Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Motor Evoked Potential | Research

Transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with attention increases cortical excitability and improves motor learning in healthy volunteers

Authors: Tomofumi Yamaguchi, Kouhei Moriya, Shigeo Tanabe, Kunitsugu Kondo, Yohei Otaka, Satoshi Tanaka

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that has the potential to induce motor cortical plasticity in humans. It is well known that motor cortical plasticity plays an essential role in motor learning and recovery in patients with stroke and neurodegenerative disorders. However, it remains unclear how cognitive function influences motor cortical plasticity induced by tDCS. The present study aimed to investigate whether anodal tDCS combined with attention to a target muscle could enhance motor cortical plasticity and improve motor learning in healthy individuals.

Methods

Thirty-three healthy volunteers were assigned to two experiments. In experiment 1, there were three interventional conditions: 1) anodal tDCS was applied while participants paid attention to the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle, 2) anodal tDCS was applied while participants paid attention to the sound, and 3) anodal tDCS was applied without the participants paying attention to the FDI muscle or the sound. Anodal tDCS (2 mA, 10 min) was applied over the primary motor cortex (M1). Changes in motor evoked potentials (MEPs), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were assessed before and immediately after (0 min), and then 10 min, 30 min, and 60 min after each intervention. In experiment 2, we investigated whether the combination of anodal tDCS and attention to the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle could facilitate the learning of a ballistic thumb movement.

Results

Anodal tDCS increased cortical excitability in all conditions immediately after the stimulation. Significant increases in MEPs and significant decreases in SICI were observed for at least 60 min after anodal tDCS, but only when participants paid attention to the FDI muscle. In contrast, no significant changes in ICF were observed in any condition. In experiment 2, the combination of tDCS and attention to the APB muscle significantly enhanced the acquisition of a ballistic thumb movement. The higher performance was still observed 7 days after the stimulation.

Conclusions

This study shows that anodal tDCS over M1 in conjunction with attention to the target muscle enhances motor cortex plasticity and improves motor learning in healthy adults. These findings suggest that a combination of attention and tDCS may be an effective strategy to promote rehabilitation training in patients with stroke and neurodegenerative disorders.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered (UMIN000036848).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nitsche M, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527:633–9.PubMedCentralPubMed Nitsche M, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527:633–9.PubMedCentralPubMed
2.
go back to reference Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001;57:1899–901.PubMed Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001;57:1899–901.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu WH, Gerloff C, Cohen LG. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005;128:490–9.PubMed Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu WH, Gerloff C, Cohen LG. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005;128:490–9.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Tanaka S, Takeda K, Otaka Y, Kita K, Osu R, Honda M, et al. Single session of transcranial direct current stimulation transiently increases knee extensor force in patients with hemiparetic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:565–9.PubMed Tanaka S, Takeda K, Otaka Y, Kita K, Osu R, Honda M, et al. Single session of transcranial direct current stimulation transiently increases knee extensor force in patients with hemiparetic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:565–9.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Tanaka S, Sandrini M, Cohen LG. Modulation of motor learning and memory formation by non-invasive cortical stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011;21:650–75.PubMed Tanaka S, Sandrini M, Cohen LG. Modulation of motor learning and memory formation by non-invasive cortical stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011;21:650–75.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Reis J, Fritsch B. Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2011;24:590–6.PubMed Reis J, Fritsch B. Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2011;24:590–6.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kang N, Summers JJ, Cauraugh JH. Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:345–55.PubMed Kang N, Summers JJ, Cauraugh JH. Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:345–55.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Buch ER, Santarnecchi E, Antal A, Born J, Celnik PA, Classen J, et al. Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: a consensus and critical position paper. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128:589–603.PubMed Buch ER, Santarnecchi E, Antal A, Born J, Celnik PA, Classen J, et al. Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: a consensus and critical position paper. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128:589–603.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Broeder S, Nackaerts E, Cuypers K, Meesen R, Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A. tDCS-enhanced consolidation of writing skills and its associations with cortical excitability in Parkinson disease: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33:1050–60.PubMed Broeder S, Nackaerts E, Cuypers K, Meesen R, Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A. tDCS-enhanced consolidation of writing skills and its associations with cortical excitability in Parkinson disease: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33:1050–60.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Eddy CM, Shapiro K, Clouter A, Hansen PC, Rickards HE. Transcranial direct current stimulation can enhance working memory in Huntington's disease. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2017;3:75–82. Eddy CM, Shapiro K, Clouter A, Hansen PC, Rickards HE. Transcranial direct current stimulation can enhance working memory in Huntington's disease. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2017;3:75–82.
11.
go back to reference Datta A, Truong D, Minhas P, Parra LC, Bikson M. Inter-individual variation during transcranial direct current stimulation and normalization of dose using MRI-derived computational models. Front Psychiatry. 2012;3:91.PubMedCentralPubMed Datta A, Truong D, Minhas P, Parra LC, Bikson M. Inter-individual variation during transcranial direct current stimulation and normalization of dose using MRI-derived computational models. Front Psychiatry. 2012;3:91.PubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wiethoff S, Hamada M, Rothwell JC. (2014). Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 2014;7:468–75.PubMed Wiethoff S, Hamada M, Rothwell JC. (2014). Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 2014;7:468–75.PubMed
13.
go back to reference López-Alonso V, Cheeran B, Rio-Rodriguez D, Fernández-Del-Olmo M. Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul. 2014;7:372–80.PubMed López-Alonso V, Cheeran B, Rio-Rodriguez D, Fernández-Del-Olmo M. Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul. 2014;7:372–80.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Laakso I, Tanaka S, Koyama S, De Santis V, Hirata A. Inter-subject variability in electric fields of motor cortical tDCS. Brain Stimul. 2015;8:906–13.PubMed Laakso I, Tanaka S, Koyama S, De Santis V, Hirata A. Inter-subject variability in electric fields of motor cortical tDCS. Brain Stimul. 2015;8:906–13.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Horvath C, Forte JD, Carter O. Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond mep amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: a systematic review. Neuropsychologia. 2015;66:213–36.PubMed Horvath C, Forte JD, Carter O. Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond mep amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: a systematic review. Neuropsychologia. 2015;66:213–36.PubMed
16.
go back to reference López-Alonso V, Cheeran B, Río-Rodríguez D, Fernández-Del-Olmo M. Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul. 2014;7:372–80.PubMed López-Alonso V, Cheeran B, Río-Rodríguez D, Fernández-Del-Olmo M. Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul. 2014;7:372–80.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Stefan K, Wycislo M, Classen J. Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92:66–72.PubMed Stefan K, Wycislo M, Classen J. Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92:66–72.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Rosenkranz K, Rothwell JC. The effect of sensory input and attention on the sensorimotor organization of the hand area of the human motor cortex. J Physiol. 2004;561:307–20.PubMedCentralPubMed Rosenkranz K, Rothwell JC. The effect of sensory input and attention on the sensorimotor organization of the hand area of the human motor cortex. J Physiol. 2004;561:307–20.PubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Chapman LJ, Chapman JP. The measurement of handedness. Brain Cogn. 1987;6:175–83.PubMed Chapman LJ, Chapman JP. The measurement of handedness. Brain Cogn. 1987;6:175–83.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Moliadze V, Antal A, Paulus W. Electrode-distance dependent after-effects of transcranial direct and random noise stimulation with extracephalic reference electrodes. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121:2165–71.PubMed Moliadze V, Antal A, Paulus W. Electrode-distance dependent after-effects of transcranial direct and random noise stimulation with extracephalic reference electrodes. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121:2165–71.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Tatemoto T, Yamaguchi T, Yohei O, Kondo K, Tanaka S. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the lower limb motor cortex increases the cortical excitability with extracephalic reference electrodes. In: Converging clinical and engineering research on Neurorehabilitation, edited by pons JL, Torricelli D, Pajaro M. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 829–34. Available at: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-34546-3_135. Tatemoto T, Yamaguchi T, Yohei O, Kondo K, Tanaka S. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the lower limb motor cortex increases the cortical excitability with extracephalic reference electrodes. In: Converging clinical and engineering research on Neurorehabilitation, edited by pons JL, Torricelli D, Pajaro M. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 829–34. Available at: http://​link.​springer.​com/​chapter/​10.​1007/​978-3-642-34546-3_​135.
22.
go back to reference Angius L, Pageaux B, Hopker J, Marcora SM, Mauger AR. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves isometric time to exhaustion of the knee extensors. Neuroscience. 2016;339:363–75.PubMed Angius L, Pageaux B, Hopker J, Marcora SM, Mauger AR. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves isometric time to exhaustion of the knee extensors. Neuroscience. 2016;339:363–75.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Vandermeeren Y, Jamart J, Ossemann M. Effect of tDCS with an extracephalic reference electrode on cardio-respiratory and autonomic functions. BMC Neurosci. 2010;11:38.PubMedCentralPubMed Vandermeeren Y, Jamart J, Ossemann M. Effect of tDCS with an extracephalic reference electrode on cardio-respiratory and autonomic functions. BMC Neurosci. 2010;11:38.PubMedCentralPubMed
24.
go back to reference Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:2220–2.PubMed Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W. Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:2220–2.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Ferbert A, et al. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol. 1993;471:501–19.PubMedCentralPubMed Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Ferbert A, et al. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol. 1993;471:501–19.PubMedCentralPubMed
26.
go back to reference Muellbacher W, Ziemann U, Boroojerdi B, Cohen L, Hallett M. Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning. Exp Brain Res. 2001;136:431–8.PubMed Muellbacher W, Ziemann U, Boroojerdi B, Cohen L, Hallett M. Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning. Exp Brain Res. 2001;136:431–8.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Muellbacher W, Ziemann U, Wissel J, Dang N, Kofler M, Facchini S, et al. Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex. Nature. 2002;415:640–4.PubMed Muellbacher W, Ziemann U, Wissel J, Dang N, Kofler M, Facchini S, et al. Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex. Nature. 2002;415:640–4.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Baraduc P, Lang N, Rothwell JC, Wolpert DM. Consolidation of dynamic motor learning is not disrupted by rTMS of primary motor cortex. Curr Biol. 2004;14:252–6.PubMed Baraduc P, Lang N, Rothwell JC, Wolpert DM. Consolidation of dynamic motor learning is not disrupted by rTMS of primary motor cortex. Curr Biol. 2004;14:252–6.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Koyama S, Tanaka S, Tanabe S, Sadato N. Dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor cortex enhances consolidation of a ballistic thumb movement. Neurosci Lett. 2015;588:49–53.PubMed Koyama S, Tanaka S, Tanabe S, Sadato N. Dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor cortex enhances consolidation of a ballistic thumb movement. Neurosci Lett. 2015;588:49–53.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Quartarone A, Morgante F, Bagnato S, Rizzo V, Sant'Angelo A, Aiello E, et al. Long lasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery. Neuroreport. 2004;15:1287–91.PubMed Quartarone A, Morgante F, Bagnato S, Rizzo V, Sant'Angelo A, Aiello E, et al. Long lasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor imagery. Neuroreport. 2004;15:1287–91.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Antal A, Terney D, Poreisz C, Paulus W. Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;26:2687–91.PubMed Antal A, Terney D, Poreisz C, Paulus W. Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;26:2687–91.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Miyaguchi S, Onishi H, Kojima S, Sugawara K, Tsubaki A, Kirimoto H, et al. Corticomotor excitability induced by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with and without non-exhaustive movement. Brain Res. 2013;1529:83–91.PubMed Miyaguchi S, Onishi H, Kojima S, Sugawara K, Tsubaki A, Kirimoto H, et al. Corticomotor excitability induced by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with and without non-exhaustive movement. Brain Res. 2013;1529:83–91.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Moriya K, Yamaguchi T, Otaka Y, Kondo K, Tanaka S. Transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with attention to the paretic hand improves hand performance in stroke patients: a double-blind, sham-controlled study. Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation III. ICNR 2018. Biosystems & Biorobotics. 2019;21:829–833. Moriya K, Yamaguchi T, Otaka Y, Kondo K, Tanaka S. Transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with attention to the paretic hand improves hand performance in stroke patients: a double-blind, sham-controlled study. Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation III. ICNR 2018. Biosystems & Biorobotics. 2019;21:829–833.
34.
go back to reference Bae JH, Kang SH, Seo KM, Kim DK, Shin HI, Shin HE. Relationship between grip and pinch strength and activities of daily living in stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015;39:752–62.PubMedCentralPubMed Bae JH, Kang SH, Seo KM, Kim DK, Shin HI, Shin HE. Relationship between grip and pinch strength and activities of daily living in stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015;39:752–62.PubMedCentralPubMed
35.
go back to reference Sarter M, Gehring WJ, Kozak R. More attention must be paid: the neurobiology of attentional effort. Brain Res Rev. 2006;51:145–16.PubMed Sarter M, Gehring WJ, Kozak R. More attention must be paid: the neurobiology of attentional effort. Brain Res Rev. 2006;51:145–16.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Treue S, Maunsell JHR. Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST. Nature. 1996;382:539–41.PubMed Treue S, Maunsell JHR. Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST. Nature. 1996;382:539–41.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Bentley P, Husain M, Dolan RJ. Effects of cholinergic enhancement on visual stimulation, spatial attention, and spatial working memory. Neuron. 2004;41:969–82.PubMed Bentley P, Husain M, Dolan RJ. Effects of cholinergic enhancement on visual stimulation, spatial attention, and spatial working memory. Neuron. 2004;41:969–82.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Hasselmo ME, Schnell E, Barkai E. Dynamics of learning and recall at excitatory recurrent synapses and cholinergic modulation in rat hippocampal region CA3. J Neurosci. 1995;15:5249–62.PubMedCentralPubMed Hasselmo ME, Schnell E, Barkai E. Dynamics of learning and recall at excitatory recurrent synapses and cholinergic modulation in rat hippocampal region CA3. J Neurosci. 1995;15:5249–62.PubMedCentralPubMed
39.
go back to reference Rasmusson DD. The role of acetylcholine in cortical synaptic plasticity. Behav Brain Res. 2000;115:205–18.PubMed Rasmusson DD. The role of acetylcholine in cortical synaptic plasticity. Behav Brain Res. 2000;115:205–18.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Hasselmo ME, McGaughy J. High acetylcholine levels set circuit dynamics for attention and encoding and low acetylcholine levels set dynamics for consolidation. Prog Brain Res. 2004;145:207–31.PubMed Hasselmo ME, McGaughy J. High acetylcholine levels set circuit dynamics for attention and encoding and low acetylcholine levels set dynamics for consolidation. Prog Brain Res. 2004;145:207–31.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Scelzo E, Giannicola G, Rosa M, Ciocca M, Ardolino G, Cogiamanian F, et al. Increased short latency afferent inhibition after anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Neurosci Lett. 2011;498:167–70.PubMed Scelzo E, Giannicola G, Rosa M, Ciocca M, Ardolino G, Cogiamanian F, et al. Increased short latency afferent inhibition after anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Neurosci Lett. 2011;498:167–70.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Hasselmo ME, Barkai E. Cholinergic modulation of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in the piriform cortex and associative memory function in a network biophysical simulation. J Neurosci. 1995;15:6592–604.PubMedCentralPubMed Hasselmo ME, Barkai E. Cholinergic modulation of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in the piriform cortex and associative memory function in a network biophysical simulation. J Neurosci. 1995;15:6592–604.PubMedCentralPubMed
43.
go back to reference Hasselmo ME. Neuromodulation: acetylcholine and memory consolidation. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999;3:351–9.PubMed Hasselmo ME. Neuromodulation: acetylcholine and memory consolidation. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999;3:351–9.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Boyd TE, Trepel C, Racine RJ. Cholinergic modulation of neocortical long-term potentiation in the awake, freely moving rat. Brain Res. 2000;881:28–36.PubMed Boyd TE, Trepel C, Racine RJ. Cholinergic modulation of neocortical long-term potentiation in the awake, freely moving rat. Brain Res. 2000;881:28–36.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Ziemann U, Lonnecker S, Steinhoff BJ, Paulus W. Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Ann Neurol. 1996;40:367–78.PubMed Ziemann U, Lonnecker S, Steinhoff BJ, Paulus W. Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Ann Neurol. 1996;40:367–78.PubMed
46.
go back to reference Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K, Klein CC, Rochford C, Nitsche MS, et al. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol. 2005;568:291–303.PubMedCentralPubMed Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K, Klein CC, Rochford C, Nitsche MS, et al. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol. 2005;568:291–303.PubMedCentralPubMed
47.
48.
go back to reference Kim S, Stephenson MC, Morris PG, Jackson SR. tDCS-induced alterations in GABA concentration within primary motor cortex predict motor learning and motor memory: a 7 T magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Neuroimage. 2014;99:237–43.PubMed Kim S, Stephenson MC, Morris PG, Jackson SR. tDCS-induced alterations in GABA concentration within primary motor cortex predict motor learning and motor memory: a 7 T magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Neuroimage. 2014;99:237–43.PubMed
49.
go back to reference Bachtiar V, Near J, Johansen-Berg H, Stagg CJ. Modulation of GABA and resting state functional connectivity by transcranial direct current stimulation. Elife. 2015;4:e08789.PubMedCentralPubMed Bachtiar V, Near J, Johansen-Berg H, Stagg CJ. Modulation of GABA and resting state functional connectivity by transcranial direct current stimulation. Elife. 2015;4:e08789.PubMedCentralPubMed
50.
go back to reference Maeda F, Gangitano M, Thall M, Pascual-Leone A. Inter- and intra-individual variability of paired-pulse curves with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:376–82.PubMed Maeda F, Gangitano M, Thall M, Pascual-Leone A. Inter- and intra-individual variability of paired-pulse curves with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:376–82.PubMed
51.
go back to reference Davila-Pérez P, Jannati A, Fried PJ, Cudeiro Mazaira J, Pascual-Leone A. The effects of waveform and current direction on the efficacy and test-retest reliability of Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroscience. 2018;393:97–109.PubMed Davila-Pérez P, Jannati A, Fried PJ, Cudeiro Mazaira J, Pascual-Leone A. The effects of waveform and current direction on the efficacy and test-retest reliability of Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroscience. 2018;393:97–109.PubMed
52.
go back to reference Fritsch B, Reis J, Martinowich K, Schambra HM, Ji Y, Cohen LG, et al. Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron. 2010;66:198–204.PubMedCentralPubMed Fritsch B, Reis J, Martinowich K, Schambra HM, Ji Y, Cohen LG, et al. Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron. 2010;66:198–204.PubMedCentralPubMed
53.
go back to reference Stagg CJ, Jayaram G, Pastor D, Kincses ZT, Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H. Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49:800–4.PubMedCentralPubMed Stagg CJ, Jayaram G, Pastor D, Kincses ZT, Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H. Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49:800–4.PubMedCentralPubMed
54.
go back to reference Kronberg G, Bridi M, Abel T, Bikson M, Parra LC. Direct current stimulation modulates LTP and LTD: activity dependence and dendritic effects. Brain Stimul. 2017;10:51–8.PubMed Kronberg G, Bridi M, Abel T, Bikson M, Parra LC. Direct current stimulation modulates LTP and LTD: activity dependence and dendritic effects. Brain Stimul. 2017;10:51–8.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with attention increases cortical excitability and improves motor learning in healthy volunteers
Authors
Tomofumi Yamaguchi
Kouhei Moriya
Shigeo Tanabe
Kunitsugu Kondo
Yohei Otaka
Satoshi Tanaka
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00665-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2020 Go to the issue