Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diagnostic Pathology 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Urinalysis | Research

Atypical cells parameter in Sysmex UN automated urine analyzer: feedback from the field

Author: Ozgur Aydin

Published in: Diagnostic Pathology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

“Atypical cells” parameter in automated urinalysis has recently been introduced. An instrument capable of measuring quantitative and qualitative features of nuclear and cytoplasmic properties of a cell has the potential to detect cellular atypia. Instruments using flow cytometry have been detecting atypical cells in blood for a long time; yet instruments using the same methodology very lately developed this parameter in urinalysis.

Materials and methods

Samples with an atypical cells value higher than 1 atypical cell/µL were included in the study. Besides automated urinalysis, every sample was reflexed to modular unit for digital imaging. The remainder of each sample was stained with Sternheimer dye and examined manually under a light microscope.

Results

50 samples with higher than1 atypical cell/µL result were included in the study. Patients were composed of 43 females (86 %) and 7 males (14 %). The mean age was 47.12 ± 19.45 years. The median atypical cells value was 1.8/µL (95 % range 1.5–2.4/µL). Manual microscopic evaluation of the 50 samples showed atypical cells in 1 sample. The patient had papillary lesions on cystoscopy and pathology report informed a high grade urothelial carcinoma. Other 49 samples were negative for atypical cells in manual microscopy. They were crowded samples with leucocytes and squamous epithelial cells.

Conclusions

The positive case provided evidence for Sysmex UN’s capability to detect atypical cells in urine. The negative cases presented clues that probable vulvovaginal contamination and crowded specimens could be deceptive for Sysmex UN in this particular parameter.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Oyaert M, Delanghe J. Progress in Automated Urinalysis. Ann Lab Med. 2019;39:15–22.CrossRef Oyaert M, Delanghe J. Progress in Automated Urinalysis. Ann Lab Med. 2019;39:15–22.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Miyazaki J, Nishiyama H. Epidemiology of urothelial carcinoma. Int J Urol. 2017;24:730–4.CrossRef Miyazaki J, Nishiyama H. Epidemiology of urothelial carcinoma. Int J Urol. 2017;24:730–4.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fogazzi GB, Pallotti F, Garigali G. Atypical/malignant urothelial cells in routine urinary sediment: worth knowing and reporting. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;439:107–11.CrossRef Fogazzi GB, Pallotti F, Garigali G. Atypical/malignant urothelial cells in routine urinary sediment: worth knowing and reporting. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;439:107–11.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Glass R, Rosen L, Chau K, Sheikh-Fayyaz S, Farmer P, Coutsouvelis C, et al. Analysis of the Cytomorphological Features in Atypical Urine Specimens following Application of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology. Acta Cytol. 2018;62:54–61.CrossRef Glass R, Rosen L, Chau K, Sheikh-Fayyaz S, Farmer P, Coutsouvelis C, et al. Analysis of the Cytomorphological Features in Atypical Urine Specimens following Application of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology. Acta Cytol. 2018;62:54–61.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tan WS, Sarpong R, Khetrapal P. Does urinary cytology have a role in haematuria investigations? BJU Int. 2019;123:74–81.CrossRef Tan WS, Sarpong R, Khetrapal P. Does urinary cytology have a role in haematuria investigations? BJU Int. 2019;123:74–81.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ren C, Wang X, Yang C, Li S, Liu S, Cao H. Investigation of Atyp.C using UF-5000 flow cytometer in patients with a suspected diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma: a single-center study. Diagn Pathol. 2020;15:77.CrossRef Ren C, Wang X, Yang C, Li S, Liu S, Cao H. Investigation of Atyp.C using UF-5000 flow cytometer in patients with a suspected diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma: a single-center study. Diagn Pathol. 2020;15:77.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aydin O. Atypical cells parameter in an automated urine analyzer: Does it have a future? Anal Biochem. 2020;600:113763.CrossRef Aydin O. Atypical cells parameter in an automated urine analyzer: Does it have a future? Anal Biochem. 2020;600:113763.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Anderlini R, Manieri G, Lucchi C, Raisi o, Soliera AR, Torricelli F, et al. Automated urinalysis with expert review for incidental identification of atypical urothelial cells: An anticipated bladder carcinoma diagnosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;451:252–6.CrossRef Anderlini R, Manieri G, Lucchi C, Raisi o, Soliera AR, Torricelli F, et al. Automated urinalysis with expert review for incidental identification of atypical urothelial cells: An anticipated bladder carcinoma diagnosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;451:252–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mohr NM, Harland KK, Crabb V, Mutnick R, Baumgartner D, Spinosi S, et al. Urinary squamous epithelial cells do not accurately predict urine culture contamination, but may predict urinalysis performance in predicting bacteriuria. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23:323–30.CrossRef Mohr NM, Harland KK, Crabb V, Mutnick R, Baumgartner D, Spinosi S, et al. Urinary squamous epithelial cells do not accurately predict urine culture contamination, but may predict urinalysis performance in predicting bacteriuria. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23:323–30.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Aydin O, Yapıcı O, Copuroglu R. Atypical cells in sysmex UN automated.urine particle analyzer: a case report and pitfalls for future studies. Turk J Biochem 2020;45(5):617–19. Aydin O, Yapıcı O, Copuroglu R. Atypical cells in sysmex UN automated.urine particle analyzer: a case report and pitfalls for future studies. Turk J Biochem 2020;45(5):617–19.
Metadata
Title
Atypical cells parameter in Sysmex UN automated urine analyzer: feedback from the field
Author
Ozgur Aydin
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1746-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-021-01068-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Diagnostic Pathology 1/2021 Go to the issue