Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Review

Methods for integrating postural control into biomechanical human simulations: a systematic review

Authors: Julian Shanbhag, Alexander Wolf, Iris Wechsler, Sophie Fleischmann, Jürgen Winkler, Sigrid Leyendecker, Bjoern M. Eskofier, Anne D. Koelewijn, Sandro Wartzack, Jörg Miehling

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Understanding of the human body’s internal processes to maintain balance is fundamental to simulate postural control behaviour. The body uses multiple sensory systems’ information to obtain a reliable estimate about the current body state. This information is used to control the reactive behaviour to maintain balance. To predict a certain motion behaviour with knowledge of the muscle forces, forward dynamic simulations of biomechanical human models can be utilized. We aim to use predictive postural control simulations to give therapy recommendations to patients suffering from postural disorders in the future. It is important to know which types of modelling approaches already exist to apply such predictive forward dynamic simulations. Current literature provides different models that aim to simulate human postural control. We conducted a systematic literature research to identify the different approaches of postural control models. The different approaches are discussed regarding their applied biomechanical models, sensory representation, sensory integration, and control methods in standing and gait simulations. We searched on Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed using a search string, scanned 1253 records, and found 102 studies to be eligible for inclusion. The included studies use different ways for sensory representation and integration, although underlying neural processes still remain unclear. We found that for postural control optimal control methods like linear quadratic regulators and model predictive control methods are used less, when models’ level of details is increasing, and nonlinearities become more important. Considering musculoskeletal models, reflex-based and PD controllers are mainly applied and show promising results, as they aim to create human-like motion behaviour considering physiological processes.
Literature
36.
go back to reference Hettich G, Fennell L, Mergner T. Double inverted pendulum model of reactive human stance control. Multibody Dyn. 2011;2011:4–7. Hettich G, Fennell L, Mergner T. Double inverted pendulum model of reactive human stance control. Multibody Dyn. 2011;2011:4–7.
41.
go back to reference Jahn K, Wühr M. Postural control mechanisms in mammals, including humans. In: The senses: a comprehensive reference. Elsevier; 2020. pp 344–370. Jahn K, Wühr M. Postural control mechanisms in mammals, including humans. In: The senses: a comprehensive reference. Elsevier; 2020. pp 344–370.
96.
go back to reference Tian C, He J, Engineering M. Simulation study of human. 1997; 2529–2534. Tian C, He J, Engineering M. Simulation study of human. 1997; 2529–2534.
Metadata
Title
Methods for integrating postural control into biomechanical human simulations: a systematic review
Authors
Julian Shanbhag
Alexander Wolf
Iris Wechsler
Sophie Fleischmann
Jürgen Winkler
Sigrid Leyendecker
Bjoern M. Eskofier
Anne D. Koelewijn
Sandro Wartzack
Jörg Miehling
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01235-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2023 Go to the issue