Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

A biologically-inspired multi-joint soft exosuit that can reduce the energy cost of loaded walking

Authors: Fausto A. Panizzolo, Ignacio Galiana, Alan T. Asbeck, Christopher Siviy, Kai Schmidt, Kenneth G. Holt, Conor J. Walsh

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Carrying load alters normal walking, imposes additional stress to the musculoskeletal system, and results in an increase in energy consumption and a consequent earlier onset of fatigue. This phenomenon is largely due to increased work requirements in lower extremity joints, in turn requiring higher muscle activation. The aim of this work was to assess the biomechanical and physiological effects of a multi-joint soft exosuit that applies assistive torques to the biological hip and ankle joints during loaded walking.

Methods

The exosuit was evaluated under three conditions: powered (EXO_ON), unpowered (EXO_OFF) and unpowered removing the equivalent mass of the device (EXO_OFF_EMR). Seven participants walked on an instrumented split-belt treadmill and carried a load equivalent to 30 % their body mass. We assessed their metabolic cost of walking, kinetics, kinematics, and lower limb muscle activation using a portable gas analysis system, motion capture system, and surface electromyography.

Results

Our results showed that the exosuit could deliver controlled forces to a wearer. Net metabolic power in the EXO_ON condition (7.5 ± 0.6 W kg−1) was 7.3 ± 5.0 % and 14.2 ± 6.1 % lower than in the EXO_OFF_EMR condition (7.9 ± 0.8 W kg−1; p = 0.027) and in the EXO_OFF condition (8.5 ± 0.9 W kg−1; p = 0.005), respectively. The exosuit also reduced the total joint positive biological work (sum of hip, knee and ankle) when comparing the EXO_ON condition (1.06 ± 0.16 J kg−1) with respect to the EXO_OFF condition (1.28 ± 0.26 J kg−1; p = 0.020) and to the EXO_OFF_EMR condition (1.22 ± 0.21 J kg−1; p = 0.007).

Conclusions

The results of the present work demonstrate for the first time that a soft wearable robot can improve walking economy. These findings pave the way for future assistive devices that may enhance or restore gait in other applications.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Griffin TM, Roberts TJ, Kram R. Metabolic cost of generating muscular force in human walking: insights from load-carrying and speed experiments. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95:172–83.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Knapik JJ, Reynolds KL, Harman E. Soldier load carriage: historical, physiological, biomechanical, and medical aspects. Mil Med. 2004;169:45–56.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Wang H, Frame J, Ozimek E, Leib D, Dugan EL. The effects of load carriage and muscle fatigue on lower-extremity joint mechanics. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84:305–12.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Silder A, Delp SL, Besier T. Men and women adopt similar walking mechanics and muscle activation patterns during load carriage. J Biomech. 2013;46:2522–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Knapik J, Harman E, Reynolds K. Load carriage using packs: a review of physiological, biomechanical and medical aspects. Appl Ergon. 1996;27:207–16.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Dollar AM, Herr H. Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: challenges and state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Robot. 2008;24:144–58.CrossRef
8.
Kazerooni H, Steger R. The Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2006;128:14.CrossRef
9.
Walsh CJ, Endo K, Herr H. A quasi-passive leg exoskeleton for load-carrying augmentation. Int J Humanoid Robot. 2007;4:487–506.CrossRef
10.
Garcia E, Sater J, Main J. Exoskeletons for human performance augmentation (EHPA): A program summary. J Robotics Soc Japan. 2002;20:822–6.CrossRef
11.
Yamamoto K, Ishii M, Hyodo K, Yoshimitsu T, Matsuo T. Development of power assisting suit (miniaturization of supply system to realize wearable suit). JSME Int J Ser C. 2003;46:923–30.CrossRef
12.
Sawicki GS, Ferris DP. Powered ankle exoskeletons reveal the metabolic cost of plantar flexor mechanical work during walking with longer steps at constant step frequency. J Exp Biol. 2009;212:21–31.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Banala SK, Agrawal SK, Scholz SP. Active leg exoskeleton (ALEX) for gait rehabilitation of motor-impaired patients. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2007, 401–7
14.
Kawamoto H, Lee S, Kanbe S, Sankai Y. Power assist method for HAL-3 using emg-based feedback controller. IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern 2003, 1648–53.
15.
Schiele A. Ergonomics of exoskeletons: Subjective performance metrics. IEEE/RSJ Int Conf Intell Rob and Sys 2009, 480–5
16.
Browning RC, Modica JR, Kram R, Goswami A. The effects of adding mass to the legs on the energetics and biomechanics of walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:515–25.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Asbeck AT, De Rossi SMM, Galiana I, Ding Y, Walsh CJ. Stronger, smarter, softer: next-generation wearable robots. IEEE Robot Autom Mag. 2014;21:22–33.CrossRef
18.
Asbeck AT, Dyer RJ, Larusson AF, Walsh CJ. Biologically-inspired soft exosuit. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2013, 1–8
19.
Asbeck AT, Schmidt K, Walsh CJ. Soft exosuit for hip assistance. Rob Auton Syst. 2015;73:102–10.CrossRef
20.
Ding Y, Galiana I, Asbeck A, De Rossi S, Bae J, Santos RT, Araujo VL, Lee S, Holt KG, Walsh C. Biomechanical and physiological evaluation of multi-joint assistance with soft exosuits. IEEE T Neur Sys Reh. 2016;99:1.CrossRef
21.
Ding Y, Galiana I, Asbeck AT, Quinlivan B, De Rossi SMM, Walsh C. Multi-joint actuation platform for lower extremity soft exosuits, IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2014, 1327–34
22.
Asbeck AT, Schmidt K, Galiana I, Walsh C. Multi-joint soft exosuit for gait assistance, IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2015, 6197–204
23.
24.
Asbeck AT, De Rossi S, Holt K, Walsh C. A biologically inspired soft exosuit for walking assistance. Int J Rob Res. 2015;34:744–62.CrossRef
25.
Umberger BR, Rubenson J. Understanding muscle energetics in locomotion: new modeling and experimental approaches. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2011;39:59–67.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zhang J, Cheah CC, Collins SH. Experimental comparison of torque control methods on an ankle exoskeleton during human walking. Int Conf Robot Autom 2015, 5584–9
27.
Winter DA. The biomechanics and motor control of human gait (University of Waterloo Press. 4th ed. 2009.CrossRef
28.
Brockway JM. Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1987;41:463–71.PubMed
29.
30.
Mooney LM, Herr HM. Biomechanical walking mechanisms underlying the metabolic reduction caused by an autonomous exoskeleton. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13:4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Collins SH, Wiggin MB, Sawicki GS. Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton. Nature. 2015;10:15.
32.
33.
Van Dijk W, van der Kooij H, Hekman E. A passive exoskeleton with artificial tendons: design and experimental evaluation. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2011, 1–6
34.
Gregorczyk KN, Hasselquist L, Schiffman JM, Bensel CK, Obusek JP, Gutekunst DJ. Effects of a lower-body exoskeleton device on metabolic cost and gait biomechanics during load carriage. Ergonomics. 2010;53:1263–75.CrossRefPubMed
35.
36.
Kawakami Y, Ichinose Y, Fukunaga T. Architectural and functional features of human triceps surae muscles during contraction. J Appl Physiol. 1998;85:398–404.PubMed
37.
Chleboun GS, France AR, Crill MT, Braddock HK, Howell JN. In vivo measurement of fascicle length and pennation angle of the human biceps femoris muscle. Cells Tissues Organs. 2001;169:401–9.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Lastayo PC, Pierotti DJ, Pifer J, Hoppeler H, Lindstedt SL. Eccentric ergometry: Increases in locomotor muscle size and strength at low training intensities. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000;278:1282–8.
39.
Jackson RW, Collins SH. An experimental comparison of the relative benefits of work and torque assistance in ankle exoskeletons. J Appl Physiol. 2015;119:541–57.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Farris DJ, Robertson BD, Sawicki GS. Elastic ankle exoskeletons reduce soleus muscle force but not work in human hopping. J Appl Physiol. 2013;115:579–85.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Reinkensmeyer DJ, Emken JL, Cramer SC. Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2004;6:497–525.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Ding Y, Galiana I, Siviy C, Panizzolo FA, Walsh C. IMU-based iterative control for hip extension assistance with a soft exosuit. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2016.
43.
Lee S, Crea S, Malcolm P, Galiana I, Walsh C. Controlling negative and positive power at the ankle with a soft exosuit. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2016.
44.
Quinlivan B, Asbeck A, Wagner D, Ranzani T, Russo S, Walsh C. Force transfer characterization of a soft exosuit for gait assistance. ASME Int Design Eng Tech Conf & Comput Info Eng Conf 2015, V05AT08A049.
45.
Bae J, De Rossi SMM, O’Donnell K, Hendron KL, Awad LN, Teles Dos Santos TR, De Araujo VL, Ding Y, Holt KG, Ellis TD, Walsh CJ. A soft exosuit for patients with stroke: feasibility study with a mobile off-board actuation unit. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2015, 131–8.
46.
Perry J, Burnfield J. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function, Slack Incorporated. 2nd ed. 2010.
Metadata
Title
A biologically-inspired multi-joint soft exosuit that can reduce the energy cost of loaded walking
Authors
Fausto A. Panizzolo
Ignacio Galiana
Alan T. Asbeck
Christopher Siviy
Kai Schmidt
Kenneth G. Holt
Conor J. Walsh
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0150-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research

Evaluation of a smartphone human activity recognition application with able-bodied and stroke participants

Research

A novel accelerometry-based algorithm for the detection of step durations over short episodes of gait in healthy elderly

Research

Do children and adolescent ice hockey players with and without a history of concussion differ in robotic testing of sensory, motor and cognitive function?

Research

Model-based variables for the kinematic assessment of upper-extremity impairments in post-stroke patients

Research

Quantifying dimensions of physical behavior in chronic pain conditions

Research

The impact of positive, negative and neutral stimuli in a virtual reality cognitive-motor rehabilitation task: a pilot study with stroke patients