Top

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Stroke | Review

Determining optimal mobile neurofeedback methods for motor neurorehabilitation in children and adults with non-progressive neurological disorders: a scoping review

Authors: Ahad Behboodi, Walker A. Lee, Victoria S. Hinchberger, Diane L. Damiano

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2022

Abstract

Background

Brain–computer interfaces (BCI), initially designed to bypass the peripheral motor system to externally control movement using brain signals, are additionally being utilized for motor rehabilitation in stroke and other neurological disorders. Also called neurofeedback training, multiple approaches have been developed to link motor-related cortical signals to assistive robotic or electrical stimulation devices during active motor training with variable, but mostly positive, functional outcomes reported. Our specific research question for this scoping review was: for persons with non-progressive neurological injuries who have the potential to improve voluntary motor control, which mobile BCI-based neurofeedback methods demonstrate or are associated with improved motor outcomes for Neurorehabilitation applications?

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases with all steps from study selection to data extraction performed independently by at least 2 individuals. Search terms included: brain machine or computer interfaces, neurofeedback and motor; however, only studies requiring a motor attempt, versus motor imagery, were retained. Data extraction included participant characteristics, study design details and motor outcomes.

Results

From 5109 papers, 139 full texts were reviewed with 23 unique studies identified. All utilized EEG and, except for one, were on the stroke population. The most commonly reported functional outcomes were the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA; n = 13) and the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT; n = 6) which were then utilized to assess effectiveness, evaluate design features, and correlate with training doses. Statistically and functionally significant pre-to post training changes were seen in FMA, but not ARAT. Results did not differ between robotic and electrical stimulation feedback paradigms. Notably, FMA outcomes were positively correlated with training dose.

Conclusion

This review on BCI-based neurofeedback training confirms previous findings of effectiveness in improving motor outcomes with some evidence of enhanced neuroplasticity in adults with stroke. Associative learning paradigms have emerged more recently which may be particularly feasible and effective methods for Neurorehabilitation. More clinical trials in pediatric and adult neurorehabilitation to refine methods and doses and to compare to other evidence-based training strategies are warranted.

Tariq M, Trivailo PM, Simic M. Eeg-based bci control schemes for lower-limb assistive-robots. Front Human Neurosci. 2018;312.

Baniqued PDE, Stanyer EC, Awais M, Alazmani A, Jackson AE, Mon-Williams MA, Mushtaq F, Holt RJ. Brain–computer interface robotics for hand rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00820-8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Abiri R, Borhani S, Sellers EW, Jiang Y, Zhao X. A comprehensive review of eeg-based brain–computer interface paradigms. J Neural Eng. 2019;16(1):011001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aaf12e.PubMedCrossRef

Ramos-Murguialday A, Broetz D, Rea M, Läer L, Yilmaz O, Brasil FL, Liberati G, Curado MR, Garcia-Cossio E, Vyziotis A, Cho W, Agostini M, Soares E, Soekadar S, Caria A, Cohen LG, Birbaumer N. Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study. Ann Neurol. 2013;74(1):100–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23879.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Ramos-Murguialday A, Curado MR, Broetz D, Yilmaz O, Brasil FL, Liberati G, Garcia-Cossio E, Cho W, Caria A, Cohen LG, Birbaumer N. Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke: randomized trial long-term follow-up. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(3):188–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968319827573.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Sonuga-Barke E, Brandeis D, Holtmann M, Cortese S. Computer-based cognitive training for adhd: a review of current evidence. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin. 2014;23(4):807–24.CrossRef

Evans JR, Budzynski TH, Budzynski HK, Abarbanel A. Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback: advanced theory and applications. Academic Press; 2009.

Hurt E, Arnold LE, Lofthouse N. Quantitative eeg neurofeedback for the treatment of pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorders, learning disorders, and epilepsy. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin. 2014;23(3):465–86.CrossRef

McCarthy-Jones S. Taking back the brain: could neurofeedback training be effective for relieving distressing auditory verbal hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia? Schizophr Bull. 2012;38(4):678–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

10.

Othmer S. Progress in neurofeedback for the autism spectrum. In: 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback. Monterey, Canada, pp. 15–18.

11.

Horrell T, El-Baz A, Baruth J, Tasman A, Sokhadze G, Stewart C, Sokhadze E. Neurofeedback effects on evoked and induced eeg gamma band reactivity to drug-related cues in cocaine addiction. J Neurother. 2010;14(3):195–216.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

12.

Hammer BU, Colbert AP, Brown KA, Ilioi EC. Neurofeedback for insomnia: a pilot study of z-score smr and individualized protocols. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2011;36(4):251–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-011-9165-y.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Walker JE. Using qeeg-guided neurofeedback for epilepsy versus standardized protocols: enhanced effectiveness? Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2010;35(1):29–30.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Ibric VL, Dragomirescu LG. Neurofeedback in pain management. Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback: Advanced theory and applications 2nd edn., 2009;417–451.

15.

Marzbani H, Marateb HR, Mansourian M. Neurofeedback: a comprehensive review on system design, methodology and clinical applications. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2016;7(2):143.PubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Sitaram R, Ros T, Stoeckel L, Haller S, Scharnowski F, Lewis-Peacock J, Weiskopf N, Blefari ML, Rana M, Oblak E. Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(2):86–100.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Motolese F, Capone F, Di Lazzaro V. New tools for shaping plasticity to enhance recovery after stroke. Handb Clin Neurol. 2022;184:299–315.PubMedCrossRef

18.

O’Leary GH, Jenkins DD, Coker-Bolt P, George MS, Kautz S, Bikson M, Gillick BT, Badran BW. From adults to pediatrics: a review noninvasive brain stimulation (nibs) to facilitate recovery from brain injury. Prog Brain Res. 2021;264:287–322.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

19.

Thompson AK, Wolpaw JR. Targeted neuroplasticity for rehabilitation. Prog Brain Res. 2015;218:157–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

20.

Wolpaw JR. The negotiated equilibrium model of spinal cord function. J Physiol. 2018;596(16):3469–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

21.

Mrachacz-Kersting N, Ibáñez J, Farina D. Towards a mechanistic approach for the development of non-invasive brain–computer interfaces for motor rehabilitation. J Physiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1113/jp281314.

22.

Biasiucci A, Leeb R, Iturrate I, Perdikis S, Al-Khodairy A, Corbet T, Schnider A, Schmidlin T, Zhang H, Bassolino M, Viceic D, Vuadens P, Guggisberg AG, Millán JDR. Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2421. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

23.

Chen S, Cao L, Shu X, Wang H, Ding L, Wang SH, Jia J. Longitudinal electroencephalography analysis in subacute stroke patients during intervention of brain–computer interface with exoskeleton feedback. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:809. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00809.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

24.

Frolov AA, Mokienko O, Lyukmanov R, Biryukova E, Kotov S, Turbina L, Nadareyshvily G, Bushkova Y. Post-stroke rehabilitation training with a motor-imagery-based brain-computer interface (bci)-controlled hand exoskeleton: A randomized controlled multicenter trial. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:400. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00400.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

25.

Miao YY, Chen SG, Zhang XR, Jin J, Xu R, Daly I, Jia J, Wang XY, Cichocki A, Jung TP. Bci-based rehabilitation on the stroke in sequela stage. Neural Plasticity. 2020;2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8882764.

26.

Mrachacz-Kersting N, Stevenson AJ, Jørgensen HR, Severinsen KE, Aliakbaryhosseinabadi S, Jiang N, Farina D. Brain state-dependent stimulation boosts functional recovery following stroke. Ann Neurol. 2019;85(1):84–95.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Brain functional networks study of subacute stroke patients with upper limb dysfunction after comprehensive rehabilitation including bci training. Front Neurol . 2019;10:1419. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01419.

28.

Khan MA, Das R, Iversen HK, Puthusserypady S. Review on motor imagery based bci systems for upper limb post-stroke neurorehabilitation: from designing to application. Comput Biol Med. 2020;123:103843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103843.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Lazarou I, Nikolopoulos S, Petrantonakis PC, Kompatsiaris I, Tsolaki M. Eeg-based brain–computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation of people with motor impairment: a novel approach of the 21 (st) century. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00014.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

30.

Wen D, Fan Y, Hsu SH, Xu J, Zhou Y, Tao J, Lan X, Li F. Combining brain–computer interface and virtual reality for rehabilitation in neurological diseases: a narrative review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;64(1):101404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2020.03.015.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Millán JD, Rupp R, Müller-Putz GR, Murray-Smith R, Giugliemma C, Tangermann M, Vidaurre C, Cincotti F, Kübler A, Leeb R, Neuper C, Müller KR, Mattia D. Combining brain–computer interfaces and assistive technologies: state-of-the-art and challenges. Front Neurosci. 2010;4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00161.

32.

Bockbrader MA, Francisco G, Lee R, Olson J, Solinsky R, Boninger ML. Brain computer interfaces in rehabilitation medicine. PMR. 2018;10(9 Suppl 2):233–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.028.CrossRef

33.

Ang KK, Chua KSG, Phua KS, Wang C, Chin ZY, Kuah CWK, Low W, Guan C. A randomized controlled trial of eeg-based motor imagery brain–computer interface robotic rehabilitation for stroke. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2015;46(4):310–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059414522229.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Shindo K, Kawashima K, Ushiba J, Ota N, Ito M, Ota T, Kimura A, Liu M. Effects of neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain–computer interface for hand paralysis in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary case series study. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(10):951–7. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0859.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Várkuti B, Guan C, Pan Y, Phua KS, Ang KK, Kuah CW, Chua K, Ang BT, Birbaumer N, Sitaram R. Resting state changes in functional connectivity correlate with movement recovery for bci and robot-assisted upper-extremity training after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27(1):53–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968312445910.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Bobrov P, Biryukova E, Polyaev B, Lajsheva O, Usachjova E, Sokolova A, Mihailova D, Dement’Eva K, Fedotova I. Rehabilitation of patients with cerebral palsy using hand exoskeleton controlled by brain–computer interface. Bull Russian State Med Univ. 2020;(4).

37.

Blankertz B, Losch F, Krauledat M, Dornhege G, Curio G, Müller KR. The berlin brain–computer interface: accurate performance from first-session in bci-naïve subjects. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55(10):2452–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2008.923152.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Nijholt A, Tan D, Pfurtscheller G, Brunner C, Millán JdR, Allison B, Graimann B, Popescu F, Blankertz B, Müller K-R. Brain–computer interfacing for intelligent systems. IEEE Intell Syst. 2008;23(3):72–9.CrossRef

39.

Zhang X, Guo Y, Gao B, Long J. Alpha frequency intervention by electrical stimulation to improve performance in mu-based bci. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020;28(6):1262–70.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Blokland Y, Vlek R, Karaman B, Özin F, Thijssen D, Eijsvogels T, Colier W, Floor-Westerdijk M, Bruhn J, Farquhar J. Detection of event-related desynchronization during attempted and imagined movements in tetraplegics for brain switch control. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:3967–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/embc.2012.6346835.PubMedCrossRef

41.

...Remsik AB, Williams JL, Gjini K, Dodd K, Thoma J, Jacobson T, Walczak M, McMillan M, Rajan S, Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, Advani H, Mohanty R, Tellapragada N, Allen J, Mazrooyisebdani M, Walton LM, van Kan PLE, Kang TJ, Sattin JA, Nair VA, Edwards DF, Williams JC, Prabhakaran V. Ipsilesional mu rhythm desynchronization and changes in motor behavior following post stroke bci intervention for motor rehabilitation. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00053.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

42.

Bai Z, Fong KNK, Zhang JJ, Chan J, Ting KH. Immediate and long-term effects of bci-based rehabilitation of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00686-2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

43.

Muralidharan A, Chae J, Taylor DM. Extracting attempted hand movements from eegs in people with complete hand paralysis following stroke. Front Neurosci. 2011;5:39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00039.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

44.

Muralidharan A, Chae J, Taylor DM. Early detection of hand movements from electroencephalograms for stroke therapy applications. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046003.

45.

Jeunet C, Glize B, McGonigal A, Batail JM, Micoulaud-Franchi JA. Using eeg-based brain computer interface and neurofeedback targeting sensorimotor rhythms to improve motor skills: theoretical background, applications and prospects. Neurophysiol Clin. 2019;49(2):125–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2018.10.068.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Mane R, Chouhan T, Guan C. Bci for stroke rehabilitation: motor and beyond. J Neural Eng. 2020;17(4):041001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aba162.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Kohl SH, Mehler DMA, Lührs M, Thibault RT, Konrad K, Sorger B. The potential of functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based neurofeedback—a systematic review and recommendations for best practice. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00594.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

48.

Pichiorri F, Mattia D. Brain–computer interfaces in neurologic rehabilitation practice. Handb Clin Neurol. 2020;168:101–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-63934-9.00009-3.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Carvalho R, Dias N, Cerqueira JJ. Brain–machine interface of upper limb recovery in stroke patients rehabilitation: a systematic review. Physiother Res Int. 2019;24(2):1764. https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1764.CrossRef

50.

Cervera MA, Soekadar SR, Ushiba J, Millán JdR, Liu M, Birbaumer N, Garipelli G. Brain–computer interfaces for post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a meta-analysis. Annal Clin Transl Neurol. 2018;5(5):651–63.CrossRef

51.

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MD, Horsley T, Weeks L. Prisma extension for scoping reviews (prisma-scr): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Peters MD, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Baldini Soares C, Khalil H, Parker D, Munn Z. Chapter 11: scoping reviews. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2017.

53.

Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, Walton LM, Remsik A, Song J, Nair VA, Tyler ME, Edwards DF, Caldera K, Sattin JA, Williams JC, Prabhakaran V. Dose-response relationships using brain–computer interface technology impact stroke rehabilitation. Front Human Neurosci. 2015;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00361.

54.

Young BM, Stamm JM, Song J, Remsik AB, Nair VA, Tyler ME, Edwards DF, Caldera K, Sattin JA, Williams JC, Prabhakaran V. Brain–computer interface training after stroke affects patterns of brain-behavior relationships in corticospinal motor fibers. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00457.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

55.

...Remsik AB, Dodd K, Leroy JW, Thoma J, Jacobson T, Allen JD, Advani H, Mohanty R, McMillan M, Rajan S, Walczak M, Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, Rivera CA, Mazrooyisebdani M, Tellapragada N, Walton LM, Gjini K, Van Kan PLE, Kang TJ, Sattin JA, Nair VA, Edwards DF, Williams JC, Prabhakaran V. Behavioral outcomes following braincomputer interface intervention for upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Front Neurosci. 2018;12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00752.

56.

Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, Nair VA, Walton LM, Song J, Tyler ME, Edwards DF, Caldera K, Sattin JA, Williams JC, Prabhakaran V. Case report: post-stroke interventional bci rehabilitation in an individual with preexisting sensorineural disability. Front Neuroeng. 2014;7:18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00018.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

57.

Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, Remsik A, Walton LM, Song J, Nair VA, Grogan SW, Tyler ME, Edwards DF, Caldera K. Changes in functional connectivity correlate with behavioral gains in stroke patients after therapy using a brain–computer interface device. Front Neuroeng. 2014;7:25.PubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, Walton LM, Song J, Nair VA, Grogan SW, Tyler ME, Edwards DF, Caldera K, Sattin JA. Changes in functional brain organization and behavioral correlations after rehabilitative therapy using a brain–computer interface. Front Neuroeng. 2014;7:26.PubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Cisotto G, Pupolin S, Cavinato M, Piccione F. An eeg-based bci platform to improve arm reaching ability of chronic stroke patients by means of an operant learning training with a contingent force feedback. Int J E-Health Med Commun. 2014;5(1):114–34. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijehmc.2014010107.CrossRef

60.

Silvoni S, Cavinato M, Volpato C, Cisotto G, Genna C, Agostini M, Turolla A, Ramos-Murguialday A, Piccione F. Kinematic and neurophysiological consequences of an assisted-force-feedback brain–machine interface training: a case study. Front Neurol. 2013;4:173. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00173.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

61.

Mrachacz-Kersting N, Jiang N, Thomas Stevenson AJ, Niazi IK, Kostic V, Pavlovic A, Radovanovic S, Djuric-Jovicic M, Agosta F, Dremstrup K, Farina D. Efficient neuroplasticity induction in chronic stroke patients by an associative brain–computer interface. J Neurophysiol. 2016;115(3):1410–21. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00918.2015.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1989;95(2):2–4.CrossRef

63.

Jang YY, Kim TH, Lee BH. Effects of brain–computer interface-controlled functional electrical stimulation training on shoulder subluxation for patients with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Occup Ther Int. 2016;23(2):175–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1422.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Osuagwu BC, Wallace L, Fraser M, Vuckovic A. Rehabilitation of hand in subacute tetraplegic patients based on brain computer interface and functional electrical stimulation: a randomised pilot study. J Neural Eng. 2016;13(6):065002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/13/6/065002.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Bhagat NA, Yozbatiran N, Sullivan JL, Paranjape R, Losey C, Hernandez Z, Keser Z, Grossman R, Francisco GE, O’Malley MK, Contreras-Vidal JL. Neural activity modulations and motor recovery following brain-exoskeleton interface mediated stroke rehabilitation. Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102502.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

66.

Chowdhury A, Meena YK, Raza H, Bhushan B, Uttam AK, Pandey N, Hashmi AA, Bajpai A, Dutta A, Prasad G. Active physical practice followed by mental practice using bci-driven hand exoskeleton: a pilot trial for clinical effectiveness and usability. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018;22(6):1786–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2018.2863212.PubMedCrossRef

67.

Chowdhury A, Dutta A, Prasad G. Corticomuscular co-activation based hybrid brain–computer interface for motor recovery monitoring. Ieee Access. 2020;8:174542–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3026037.CrossRef

68.

Ibáñez J, Monge-Pereira E, Molina-Rueda F, Serrano JI, Del Castillo MD, Cuesta-Gómez A, Carratalá-Tejada M, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Alguacil-Diego IM, Miangolarra-Page JC, Pons JL. Low latency estimation of motor intentions to assist reaching movements along multiple sessions in chronic stroke patients: a feasibility study. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00126.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

69.

Norman SL, McFarland DJ, Miner A, Cramer SC, Wolbrecht ET, Wolpaw JR, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Controlling pre-movement sensorimotor rhythm can improve finger extension after stroke. J Neural Eng. 2018;15(5):056026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aad724.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

70.

McCrimmon CM, King CE, Wang PT, Cramer SC, Nenadic Z, Do AH. Brain-controlled functional electrical stimulation for lower-limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:1247–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/embc.2014.6943823.PubMedCrossRef

71.

Vourvopoulos A, Pardo OM, Lefebvre S, Neureither M, Saldana D, Jahng E, Liew SL. Effects of a brain–computer interface with virtual reality (vr) neurofeedback: a pilot study in chronic stroke patients. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13:210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00210.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

72.

Daly JJ, Cheng R, Rogers J, Litinas K, Hrovat K, Dohring M. Feasibility of a new application of noninvasive brain computer interface (bci): a case study of training for recovery of volitional motor control after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009;33(4):203–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181c1fc0b.PubMedCrossRef

73.

Jovanovic LI, Kapadia N, Lo L, Zivanovic V, Popovic MR, Marquez-Chin C. Restoration of upper limb function after chronic severe hemiplegia: a case report on the feasibility of a brain–computer interface-triggered functional electrical stimulation therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;99(3):35–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000001163.CrossRef

74.

Marquez-Chin C, Marquis A, Popovic MR. Eeg-triggered functional electrical stimulation therapy for restoring upper limb function in chronic stroke with severe hemiplegia. Case Rep Neurol Med. 2016;2016:9146213. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9146213.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

75.

Mukaino M, Ono T, Shindo K, Fujiwara T, Ota T, Kimura A, Liu M, Ushiba J. Efficacy of brain–computer interface-driven neuromuscular electrical stimulation for chronic paresis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(4):378–82. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1785.PubMedCrossRef

76.

Ono T, Mukaino M, Ushiba J. Functional recovery in upper limb function in stroke survivors by using brain–computer interface a single case a-b-a-b design. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:265–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/embc.2013.6609488.PubMedCrossRef

77.

Takahashi M, Takeda K, Otaka Y, Osu R, Hanakawa T, Gouko M, Ito K. Event related desynchronization-modulated functional electrical stimulation system for stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

78.

Mrachacz-Kersting N, Jiang N, Dremstrup K, Farina D. A novel brain-computer interface for chronic stroke patients. In: Christoph Guger ECL, Brendan Allison (eds) Brain–computer interface research: a state-of-the-art summary 2. Biosystems and Biorobotics, vol. 6, pp. 51–61. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54707-2_6.

79.

Takeoka A, Vollenweider I, Courtine G, Arber S. Muscle spindle feedback directs locomotor recovery and circuit reorganization after spinal cord injury. Cell. 2014;159(7):1626–39.PubMedCrossRef

80.

Sebastián-Romagosa M, Cho W, Ortner R, Murovec N, Von Oertzen T, Kamada K, Allison BZ, Guger C. Brain computer interface treatment for motor rehabilitation of upper extremity of stroke patients-a feasibility study. Front Neurosci. 2020;14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.591435.

81.

Ono T, Shindo K, Kawashima K, Ota N, Ito M, Ota T, Mukaino M, Fujiwara T, Kimura A, Liu M, Ushiba J. Brain–computer interface with somatosensory feedback improves functional recovery from severe hemiplegia due to chronic stroke. Front Neuroeng. 2014;7:19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneng.2014.00019.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

82.

Bergquist A, Clair J, Lagerquist O, Mang C, Okuma Y, Collins D. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(10):2409–26.PubMedCrossRef

83.

Bradley CL, Damiano DL. Effects of dopamine on motor recovery and training in adults and children with nonprogressive neurological injuries: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(5):331–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

84.

Cruz A, Pires G, Lopes A, Carona C, Nunes UJ. A self-paced bci with a collaborative controller for highly reliable wheelchair driving: Experimental tests with physically disabled individuals. IEEE Trans Human-Mach Syst. 2021;51(2):109–19.CrossRef

85.

Daly I, Billinger M, Laparra-Hernández J, Aloise F, García ML, Faller J, Scherer R, Müller-Putz G. On the control of brain–computer interfaces by users with cerebral palsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(9):1787–97.PubMedCrossRef

86.

Bobrov P, Frolov AA, Husek D. In: Kudelka M, Pokorny J, Snasel V, Abraham A (eds) Brain Computer Interface Enhancement by Independent Component Analysis. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 179, 2013;51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31603-6_5. url:\(<\)Go to ISI\(>\)://WOS:000312116400005.

87.

Frolov AA, Bobrov PD, Biryukova EV, Silchenko AV, Kondur AA, Dzhalagoniya IZ, Massion J. Electrical, hemodynamic, and motor activity in bci post-stroke rehabilitation: clinical case study. Front Neurol. 2018;9:1135. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01135.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

88.

Kotov SV, Turbina LG, Bobrov PD, Frolov AA, Pavlova OG, Kurganskaia ME, Biriukova EV. rehabilitation of post stroke patients using a bioengineering system “brain–computer interface + exoskeleton’’. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2014;114(12 Pt 2):66–72. https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro201411412266-71.PubMedCrossRef

89.

alves-Pinto A, Turova V, Blumenstein T, Hantuschke C, Lampe R. Implicit learning of a finger motor sequence by patients with cerebral palsy after neurofeedback. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2017;42(1):27–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-017-9349-1.PubMedCrossRef

90.

Mihara M, Hattori N, Hatakenaka M, Yagura H, Kawano T, Hino T, Miyai I. Near-infrared spectroscopy-mediated neurofeedback enhances efficacy of motor imagery-based training in poststroke victims: a pilot study. Stroke. 2013;44(4):1091–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.111.674507.PubMedCrossRef

91.

Fujimoto H, Mihara M, Hattori N, Hatakenaka M, Yagura H, Kawano T, Miyai I, Mochizuki H. Neurofeedback-induced facilitation of the supplementary motor area affects postural stability. Neurophotonics. 2017;4(4):045003. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.4.4.045003.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

92.

Rayegani S, Raeissadat S, Sedighipour L, Mohammad Rezazadeh I, Bahrami M, Eliaspour D, Khosrawi S. Effect of neurofeedback and electromyographic-biofeedback therapy on improving hand function in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21(2):137–51.PubMedCrossRef

93.

Ding Q, Lin T, Wu M, Yang W, Li W, Jing Y, Ren X, Gong Y, Xu G, Lan Y. Influence of itbs on the acute neuroplastic change after bci training. Front Cell Neurosci. 2021;15:67.CrossRef

94.

Caria A, Weber C, Brötz D, Ramos A, Ticini LF, Gharabaghi A, Braun C, Birbaumer N. Chronic stroke recovery after combined bci training and physiotherapy: a case report. Psychophysiology. 2011;48(4):578–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01117.x.PubMedCrossRef

95.

Buch E, Weber C, Cohen LG, Braun C, Dimyan MA, Ard T, Mellinger J, Caria A, Soekadar S, Fourkas A, Birbaumer N. Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain–computer interface (bci) system for chronic stroke. Stroke. 2008;39(3):910–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.107.505313.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

96.

Gwin JT, Gramann K, Makeig S, Ferris DP. Electrocortical activity is coupled to gait cycle phase during treadmill walking. Neuroimage. 2011;54(2):1289–96.PubMedCrossRef

97.

Mrachacz-Kersting N, Kristensen SR, Niazi IK, Farina D. Precise temporal association between cortical potentials evoked by motor imagination and afference induces cortical plasticity. J Physiol. 2012;590(7):1669–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

98.

Grosse-Wentrup M, Mattia D, Oweiss K. Using brain–computer interfaces to induce neural plasticity and restore function. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(2):025004.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

99.

Raza H, Chowdhury A, Bhattacharyya S. Deep learning based prediction of eeg motor imagery of stroke patients’ for neuro-rehabilitation application. In: 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1–8. IEEE.

Title: Determining optimal mobile neurofeedback methods for motor neurorehabilitation in children and adults with non-progressive neurological disorders: a scoping review
Authors: Ahad Behboodi
Walker A. Lee
Victoria S. Hinchberger
Diane L. Damiano
Publication date: 01-12-2022
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keywords: Stroke
Neurorehabilitation
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01081-9

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Determining optimal mobile neurofeedback methods for motor neurorehabilitation in children and adults with non-progressive neurological disorders: a scoping review

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Gaze-contingent display technology can help to reduce the ipsilesional attention bias in hemispatial neglect following stroke

Soft robotics and functional electrical stimulation advances for restoring hand function in people with SCI: a narrative review, clinical guidelines and future directions

Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review

Neuron matters: neuromodulation with electromagnetic stimulation must consider neurons as dynamic identities

Temporal virtual reality-guided, dual-task, trunk balance training in a sitting position improves persistent postural-perceptual dizziness: proof of concept

Prosthetic embodiment: systematic review on definitions, measures, and experimental paradigms