Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Ugandan providers’ views on the acceptability of contraceptive self-injection for adolescents: a qualitative study

Authors: Jane Cover, Allen Namagembe, Justine Tumusiime, Jeanette Lim, Carie Muntifering Cox

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Self-injection of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate may offer greater discretion and increase access to injectable contraception, particularly for those who face challenges accessing clinic services. In particular, unmarried adolescents often encounter stigma when seeking services, and may also lack the financial means to travel to clinics on the quarterly basis that injectable contraception requires. Whether self-injection is offered to women on a wide scale basis, and to adolescents specifically, will depend in part upon the willingness of providers to train clients of diverse ages and educational backgrounds. This study explores the views of providers with regard to self-injection as an option for women and adolescents in Uganda.

Methods

In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with family planning providers in Gulu district, to understand their views on injectable self-injection for women, with a specific focus on unmarried adolescents ages 15 to 19 years. The in-depth interviews, which lasted up to 60 min were audio-recorded, translated and transcribed simultaneously, and analyzed using Atlas.ti software to identify key themes and common perspectives.

Results

A total of 40 health care providers were interviewed with equal numbers of each type (public, NGO, and private clinics, pharmacies, and community-based health workers). While most providers were receptive to self-injection for adult women, fewer than half were supportive of adolescent self-injection. Their reservations focused on age, marital status and parity concerns around adolescent use of the injectable more broadly, and concerns about the ability of adolescents to self-inject safely.

Conclusions

Self-injection presents an opportunity to reduce the enormous burden on the public sector health system in Uganda, which is particularly compounded by the heavy reliance on injectable contraception requiring quarterly clinic visits. The results of this study reveal a level of cautious support for self-injection among providers when it comes to self-injection by adult women. With respect to adolescent clients, family planning policymakers and program implementers should design, implement, and evaluate self-injection interventions with the needs of adolescent clients uppermost in mind, recognizing that extra attention will likely be needed to reduce provider-imposed restrictions on adolescent access to this injectable delivery modality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stout A, Wood S, Barigye G, Kaboré A, Siddo D, Ndione I. Expanding access to injectable contraception: results from pilot introduction of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) in 4 African countries. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2018;6(1):55–72 https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00250. Stout A, Wood S, Barigye G, Kaboré A, Siddo D, Ndione I. Expanding access to injectable contraception: results from pilot introduction of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) in 4 African countries. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2018;6(1):55–72 https://​doi.​org/​10.​9745/​GHSP-D-17-00250.
2.
go back to reference Jain, et al. Contraceptive efficacy and safety of DMPA-SC. Contraception. 2004;70:269–75.CrossRef Jain, et al. Contraceptive efficacy and safety of DMPA-SC. Contraception. 2004;70:269–75.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and ICF. 2017. Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2016: Key indicators report. Kampala, Uganda: UBOS, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: UBOS and ICF. Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and ICF. 2017. Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2016: Key indicators report. Kampala, Uganda: UBOS, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: UBOS and ICF.
5.
go back to reference Uganda Bureau of Statistics. The National Population and housing census 2014 – Main report. Uganda: Kampala; 2016. Uganda Bureau of Statistics. The National Population and housing census 2014 – Main report. Uganda: Kampala; 2016.
7.
go back to reference Burke HM, et al. Observational study of the acceptability of Sayana ® press among intramuscular DMPA users in Uganda and Senegal. Contraception. 2014;89(5):361–7.CrossRef Burke HM, et al. Observational study of the acceptability of Sayana ® press among intramuscular DMPA users in Uganda and Senegal. Contraception. 2014;89(5):361–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cover, J. et al. Continuation of self-injected v. provider-administered contraception in Senegal: a non-randomized, prospective cohort study. Under review at Contraception. Cover, J. et al. Continuation of self-injected v. provider-administered contraception in Senegal: a non-randomized, prospective cohort study. Under review at Contraception. 
13.
go back to reference Biddlecom AE, et al. Adolescents' views of and preferences for sexual and reproductive health services in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi and Uganda. Afr J Reprod Health. 2007;11(3):99–110.CrossRef Biddlecom AE, et al. Adolescents' views of and preferences for sexual and reproductive health services in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi and Uganda. Afr J Reprod Health. 2007;11(3):99–110.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference United States Agency for International Development. High-impact practices in family planning (HIPs). Adolescent-friendly contraceptive services: mainstreaming adolescent-friendly elements into existing contraceptive services. Washington (DC): USAID; 2015. Available at: https://www.fphighimpactpractices.org/afcs United States Agency for International Development. High-impact practices in family planning (HIPs). Adolescent-friendly contraceptive services: mainstreaming adolescent-friendly elements into existing contraceptive services. Washington (DC): USAID; 2015. Available at: https://​www.​fphighimpactprac​tices.​org/​afcs
17.
go back to reference Kiapi-Iwa L, Hart GJ. The sexual and reproductive health of young people in Adjumani district, Uganda: qualitative study of the role of formal, informal and traditional health providers. AIDS Care. 2004;16(3):339–47.CrossRef Kiapi-Iwa L, Hart GJ. The sexual and reproductive health of young people in Adjumani district, Uganda: qualitative study of the role of formal, informal and traditional health providers. AIDS Care. 2004;16(3):339–47.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schwandt HM, et al. Contraceptive service provider imposed restrictions to contraceptive access in urban Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:278.CrossRef Schwandt HM, et al. Contraceptive service provider imposed restrictions to contraceptive access in urban Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:278.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ilene S, Speizer, et al. Do service providers in Tanzania unnecessarily restrict Clients' access to contraceptive methods? Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2000;26(1):13–20 & 42.CrossRef Ilene S, Speizer, et al. Do service providers in Tanzania unnecessarily restrict Clients' access to contraceptive methods? Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2000;26(1):13–20 & 42.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nalwadda G, et al. Young peoples’ interface with providers of contraceptive care: a simulated client study in two Ugandan districts. Contraception and Reproductive Medicine. 2016;1:15.CrossRef Nalwadda G, et al. Young peoples’ interface with providers of contraceptive care: a simulated client study in two Ugandan districts. Contraception and Reproductive Medicine. 2016;1:15.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nalwadda G, Mirembe F, Tumwesigye NM, Byamugisha J, Faxelid E. Constraints and prospects for contraceptive service provision to young people in Uganda: providers’ perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:220.CrossRef Nalwadda G, Mirembe F, Tumwesigye NM, Byamugisha J, Faxelid E. Constraints and prospects for contraceptive service provision to young people in Uganda: providers’ perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:220.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cover J, et al. A prospective cohort study of the feasibility and acceptability of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate administered subcutaneously through self-injection. Contraception. 2016;95(3):306–11.CrossRef Cover J, et al. A prospective cohort study of the feasibility and acceptability of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate administered subcutaneously through self-injection. Contraception. 2016;95(3):306–11.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Prabhakaran S, Sweet A. Self-administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception: feasibility and acceptability. Contraception. 2012;85(5):453–7.CrossRef Prabhakaran S, Sweet A. Self-administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception: feasibility and acceptability. Contraception. 2012;85(5):453–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cameron ST, Glasier A, Johnstone A. Pilot study of home self-administration of subcutaneous depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Contraception. 2012;85(5):458–64.CrossRef Cameron ST, Glasier A, Johnstone A. Pilot study of home self-administration of subcutaneous depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Contraception. 2012;85(5):458–64.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Stanwood NL, et al. Self-injection of monthly combined hormonal contraceptive. Contraception. 2006;73(1):53–5.CrossRef Stanwood NL, et al. Self-injection of monthly combined hormonal contraceptive. Contraception. 2006;73(1):53–5.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Williams RL, Hensel DJ, Fortenberry JD. Self-administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate by adolescent women. Contraception. 2013;88(3):401–7.CrossRef Williams RL, Hensel DJ, Fortenberry JD. Self-administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate by adolescent women. Contraception. 2013;88(3):401–7.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cover, J. et al. Acceptability of contraceptive self-injection with DMPA-SC among adolescents in Gulu District, Uganda. International Perspectives in Sexual and Reproductive Health. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017;43(4):153–62.CrossRef Cover, J. et al. Acceptability of contraceptive self-injection with DMPA-SC among adolescents in Gulu District, Uganda. International Perspectives in Sexual and Reproductive Health. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017;43(4):153–62.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Chandra-Mouli, et al. A never-before opportunity to strengthen investment and action on adolescent contraception, and what we must do to make full use of it. Reprod Health. 2017;14:85.CrossRef Chandra-Mouli, et al. A never-before opportunity to strengthen investment and action on adolescent contraception, and what we must do to make full use of it. Reprod Health. 2017;14:85.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ann K. Blanc et al. Patterns and trends in Adolescents' contraceptive use and discontinuation in developing countries and comparisons with adult women. International Perspectives in Sexual and Reproductive Health, volume 35, Issue 2 June 2009. Ann K. Blanc et al. Patterns and trends in Adolescents' contraceptive use and discontinuation in developing countries and comparisons with adult women. International Perspectives in Sexual and Reproductive Health, volume 35, Issue 2 June 2009.
Metadata
Title
Ugandan providers’ views on the acceptability of contraceptive self-injection for adolescents: a qualitative study
Authors
Jane Cover
Allen Namagembe
Justine Tumusiime
Jeanette Lim
Carie Muntifering Cox
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0611-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Reproductive Health 1/2018 Go to the issue