Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Implementation of blinded outcome assessment in the Effective Verruca Treatments trial (EverT) – lessons learned

Authors: Sarah Cockayne, Catherine Hewitt, Farina Hashmi, Kate Hicks, Michael Concannon, Caroline McIntosh, Kim Thomas, Jill Hall, Judith Watson, David Torgerson, Ian Watt

Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Trials using inadequate levels of blinding may report larger effect sizes than blinded studies. It has been suggested that blinded outcome assessment in open trials may in some cases be undertaken by assessments of photographs. The aim of this paper is to explore the effect of using different methods to assess the primary outcome in the EVerT (Effective Verruca Treatments) trial. It also aims to give an overview of the experiences of using digital photographs within the trial.

Methods

We undertook a secondary analysis to explore the effect of using three different methods to assess the primary outcome in the EVerT trial: assessment of digital photographs by blinded healthcare professionals; blinded healthcare professional assessment at the recruiting site and patient self-report. The verruca clearance rates were calculated using the three different methods of assessment. A Cohen’s kappa measure of inter-rater agreement was used to assess the agreement between the methods. We also investigated the experiences of healthcare professionals using digital photographs within the trial.

Results

Digital photographs for 189 out of 240 (79 %) patients in the trial were received for outcome assessment. Of the 189 photographs, 30 (16 %) were uninterpretable. The overall verruca clearance rates were 21 % (43/202,) using the unblinded patient self-reported outcome, 6 % (9/159,) using blinded assessment of digital photographs and 14 % (30/210,) using blinded outcome assessment at the site.

Conclusions

Despite differences in the clearance rates found using different methods of outcome assessment, this did not change the original conclusion of the trial, that there is no evidence of a difference in effectiveness between cryotherapy and salicylic acid. Future trials using digital photographs should consider individual training needs at sites and have a backup method of assessment agreed a priori.

Trial registration

ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN18994246
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pocock SJ. Clinical trials: a practical approach. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 1983. Pocock SJ. Clinical trials: a practical approach. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 1983.
2.
go back to reference Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman D. The landscape and lexicon of blinding in randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:254–59.CrossRefPubMed Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman D. The landscape and lexicon of blinding in randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:254–59.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what. Lancet. 2002;359:696–700.CrossRefPubMed Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what. Lancet. 2002;359:696–700.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman DR. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408–12.CrossRefPubMed Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman DR. Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408–12.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Day SJ, Altman DG. Statistics notes: blinding in clinical trials and other studies. Br Med J. 2000;321:504.CrossRef Day SJ, Altman DG. Statistics notes: blinding in clinical trials and other studies. Br Med J. 2000;321:504.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dumville JC, Worthy G, Soares MO, Bland JM, Cullum N, Dowson C, et al. VenUSII: a randomised controlled trial of larval therapy in the management of leg ulcers. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:55.CrossRef Dumville JC, Worthy G, Soares MO, Bland JM, Cullum N, Dowson C, et al. VenUSII: a randomised controlled trial of larval therapy in the management of leg ulcers. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:55.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Watson JM, Kang’ombe AR, Soares MO, Chuang L-H, Worthy G, Bland JM, et al. VenUS III: a randomised controlled trial of therapeutic ultrasound in the management of venous leg ulcers. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15:13.CrossRef Watson JM, Kang’ombe AR, Soares MO, Chuang L-H, Worthy G, Bland JM, et al. VenUS III: a randomised controlled trial of therapeutic ultrasound in the management of venous leg ulcers. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15:13.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jones BF, Plassman P. An instrument to measure the dimensions of skin wounds. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995;42:5.CrossRef Jones BF, Plassman P. An instrument to measure the dimensions of skin wounds. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995;42:5.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cockayne S, Curran M, Denby G, Hashmi F, Hewitt C, Hicks K, et al. EVerT: Cryotherapy versus salicylic acid for the treatment of verrucae: a randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15:32.CrossRef Cockayne S, Curran M, Denby G, Hashmi F, Hewitt C, Hicks K, et al. EVerT: Cryotherapy versus salicylic acid for the treatment of verrucae: a randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15:32.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cockayne S, EVerT Team. The EVERT (effective verruca treatments) trial protocol: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate cryotherapy versus salicylic acid for the treatment of verrucae. Trials. 2010. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-12 Cockayne S, EVerT Team. The EVERT (effective verruca treatments) trial protocol: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate cryotherapy versus salicylic acid for the treatment of verrucae. Trials. 2010. doi:10.​1186/​1745-6215-11-12
11.
go back to reference Cockayne S, Hewitt C, Hicks K, Jayakody S, Kang’ombe AR, Stamuli E, et al. Cryotherapy versus salicylic acid for the treatment of plantar warts (verrucae): A randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2011. doi:10.1136/bmj.d3271 Cockayne S, Hewitt C, Hicks K, Jayakody S, Kang’ombe AR, Stamuli E, et al. Cryotherapy versus salicylic acid for the treatment of plantar warts (verrucae): A randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2011. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​d3271
12.
go back to reference Oliveria SA, Dusza SW, Phelan DL, Ostroff JS, Berwick M, Halpern AC. Patient adherence to skin self-examination. Effect of nurse intervention with photographs. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:152–5.CrossRefPubMed Oliveria SA, Dusza SW, Phelan DL, Ostroff JS, Berwick M, Halpern AC. Patient adherence to skin self-examination. Effect of nurse intervention with photographs. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:152–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Scheinfeld N. Photographic images, digital imaging, dermatology and the law. Arch Dermatol. 2004. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.4.473. Scheinfeld N. Photographic images, digital imaging, dermatology and the law. Arch Dermatol. 2004. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.4.473.
Metadata
Title
Implementation of blinded outcome assessment in the Effective Verruca Treatments trial (EverT) – lessons learned
Authors
Sarah Cockayne
Catherine Hewitt
Farina Hashmi
Kate Hicks
Michael Concannon
Caroline McIntosh
Kim Thomas
Jill Hall
Judith Watson
David Torgerson
Ian Watt
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1757-1146
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0155-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2016 Go to the issue