, Altman D, Schulz K, Ravaud P, for the Consort group. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:295–309.CrossRefPubMed Boutron I, Moher D, Altman D, Schulz K, Ravaud P, for the Consort group. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:295–309.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Swinburn K, Porter G, Howard D. Comprehensive Aphasia Test. London: Psychology Press; 2004. Swinburn K, Porter G, Howard D. Comprehensive Aphasia Test. London: Psychology Press; 2004.
25.
go back to reference Jayes M, Palmer R. Initial evaluation of the consent support tool: a structured procedure to facilitate the inclusion and engagement of people with aphasia in the informed consent process. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;16:159–68.CrossRefPubMed Jayes M, Palmer R. Initial evaluation of the consent support tool: a structured procedure to facilitate the inclusion and engagement of people with aphasia in the informed consent process. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;16:159–68.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Enderby PM, John A, Petheram B. Therapy Outcome Measures for Rehabilitation Professionals. Chichester: John Wiley& Sons Ltd; 2006. Enderby PM, John A, Petheram B. Therapy Outcome Measures for Rehabilitation Professionals. Chichester: John Wiley& Sons Ltd; 2006.
27.
go back to reference Long A, Hesketh A, Paszek G, Booth M, Bowen A. Development of a reliable self-report outcome measure for pragmatic trials of communication therapy following stroke: the Communication Outcome after Stroke (COAST) scale. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22:1083–94.CrossRefPubMed Long A, Hesketh A, Paszek G, Booth M, Bowen A. Development of a reliable self-report outcome measure for pragmatic trials of communication therapy following stroke: the Communication Outcome after Stroke (COAST) scale. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22:1083–94.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Long AF, Hesketh A, Bowen A, on behalf of the ACT NoW Study. Communication outcome after stroke: a new measure of the carer's perspective. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:846–56.CrossRefPubMed Long AF, Hesketh A, Bowen A, on behalf of the ACT NoW Study. Communication outcome after stroke: a new measure of the carer's perspective. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:846–56.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Brouwer W, van Exel N, van Gorp B, Redekop W. The CarerQol instrument: a new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:1005–2.CrossRefPubMed Brouwer W, van Exel N, van Gorp B, Redekop W. The CarerQol instrument: a new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:1005–2.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Julious SA. Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials. London: Chapman and Hall; 2009.CrossRef Julious SA. Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials. London: Chapman and Hall; 2009.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC. Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York: Wiley; 1987.CrossRef Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC. Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York: Wiley; 1987.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Curtis L. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care. University of Kent at Canterbury: Personal and Social Services Research Unit; 2011. Curtis L. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care. University of Kent at Canterbury: Personal and Social Services Research Unit; 2011.
35.
go back to reference Griffin S, Welton NJ, Claxton K. Exploring the research decision space: the expected value of information for sequential research designs. Med Decis Making. 2010;30:155–62.CrossRefPubMed Griffin S, Welton NJ, Claxton K. Exploring the research decision space: the expected value of information for sequential research designs. Med Decis Making. 2010;30:155–62.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (Big CACTUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Rebecca Palmer
Cindy Cooper
Pam Enderby
Marian Brady
Steven Julious
Audrey Bowen
Nicholas Latimer
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-014-0527-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Trials 1/2015 Go to the issue