Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BioPsychoSocial Medicine 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

The reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Daily Record of Severity of Problems (J-DRSP) and Development of a Short-Form version (J-DRSP (SF)) to assess symptoms of premenstrual syndrome among Japanese women

Authors: Yumie Ikeda, Miho Egawa, Kazuya Okamoto, Masaki Mandai, Yoshimitsu Takahashi, Takeo Nakayama

Published in: BioPsychoSocial Medicine | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Daily Record of Severity of Problems (J-DRSP, 24 items) for evaluating symptoms of premenstrual syndrome (PMS), and to develop a short form version of the J-DRSP.

Methods

Using the “DRSP-JAPAN” smartphone app, we collected daily J-DRSP records from cycle day − 6 (CD − 6) to CD 10, with CD 1 representing the menstruation onset date. Factorial validity (exploratory factor analysis: EFA, confirmatory factor analysis: CFA) and criterion validity were examined, and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation: ICC) evaluated. The short-form version of the J-DRSP was developed using classical test theory.

Results

In total, 304 women participated and 243 recorded symptoms on at least 4 days spanning the week of the luteal phase (CD − 6 to CD 0) and 4 days spanning the week of the follicular phase (CD 4 to CD 10), with CD 0 set as the day before menstruation started. The EFA revealed a two-factor structure. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was 0.992, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity chi-square was 3653.89 (P < 0.001). However, the model fitness of CFA was found to be suboptimal (comparative fit index (CFI): 0.83, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA): 0.12). Total scores for J-DRSP and the sum scores for each subscale were higher on CD 0 than on CD 10 (p < 0.001), suggesting validity for some criteria. ICC values for the total J-DRSP score from CD 0 to CD − 1, and between CD 9 to CD 10, were 0.60 (95% CI: 0.48–0.72) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69–0.82), respectively. Having eliminated some original items after considering factor loading for each item, we developed an 8-item Short-Form J-DRSP (J-DRSP (SF)) comprising 2 factors (S-Psychological and S-Physical, 4 items for each). CFA showed a better model fit (CFI: 0.99, RMSEA: 0.048), and ICC values in the luteal and follicular phases were 0.61 (95%CI: 0.51–0.68) and 0.70 (95%CI: 0.62–0.77), respectively.

Conclusion

The J-DRSP has moderate to good reliability and a certain level of validity. The 8-item J-DRSP (SF) has a two-factor structure and can be used effectively among Japanese women to assess their PMS symptoms.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Borenstein JE, Dean BB, Yonkers KA, Endicott J. Using the daily record of severity of problems as a screening instrument for premenstrual syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(5):1068–75.CrossRef Borenstein JE, Dean BB, Yonkers KA, Endicott J. Using the daily record of severity of problems as a screening instrument for premenstrual syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(5):1068–75.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Survey on Health Promotion and Working Women. Health and global policy institute. 2018;2018. Survey on Health Promotion and Working Women. Health and global policy institute. 2018;2018.
3.
go back to reference Green LJ, O’Brien PMS, Panay N, Craig M, on behalf of the Royal College of obstetricians and Gynaecologist. Management of Premenstrual Syndrome. BJOG. 2017;124:e73–e105.CrossRef Green LJ, O’Brien PMS, Panay N, Craig M, on behalf of the Royal College of obstetricians and Gynaecologist. Management of Premenstrual Syndrome. BJOG. 2017;124:e73–e105.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Eisenlohr-Moul TA, Girdler SS, Schmalenberger KM, Dawson DN, Surana P, Johnson JL, et al. Toward the reliable diagnosis of DSM-5 premenstrual Dysphoric disorder: the Carolina premenstrual assessment scoring system (C-PASS). Am J Psychiatr. 2017;174(1):51–9.CrossRef Eisenlohr-Moul TA, Girdler SS, Schmalenberger KM, Dawson DN, Surana P, Johnson JL, et al. Toward the reliable diagnosis of DSM-5 premenstrual Dysphoric disorder: the Carolina premenstrual assessment scoring system (C-PASS). Am J Psychiatr. 2017;174(1):51–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Armour M, Ee CC, Hao J, Wilson TM, Yao SS, Smith CA. Acupuncture and acupressure for premenstrual syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8(8):Cd005290.PubMed Armour M, Ee CC, Hao J, Wilson TM, Yao SS, Smith CA. Acupuncture and acupressure for premenstrual syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8(8):Cd005290.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Lundin C, Danielsson KG, Bixo M, Moby L, Bengtsdotter H, Jawad I, et al. Combined oral contraceptive use is associated with both improvement and worsening of mood in the different phases of the treatment cycle-a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;76:135–43.CrossRef Lundin C, Danielsson KG, Bixo M, Moby L, Bengtsdotter H, Jawad I, et al. Combined oral contraceptive use is associated with both improvement and worsening of mood in the different phases of the treatment cycle-a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;76:135–43.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.CrossRef Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ikeda Y, Egawa M, Hiyoshi K, Ueno T, Ueda K, Becker CB, Takahashi Y, Nakayama T, Mandai M. Development of a Japanese Version of the Daily Record of Severity of Problems for Diagnosing Premenstrual Syndrome. Womens Health Rep. 2020;1(1):11-6. Ikeda Y, Egawa M, Hiyoshi K, Ueno T, Ueda K, Becker CB, Takahashi Y, Nakayama T, Mandai M. Development of a Japanese Version of the Daily Record of Severity of Problems for Diagnosing Premenstrual Syndrome. Womens Health Rep. 2020;1(1):11-6.
9.
go back to reference Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W. Daily record of severity of problems (DRSP): reliability and validity. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2006;9(1):41–9.CrossRef Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W. Daily record of severity of problems (DRSP): reliability and validity. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2006;9(1):41–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Eremenco S, Pease S, Mann S, Berry P. PRO Consortium’s Process Subcommittee. Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Consortium translation process: consensus development of updated best practices. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;2(1):12.CrossRef Eremenco S, Pease S, Mann S, Berry P. PRO Consortium’s Process Subcommittee. Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Consortium translation process: consensus development of updated best practices. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;2(1):12.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1–55.CrossRef Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1–55.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wu L, He Z, Zhao H, Ma D, Zhang S, Deng H, et al. Chinese version of daily record of severity of problems: reliability and validity. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(2):449–56.CrossRef Wu L, He Z, Zhao H, Ma D, Zhang S, Deng H, et al. Chinese version of daily record of severity of problems: reliability and validity. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(2):449–56.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Daily Record of Severity of Problems (J-DRSP) and Development of a Short-Form version (J-DRSP (SF)) to assess symptoms of premenstrual syndrome among Japanese women
Authors
Yumie Ikeda
Miho Egawa
Kazuya Okamoto
Masaki Mandai
Yoshimitsu Takahashi
Takeo Nakayama
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1751-0759
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-021-00208-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BioPsychoSocial Medicine 1/2021 Go to the issue