Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

An action research approach to facilitating the adoption of a foot health assessment tool in India

Authors: Michael Harrison-Blount, Michelle Cullen, Christopher J. Nester, Anita E. Williams

Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

India has a diabetes population that is growing and alongside this, the incidence of limb threatening foot problems is increasing. Foot health care provision does not yet meet this demand. In one locality in India, clinicians had an unstructured approach to foot health assessments resulting in poor adoption of evidence based guidelines from the West and a persistence of serious foot complications. There was the perception that existing assessment tools did not take into account the local cultural, organizational and professional needs and there was a lack of ownership of any potential solution to the problem. Therefore, the aim of this work was to facilitate the ownership and development of a foot health assessment tool for use in the Indian context. In order to achieve this an action research approach was chosen.

Methods

Participants were facilitated through the action and implementation phases of the action research cycle by the researchers. The action phase included generating a list of potential items for inclusion in the tool from a review of the literature to provide an evidence based foundation for the foot health assessment tool. A modified Delphi method was used to further refine the contents of the tool. Members of the Delphi Panel (n = 8) were experts in their field of medicine and experts in delivering health care within services in India.

Results

The outcome of the study was the adoption of a locally developed foot health assessment tool (Salford Indian Foot Health Assessment Tool, SIFT). It contains thirteen sections, which reflect the risk factors identified for assessing foot health agreed by the participants to fit the Indian context. The SIFT is supported with evidence based guidelines from the West and a training program was delivered by the researchers in order to support its implementation into clinical practice.

Conclusion

An action research approach has facilitated the development and implementation of a locally created and owned foot health assessment tool. This in turn has resulted in the integration of evidence-based guidelines from the West with consideration to local cultural, organizational and professional needs and ultimately the needs of their patients. Further work is underway evaluating the outcomes of the SIFT in practice.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference 5th International Symposium on The Diabetic Foot, The Diabetic Foot Journal. 2007; 10(2): 108–110. 5th International Symposium on The Diabetic Foot, The Diabetic Foot Journal. 2007; 10(2): 108–110.
3.
go back to reference Bakker K, Abbas ZG, Pendsey S. Step by Step, improving diabetic foot care in the developing world. A pilot study for India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Tanzania. Practical Diabetes Int. 2006;23:365–9.CrossRef Bakker K, Abbas ZG, Pendsey S. Step by Step, improving diabetic foot care in the developing world. A pilot study for India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Tanzania. Practical Diabetes Int. 2006;23:365–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Apelqvist J. Diabetic foot ulcers: evidence, cost and management. The diabetic Foot J. 2007;10:6–8. Apelqvist J. Diabetic foot ulcers: evidence, cost and management. The diabetic Foot J. 2007;10:6–8.
5.
go back to reference Harrison-Blount M, Cullen M, Nester CJ, Williams AE. The assessment and management of diabetes related lower limb problems in India-an action research approach to integrating best practice. Journal of foot and ankle research., 2014. doi:10.1186/1757-1146-7-30. Harrison-Blount M, Cullen M, Nester CJ, Williams AE. The assessment and management of diabetes related lower limb problems in India-an action research approach to integrating best practice. Journal of foot and ankle research., 2014. doi:10.​1186/​1757-1146-7-30.
6.
go back to reference Halfens R, Van Linghe R. Dissemination and implementation of knowledge. State of the art studies. The Netherlands: LEVV; 2003. Halfens R, Van Linghe R. Dissemination and implementation of knowledge. State of the art studies. The Netherlands: LEVV; 2003.
7.
go back to reference Funk G, Champagne MT, Wiese RA, Tornquist EM. Barriers to using research findings in practice. The clinician’s perspective. Applied Nursing Res. 1991;4(2):90–5.CrossRef Funk G, Champagne MT, Wiese RA, Tornquist EM. Barriers to using research findings in practice. The clinician’s perspective. Applied Nursing Res. 1991;4(2):90–5.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Quality in Health Care. 1998;7:149–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B. Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Quality in Health Care. 1998;7:149–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Denis JL, Hebert Y, Langley A, Lozeau D, Trottier LH. Explaining diffusion patterns for complex health care innovations. Health Care Management Re- view. 2002;27(3):60–73.CrossRef Denis JL, Hebert Y, Langley A, Lozeau D, Trottier LH. Explaining diffusion patterns for complex health care innovations. Health Care Management Re- view. 2002;27(3):60–73.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dopson S, FitzGerald L, Ferlie E, Gabbay J, Locock L. No magic targets! Changing clinical practice to become more evidence based. Health Care Management Rev. 2002;27(3):35–47.CrossRef Dopson S, FitzGerald L, Ferlie E, Gabbay J, Locock L. No magic targets! Changing clinical practice to become more evidence based. Health Care Management Rev. 2002;27(3):35–47.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Clinical Guidelines and Evidence Review for Type 2 Diabetes: Prevention and Management of Foot Problems. Clinical guideline 10. 2004. Retrieved from http//www.nice.org.uk/CG10 National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Clinical Guidelines and Evidence Review for Type 2 Diabetes: Prevention and Management of Foot Problems. Clinical guideline 10. 2004. Retrieved from http//www.​nice.​org.​uk/​CG10
12.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.CrossRef Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cook C, Brismée J, Pietrobon R. Development of a quality checklist using Delphi methods for prescriptive clinical prediction rules: the QUADCPR. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010;33:29–41.CrossRefPubMed Cook C, Brismée J, Pietrobon R. Development of a quality checklist using Delphi methods for prescriptive clinical prediction rules: the QUADCPR. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010;33:29–41.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
15.
go back to reference Diamonds IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Pencharz PB, Ling SC, Moore AM, et al. Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies 2013. Retrieved from. Diamonds IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, Pencharz PB, Ling SC, Moore AM, et al. Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies 2013. Retrieved from.
16.
go back to reference Haines S, Baker T, Donaldson M. Development of a physical performance assessment checklist for athletes who sustained a lower extremity injury in preparation for return to sport: A Delphi study. Int J Sports Phys Ther.2013;8(1):44–53. Haines S, Baker T, Donaldson M. Development of a physical performance assessment checklist for athletes who sustained a lower extremity injury in preparation for return to sport: A Delphi study. Int J Sports Phys Ther.2013;8(1):44–53.
17.
go back to reference Deming Hedman L, Morris DM, Graham CL, Brown CJ, Ford MP, Ingram DA, et al. Locomotor requirements for bipedal locomotion: A Delphi survey. Physical Therapy. 2014;94(1):52–67. doi:10.2522/ptj.20120514.CrossRef Deming Hedman L, Morris DM, Graham CL, Brown CJ, Ford MP, Ingram DA, et al. Locomotor requirements for bipedal locomotion: A Delphi survey. Physical Therapy. 2014;94(1):52–67. doi:10.​2522/​ptj.​20120514.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Noffke S, Somekh B. Action research. In: Lewin BSC, editor. Research methods in the social sciences. London: Sage; 2005. p. 89–96. Noffke S, Somekh B. Action research. In: Lewin BSC, editor. Research methods in the social sciences. London: Sage; 2005. p. 89–96.
19.
go back to reference Pill J. The Delphi Method: substance, context, a critique and annotated bibliography. Socio Economic Planning Sci. 1971;5:57–71.CrossRef Pill J. The Delphi Method: substance, context, a critique and annotated bibliography. Socio Economic Planning Sci. 1971;5:57–71.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Baker J, Lovell K, Harris N. How expert are the experts? An exploration of the concept of 'expert' within Delphi panel techniques. Nurse Researcher. 2006;14:59–69. Baker J, Lovell K, Harris N. How expert are the experts? An exploration of the concept of 'expert' within Delphi panel techniques. Nurse Researcher. 2006;14:59–69.
26.
go back to reference Strauss HJ, Ziegler HL. The Delphi and its use in social science research. J Creative Behav. 1975;9:253259.CrossRef Strauss HJ, Ziegler HL. The Delphi and its use in social science research. J Creative Behav. 1975;9:253259.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Meyer JW, Boli J, Thomas GM. Ontology and rationalization in the Western Cultural Account’. In: Scott WR, Meyer JW, editors. Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994. p. 9–27. Meyer JW, Boli J, Thomas GM. Ontology and rationalization in the Western Cultural Account’. In: Scott WR, Meyer JW, editors. Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994. p. 9–27.
28.
go back to reference Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2001. Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2001.
29.
go back to reference Chhokar JS, Brodbeck FC, House RJ. India. Diversity and Complexity in Action. In: House RJ, editor. Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE Book of In-Depth Studies of 25 Societies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008. p. 971–1020. Chhokar JS, Brodbeck FC, House RJ. India. Diversity and Complexity in Action. In: House RJ, editor. Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE Book of In-Depth Studies of 25 Societies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008. p. 971–1020.
30.
go back to reference Sinha JBP, Kanungo RN. Context Sensitivity and Balancing in Indian Organization behaviour. Int J Psychol. 1997;32(2):93–105.CrossRef Sinha JBP, Kanungo RN. Context Sensitivity and Balancing in Indian Organization behaviour. Int J Psychol. 1997;32(2):93–105.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Cappelli P, Singh H, Singh J, Useem M. The India Way: How India’s Top Leaders are Revolutionizing Management. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 2010. Cappelli P, Singh H, Singh J, Useem M. The India Way: How India’s Top Leaders are Revolutionizing Management. Boston: Harvard Business Press; 2010.
32.
go back to reference Garg RK, Singh TP. Management of Change - A Comprehensive Review. Global J Flexible Systems Management. 2006;7(1/2):45–60. Garg RK, Singh TP. Management of Change - A Comprehensive Review. Global J Flexible Systems Management. 2006;7(1/2):45–60.
33.
go back to reference Williams PL, Webb C. The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. J Advanced Nursing. 1994;19:180–6.CrossRef Williams PL, Webb C. The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. J Advanced Nursing. 1994;19:180–6.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Adler M, Ziglio E. Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi Method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 1996. Adler M, Ziglio E. Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi Method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 1996.
35.
go back to reference Linstone H, Turloff M. The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. London, UK: Addison-Wesley; 1975. Linstone H, Turloff M. The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. London, UK: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
36.
go back to reference Rowe G, Wright G. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. Int J Forecasting. 1999;15(4):353–75.CrossRef Rowe G, Wright G. The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. Int J Forecasting. 1999;15(4):353–75.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Delbeq A, Van de Ven A, Gustafson DH. Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, USA: Scott, Foresman and Company; 1975. Delbeq A, Van de Ven A, Gustafson DH. Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, USA: Scott, Foresman and Company; 1975.
38.
go back to reference Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PMM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Res Methodol. 2003;3:1–25. Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PMM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Res Methodol. 2003;3:1–25.
39.
go back to reference Fahera S, Carpenter L, Seers K. Development of a tool to rate the quality assessment of randomized controlled trials using a Delphi technique. J Advanced Nursing. 1997;25(6):1262–8.CrossRef Fahera S, Carpenter L, Seers K. Development of a tool to rate the quality assessment of randomized controlled trials using a Delphi technique. J Advanced Nursing. 1997;25(6):1262–8.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Nekolaichuk CL, Fainsinger RL, Lawlor PG. The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain: Comparison of pain classification features and pain intensity across diverse palliative care settings in eight countries. J Palliative Medicine. 2013;16(5):516–23.CrossRefPubMed Nekolaichuk CL, Fainsinger RL, Lawlor PG. The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain: Comparison of pain classification features and pain intensity across diverse palliative care settings in eight countries. J Palliative Medicine. 2013;16(5):516–23.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Hagen NA, Stiles C, Nekolaichuk C, Biondo P, Carlson LE, Fisher K, et al. The Alberta Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool for cancer patients: a validation study using a Delphi process and patient think-aloud interviews. J Pain Symptom Management. 2008;35(2):136–52. Hagen NA, Stiles C, Nekolaichuk C, Biondo P, Carlson LE, Fisher K, et al. The Alberta Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool for cancer patients: a validation study using a Delphi process and patient think-aloud interviews. J Pain Symptom Management. 2008;35(2):136–52.
42.
go back to reference Palter VN, MacRae HM, Grantcharov TP. Development of an objective evaluation tool to assess technical skill in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi methodology. Am J Surg. 2011;201(2):251–9.CrossRefPubMed Palter VN, MacRae HM, Grantcharov TP. Development of an objective evaluation tool to assess technical skill in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi methodology. Am J Surg. 2011;201(2):251–9.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Ramanan AV. Developing a disease activity tool for systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis by international consensus using the Delphi approach. Rheumatology. 2005;44(12):1574–8.CrossRefPubMed Ramanan AV. Developing a disease activity tool for systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis by international consensus using the Delphi approach. Rheumatology. 2005;44(12):1574–8.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Santrock JW. A Topical Approach to Human Life-span Development. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: McGraw-Hill; 2007. Santrock JW. A Topical Approach to Human Life-span Development. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: McGraw-Hill; 2007.
45.
go back to reference Halligan PW, Aylward M, editors. The Power of Belief: Psychosocial influence on illness, disability and medicine. UK: Oxford University Press; 2006. Halligan PW, Aylward M, editors. The Power of Belief: Psychosocial influence on illness, disability and medicine. UK: Oxford University Press; 2006.
48.
go back to reference Apelvist J, Bakker K, Van Houtum W, Nabuurs-Fransen M, Schaper N. International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot. Amsterdam: International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot; 1996. Apelvist J, Bakker K, Van Houtum W, Nabuurs-Fransen M, Schaper N. International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot. Amsterdam: International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot; 1996.
49.
go back to reference Peters JG, Lavery LA. Effectiveness of the Diabetic Foot Risk Classification System of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1442–7.CrossRefPubMed Peters JG, Lavery LA. Effectiveness of the Diabetic Foot Risk Classification System of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1442–7.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Redelmeier D, Tu J, Schull M, Ferris L, Hux JE. Problems for clinical judgement: Obtaining a reliable past medical history. Can Med Assoc J. 2001;164:809–13. Redelmeier D, Tu J, Schull M, Ferris L, Hux JE. Problems for clinical judgement: Obtaining a reliable past medical history. Can Med Assoc J. 2001;164:809–13.
51.
go back to reference Bower VM, Hobbs M. Validation of the Basic Foot Screening Checklist. A Population Screening Tool for Identifying Foot Ulcer Risk in People with Diabetes Mellitus. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association., 2009;99(4). Bower VM, Hobbs M. Validation of the Basic Foot Screening Checklist. A Population Screening Tool for Identifying Foot Ulcer Risk in People with Diabetes Mellitus. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association., 2009;99(4).
52.
go back to reference Toro B, Nester CJ, Farren PC. The Development and Validity of the Salford Gait Tool: An Observation-Based Clinical Gait Assessment Tool. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(3):321-7. Toro B, Nester CJ, Farren PC. The Development and Validity of the Salford Gait Tool: An Observation-Based Clinical Gait Assessment Tool. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(3):321-7.
53.
go back to reference McInnes A, Baird S. Diabetic foot care training in the absence of podiatrists. Diabetic Foot J. 2009;12(3):104–10. McInnes A, Baird S. Diabetic foot care training in the absence of podiatrists. Diabetic Foot J. 2009;12(3):104–10.
54.
go back to reference Murugesan N, Shobana R, Snehalatha C, Kapur A, Ramachandra A. Immediate impact of a diabetes training programme for primary care physicians- An endeavour for national capacity building for diabetes management in India. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2009;83:140–4.CrossRefPubMed Murugesan N, Shobana R, Snehalatha C, Kapur A, Ramachandra A. Immediate impact of a diabetes training programme for primary care physicians- An endeavour for national capacity building for diabetes management in India. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2009;83:140–4.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Bakker K, Abbas ZG, Pendsey S. Step by step, improving diabetic foot care in the developing world. Practical Diabetes Int. 2006;23(8):365–9.CrossRef Bakker K, Abbas ZG, Pendsey S. Step by step, improving diabetic foot care in the developing world. Practical Diabetes Int. 2006;23(8):365–9.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Thompson D, Estabrooks C, Scott-Findlay S, Moore K, Wallin L. Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: A systematic review. Implementation Science. 2007;2(1):1–16.CrossRef Thompson D, Estabrooks C, Scott-Findlay S, Moore K, Wallin L. Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: A systematic review. Implementation Science. 2007;2(1):1–16.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Dufault MA, Bielecki C, Collins E, Willey C. Changing nurses’ pain assessment practice: A collabo- rative research utilization approach. J Advanced Nursing. 1995;21(4):634–45.CrossRef Dufault MA, Bielecki C, Collins E, Willey C. Changing nurses’ pain assessment practice: A collabo- rative research utilization approach. J Advanced Nursing. 1995;21(4):634–45.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An action research approach to facilitating the adoption of a foot health assessment tool in India
Authors
Michael Harrison-Blount
Michelle Cullen
Christopher J. Nester
Anita E. Williams
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1757-1146
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0108-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2015 Go to the issue