Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Esophagus Resection | Research article

Learning curve for minimally invasive oesophagectomy of oesophageal cancer and survival analysis

Authors: Yunpeng Zhao, Lei Shan, Chuanliang Peng, Bo Cong, Xiaogang Zhao

Published in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Minimally invasive oesophagectomy is a technically demanding procedure, and the learning curve for this procedure should be explored. A survival analysis should also be performed.

Methods

A total of 214 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive oesophagectomy were retrospectively reviewed. To evaluate the development of thoracoscopic-laparoscopic oesophagectomy and compare mature minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy, we comprehensively studied the clinical and surgical parameters. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) plot was used to evaluate the learning curve for systemic lymphadenectomy. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to explore the clinical factors affecting survival.

Results

The bleeding volume, operation time, and postoperative mortality within 3 months significantly decreased after 20 patients. The rise point for node dissection was visually determined to occur at patient 57 in the CUSUM plots. Patients who underwent mature thoracoscopic-laparoscopic oesophagectomy had better surgical data and short-term benefits than patients who underwent an open procedure. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the maximum diameter of the tumour cross-sectional area and the number of positive nodes significantly influenced survival.

Conclusions

The results suggest that thoracoscopic-laparoscopic oesophagectomy has short-term benefits. There was no evidence that it was associated with a significantly better prognosis for patients with oesophageal cancer.
ClinicalTrials Gov ID: NCT04217239; January 2, 2020 retrospectively registered.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.CrossRef Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tew WP, Kelsen DP, Ilson DH. Targeted therapies for esophageal cancer. Oncologist. 2005;10(8):590–601.CrossRef Tew WP, Kelsen DP, Ilson DH. Targeted therapies for esophageal cancer. Oncologist. 2005;10(8):590–601.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(3):257–65.CrossRef Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(3):257–65.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Raymond DP, Seder CW, Wright CD, et al. Predictors of major morbidity or mortality after resection for esophageal cancer: a society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic surgery database risk adjustment model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(1):207–14.CrossRef Raymond DP, Seder CW, Wright CD, et al. Predictors of major morbidity or mortality after resection for esophageal cancer: a society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic surgery database risk adjustment model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(1):207–14.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jamieson GG, Lamb PJ, Thompson SK. The role of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;250:206–9.CrossRef Jamieson GG, Lamb PJ, Thompson SK. The role of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;250:206–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg. 2003;90:108–13.CrossRef Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg. 2003;90:108–13.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Langer FB, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3044–53.CrossRef Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Langer FB, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3044–53.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, et al. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg. 2009;33:1868–75.CrossRef Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, et al. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg. 2009;33:1868–75.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, et al. Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:162–7.CrossRef Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, et al. Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:162–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:381–90.CrossRef Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:381–90.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dhamija A, Rosen JE, Dhamija A, et al. Learning curve to lymph node resection in minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Innovations. 2014;9:286–91.CrossRef Dhamija A, Rosen JE, Dhamija A, et al. Learning curve to lymph node resection in minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Innovations. 2014;9:286–91.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Xie X, Fu JH, Wang JY, et al. Analysis of learning process of video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012;15(9):918–21.PubMed Xie X, Fu JH, Wang JY, et al. Analysis of learning process of video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012;15(9):918–21.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Zhao Y, Dong X, Cong B, et al. Development pattern on lymph node resection in minimally invasive esophagectomy and 2-year survival analysis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64(7):606–10.CrossRef Zhao Y, Dong X, Cong B, et al. Development pattern on lymph node resection in minimally invasive esophagectomy and 2-year survival analysis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64(7):606–10.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Agha R, Abdall-Razak A, Crossley E, et al, for the STROCSS Group. The STROCSS 2019 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int J Surg 2019;72:156–165. Agha R, Abdall-Razak A, Crossley E, et al, for the STROCSS Group. The STROCSS 2019 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery. Int J Surg 2019;72:156–165.
16.
go back to reference Dutkowski P, Hommel G, Bottger T, et al. How many lymph nodes are needed for an accurate pN classification in esophageal cancer? Evidence for a new threshold value. Hepatogastroenterol. 2002;49:176–80. Dutkowski P, Hommel G, Bottger T, et al. How many lymph nodes are needed for an accurate pN classification in esophageal cancer? Evidence for a new threshold value. Hepatogastroenterol. 2002;49:176–80.
17.
go back to reference Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW, et al. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251:46–50.CrossRef Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW, et al. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251:46–50.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, et al. Technique of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(10):1613–8.CrossRef Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, et al. Technique of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(10):1613–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Biere SS, vail Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-1abel, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:1887–92. Biere SS, vail Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-1abel, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:1887–92.
22.
go back to reference Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, et al. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg. 2009;33(9):1868–75.CrossRef Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, et al. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg. 2009;33(9):1868–75.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir. 2009;64(2):135–46.PubMed Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir. 2009;64(2):135–46.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256:95–103.CrossRef Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256:95–103.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Arm Surg. 2010;252:292–8. Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Arm Surg. 2010;252:292–8.
26.
go back to reference Li J, Tan L, Wang Q, et al. A retrospective study for Ivor-Lewis and McKeown esophagectomy: mininally invasive versus open esophagectomy. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;6(339–341):361. Li J, Tan L, Wang Q, et al. A retrospective study for Ivor-Lewis and McKeown esophagectomy: mininally invasive versus open esophagectomy. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;6(339–341):361.
27.
go back to reference Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastreintest Surg. 2012;16:486–94.CrossRef Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastreintest Surg. 2012;16:486–94.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mitzman B, Lutfi W, Wang CH, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent survival to open esophagectomy: an analysis of the national cancer database. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29(2):244–53.CrossRef Mitzman B, Lutfi W, Wang CH, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent survival to open esophagectomy: an analysis of the national cancer database. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29(2):244–53.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Weksler B, Sullivan JL. Survival after esophagectomy: a propensity-matched study of different surgical approaches. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104:1138–46.CrossRef Weksler B, Sullivan JL. Survival after esophagectomy: a propensity-matched study of different surgical approaches. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104:1138–46.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Learning curve for minimally invasive oesophagectomy of oesophageal cancer and survival analysis
Authors
Yunpeng Zhao
Lei Shan
Chuanliang Peng
Bo Cong
Xiaogang Zhao
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1749-8090
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01712-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue