Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Globalization and Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Corporate social responsibility in global health: an exploratory study of multinational pharmaceutical firms

Authors: Hayley Droppert, Sara Bennett

Published in: Globalization and Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

As pharmaceutical firms experience increasing civil society pressure to act responsibly in a changing globalized world, many are expanding and/or reforming their corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies. We sought to understand how multinational pharmaceutical companies currently engage in CSR activities in the developing world aimed at global health impact, their motivations for doing so and how their CSR strategies are evolving.

Methods

We conducted a small-scale, exploratory study combining (i) an in-depth review of publicly available data on pharmaceutical firms’ CSR with (ii) interviews of representatives from 6 firms, purposively selected, from the highest earning pharmaceutical firms worldwide.

Results

Corporate social responsibility differed for each firm particularly with respect to how CSR is defined, organizational structures for managing CSR, current CSR activities, and motivations for CSR. Across the firms studied, the common CSR activities were: differential pharmaceutical pricing, strengthening developing country drug distribution infrastructure, mHealth initiatives, and targeted research and development. Primary factors that motivated CSR engagement were: reputational benefits, recruitment and employee satisfaction, better rankings in sustainability indices, entrance into new markets, long-term economic returns, and improved population health. In terms of CSR strategy, firms were at different points on a spectrum ranging from philanthropic donations to integrated systemic shared value business models.

Conclusions

CSR is of increasing importance for multinational pharmaceutical firms yet understanding of the array of CSR strategies employed and their effects is nascent. Our study points to the need to (i) develop clearer and more standardized definitions of CSR in global health (2) strengthen indices to track CSR strategies and their public health effects in developing countries and (iii) undertake more country level studies that investigate how CSR engages with national health systems.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Porter ME, Kramer MR. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harv Bus Rev. 2002;80:56–68. 133.PubMed Porter ME, Kramer MR. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harv Bus Rev. 2002;80:56–68. 133.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Blowfield M, Frynas JG. Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. Intl Affairs. 2005;81:499–513.CrossRef Blowfield M, Frynas JG. Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. Intl Affairs. 2005;81:499–513.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hopkins M. Corporate social responsibility: Is business the solution? London: Earthscan; 2007. Hopkins M. Corporate social responsibility: Is business the solution? London: Earthscan; 2007.
7.
go back to reference Lee J-Y, Hunt P. Human rights responsibilities of pharmaceutical companies in relation to access to medicines. J Law Med Ethics. 2012;40:220–33.CrossRefPubMed Lee J-Y, Hunt P. Human rights responsibilities of pharmaceutical companies in relation to access to medicines. J Law Med Ethics. 2012;40:220–33.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference The PLoS Medicine Editors. Drug companies should be held more accountable for their human rights responsibilities. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000344.CrossRefPubMedCentral The PLoS Medicine Editors. Drug companies should be held more accountable for their human rights responsibilities. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000344.CrossRefPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Vian T, McCoy K, Richards SC, Connelly P, Feeley F. Corporate social responsibility in global health: the Pfizer Global Health Fellows International Volunteering Program. Hum Resour Plan J. 2007;30:30–5. Vian T, McCoy K, Richards SC, Connelly P, Feeley F. Corporate social responsibility in global health: the Pfizer Global Health Fellows International Volunteering Program. Hum Resour Plan J. 2007;30:30–5.
11.
go back to reference Mahmud A, Parkhurst M. The role of the health care sector in expanding economic opportunity. Corporate social responsibility initiative report No. 21. Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; 2007. Mahmud A, Parkhurst M. The role of the health care sector in expanding economic opportunity. Corporate social responsibility initiative report No. 21. Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; 2007.
12.
go back to reference Leisinger KM. The corporate social responsibility of the pharmaceutical industry: idealism without illusion and realism without resignation. Bus Ethics Q. 2005;15:577–94.CrossRefPubMed Leisinger KM. The corporate social responsibility of the pharmaceutical industry: idealism without illusion and realism without resignation. Bus Ethics Q. 2005;15:577–94.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lee M, Kohler J. Benchmarking and transparency: incentives for the pharmaceutical Industry’s corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics. 2010;95:641–58.CrossRef Lee M, Kohler J. Benchmarking and transparency: incentives for the pharmaceutical Industry’s corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics. 2010;95:641–58.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Margolis JD, Walsh JP. People and profits? The search for a link between a Company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001. Margolis JD, Walsh JP. People and profits? The search for a link between a Company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
22.
go back to reference Momin MA, Parker LD. Motivations for corporate social responsibility reporting by MNC subsidiaries in an emerging country: The case of Bangladesh. Br Account Rev. 2013;45:215–28.CrossRef Momin MA, Parker LD. Motivations for corporate social responsibility reporting by MNC subsidiaries in an emerging country: The case of Bangladesh. Br Account Rev. 2013;45:215–28.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Attard J. Access to medicine index: Can a global scorecard framework increase access to essential medicines in developing countries? Sanford J Public Policy. 2014;5:1–23. Attard J. Access to medicine index: Can a global scorecard framework increase access to essential medicines in developing countries? Sanford J Public Policy. 2014;5:1–23.
24.
go back to reference Peters DH, Paina L, Bennett S. Expecting the unexpected: applying the Develop-Distort Dilemma to maximize positive market impacts in health. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27 suppl 4:iv44–53.CrossRefPubMed Peters DH, Paina L, Bennett S. Expecting the unexpected: applying the Develop-Distort Dilemma to maximize positive market impacts in health. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27 suppl 4:iv44–53.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Corporate social responsibility in global health: an exploratory study of multinational pharmaceutical firms
Authors
Hayley Droppert
Sara Bennett
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Globalization and Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1744-8603
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-015-0100-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Globalization and Health 1/2015 Go to the issue