Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Care | Review

Chiropractors in interprofessional practice settings: a narrative review exploring context, outcomes, barriers and facilitators

Authors: Corrie Myburgh, Solvej Teglhus, Kristian Engquist, Evgenios Vlachos

Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

To determine the added value of interprofessional interventions over existing mono-professional practice, elucidation of specific health care issues, service delivery contexts and benefits of combining multiple service provider is required. However, from existing literature, it is difficult to develop a sense of the evidence that supports interprofessional practice initiatives involving chiropractors. This review aims to describe and explore the contexts, outcomes, and barriers and facilitators relating to interprofessional practice involving chiropractors available in current literature. A search of Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases covering the literature from 2005 to October 2021 was conducted, after which a narrative review of identified peer-reviewed articles written in English was performed. We included data from seven studies, conducted across four distinct service delivery contexts. Eight interprofessional practice partners were identified, and eight factors appear to act as barriers and facilitators. Data suggests that incorporating chiropractors into community health and sports medicine interprofessional practice interventions is achievable and appears to impact collaborative practice positively. For older adults with low back pain, quality of life and care-related satisfaction are potential relevant outcomes for the evaluation of interprofessional practice interventions. There is currently very limited evidence from which to judge the value of interprofessional practice interventions, as available literature appears to focus mainly on interprofessional collaboration. Studies conducted specifically to evaluate interprofessional practice solutions and addressing specific health care issues or practice domains are urgently required.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd ed. Sage; 2011 Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd ed. Sage; 2011
10.
go back to reference Goertz CM, Salsbury SA, Long CR, Vining RD, Andresen AA, Hondras MA, Lyons KJ, Killinger LZ, Wolinsky FD, Wallace RB. Patient-centered professional practice models for managing low back pain in older adults: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0624-z.CrossRef Goertz CM, Salsbury SA, Long CR, Vining RD, Andresen AA, Hondras MA, Lyons KJ, Killinger LZ, Wolinsky FD, Wallace RB. Patient-centered professional practice models for managing low back pain in older adults: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):1–13. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12877-017-0624-z.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kopansky-Giles D, Vernon H, Boon H, Steiman I, Kelly M, Kachan N. Inclusion of a CAM therapy (chiropractic care) for the management of musculoskeletal pain in an integrative, inner city, hospital-based primary care setting. J Alter Med Res. 2010;2(1):61–74. Kopansky-Giles D, Vernon H, Boon H, Steiman I, Kelly M, Kachan N. Inclusion of a CAM therapy (chiropractic care) for the management of musculoskeletal pain in an integrative, inner city, hospital-based primary care setting. J Alter Med Res. 2010;2(1):61–74.
14.
go back to reference Meeker WC, Haldeman S. Chiropractic: a profession at the crossroads of mainstream and alternative medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(3):216–27.CrossRef Meeker WC, Haldeman S. Chiropractic: a profession at the crossroads of mainstream and alternative medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(3):216–27.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2021:n71. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2021:n71.
18.
go back to reference Parse RR. Interdisciplinary and interprofessional: what are the differences? Nurs Sci Q. 2015;28(1):2.CrossRef Parse RR. Interdisciplinary and interprofessional: what are the differences? Nurs Sci Q. 2015;28(1):2.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rosenthal B, Gravrand H, Lisi AJ. Interprofessional collaboration among complementary and integrative health providers in private practice and community health centers. J Interprofessional Educ Pract. 2019;15:70–4.CrossRef Rosenthal B, Gravrand H, Lisi AJ. Interprofessional collaboration among complementary and integrative health providers in private practice and community health centers. J Interprofessional Educ Pract. 2019;15:70–4.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Chiropractors in interprofessional practice settings: a narrative review exploring context, outcomes, barriers and facilitators
Authors
Corrie Myburgh
Solvej Teglhus
Kristian Engquist
Evgenios Vlachos
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 2045-709X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00461-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2022 Go to the issue