Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Hematology & Oncology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Myelodysplastic Syndrome | Research

Novel scheme for defining the clinical implications of TP53 mutations in myeloid neoplasia

Authors: Waled Bahaj, Tariq Kewan, Carmelo Gurnari, Arda Durmaz, Ben Ponvilawan, Ishani Pandit, Yasuo Kubota, Olisaemeka D. Ogbue, Misam Zawit, Yazan Madanat, Taha Bat, Suresh K. Balasubramanian, Hussein Awada, Ramsha Ahmed, Minako Mori, Manja Meggendorfer, Torsten Haferlach, Valeria Visconte, Jaroslaw P. Maciejewski

Published in: Journal of Hematology & Oncology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

TP53 mutations (TP53MT) occur in diverse genomic configurations. Particularly, biallelic inactivation is associated with poor overall survival in cancer. Lesions affecting only one allele might not be directly leukemogenic, questioning the presence of cryptic biallelic subclones in cases with dismal prognosis.

Methods

We have collected clinical and molecular data of 7400 patients with myeloid neoplasms and applied a novel model by identifying an optimal VAF cutoff using a statistically robust strategy of sampling-based regression on survival data to accurately classify the TP53 allelic configuration and assess prognosis more precisely.

Results

Overall, TP53MT were found in 1010 patients. Following the traditional criteria, 36% of the cases were classified as single hits, while 64% exhibited double hits genomic configuration. Using a newly developed molecular algorithm, we found that 579 (57%) patients had unequivocally biallelic, 239 (24%) likely contained biallelic, and 192 (19%) had most likely monoallelic TP53MT. Interestingly, our method was able to upstage 192 out of 352 (54.5%) traditionally single hit lesions into a probable biallelic category. Such classification was further substantiated by a survival-based model built after re-categorization. Among cases traditionally considered monoallelic, the overall survival of those with probable monoallelic mutations was similar to the one of wild-type patients and was better than that of patients with a biallelic configuration. As a result, patients with certain biallelic hits, regardless of the disease subtype (AML or MDS), had a similar prognosis. Similar results were observed when the model was applied to an external cohort. In addition, single-cell DNA studies unveiled the biallelic nature of previously considered monoallelic cases.

Conclusion

Our novel approach more accurately resolves TP53 genomic configuration and uncovers genetic mosaicism for the use in the clinical setting to improve prognostic evaluation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
16.
go back to reference Elsa Bernard PDea. Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes. NEJM evidence; 2022. Elsa Bernard PDea. Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes. NEJM evidence; 2022.
20.
24.
go back to reference Ishwaran H, and U. B. Kogalur. Fast unified random forests for survival, regression, and classification (RF-SRC); R package version 2.1 2019. Ishwaran H, and U. B. Kogalur. Fast unified random forests for survival, regression, and classification (RF-SRC); R package version 2.1 2019.
Metadata
Title
Novel scheme for defining the clinical implications of TP53 mutations in myeloid neoplasia
Authors
Waled Bahaj
Tariq Kewan
Carmelo Gurnari
Arda Durmaz
Ben Ponvilawan
Ishani Pandit
Yasuo Kubota
Olisaemeka D. Ogbue
Misam Zawit
Yazan Madanat
Taha Bat
Suresh K. Balasubramanian
Hussein Awada
Ramsha Ahmed
Minako Mori
Manja Meggendorfer
Torsten Haferlach
Valeria Visconte
Jaroslaw P. Maciejewski
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1756-8722
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-023-01480-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Journal of Hematology & Oncology 1/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine