Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Stroke | Research

Impact of the robotic-assistance level on upper extremity function in stroke patients receiving adjunct robotic rehabilitation: sub-analysis of a randomized clinical trial

Authors: Takashi Takebayashi, Kayoko Takahashi, Yuho Okita, Hironobu Kubo, Kenji Hachisuka, Kazuhisa Domen

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Robotic therapy has been demonstrated to be effective in treating upper extremity (UE) paresis in stroke survivors. However, it remains unclear whether the level of assistance provided by robotics in UE training could affect the improvement in UE function in stroke survivors. We aimed to exploratorily investigate the impact of robotic assistance level and modes of adjustment on functional improvement in a stroke-affected UE.

Methods

We analyzed the data of 30 subacute stroke survivors with mild-to-severe UE hemiplegia who were randomly assigned to the robotic therapy (using ReoGo System) group in our previous randomized clinical trial. A cluster analysis based on the training results (the percentage of each stroke patient’s five assistance modes of robotics used during the training) was performed. The patients were divided into two groups: high and low robotic assistance groups. Additionally, the two groups were sub-categorized into the following classes based on the severity of UE functional impairment: moderate-to-mild [Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score ≥ 30] and severe-to-moderate class (FMA < 30). The outcomes were assessed using FMA, FMA-proximal, performance-time in the Wolf motor function test (WMFT), and functional assessment scale (FAS) in WMFT. The outcomes of each class in the two groups were analyzed. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted with robot assistance level and severity of UE function as explanatory factors and the change in each outcome pre- and post-intervention as the objective factor.

Results

Overall, significant differences of the group × severity interaction were found in most of the outcomes, including FMA-proximal (p = 0.038, η2 = 0.13), WMFT-PT (p = 0.021, η2 = 0.17), and WMFT-FAS (p = 0.045, η2 = 0.14). However, only the FMA score appeared not to be significantly different in each group (p = 0.103, η2 = 0.09).

Conclusion

An optimal amount of robotic assistance is a key to maximize improvement in post-stroke UE paralysis. Furthermore, severity of UE paralysis is an important consideration when deciding the amount of assistance in robotic therapy.
Trial registration Trial enrollment was done at UMIN (UMIN 000001619, registration date was January 1, 2009)
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394–8.CrossRef Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394–8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Stroke: neurologic and functional recovery the Copenhagen stroke study. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 1999;10:887–906.CrossRef Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Stroke: neurologic and functional recovery the Copenhagen stroke study. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 1999;10:887–906.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–4.CrossRef Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–4.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Parry R, Lincoln N, Vass C. Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:187–98.CrossRef Parry R, Lincoln N, Vass C. Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:187–98.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Masiero S, Poli P, Rosati G, Zanotto D, Iosa M, Paolucci S, et al. The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014;11:187–98.CrossRef Masiero S, Poli P, Rosati G, Zanotto D, Iosa M, Paolucci S, et al. The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014;11:187–98.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47:e98–169.CrossRef Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47:e98–169.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenverg GF, Federman DG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1772–83.CrossRef Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenverg GF, Federman DG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1772–83.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rodgers H, Bosomworth H, Krebs HI, van Wijck F, Howel D, Wilson N, et al. Robot assisted training for the upper limb after stroke (RATULS): a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:51–62.CrossRef Rodgers H, Bosomworth H, Krebs HI, van Wijck F, Howel D, Wilson N, et al. Robot assisted training for the upper limb after stroke (RATULS): a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:51–62.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rémy-Néris O, Le Jeannic A, Dion A, Médée B, Nowak E, Poiroux É, et al. Additional, mechanized upper limb self-rehabilitation in patients with subacute stroke: the REM-AVC randomized trial. Stroke. 2021;52:1938–47.CrossRef Rémy-Néris O, Le Jeannic A, Dion A, Médée B, Nowak E, Poiroux É, et al. Additional, mechanized upper limb self-rehabilitation in patients with subacute stroke: the REM-AVC randomized trial. Stroke. 2021;52:1938–47.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Norouzi-Gheidari N, Archambault PS, Fung J. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49:479–96.CrossRef Norouzi-Gheidari N, Archambault PS, Fung J. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49:479–96.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wu J, Cheng H, Zhang J, Yang S, Cai S. Robot-assisted therapy for upper extremity motor impairment after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2021;101: pzab010.CrossRef Wu J, Cheng H, Zhang J, Yang S, Cai S. Robot-assisted therapy for upper extremity motor impairment after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2021;101: pzab010.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goršič M, Cikajlo I, Goliar N, Novak D. Amultisession evaluation of an adaptive competitive arm rehabilitation game. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14:128.CrossRef Goršič M, Cikajlo I, Goliar N, Novak D. Amultisession evaluation of an adaptive competitive arm rehabilitation game. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14:128.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kao PC, Srivastava S, Agrawal SK, Scholz JP. Effect of robotic performance-based error-augmentation versus error-reduction training on the gait of healthy individuals. Gait Posture. 2013;37:113–20.CrossRef Kao PC, Srivastava S, Agrawal SK, Scholz JP. Effect of robotic performance-based error-augmentation versus error-reduction training on the gait of healthy individuals. Gait Posture. 2013;37:113–20.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Patton JL, Stoykov ME, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Exp Brain Res. 2006;168:368–83.CrossRef Patton JL, Stoykov ME, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Exp Brain Res. 2006;168:368–83.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:20.CrossRef Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:20.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rowe JB, Chen V, Ingemanson ML, Cramer SC, Wolbrecht T, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robotic assistance for training finger movement using a Hebbian model: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31:769–80.CrossRef Rowe JB, Chen V, Ingemanson ML, Cramer SC, Wolbrecht T, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robotic assistance for training finger movement using a Hebbian model: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31:769–80.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Israel JF, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Hornby TG. Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1466–78.CrossRef Israel JF, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Hornby TG. Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2006;86:1466–78.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wolbrecht ET, Chan V, Le V, Cramer SC, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow JE. Real-time computer modeling of weakness following stroke optimizes robotic assistance for movement therapy. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international IEEE/EMBS conference on neural engineering. 2007. p. 152–8. Wolbrecht ET, Chan V, Le V, Cramer SC, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow JE. Real-time computer modeling of weakness following stroke optimizes robotic assistance for movement therapy. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international IEEE/EMBS conference on neural engineering. 2007. p. 152–8.
19.
go back to reference Takahashi K, Domen K, Sakamoto T, Toshima M, Otaka Y, Seto M, et al. The efficacy of upper extremity robotic therapy in subacute post-stroke hemiplegia: an exploratory randomized trial. Stroke. 2016;47:1385–8.CrossRef Takahashi K, Domen K, Sakamoto T, Toshima M, Otaka Y, Seto M, et al. The efficacy of upper extremity robotic therapy in subacute post-stroke hemiplegia: an exploratory randomized trial. Stroke. 2016;47:1385–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.PubMed Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13–31.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patents after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1635–9.CrossRef Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patents after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1635–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trial. Ann Int Med. 2010;152:726–32.CrossRef Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trial. Ann Int Med. 2010;152:726–32.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, Jansen-Troy A, Leonhardt S. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:3.CrossRef Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, Jansen-Troy A, Leonhardt S. A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:3.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chen ZJ, He C, Guo F, Xiong CH, Huang XL. Exoskelton-assisted anthropomorphic movement training (EAMT) for poststroke upper limb rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;S00039993(21):00457–63. Chen ZJ, He C, Guo F, Xiong CH, Huang XL. Exoskelton-assisted anthropomorphic movement training (EAMT) for poststroke upper limb rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;S00039993(21):00457–63.
25.
go back to reference Lynch D, Ferraro M, Krol J, Trudell CM, Christos P, Volpe BT. Continuous passive motion improves shoulder joint integrity following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:594–9.CrossRef Lynch D, Ferraro M, Krol J, Trudell CM, Christos P, Volpe BT. Continuous passive motion improves shoulder joint integrity following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:594–9.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Krebs HI, Palazzolo JJ, Dipietro L, Ferraro M, Krol J, Rannekleiv K, et al. Rehabilitation robotics: performance-based progressive robot-assisted therapy. Auton Robots. 2003;15:7–20.CrossRef Krebs HI, Palazzolo JJ, Dipietro L, Ferraro M, Krol J, Rannekleiv K, et al. Rehabilitation robotics: performance-based progressive robot-assisted therapy. Auton Robots. 2003;15:7–20.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lee SH, Park G, Cho DY, Kim HY, Lee JY, Kim S, et al. Comparisons between end-effector and exoskeleton rehabilitation robots regarding upper extremity function among chronic stroke patients with moderate-to-severe upper limb impairment. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1806.CrossRef Lee SH, Park G, Cho DY, Kim HY, Lee JY, Kim S, et al. Comparisons between end-effector and exoskeleton rehabilitation robots regarding upper extremity function among chronic stroke patients with moderate-to-severe upper limb impairment. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1806.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Maggio L, Sire AD, Marotta N, Demeco A, Ammendolia A. Exsoskelton versus end-effector robot-assisted therapy for finger-hand motor recovery in stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021;21:1–12.CrossRef Maggio L, Sire AD, Marotta N, Demeco A, Ammendolia A. Exsoskelton versus end-effector robot-assisted therapy for finger-hand motor recovery in stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021;21:1–12.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wolbrecht ET, Chan V, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow JE. Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008;6:286–97.CrossRef Wolbrecht ET, Chan V, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow JE. Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008;6:286–97.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, Motiwala RR, Cramer SC. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain. 2008;131:425–37.CrossRef Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, Motiwala RR, Cramer SC. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain. 2008;131:425–37.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of the robotic-assistance level on upper extremity function in stroke patients receiving adjunct robotic rehabilitation: sub-analysis of a randomized clinical trial
Authors
Takashi Takebayashi
Kayoko Takahashi
Yuho Okita
Hironobu Kubo
Kenji Hachisuka
Kazuhisa Domen
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Stroke
Hemiplegia
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-00986-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2022 Go to the issue