Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Patient Safety in Surgery 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

Cognition errors in the treatment course of patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal resection

Authors: P. Vogel, D. H. V. Vogel

Published in: Patient Safety in Surgery | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cognitive errors have a considerable effect on procedural outcome. They play a major role in situational judgement and decision making, especially during cognitively demanding tasks. As such they need to be considered an important factor in medical and surgical procedures. However, whereas cognitive diagnostic errors are well known, as of yet the occurrence of errors due to cognitive heuristics may have been downplayed, underestimated, or simply been ignored during the course of surgical treatment.

Methods

All colorectal resections with anastomosis in 2015 and 2016 (n = 230) were prospectively screened for anastomotic failure (n = 17/230). During structured Morbidity and Mortality Conferences (MMC) all anastomotic failures were analyzed for both tactical and technical decisions in the pre- and intraoperative setting with potential meaning for the postoperative course, based on the London Protocol. In order to demonstrate the significance of cognitive errors in surgical procedures a structured interview with the individual surgeon was conducted including the video and photo documentation of the individual surgical procedure. The interviews were coded by independent coders who were instructed to identify defined cognitive errors. Inter-coder agreement was calculated using Krippendorff’s alpha.

Results

In 12/17 patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal surgery tactical or technical decisions with potential negative influence on anastomotic healing or the postoperative course were assessed during MMC. In 8/12 procedures a structured interview could be conducted with the operating surgeon. In 7/8 procedures cognitive errors could be identified. In particular we found Anchoring (n = 1), Availability Bias (n = 1), Commission Bias (n = 1), Overconfidence Bias (n = 1), Omission Bias (n = 2) and Sunk Costs (n = 1).

Conclusion

Cognitive errors seem to play an important role during surgical therapy of patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal resection. Consequently, we suggest cognitive errors should attract more interest in research as well as attention in clinical practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ilyas MLM, Zangbar B, Nfonsam VN, Maegawa FA, Joseph BA, Patel JA, Wexner SD. Are there differences in outcome after elective sigmodectomy for diverticular disease and for cancer? A national inpatient study. Colorectal Disease. 2016;19:260–5.CrossRef Ilyas MLM, Zangbar B, Nfonsam VN, Maegawa FA, Joseph BA, Patel JA, Wexner SD. Are there differences in outcome after elective sigmodectomy for diverticular disease and for cancer? A national inpatient study. Colorectal Disease. 2016;19:260–5.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pommergaard H-C, Gessler B, Burcharth J, Angenete E, Haglind E, Rosenberg J. Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis. 2014;16:662–71.CrossRef Pommergaard H-C, Gessler B, Burcharth J, Angenete E, Haglind E, Rosenberg J. Preoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis. 2014;16:662–71.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Vogel, P Nicht-patientenbezogene Risikofaktoren für Entstehung und Behandlungsverlauf einer Anastomoseninsuffizienz nach Kolonresektion. – Ergebnisse einer strukturierten M+M-Konferenz. Zentralbl Chir 2017; epub ahead of print DOI https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-117175. Vogel, P Nicht-patientenbezogene Risikofaktoren für Entstehung und Behandlungsverlauf einer Anastomoseninsuffizienz nach Kolonresektion. – Ergebnisse einer strukturierten M+M-Konferenz. Zentralbl Chir 2017; epub ahead of print DOI https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-0043-117175.
4.
go back to reference Stiegler MP, Neelankavil JP, Canales C, Dhillon A. Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study. Br J Anaestesia. 2012;108:229–35.CrossRef Stiegler MP, Neelankavil JP, Canales C, Dhillon A. Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study. Br J Anaestesia. 2012;108:229–35.CrossRef
5.
6.
7.
go back to reference Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185:1124–31.CrossRef Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185:1124–31.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brennan PA, Mitchell DA, Holmes S, Plint S, Parry D. Good people who try their best can have problems: recognition of human factors and how to minimize errors. Br J Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54:3–7.CrossRef Brennan PA, Mitchell DA, Holmes S, Plint S, Parry D. Good people who try their best can have problems: recognition of human factors and how to minimize errors. Br J Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54:3–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Corkerry P. Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection bias. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:1184–204.CrossRef Corkerry P. Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection bias. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:1184–204.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Singh H, Peterson LA, Thomas EJ. Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: a lesson learned from aviation. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:159–64.CrossRef Singh H, Peterson LA, Thomas EJ. Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: a lesson learned from aviation. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:159–64.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Espinosa JA, Nolan TW. Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: a longitudinal study. BMJ. 2000;320:737–40.CrossRef Espinosa JA, Nolan TW. Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: a longitudinal study. BMJ. 2000;320:737–40.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Carayon P, Wood KE. Patient safety: the role of human factors and systems engineering. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;153:23–46.PubMedPubMedCentral Carayon P, Wood KE. Patient safety: the role of human factors and systems engineering. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;153:23–46.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Thomas EJ, Brennan TA. Incidence and types of preventable adverse events in elderly patients: population based review of medical records. BMJ. 2000;320:741–4.CrossRef Thomas EJ, Brennan TA. Incidence and types of preventable adverse events in elderly patients: population based review of medical records. BMJ. 2000;320:741–4.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dekker SWA, Hugh TB. Laparoscopic bile duct injury: understanding the psychology and heuristics of the error. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:1109–14.CrossRef Dekker SWA, Hugh TB. Laparoscopic bile duct injury: understanding the psychology and heuristics of the error. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:1109–14.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Madani A, Watanabe Y, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Barkun JS, Fried GM, Aggarwal R. Expert intraoperative judgement and decision making: defining cognitive competencies for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:931–40.CrossRef Madani A, Watanabe Y, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Barkun JS, Fried GM, Aggarwal R. Expert intraoperative judgement and decision making: defining cognitive competencies for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:931–40.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Büchler MW. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the international study group of rectal cancer. Surgery. 2010;147:339–51.CrossRef Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Büchler MW. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the international study group of rectal cancer. Surgery. 2010;147:339–51.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Vincent T, Taylor-Adams S, Stanhope N. Framework for analyzing risk and safety in clinical medicine. BMJ. 1998;316:1154–7.CrossRef Vincent T, Taylor-Adams S, Stanhope N. Framework for analyzing risk and safety in clinical medicine. BMJ. 1998;316:1154–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nandakumar G, Stein SL, Michelassi F. Anastomoses of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:709–16.CrossRef Nandakumar G, Stein SL, Michelassi F. Anastomoses of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:709–16.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;320:114–6.CrossRef Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;320:114–6.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mayring P. Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt: Psychopen; 2014. Mayring P. Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt: Psychopen; 2014.
21.
go back to reference Hayes AF, Krippendorff K. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun Methods Meas. 2007;1:77–89.CrossRef Hayes AF, Krippendorff K. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun Methods Meas. 2007;1:77–89.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Archampong D, Borowski DW, Dickinson HO. Impact of surgeon volume on outcomes in rectal cancer surgery: a systemic review and meta analysis. Surgeon. 2010;8:341–52.CrossRef Archampong D, Borowski DW, Dickinson HO. Impact of surgeon volume on outcomes in rectal cancer surgery: a systemic review and meta analysis. Surgeon. 2010;8:341–52.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mroczkowski P, Kube R, Ptok H, Schmidt U, Hac S, Köckerling F, Gastinger I, Lippert H. Low volume center vs high volume: the role of quality assurance programme in colon cancer surgery. Color Dis. 2011;13:e276–83.CrossRef Mroczkowski P, Kube R, Ptok H, Schmidt U, Hac S, Köckerling F, Gastinger I, Lippert H. Low volume center vs high volume: the role of quality assurance programme in colon cancer surgery. Color Dis. 2011;13:e276–83.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Reason J, Carthey J, de Leval MR. Diagnosing “vulnerable system syndrome”: an essential prerequisite to effective risk management. Qual Health Care. 2001;10(Suppl 2):ii21–5.PubMedPubMedCentral Reason J, Carthey J, de Leval MR. Diagnosing “vulnerable system syndrome”: an essential prerequisite to effective risk management. Qual Health Care. 2001;10(Suppl 2):ii21–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Espin S, Lingard L, Baker GR, Regehr G. Persistance of unsafe practice in everyday work: an exploration of organizational and psychological factors constraining safety in the operating room. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:165–70.CrossRef Espin S, Lingard L, Baker GR, Regehr G. Persistance of unsafe practice in everyday work: an exploration of organizational and psychological factors constraining safety in the operating room. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:165–70.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Amalberti R, Vincent C, Auroy Y, de Saint Maurice G. Violations and migrations in health care: a framework for understanding and management. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(Suppl 1):i66–71.CrossRef Amalberti R, Vincent C, Auroy Y, de Saint Maurice G. Violations and migrations in health care: a framework for understanding and management. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(Suppl 1):i66–71.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Amalberti R, Auroy Y, Berwick D, Barack P. Five system barriers to achieving ultrasafe health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:756–64.CrossRef Amalberti R, Auroy Y, Berwick D, Barack P. Five system barriers to achieving ultrasafe health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:756–64.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Choudry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB. Systemic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:260–73.CrossRef Choudry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB. Systemic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:260–73.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bonrath EM, Dedy NJ, Zevin B, Grantcharov TP. International consensus on safe techniques and error definitions in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1535–44.CrossRef Bonrath EM, Dedy NJ, Zevin B, Grantcharov TP. International consensus on safe techniques and error definitions in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1535–44.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kuntz L, Mennicken R, Scholtes S. Stress on the ward: evidence of safety tipping poits in hospitals. Manag Sci. 2015;61:754–71.CrossRef Kuntz L, Mennicken R, Scholtes S. Stress on the ward: evidence of safety tipping poits in hospitals. Manag Sci. 2015;61:754–71.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Arkes HR, Blumer C. The psychology of sunk cost. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1985;35:124–40.CrossRef Arkes HR, Blumer C. The psychology of sunk cost. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1985;35:124–40.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Graber M. Metacognitive training to reduce diagnostic errors: ready for prime time. Acad Med. 2003;78:781.CrossRef Graber M. Metacognitive training to reduce diagnostic errors: ready for prime time. Acad Med. 2003;78:781.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Wallace L, Raison N, Ghumman F, Moran A, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Cognitive training: how can it be adapted for surgical education? Surgeon. 2017;15:231–9.CrossRef Wallace L, Raison N, Ghumman F, Moran A, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Cognitive training: how can it be adapted for surgical education? Surgeon. 2017;15:231–9.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 1995;18:179–83.CrossRef Sandelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health. 1995;18:179–83.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cognition errors in the treatment course of patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal resection
Authors
P. Vogel
D. H. V. Vogel
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Patient Safety in Surgery / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1754-9493
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-019-0184-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Patient Safety in Surgery 1/2019 Go to the issue