Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

Creating a measure to operationalize engaged well-being at work

Authors: Catherin Bosle, Joachim E. Fischer, Raphael M. Herr

Published in: Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mental well-being and work engagement are both desirable, positive states of mind that help employees to better function in the workplace. While occupational researchers have argued in favor of considering both states concurrently, it is less clear how this might be translated to provide an instrument characterizing the workforce accordingly. The present study describes empirical efforts to operationalize a construct called engaged well-being.

Methods

We used employee-level data (n = 13,538) from three waves of the German linked personnel panel (LPP; 2012–2017). Exploratory factor analysis and a combination of hierarchical and non-hierarchical cluster analyses linked with within-sum-of-squares statistics were used to identify distinct profiles describing mental well-being and work engagement concurrently. These profiles were then used as the basis to identify cut-offs to create replicable categories of engaged well-being. Using the longitudinal data from a subgroup providing data across more than one wave, we observed whether the newly constructed indicator changed over time.

Results

The exploratory factor analysis suggested that both states were two distinct factors. Cluster analysis linked with within-sum-of-squares statistics suggested a four-cluster solution: engaged well-being (46.9%), disengaged well-being (27.5%), engaged strain (8.8%), and disengaged strain (16.8%). One cut-off for each state was identified to replicate the cluster solution. Across observation periods, we could observe changes in engaged well-being.

Conclusions

Our measure of engaged well-being can be used to simultaneously characterize a workforce’s mental well-being and work engagement. Changes in this measure over time suggest its potential utility in organizational interventions. Future studies are needed to further explore both the antecedents, correlates, and potential effects of engaged well-being.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB. Positive organizational behavior: engaged employees in flourishing organizations. J Org Behav. 2008;29(2):147–54.CrossRef Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB. Positive organizational behavior: engaged employees in flourishing organizations. J Org Behav. 2008;29(2):147–54.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bakker AB, van Woerkom M. Strengths use in organizations: a positive approach of occupational health. Can Psychol. 2018;59(1):38.CrossRef Bakker AB, van Woerkom M. Strengths use in organizations: a positive approach of occupational health. Can Psychol. 2018;59(1):38.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Seligman ME, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):5–14.PubMedCrossRef Seligman ME, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):5–14.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Robertson IT, Jansen Birch A, Cooper CL. Job and work attitudes, engagement and employee performance: where does psychological well-being fit in? Leader Org Dev J. 2012;33(3):224–32.CrossRef Robertson IT, Jansen Birch A, Cooper CL. Job and work attitudes, engagement and employee performance: where does psychological well-being fit in? Leader Org Dev J. 2012;33(3):224–32.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Huppert FA. Psychological well-being: evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Appl Psychol. 2009;1(2):137–64. Huppert FA. Psychological well-being: evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Appl Psychol. 2009;1(2):137–64.
7.
go back to reference Keyes CL. The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. J Health Soc Behav. 2002;43(2):207–22. Keyes CL. The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. J Health Soc Behav. 2002;43(2):207–22.
8.
go back to reference Bubonya M, Cobb-Clark DA, Wooden M. Mental health and productivity at work: does what you do matter? Labour Econ. 2017;46:150–65.CrossRef Bubonya M, Cobb-Clark DA, Wooden M. Mental health and productivity at work: does what you do matter? Labour Econ. 2017;46:150–65.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rennert D, Kliner K, Richter M. Arbeitsunfähigkeit. In: Knieps F, Pfaff H, editors. BKK Gesundheitsreport 2018 Arbeit und Gesundheit Generation 50+; 2018. Rennert D, Kliner K, Richter M. Arbeitsunfähigkeit. In: Knieps F, Pfaff H, editors. BKK Gesundheitsreport 2018 Arbeit und Gesundheit Generation 50+; 2018.
11.
go back to reference Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-Romá V, Bakker AB. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud. 2002;3(1):71–92.CrossRef Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-Romá V, Bakker AB. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud. 2002;3(1):71–92.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hakanen JJ, Schaufeli WB. Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study. J Affect Disord. 2012;141(2–3):415–24.PubMedCrossRef Hakanen JJ, Schaufeli WB. Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study. J Affect Disord. 2012;141(2–3):415–24.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shimazu A, Schaufeli WB, Kamiyama K, Kawakami N. Workaholism vs. work engagement: the two different predictors of future well-being and performance. Int J Behav Med. 2015;22(1):18–23.PubMedCrossRef Shimazu A, Schaufeli WB, Kamiyama K, Kawakami N. Workaholism vs. work engagement: the two different predictors of future well-being and performance. Int J Behav Med. 2015;22(1):18–23.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schaufeli WB, Taris TW, Bakker AB. Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde: On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. Research companion to working time and work addiction; 2006. p. 193–217. Schaufeli WB, Taris TW, Bakker AB. Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde: On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. Research companion to working time and work addiction; 2006. p. 193–217.
15.
go back to reference Innstrand ST, Langballe EM, Falkum E. A longitudinal study of the relationship between work engagement and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Stress Health. 2012;28(1):1–10.PubMedCrossRef Innstrand ST, Langballe EM, Falkum E. A longitudinal study of the relationship between work engagement and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Stress Health. 2012;28(1):1–10.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Christian MS, Garza AS, Slaughter JE. Work engagement: a quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Pers Psychol. 2011;64(1):89–136.CrossRef Christian MS, Garza AS, Slaughter JE. Work engagement: a quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Pers Psychol. 2011;64(1):89–136.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Merrill RM, Aldana SG, Pope JE, Anderson DR, Coberley CR, Grossmeier JJ, et al. Self-rated job performance and absenteeism according to employee engagement, health behaviors, and physical health. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55(1):10–8.PubMedCrossRef Merrill RM, Aldana SG, Pope JE, Anderson DR, Coberley CR, Grossmeier JJ, et al. Self-rated job performance and absenteeism according to employee engagement, health behaviors, and physical health. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55(1):10–8.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Van Rhenen W. How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. J Org Behav. 2009;30(7):893–917.CrossRef Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Van Rhenen W. How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. J Org Behav. 2009;30(7):893–917.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Simbula S, Guglielmi D. I am engaged, I feel good, and I go the extra-mile: reciprocal relationships between work engagement and consequences. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones. 2013;29(3):117–25.CrossRef Simbula S, Guglielmi D. I am engaged, I feel good, and I go the extra-mile: reciprocal relationships between work engagement and consequences. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones. 2013;29(3):117–25.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Harter JK, Schmidt FL, Hayes TL. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(2):268.PubMedCrossRef Harter JK, Schmidt FL, Hayes TL. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(2):268.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Robertson IT, Cooper CL. Full engagement: the integration of employee engagement and psychological well-being. Leader Org Dev J. 2010;31(4):324–36.CrossRef Robertson IT, Cooper CL. Full engagement: the integration of employee engagement and psychological well-being. Leader Org Dev J. 2010;31(4):324–36.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Grant AM. ROI is a poor measure of coaching success: towards a more holistic approach using a well-being and engagement framework. Coaching. 2012;5(2):74–85. Grant AM. ROI is a poor measure of coaching success: towards a more holistic approach using a well-being and engagement framework. Coaching. 2012;5(2):74–85.
23.
go back to reference Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Job demands–resources theory: taking stock and looking forward. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22(3):273.PubMedCrossRef Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Job demands–resources theory: taking stock and looking forward. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22(3):273.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Magee C, Gordon R, Robinson L, Caputi P, Oades L. Workplace bullying and absenteeism: the mediating roles of poor health and work engagement. Hum Resour Manag J. 2017;27(3):319–34.CrossRef Magee C, Gordon R, Robinson L, Caputi P, Oades L. Workplace bullying and absenteeism: the mediating roles of poor health and work engagement. Hum Resour Manag J. 2017;27(3):319–34.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schaufeli WB, Taris TW. A critical review of the Job Demands-Resources Model: Implications for improving work and health. Bridging occupational, organizational and public health: Springer; 2014. p. 43–68. Schaufeli WB, Taris TW. A critical review of the Job Demands-Resources Model: Implications for improving work and health. Bridging occupational, organizational and public health: Springer; 2014. p. 43–68.
26.
go back to reference Leijten FR, van den Heuvel SG, van der Beek AJ, Ybema JF, Robroek SJ, Burdorf A. Associations of work-related factors and work engagement with mental and physical health: a 1-year follow-up study among older workers. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):86–95.PubMedCrossRef Leijten FR, van den Heuvel SG, van der Beek AJ, Ybema JF, Robroek SJ, Burdorf A. Associations of work-related factors and work engagement with mental and physical health: a 1-year follow-up study among older workers. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):86–95.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Matthews RA, Mills MJ, Trout RC, English L. Family-supportive supervisor behaviors, work engagement, and subjective well-being: a contextually dependent mediated process. J Occup Health Psychol. 2014;19(2):168.PubMedCrossRef Matthews RA, Mills MJ, Trout RC, English L. Family-supportive supervisor behaviors, work engagement, and subjective well-being: a contextually dependent mediated process. J Occup Health Psychol. 2014;19(2):168.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Fairlie P. Work engagement and employee well-being. Research Handbook on Work and Well-Being: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2017. Fairlie P. Work engagement and employee well-being. Research Handbook on Work and Well-Being: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2017.
29.
go back to reference Johnson S, Robertson I, Cooper CL. Well-being and employee engagement. WELL-BEING: Springer; 2018. p. 31–42. Johnson S, Robertson I, Cooper CL. Well-being and employee engagement. WELL-BEING: Springer; 2018. p. 31–42.
30.
go back to reference Grant AM. The third ‘generation’of workplace coaching: creating a culture of quality conversations. Coaching. 2017;10(1):37–53. Grant AM. The third ‘generation’of workplace coaching: creating a culture of quality conversations. Coaching. 2017;10(1):37–53.
31.
go back to reference Grant AM, Spence GB. Using coaching and positive psychology to promote a flourishing workforce: a model of goal-striving and mental health; 2010. Grant AM, Spence GB. Using coaching and positive psychology to promote a flourishing workforce: a model of goal-striving and mental health; 2010.
32.
go back to reference Broszeit S, Grunau P, Wolter S. LPP-linked personnel panel 1415: quality of work and economic success: longitudinal study in German establishments (data collection on the second wave); 2016. Broszeit S, Grunau P, Wolter S. LPP-linked personnel panel 1415: quality of work and economic success: longitudinal study in German establishments (data collection on the second wave); 2016.
33.
go back to reference Broszeit S, Philipp G, Wolter S. LPP-linked personnel panel: quality of work and economic success: longitudinal study in German establishments (data documentation on the first wave); 2015. Broszeit S, Philipp G, Wolter S. LPP-linked personnel panel: quality of work and economic success: longitudinal study in German establishments (data documentation on the first wave); 2015.
34.
go back to reference Kampkötter P, Mohrenweiser J, Sliwka D, Steffes S, Wolter S. Measuring the use of human resources practices and employee attitudes: the linked personnel panel. Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship; 2016: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Kampkötter P, Mohrenweiser J, Sliwka D, Steffes S, Wolter S. Measuring the use of human resources practices and employee attitudes: the linked personnel panel. Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship; 2016: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
35.
go back to reference Mackeben J, Ruf K, Grunau P, Wolter S. LPP-Linked Personnel Panel 1617: Arbeitsqualität und wirtschaftlicher Erfolg: Längsschnittstudie in deutschen Betrieben (Datendokumentation der dritten Welle). In: Institut für Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung (IAB). Nürnberg: Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany; 2018. Mackeben J, Ruf K, Grunau P, Wolter S. LPP-Linked Personnel Panel 1617: Arbeitsqualität und wirtschaftlicher Erfolg: Längsschnittstudie in deutschen Betrieben (Datendokumentation der dritten Welle). In: Institut für Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung (IAB). Nürnberg: Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany; 2018.
36.
go back to reference Bellmann L, Bender S, Bossler M, Broszeit S, Dickmann C, Gensicke M, et al. LPP–Linked Personnel Panel. Quality of Work and Economic Success: Longitudinal Study in German Establishments (Data Collection on the First Wave) FDZ method reports, vol. 5; 2015. p. 2015. Bellmann L, Bender S, Bossler M, Broszeit S, Dickmann C, Gensicke M, et al. LPP–Linked Personnel Panel. Quality of Work and Economic Success: Longitudinal Study in German Establishments (Data Collection on the First Wave) FDZ method reports, vol. 5; 2015. p. 2015.
37.
go back to reference Fischer G, Janik F, Müller D, Schmucker A. The IAB establishment panel-things users should know. J Contextual Econ. 2009;129(1):133. Fischer G, Janik F, Müller D, Schmucker A. The IAB establishment panel-things users should know. J Contextual Econ. 2009;129(1):133.
38.
go back to reference Bech P, Olsen LR, Kjoller M, Rasmussen NK. Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: a comparison of the SF-36 mental health subscale and the WHO-five well-being scale. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2003;12(2):85–91.PubMedCrossRef Bech P, Olsen LR, Kjoller M, Rasmussen NK. Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: a comparison of the SF-36 mental health subscale and the WHO-five well-being scale. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2003;12(2):85–91.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 well-being index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167–76.PubMedCrossRef Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 well-being index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167–76.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J Org Behav. 2004;25(3):293–315.CrossRef Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J Org Behav. 2004;25(3):293–315.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(4):701–16.CrossRef Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(4):701–16.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference StataCorp. inventorStata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2015. StataCorp. inventorStata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2015.
43.
go back to reference Asendorpf JB, Borkenau P, Ostendorf F, Van Aken MA. Carving personality description at its joints: confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. Eur J Personal. 2001;15(3):169–98.CrossRef Asendorpf JB, Borkenau P, Ostendorf F, Van Aken MA. Carving personality description at its joints: confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. Eur J Personal. 2001;15(3):169–98.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Sârbescu P, Boncu A. The resilient, the restraint and the restless: personality types based on the alternative five-factor model. Personal Individ Differ. 2018;134:81–7.CrossRef Sârbescu P, Boncu A. The resilient, the restraint and the restless: personality types based on the alternative five-factor model. Personal Individ Differ. 2018;134:81–7.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Makles A. Stata tip 110: how to get the optimal k-means cluster solution. Stata J. 2012;12(2):347–51.CrossRef Makles A. Stata tip 110: how to get the optimal k-means cluster solution. Stata J. 2012;12(2):347–51.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Taris TW. Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work Stress. 2008;22(3):187–200.CrossRef Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Taris TW. Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work Stress. 2008;22(3):187–200.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Keyes CL. Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(3):539.PubMedCrossRef Keyes CL. Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(3):539.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Russell JA, Carroll JM. On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(1):3.PubMedCrossRef Russell JA, Carroll JM. On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychol Bull. 1999;125(1):3.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Zwetsloot G, Pot F. The business value of health management. J Bus Ethics. 2004;55(2):115–24.CrossRef Zwetsloot G, Pot F. The business value of health management. J Bus Ethics. 2004;55(2):115–24.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Meyers MC, van Woerkom M, Bakker AB. The added value of the positive: a literature review of positive psychology interventions in organizations. Eur J Work Org Psychol. 2013;22(5):618–32.CrossRef Meyers MC, van Woerkom M, Bakker AB. The added value of the positive: a literature review of positive psychology interventions in organizations. Eur J Work Org Psychol. 2013;22(5):618–32.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Demerouti E, Nachreiner F. Zum Arbeitsanforderungen-Arbeitsressourcen-Modell von Burnout und Arbeitsengagement–Stand der Forschung [The job demands—job resources model of burnout and work engagement—state of the art]. Z. Arb. Wiss. 2019;73:119–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-018-0100-4. Demerouti E, Nachreiner F. Zum Arbeitsanforderungen-Arbeitsressourcen-Modell von Burnout und Arbeitsengagement–Stand der Forschung [The job demands—job resources model of burnout and work engagement—state of the art]. Z. Arb. Wiss. 2019;73:119–30. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s41449-018-0100-4.
52.
go back to reference Schaufeli WB, Taris TW, Van Rhenen W. Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Appl Psychol. 2008;57(2):173–203.CrossRef Schaufeli WB, Taris TW, Van Rhenen W. Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Appl Psychol. 2008;57(2):173–203.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Hernán MA, Hernández-Díaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology. 2004;15(5):615–25.PubMedCrossRef Hernán MA, Hernández-Díaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology. 2004;15(5):615–25.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879.PubMedCrossRef Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Creating a measure to operationalize engaged well-being at work
Authors
Catherin Bosle
Joachim E. Fischer
Raphael M. Herr
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6673
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00297-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 1/2021 Go to the issue