Top

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Stress Echocardiography | Review

Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance perspective on the ACC/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ASPC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2023 multi-modality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of chronic coronary disease

Authors: W. Patricia Bandettini, Raymond Y. Kwong, Amit R. Patel, Sven Plein, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Published in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance | Issue 1/2023

Excerpt

The American College of Cardiology, together with other specialty and subspecialty societies, has recently published Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the Detection and Risk Assessment of Chronic Coronary Disease (CCD) [1]. The document updates the 2013 AUC for the management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease (SIHD) [2] and covers the use of radionuclide imaging, stress echocardiography (echo), coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and calcium scoring, stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), and invasive coronary angiography. The document aims to complement clinical practice guidelines and aid clinicians in decision-making for common clinical scenarios in CCD and implement best practices in patient care. Recommendations are given for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with a spectrum of scenarios in each of the two categories. …

Winchester DE, Maron DJ, Blankstein R, Chang IC, Kirtane AJ, Kwong RY, et al. ACC/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ASPC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2023 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of chronic coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81(25):2445–67.

Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(4):380–406.CrossRefPubMed

Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, Amsterdam E, Bhatt DL, Birtcher KK, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2021;144(22):e368–454.PubMed

Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(3):407–77.CrossRefPubMed

Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, Brown JM, Nixon J, Everett CC, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):453–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Greenwood JP, Ripley DP, Berry C, McCann GP, Plein S, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, et al. Effect of care guided by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, or NICE guidelines on subsequent unnecessary angiography rates: The CE-MARC 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016;316(10):1051–60.CrossRefPubMed

Danad I, Szymonifka J, Twisk JWR, Norgaard BL, Zarins CK, Knaapen P, et al. Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(13):991–8.PubMed

Juarez-Orozco LE, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Prescott E, Ballo H, Bax JJ, et al. Impact of a decreasing pre-test probability on the performance of diagnostic tests for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;20(11):1198–207.CrossRefPubMed

Ge Y, Pandya A, Steel K, Bingham S, Jerosch-Herold M, Chen YY, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for stable chest pain syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(7):1505–17.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Walker S, Girardin F, McKenna C, Ball SG, Nixon J, Plein S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease: an economic evaluation using data from the CE-MARC study. Heart. 2013;99(12):873–81.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Kalb B, Indik JH, Ott P, Martin DR. MRI of patients with implanted cardiac devices. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47(3):595–603.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Nazarian S, Hansford R, Rahsepar AA, Weltin V, McVeigh D, Gucuk Ipek E, Kwan A, Berger RD, Calkins H, Lardo AC, Kraut MA, Kamel IR, Zimmerman SL, Halperin HR. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(26):2555–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Wong ND, Budoff MJ, Ferdinand K, Graham IM, Michos ED, Reddy T, et al. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment: an American Society for Preventive Cardiology clinical practice statement. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2022;10: 100335.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, Elliott MD, Regenfus M, Parker M, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet. 2003;361(9355):374–9.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, Momose M, Sammer A, Haas F, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 2002;105(2):162–7.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Izquierdo M, Ruiz-Granell R, Bonanad C, Chaustre F, Gomez C, Ferrero A, et al. Value of early cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the prediction of adverse arrhythmic cardiac events after a first noncomplicated ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(5):755–61.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Harries I, Liang K, Williams M, Berlot B, Biglino G, Lancellotti P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging to detect cardiovascular effects of cancer therapy: JACC CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review. JACC CardioOncol. 2020;2(2):270–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Raman SV, Markl M, Patel AR, Bryant J, Allen BD, Plein S, et al. 30-minute CMR for common clinical indications: a Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance white paper. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022;24(1):13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance perspective on the ACC/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ASPC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2023 multi-modality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of chronic coronary disease
Authors: W. Patricia Bandettini
Raymond Y. Kwong
Amit R. Patel
Sven Plein
the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Publication date: 01-12-2023
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keyword: Stress Echocardiography
Published in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1532-429X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00959-4

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance perspective on the ACC/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ASPC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2023 multi-modality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of chronic coronary disease

Excerpt

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Excerpt

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Cardiac magnetic resonance in histologically proven eosinophilic myocarditis

MRXCAT2.0: Synthesis of realistic numerical phantoms by combining left-ventricular shape learning, biophysical simulations and tissue texture generation

Potential of non-contrast stress T1 mapping for the assessment of myocardial injury in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Worldwide variation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance practice models

Age- and sex-specific reference values of biventricular flow components and kinetic energy by 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in healthy subjects

Late-gadolinium enhancement is common in older pediatric heart transplant recipients and is associated with lower ejection fraction