Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis in critically ill patients: a prospective, clinician-blinded investigation

Authors: Sarah L. Jones, Aiko Tanaka, Glenn M. Eastwood, Helen Young, Leah Peck, Rinaldo Bellomo, Johan Mårtensson

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Assessment of fluid status in critically ill patients is challenging. We aimed to assess the feasibility and validity of bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) as a measure of hydration in critically ill patients.

Methods

We performed twice-daily BIVA measurements and fluid balance calculations and recorded physiological variables in mechanically ventilated patients within 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission for up to 5 days. Treating clinicians were blinded to BIVA results.

Results

We performed 344 BIVA measurements in 61 patients. According to BIVA, 14 patients (23 %) were dehydrated, 22 (36 %) were normally hydrated and 25 (41 %) were overhydrated upon ICU admission. Patients with normal BIVA hydration were less sick, had fewer comorbidities and had less deranged physiology than patients found to be dehydrated or overhydrated with BIVA. Cumulative fluid balance increased in patients found to be dehydrated with BIVA by a mean of 3.4±2.2 L, whereas in patients found to be overhydrated with BIVA, it decreased by a mean of 4.5±6.9 L. In patients found to be normally hydrated with BIVA, fluid balance remained unchanged. BIVA-defined hydration increased with 1 L (median change 1.5 %, P =0.09) or 2 L (median change 0.7 %, P =0.09) of calculated fluid gains. BIVA-defined hydration decreased (median change −0.8 %, P =0.02) with a negative cumulative fluid balance of >2 L. BIVA-defined hydration between first and last measurement correlated with the corresponding change in fluid balance (ρ =0.25, P =0.05).

Conclusions

BIVA is feasible in critically ill patients. Its validity is supported by the observed characteristics of patients with different degrees of BIVA hydration upon admission and by different fluid management of such patients by blinded clinicians. The sensitivity of repeated BIVA hydration measurements to detect fluid accumulation or fluid balance changes <2 L was low, however. These contradictory findings provide the rational basis for studies of BIVA-assisted fluid management in ICU patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict volume responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134:172–8.CrossRef Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict volume responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134:172–8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, Habet K, Zanotti S, Marshall S, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:691–9.CrossRef Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, Habet K, Zanotti S, Marshall S, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:691–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121:2000–8.CrossRef Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121:2000–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Perren A, Markmann M, Merlani G, Marone C, Merlani P. Fluid balance in critically ill patients: should we really rely on it? Minerva Anesthesiol. 2011;77:802–11. Perren A, Markmann M, Merlani G, Marone C, Merlani P. Fluid balance in critically ill patients: should we really rely on it? Minerva Anesthesiol. 2011;77:802–11.
5.
go back to reference Schneider A, Baldwin I, Freitag E, Glassford N, Bellomo R. Estimation of fluid status changes in critically ill patients: fluid balance or electronic bed weight? J Crit Care. 2012;27:745.e7–e12.CrossRef Schneider A, Baldwin I, Freitag E, Glassford N, Bellomo R. Estimation of fluid status changes in critically ill patients: fluid balance or electronic bed weight? J Crit Care. 2012;27:745.e7–e12.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schneider AG, Thorpe C, Delbridge K, Matalanis G, Bellomo R. Electronic bed-weighing vs daily fluid balance changes after cardiac surgery. J Crit Care. 2013;28:1113.e1–e5.CrossRef Schneider AG, Thorpe C, Delbridge K, Matalanis G, Bellomo R. Electronic bed-weighing vs daily fluid balance changes after cardiac surgery. J Crit Care. 2013;28:1113.e1–e5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Stevenson LW, Perloff JK. The limited availability of physical signs for estimating hemodynamics in chronic heart failure. JAMA. 1989;261:884–8.CrossRef Stevenson LW, Perloff JK. The limited availability of physical signs for estimating hemodynamics in chronic heart failure. JAMA. 1989;261:884–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Di Somma S, Navarin S, Giordano S, Spadini F, Lippi G, Cervellin G, et al. The emerging role of biomarkers and bioimpedance in evaluating hydration status in patients with acute heart failure. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012;50:2093–105.CrossRef Di Somma S, Navarin S, Giordano S, Spadini F, Lippi G, Cervellin G, et al. The emerging role of biomarkers and bioimpedance in evaluating hydration status in patients with acute heart failure. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012;50:2093–105.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kushner RF, Schoeller GA, Fjeld CR, Danford L. Is the impedance index (ht2/R) significant in predicting total body water? Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;56:835–9.CrossRef Kushner RF, Schoeller GA, Fjeld CR, Danford L. Is the impedance index (ht2/R) significant in predicting total body water? Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;56:835–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lukaski HC, Hall CB, Siders WA. Assessment of hydration status in women during pregnancy and postpartum with bioelectrical impedance vectors. Nutrition. 2007;23:543–50.CrossRef Lukaski HC, Hall CB, Siders WA. Assessment of hydration status in women during pregnancy and postpartum with bioelectrical impedance vectors. Nutrition. 2007;23:543–50.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ronco C, Kaushik M, Valle R, Aspromonte N, Peacock 4th WF. Diagnosis and management of fluid overload in heart failure and cardio-renal syndrome: the “5B” approach. Semin Nephrol. 2012;32:129–41.CrossRef Ronco C, Kaushik M, Valle R, Aspromonte N, Peacock 4th WF. Diagnosis and management of fluid overload in heart failure and cardio-renal syndrome: the “5B” approach. Semin Nephrol. 2012;32:129–41.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Uszko-Lencer N, Bothmer F, Van Pol PE, Schols AM. Measurement of body composition in chronic heart failure: a comparison of methods. Eur J Heart Fail. 2006;8:208–14.CrossRef Uszko-Lencer N, Bothmer F, Van Pol PE, Schols AM. Measurement of body composition in chronic heart failure: a comparison of methods. Eur J Heart Fail. 2006;8:208–14.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Piccoli A. the Italian Hemodialysis-Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (HD-BIA) Study Group. Identification of operational clues to dry weight prescription in haemodialysis using bioimpedance vector analysis. Kidney Int. 1998;53:1036–43.CrossRef Piccoli A. the Italian Hemodialysis-Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (HD-BIA) Study Group. Identification of operational clues to dry weight prescription in haemodialysis using bioimpedance vector analysis. Kidney Int. 1998;53:1036–43.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jha V, Jairam A, Sharma MC, Sakhuja V, Piccoli A, Parthasarathy S. Body composition analysis with bioelectric impedance in adult Indians with ESRD: comparison with healthy population. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1649–53.CrossRef Jha V, Jairam A, Sharma MC, Sakhuja V, Piccoli A, Parthasarathy S. Body composition analysis with bioelectric impedance in adult Indians with ESRD: comparison with healthy population. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1649–53.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pillon L, Piccoli A, Lowrie EG, Lazarus JM, Chertow GM. Vector length as a proxy for the adequacy of ultrafiltration in haemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2004;66:1266–71.CrossRef Pillon L, Piccoli A, Lowrie EG, Lazarus JM, Chertow GM. Vector length as a proxy for the adequacy of ultrafiltration in haemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2004;66:1266–71.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Onofriescu M, Hogas S, Voroneanu L, Apetrii M, Nistor I, Kanbay M, et al. Bioimpedance-guided fluid management in maintenance haemodialysis: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64:111–8.CrossRef Onofriescu M, Hogas S, Voroneanu L, Apetrii M, Nistor I, Kanbay M, et al. Bioimpedance-guided fluid management in maintenance haemodialysis: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64:111–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Piccoli A, Condognotto M, Pasesntin P, Naso A. Combined evaluation of nutrition and hydration in dialysis patients with bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA). Clin Nutr. 2014;33:673–7.CrossRef Piccoli A, Condognotto M, Pasesntin P, Naso A. Combined evaluation of nutrition and hydration in dialysis patients with bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA). Clin Nutr. 2014;33:673–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Peacock 4th WF. Use of bioimpedance vector analysis in critically ill and cardiorenal patients. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;165:226–35.CrossRef Peacock 4th WF. Use of bioimpedance vector analysis in critically ill and cardiorenal patients. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;165:226–35.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Piccoli A. Bioelectric impedance measurement for fluid status assessment. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;164:143–52.CrossRef Piccoli A. Bioelectric impedance measurement for fluid status assessment. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;164:143–52.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Piccoli A, Pittoni G, Facco E, Favaro E, Pillon L. Relationship between central venous pressure and bioimpedance vector analysis in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:132–7.CrossRef Piccoli A, Pittoni G, Facco E, Favaro E, Pillon L. Relationship between central venous pressure and bioimpedance vector analysis in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:132–7.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Basso F, Berdin G, Virzi GM, Mason G, Piccinni P, Day S, et al. Fluid management in the intensive care unit: bioelectrical impedance vector analysis as a tool to assess hydration status and optimal fluid balance in critically ill patients. Blood Purif. 2013;36:192–9.CrossRef Basso F, Berdin G, Virzi GM, Mason G, Piccinni P, Day S, et al. Fluid management in the intensive care unit: bioelectrical impedance vector analysis as a tool to assess hydration status and optimal fluid balance in critically ill patients. Blood Purif. 2013;36:192–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chen H, Buyun W, Gong D, Liu Z. Fluid overload at start of continuous renal replacement therapy is associated with poorer clinical condition and outcome: a prospective observational study on the combined use of bioimpedance vector analysis and serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide measurement. Crit Care. 2015;19:135.CrossRef Chen H, Buyun W, Gong D, Liu Z. Fluid overload at start of continuous renal replacement therapy is associated with poorer clinical condition and outcome: a prospective observational study on the combined use of bioimpedance vector analysis and serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide measurement. Crit Care. 2015;19:135.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis in critically ill patients: a prospective, clinician-blinded investigation
Authors
Sarah L. Jones
Aiko Tanaka
Glenn M. Eastwood
Helen Young
Leah Peck
Rinaldo Bellomo
Johan Mårtensson
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1009-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Critical Care 1/2015 Go to the issue