Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BioPsychoSocial Medicine 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Public Health | Research

Reliability and validity of the English, Chinese, Korean, Indonesian, and Vietnamese versions of the public health research foundation stress checklist short form

Authors: Yoko HAYASHI, Yoshie IMAZU, Sixin DENG, Masato MURAKAMI

Published in: BioPsychoSocial Medicine | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Foreign nationals residing in Japan account for approximately 2% of the total population (i.e., approximately 2.6 million people). Of these, 12% are not proficient in speaking Japanese and 25% experience difficulty reading Japanese. Therefore, a simple, convenient, and accurate scale in the native language of foreign nationals is required to support their mental health. In this study, the Public Health Research Foundation Stress Checklist Short Form (PHRF-SCL (SF)) was translated into five languages and the reliability and validity of the translations were confirmed.

Methods

The five translated versions of the PHRF-SCL (SF) have been reverse-translated into the original language, Japanese. The creator confirmed that there were no inconsistencies between the Japanese and reverse-translated versions. A total of 777 adults aged 18–64 years participated in the study. They were asked to complete the native language versions of the PHRF-SCL (SF) and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS 21) online.

Results

An exploratory factor analysis yielded the same four-factor structure as the original. Internal consistency was confirmed by the alpha coefficients of the subscales. Participants were classified into two groups on the basis of the severity classification obtained from each subscale of the DASS 21. Scores of PHRF-SCL (SF) are significantly higher in groups classified as symptomatic by DASS 21, thereby confirming construct validity. Concomitant validity was confirmed based on correlations with the DASS 21.

Conclusions

English, Chinese, Korean, Indonesian, and Vietnamese versions of the PHRF-SCL(SF) have been prepared. Although these versions are subject to further statistical analysis, the results were sufficiently substantiated for practical use. This scale is expected to contribute to the promotion of mental health services for people from these countries.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Imazu Y, Matsuno T, Murakami M, Hayashi Y, Sugiyama T. A study of the construct validity of the Public Health Research Foundation stress checklist (short form): the relationship between stress response and egograms (SGE) in patients visiting the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine. Jpn J Psychosom Med. 2016;56:263–70. https://doi.org/10.15064/jjpm.56.3_263.CrossRef Imazu Y, Matsuno T, Murakami M, Hayashi Y, Sugiyama T. A study of the construct validity of the Public Health Research Foundation stress checklist (short form): the relationship between stress response and egograms (SGE) in patients visiting the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine. Jpn J Psychosom Med. 2016;56:263–70. https://​doi.​org/​10.​15064/​jjpm.​56.​3_​263.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lovibond H, Lovibond P. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. 2nd ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia; 2020. Lovibond H, Lovibond P. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. 2nd ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia; 2020.
8.
go back to reference Li XL, Tang HB, Guo F, He HY. A review of depression-anxiety-stress scale’s reliability and validity.Chin J Clin Psychol. 2012;350–2. Li XL, Tang HB, Guo F, He HY. A review of depression-anxiety-stress scale’s reliability and validity.Chin J Clin Psychol. 2012;350–2.
Metadata
Title
Reliability and validity of the English, Chinese, Korean, Indonesian, and Vietnamese versions of the public health research foundation stress checklist short form
Authors
Yoko HAYASHI
Yoshie IMAZU
Sixin DENG
Masato MURAKAMI
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1751-0759
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-023-00271-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BioPsychoSocial Medicine 1/2023 Go to the issue