Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Principles for interactions with biopharmaceutical companies: the development of guidelines for patient advocacy organizations in the field of rare diseases

Authors: Susan Stein, Elizabeth Bogard, Nicole Boice, Vivian Fernandez, Tessa Field, Alan Gilstrap, Susan R. Kahn, Jane Larkindale, Toni Mathieson

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Rare diseases are a global public health concern, affecting an estimated 350 million individuals. Only 5% of approximately 7000 known rare diseases have a treatment, and only about half have a patient advocacy organization. Biopharmaceutical companies face complex challenges in developing treatments for rare diseases. Patient advocacy organizations may play a major role by positively influencing research and development, clinical trials, and regulations. Thus, collaboration among patient advocacy organizations and industry is essential to bring new therapeutics to patients.

Methods

We identified an unmet need for guidelines on day-to-day decision-making by rare disease patient advocacy organizations when working with biopharmaceutical partners. We convened an Independent Expert Panel experienced in collaborations between patient advocacy organizations and biopharmaceutical companies (April 2017) to develop consensus guidelines for these relationships. The guidelines were based on an original version by the International Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Association (IFOPA). The Expert Panel reviewed and broadened these to be applicable to all patient advocacy organizations. Comments on the draft Guidelines were provided first by Panel participants and subsequently by six independent experts from patient advocacy organizations and industry.

Results

The Panel comprised four experts from the rare disease community who lead patient advocacy organizations; three leaders who perform advocacy functions within biopharmaceutical companies; and two facilitators, both having leadership experience in rare diseases and industry. The finalized Guidelines consist of four main sections: Identification and Engagement With Companies, Patient Engagement and Patient Privacy, Financial Contributions, and Clinical Trial Communication and Support. The Guidelines address the daily considerations, choices, and consequences of patient advocacy organizations as they engage with biopharmaceutical companies, and offer recommendations for volunteer/paid leaders of the organizations on how to interact in a thoughtful, responsible, ethical way that engenders trust.

Conclusions

These Guidelines recommend best practices and standards for interactions between patient advocacy organizations and industry that will ultimately have a positive effect on the development of novel treatments. Patient advocacy organizations will be provided free access to these Guidelines to help bring clarification to day-to-day decision-making around their interactions, and for use as a living document with the potential for regular revisions and updates.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Myshko D. Rare Diseases: Research, Development, and Commercialization. PharmaVOICE. 2015:15–21. Myshko D. Rare Diseases: Research, Development, and Commercialization. PharmaVOICE. 2015:15–21.
5.
go back to reference Nijsten T, Bergstresser PR. Patient advocacy groups: let’s stick together. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:1757–9. [Editorial]CrossRefPubMed Nijsten T, Bergstresser PR. Patient advocacy groups: let’s stick together. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:1757–9. [Editorial]CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dunkle M, Pines W, Saltonstall PL. Advocacy groups and their role in rare disease research. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;686:515–25.CrossRefPubMed Dunkle M, Pines W, Saltonstall PL. Advocacy groups and their role in rare disease research. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;686:515–25.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference McCoy MS, Carnoil M, Chockley K, Urwin JW, Emanuel EJ, Schmidt H. Conflicts of interest for patient-advocacy organizations. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:880–5.CrossRefPubMed McCoy MS, Carnoil M, Chockley K, Urwin JW, Emanuel EJ, Schmidt H. Conflicts of interest for patient-advocacy organizations. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:880–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference The International Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Association (IFOPA) Guidelines for Engagement with Pharmaceutical Companies. V1.0; Casselberry, FL: IFOPA. 2016. The International Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Association (IFOPA) Guidelines for Engagement with Pharmaceutical Companies. V1.0; Casselberry, FL: IFOPA. 2016.
Metadata
Title
Principles for interactions with biopharmaceutical companies: the development of guidelines for patient advocacy organizations in the field of rare diseases
Authors
Susan Stein
Elizabeth Bogard
Nicole Boice
Vivian Fernandez
Tessa Field
Alan Gilstrap
Susan R. Kahn
Jane Larkindale
Toni Mathieson
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0761-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2018 Go to the issue