Top

International Breastfeeding Journal

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Review

Mothers’ experiences and perceptions of breastfeeding peer support: a qualitative systematic review

Authors: Yuanyuan Yang, Huijuan Liu, Xiaoyi Cui, Jingwen Meng

Published in: International Breastfeeding Journal | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Background

The global issue of low breastfeeding rates has been widely reported. Quantitative studies have shown the positive effects of peer support on breastfeeding. However, the experiences of mothers who receive breastfeeding peer support have been found to vary. To date, no systematic qualitative summary has been conducted to document the impact of peer support, nor to provide advice for its implementation from the perspective of breastfeeding mothers. This review aims to systematically synthesize qualitative findings on mothers’ experiences of breastfeeding peer support to provide evidence for optimizing peer support services and ultimately enhancing their role in promoting breastfeeding.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Datebase, VIP Database and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) were searched from the inception of each database until January 2023, to collect qualitative studies and mixed methods studies that included qualitative findings on mothers’ experiences with breastfeeding peer support. The Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI) was used to extract data and evaluate the quality of the included articles. The meta-integration method was used to explain and integrate the research findings. The review process was carried out by two authors independently, and the disagreements were resolved through consensus.

Results

A total of 15 articles were included in the study, consisting of 13 qualitative studies and 2 mixed methods studies. The analysis identified four integrated themes: (1) obtaining psycho-emotional support; (2) acquiring knowledge and skills; (3) expectations for breastfeeding peer support; and (4) feeding perceptions and behavior change. It should be noted that the articles reviewed are in English and mostly originate from developed countries or regions. Therefore, the generalizability of the integrated findings to underdeveloped regions or non-English speaking countries may be limited.

Conclusion

Mothers perceived that peer support had a positive impact on breastfeeding. To improve the effectiveness of peer support in promoting breastfeeding, it is important to consider the individual needs of each mother. It is recommended that peer support services should be standardized in the future, including the accreditation, training, supervision, and management of peer supporters.

Available only for authorised users

Arts M, Taqi I, Bégin F. Improving the early initiation of Breastfeeding: the WHO-UNICEF Breastfeeding Advocacy Initiative. Breastfeed Med. 2017;12(6):326–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2017.0047.CrossRefPubMed

WHO. Global breastfeeding scorecard 2022: protecting breastfeeding through further investments and policy actions. 7 December 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HEP-NFS-22.6.

Balogun OO, O’sullivan EJ, Mcfadden, Ota E, Gavine A, Garner CD, et al. Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11(11):CD001688. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001688.pub3.CrossRefPubMed

Dennis CL. Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stu. 2003;40:321–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7489(02)00092-5.CrossRef

Meier PP, Engstrom JL, Rossman B. Breastfeeding peer counselors as direct lactation care providers in the neonatal Intensive Care Unit. J Hum Lact. 2013;29(3):313–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334413482184.CrossRefPubMed

Shakya P, Kunieda MK, Koyama M, Rai SS, Miyaguchi M, Dhakal S et al. Effectiveness of community-based peer support for mothers to improve their breastfeeding practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177434. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177434. eCollection 2017.

Scott S, Pritchard C, Szatkowski L. The impact of breastfeeding peer support for mothers aged under 25: a time series analysis. Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13(1):e12241. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12241.CrossRefPubMed

Lok KY, Chow CLY, Shing JSY, Smith R, Lam CCO, Bick B, et al. Feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of an innovative postnatal home-based breastfeeding peer support programme in Hong Kong: a feasibility and pilot randomised controlled trial. Int Breastfeed J. 2021;16:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-021-00381-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Forster DA, McLardie-Hore FE, McLachlan HL, Davey MA, Grimes HA, Dennis CL, et al. Proactive peer (mother-to-mother) breastfeeding support by telephone (ringing up about Breastfeeding early [RUBY]): a multicentre, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2019;8:20–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.02.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

McLardie-Hore FE, Forster DA, McLachlan HL, Shafiei T, Amir LH, Davey M, et al. Is proactive telephone-based breastfeeding peer support a cost-effective intervention? A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the ‘Ringing up about Breastfeeding Early’ (RUBY) randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2023;13(6):e067049. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067049.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Kabakian-Khasholian T, Nimer H, Ayash S, Nasser F, Nabulsi M. Experiences with peer support for breastfeeding in Beirut, Lebanon: a qualitative study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0223687. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Clarke JL, Ingram J, Johnson D, Thomson G, Trickey H, Dombrowski SU, et al. The ABA intervention for improving breastfeeding initiation and continuation: feasibility study results. Matern Child Nutr. 2020;16(1):e12907. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12907.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Quinn EM, Gallagher L, Vries JD. A qualitative exploration of breastfeeding support groups in Ireland from the women’s perspectives. Midwifery. 2019;78:71–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.08.001.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Schmied V, Beake S, Sheehan A, McCourt C, Dykes F. A meta-synthesis of women’s perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(14):583–614. https://doi.org/10.11124/01938924-200907140-00001.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Chang YS, Beake S, Kam J, Lok KY, Bick D. Views and experiences of women, peer supporters and healthcare professionals on breastfeeding peer support: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Midwifery. 2022;108:103299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103299.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Lockwood C, Porritt K, Munn Z, Rittenmeyer L, Salmond S, Bjerrum M et al. Chapter 2: Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI, 2020. Available from https://synthesismanual.jbi.global. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-03.

17.

Robinson A, Davis M, Hall J, Lauckner C, Anderson AK. It takes an e-village: supporting African American mothers in sustaining breastfeeding through Facebook communities. J Hum Lact. 2019;35(3):569–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419831652.CrossRefPubMed

18.

McLardie-Hore FE, Forster DA, Shafiei T, McLachlan HL. First-time mothers’ experiences of receiving proactive telephone-based peer support for breastfeeding in Australia: a qualitative study. Int Breastfeed J. 2022;17:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-022-00476-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Clapton-Caputo E, Sweet L, Muller A. A qualitative study of expectations and experiences of women using a social media support group when exclusively expressing breastmilk to feed their infant. Women Birth. 2021;34(4):370–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.06.010.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Black R, Mclaughlin M, Giles M. Women’s experience of social media breastfeeding support and its impact on extended breastfeeding success: a social cognitive perspective. Br J Health Psychol. 2020;25(3):754–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12451.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Ingram J, Thomson G, Johnsom D, Clarke LJ, Trickey H, Hoddinott P, et al. Women’s and peer supporters’ experiences of an assets-based peer support intervention for increasing breastfeeding initiation and continuation: a qualitative study. Health Expect. 2020;23(3):621–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13042.CrossRef

22.

Regan S, Brown A. Experiences of online breastfeeding support: support and reassurance versus judgement and misinformation. Matern Child Nutr. 2019;15(4):e12874. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12874.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Robinson K, Vandevusse L, Foster J. Reactions of low-income African American women to breastfeeding peer counselors. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2016;45(1):62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2015.10.011.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Ingram J. A mixed methods evaluation of peer support in Bristol, UK: mothers’, midwives’ and peer supporters’ views and the effects on breastfeeding. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:192. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-192.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Thomson G, Crossland N, Dykes F. Giving me hope: women’s reflections on a breastfeeding peer support service. Matern Child Nutr. 2012;8(3):340–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00358.x.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Nankunda J, Tumwine JK, Nankabirwa V, Tylleskär T, PROMISE-EBF Study Group. She would sit with me’: mothers’ experiences of individual peer support for exclusive breastfeeding in Uganda. Int Breastfeed J. 2010;5:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-5-16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Hoddinott P, Chalmers M, Pill R. One-to-one or group-based peer support for breastfeeding? Women’s perceptions of a breastfeeding peer coaching intervention. Birth. 2006;33(2):139–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00092.x.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Aiken A, Thomson G. Professionalisation of a breast-feeding peer support service: issues and experiences of peer supporters. Midwifery. 2013;29(12):145–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.014.CrossRef

29.

Grant A, McEwan K, Tedstone S, Greene G, Copeland L, Hunter B, et al. Availability of breastfeeding peer support in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional study. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(1):e12476. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12476.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Herron M, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG, Stockdale J. Tapping into authentic presence: key components arising from a concept analysis of online breastfeeding support. Evid Based Midwifery. 2015;13:76–83.

Title: Mothers’ experiences and perceptions of breastfeeding peer support: a qualitative systematic review
Authors: Yuanyuan Yang
Huijuan Liu
Xiaoyi Cui
Jingwen Meng
Publication date: 01-12-2024
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: International Breastfeeding Journal / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1746-4358
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-024-00614-3

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Mothers’ experiences and perceptions of breastfeeding peer support: a qualitative systematic review

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Multilevel modeling analysis of bottle feeding and its determinants among children 0–23 months in East Africa: evidence from recent DHS data (2015–2022)

Translation and validation of the Breastfeeding Motivation Scale in China

Implementation of early essential neonatal care for newborns delivered by cesarean section in Jiaxing: a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial

Promoting breastfeeding in women with gestational diabetes mellitus in high-income settings: an integrative review

Spatial variation and determinants of delayed breastfeeding initiation in Ethiopia: spatial and multilevel analysis of recent evidence from EDHS 2019

Effect of exclusive breastfeeding and other infant and young child feeding practices on childhood morbidity outcomes: associations for infants 0–6 months in 5 South Asian countries using Demographic and Health Survey data