Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Care | Research

Shared decision making by United Kingdom osteopathic students: an observational study using the OPTION-12 instrument

Authors: Dévan Rajendran, Jane Beazley, Philip Bright

Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

At the crux of patient centred care is Shared Decision Making (SDM), which benefits patient and practitioner. Despite external pressures, studies indicate that SDM remains poorly practised across a variety of healthcare professions. The degree of SDM engagement within United Kingdom osteopathic undergraduate teaching clinics is currently unknown.

Methods

In 2014 we used the reliable and validated OPTION-12 (O12) instrument to calculate a score that reflected the degree of SDM utility in one United Kingdom Osteopathic Educational Institute’s teaching clinic. We also aimed to compare these scores with those previously obtained for physiotherapists working within the United Kingdom’s National Health Service. Student-patient initial and follow-up encounters were audio recorded, transcribed and scored using the O12. Comparisons between the following O12 scores were performed: the Osteopathic Educational Institute’s 4th and 3rd year students; the Osteopathic Educational Institute’s student’s initial and follow-up patient encounters; the Osteopathic Educational Institute’s students and National Health Service physiotherapists.

Results

We analysed 35.5 h of transcribed data from 30 student-patient encounters (7 initial: 23 follow-up). An O12 score of 0.6% (range 0–10.4%) was calculated. No significant differences were found between year groups or encounter types. Significant differences were found compared to National Health Service physiotherapist (score = 24.4%): (U = 144, z = 4.25, p < 0.0005); although both scores are below the 60% threshold for competent SDM behaviour.

Conclusions

Undergraduate osteopaths did not appear to engage in competent SDM behaviours, implying traditional and paternalistic styles of decision making that align with results from other manual therapy professions. Students in this study did not practise competent SDM behaviours. Effective educational strategies are required to ensure SDM behaviours reach competent levels.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coulter A, Edwards A, Elwyn G, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the UK. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;(4):300.CrossRef Coulter A, Edwards A, Elwyn G, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the UK. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;(4):300.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Weston WW. Informed and shared decision-making: the crux of patient-centered care. Can Med Assoc J. 2001;165:438–9. Weston WW. Informed and shared decision-making: the crux of patient-centered care. Can Med Assoc J. 2001;165:438–9.
3.
go back to reference Brand PLP, Stiggelbout AM. Effective follow-up consultations: the importance of patient-centered communication and shared decision making. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2013;14:224–8.CrossRef Brand PLP, Stiggelbout AM. Effective follow-up consultations: the importance of patient-centered communication and shared decision making. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2013;14:224–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012:1361–7.CrossRef Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012:1361–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vertinsky IB, Thompson WA, Uyeno D. Measuring consumer desire for participation in clinical decision making. Health Serv Res. 1974;9:121–34.PubMedPubMedCentral Vertinsky IB, Thompson WA, Uyeno D. Measuring consumer desire for participation in clinical decision making. Health Serv Res. 1974;9:121–34.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ. BMJ publishing. Group. 1999;319:766–71. Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ. BMJ publishing. Group. 1999;319:766–71.
7.
go back to reference President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making health care decisions. Volume One: Report: The ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient-practitioner relationship. Washington D.C.: President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research; 1982. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making health care decisions. Volume One: Report: The ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient-practitioner relationship. Washington D.C.: President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research; 1982.
8.
go back to reference Oates J, Weston WW, Jordan J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. Fam Pr. 2000;49:796–804. Oates J, Weston WW, Jordan J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. Fam Pr. 2000;49:796–804.
9.
go back to reference Dierckx K, Deveugele M, Roosen P, Devisch I. Research report implementation of shared decision making in physical therapy : observed. Phys Ther. 2013;93:1321–30.CrossRef Dierckx K, Deveugele M, Roosen P, Devisch I. Research report implementation of shared decision making in physical therapy : observed. Phys Ther. 2013;93:1321–30.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS putting tools into practice. Bmj. 2010;5146:971. Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS putting tools into practice. Bmj. 2010;5146:971.
11.
go back to reference Young HN, Bell RA, Epstein RM, Feldman MD, Kravitz RL. Physicians’ shared decision-making behaviors in depression care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1404–8.CrossRef Young HN, Bell RA, Epstein RM, Feldman MD, Kravitz RL. Physicians’ shared decision-making behaviors in depression care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1404–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Detsky AS. What patients really want from health care. Jama. 2011;306:2500–1.PubMed Detsky AS. What patients really want from health care. Jama. 2011;306:2500–1.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Towle A, Godolphin W, Manklow J, Wiesinger H. Patient perceptions that limit a community-based intervention to promote participation. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;(3):231.CrossRef Towle A, Godolphin W, Manklow J, Wiesinger H. Patient perceptions that limit a community-based intervention to promote participation. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;(3):231.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.CrossRef Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014:291–309.CrossRef Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014:291–309.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hawkes N. A brief history of post-truth in medicine. BMJ British Medical Journal Publishing Group. 2017;358:j4193.CrossRef Hawkes N. A brief history of post-truth in medicine. BMJ British Medical Journal Publishing Group. 2017;358:j4193.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Quality Statement 6: Shared Decision Making. Patient Experiences in Adult NHS Services. NICE; 2012. p. 21–3 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Quality Statement 6: Shared Decision Making. Patient Experiences in Adult NHS Services. NICE; 2012. p. 21–3
18.
go back to reference Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:301–12.CrossRef Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:301–12.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bradbury KJ, Bishop FL, Yardley L, Lewith G. Patients’ appraisals of public and private healthcare: a qualitative study of physiotherapy and osteopathy. J Health Psychol SAGE Publications Ltd. 2012;18:1307–18.CrossRef Bradbury KJ, Bishop FL, Yardley L, Lewith G. Patients’ appraisals of public and private healthcare: a qualitative study of physiotherapy and osteopathy. J Health Psychol SAGE Publications Ltd. 2012;18:1307–18.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Carnes D. What can osteopaths learn from concerns and complaints raised against them? A review of insurance and regulator reports. Int J Osteopath Med. 2016. Carnes D. What can osteopaths learn from concerns and complaints raised against them? A review of insurance and regulator reports. Int J Osteopath Med. 2016.
26.
go back to reference Carnes D. Types of concerns raised about osteopaths and osteopathic services in 2013 to 2016. London; 2017. Carnes D. Types of concerns raised about osteopaths and osteopathic services in 2013 to 2016. London; 2017.
27.
go back to reference (GOsC) General Osteopatchic Council. Cause for concern? Osteopat Mag 2019;22:8–9. (GOsC) General Osteopatchic Council. Cause for concern? Osteopat Mag 2019;22:8–9.
28.
go back to reference Thomson OP, Petty NJ, Moore AP. Clinical decision-making and therapeutic approaches in osteopathy - a qualitative grounded theory study. Man Ther. 2014;19:44–51.CrossRef Thomson OP, Petty NJ, Moore AP. Clinical decision-making and therapeutic approaches in osteopathy - a qualitative grounded theory study. Man Ther. 2014;19:44–51.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Couët N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, Vaillancourt H, Leblanc A, Turcotte S, et al. Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect. 2015;18:542–61.CrossRef Couët N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, Vaillancourt H, Leblanc A, Turcotte S, et al. Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect. 2015;18:542–61.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Jones LE, Roberts LC, Little PS, Mullee MA, Cleland JA, Cooper C. Shared decision-making in back pain consultations: an illusion or reality? Eur Spine J. 2014;23:13–9.CrossRef Jones LE, Roberts LC, Little PS, Mullee MA, Cleland JA, Cooper C. Shared decision-making in back pain consultations: an illusion or reality? Eur Spine J. 2014;23:13–9.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung WY, et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect. 2005;8:34–42.CrossRef Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung WY, et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect. 2005;8:34–42.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Gwet Kilem L. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111). 2010;61:29–48.CrossRef Gwet Kilem L. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111). 2010;61:29–48.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Cicchetti DV, Feinstien AR. High agreement but low kappa. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:551–85.CrossRef Cicchetti DV, Feinstien AR. High agreement but low kappa. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:551–85.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Pellerin MA, Elwyn G, Rousseau M, Stacey D, Robitaille H, Légaré F. Toward shared decision making: using the OPTION scale to analyze resident-patient consultations in family medicine. Acad Med. 2011;86:1010–8.CrossRef Pellerin MA, Elwyn G, Rousseau M, Stacey D, Robitaille H, Légaré F. Toward shared decision making: using the OPTION scale to analyze resident-patient consultations in family medicine. Acad Med. 2011;86:1010–8.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Joosten EAG, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CPF, de Jong CAJ. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77:219–26.CrossRef Joosten EAG, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CPF, de Jong CAJ. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77:219–26.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Fawkes CA, Leach CMJ, Mathias S, Moore AP. A profile of osteopathic care in private practices in the United Kingdom: a national pilot using standardised data collection. Man Ther. 2014;19:125–30.CrossRef Fawkes CA, Leach CMJ, Mathias S, Moore AP. A profile of osteopathic care in private practices in the United Kingdom: a national pilot using standardised data collection. Man Ther. 2014;19:125–30.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Carnes D, Mullinger B, Underwood M. Defining adverse events in manual therapies: a modified Delphi consensus study. Man Ther. 2010;15:2–6.CrossRef Carnes D, Mullinger B, Underwood M. Defining adverse events in manual therapies: a modified Delphi consensus study. Man Ther. 2010;15:2–6.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Rajendran D, Bright P, Mullinger B, Froud R. Reporting patterns and predictors of common minor adverse events following osteopathic treatment: lessons learned from a prospective, patient-administered questionnaire feasibility study in a UK teaching clinic. Eur J Integr Med. 2015;7:634–44.CrossRef Rajendran D, Bright P, Mullinger B, Froud R. Reporting patterns and predictors of common minor adverse events following osteopathic treatment: lessons learned from a prospective, patient-administered questionnaire feasibility study in a UK teaching clinic. Eur J Integr Med. 2015;7:634–44.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Wu K-S, Lee SS-J, Chen J-K, Chen Y-S, Tsai H-C, Chen Y-J, et al. Identifying heterogeneity in the Hawthorne effect on hand hygiene observation: a cohort study of overtly and covertly observed results. BMC Infect Dis BioMed Central. 2018;18:369.CrossRef Wu K-S, Lee SS-J, Chen J-K, Chen Y-S, Tsai H-C, Chen Y-J, et al. Identifying heterogeneity in the Hawthorne effect on hand hygiene observation: a cohort study of overtly and covertly observed results. BMC Infect Dis BioMed Central. 2018;18:369.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Mangione-Smith R, Elliott MN, McDonald L, McGlynn EA. An observational study of antibiotic prescribing behavior and the Hawthorne effect. Health Serv Res Health Research & Educational Trust. 2002;37:1603–23.CrossRef Mangione-Smith R, Elliott MN, McDonald L, McGlynn EA. An observational study of antibiotic prescribing behavior and the Hawthorne effect. Health Serv Res Health Research & Educational Trust. 2002;37:1603–23.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Nicolai J, Moshagen M, Eich W, Bieber C. The OPTION scale for the assessment of shared decision making (SDM): methodological issues. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106:264–71.CrossRef Nicolai J, Moshagen M, Eich W, Bieber C. The OPTION scale for the assessment of shared decision making (SDM): methodological issues. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106:264–71.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Stubenrouch FE, Pieterse AH, Falkenberg R, Santema TKB, Stiggelbout AM, van der Weijden T, et al. OPTION5 versus OPTION12 instruments to appreciate the extent to which healthcare providers involve patients in decision-making. Patient Educ Couns Elsevier Ireland Ltd. 2016;99:1062–8.CrossRef Stubenrouch FE, Pieterse AH, Falkenberg R, Santema TKB, Stiggelbout AM, van der Weijden T, et al. OPTION5 versus OPTION12 instruments to appreciate the extent to which healthcare providers involve patients in decision-making. Patient Educ Couns Elsevier Ireland Ltd. 2016;99:1062–8.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Coupé VMH, van Hooff ML, de Kleuver M, Steyerberg EW, Ostelo RWJG. Decision support tools in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol Baillière Tindall. 2016;30:1084–97.CrossRef Coupé VMH, van Hooff ML, de Kleuver M, Steyerberg EW, Ostelo RWJG. Decision support tools in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol Baillière Tindall. 2016;30:1084–97.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference van Hooff ML, van Loon J, van Limbeek J, de Kleuver M. The Nijmegen decision tool for chronic low back pain. Development of a clinical decision tool for secondary or tertiary spine care specialists. PLoS One Public Library of Science. 2014;9:e104226.CrossRef van Hooff ML, van Loon J, van Limbeek J, de Kleuver M. The Nijmegen decision tool for chronic low back pain. Development of a clinical decision tool for secondary or tertiary spine care specialists. PLoS One Public Library of Science. 2014;9:e104226.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Shared decision making by United Kingdom osteopathic students: an observational study using the OPTION-12 instrument
Authors
Dévan Rajendran
Jane Beazley
Philip Bright
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Care
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 2045-709X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0260-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 1/2019 Go to the issue